›

Do You Think Without Carver There Won't be A Season 2?

RIP_LEE_EVERETTRIP_LEE_EVERETT Banned
edited May 2014 in The Walking Dead
Do you there won't be Season 2 if Carver doesn't appear in this season? I mean, his influence and actions dictates the courses of events in Season 2.

Comments

  • AWESOMEOAWESOMEO Banned
    edited May 2014
    Dafuq?

    Carver wasn't and won't be the only antagonist in the game, and even though he's badass, they can surly continue the plot without him.
  • ClementineForLifeClementineForLife
    You know what Dutch says in RDR, "They'll always find another monster."
  • master psychicmaster psychic
    Carver isn't the only psycho in this game, if Carver wasn't created, another bad guy would replace him like Nate or a new character. Even without Carver, there is always the plot about Clem surviving and such.
  • snakecharmerofborgsnakecharmerofborg
    I agree, Season Two would survive and be just as popular without Carver. Maybe even more so. I would have preferred it if telltale had chosen Nate to be the big bad if you will, rather than Carver. At least he's a more interesting character.
    master psychic posted: »

    Carver isn't the only psycho in this game, if Carver wasn't created, another bad guy would replace him like Nate or a new character. Even without Carver, there is always the plot about Clem surviving and such.

  • Mr_EeussMr_Eeuss
    Carver exists because of Season 2, not the opposite...
  • ArthurMatrixArthurMatrix
    Nah, I'm sure telltale can hold the ropes with something else if they have to.
  • RubyMoonRubyMoon
    I mean ... So far the whole season is about Carver and his people and his community. So yeah without him Season 2 wouldn't be the same.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.