›

How would you react if....

TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
edited May 2014 in The Walking Dead
How would you react if... your Alvin died in episode 2 and that outcome would make the baby Alvin's, and that would cause Carver to become seriously mad. Or if your Alvin lived in episode 2 it would make the baby Carver's and there would be some more tension between Alvin and Carver

Comments

  • AbstractWolfAbstractWolf
    That would be so confusing and unnecessary lol
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    Unnecessary? That would change everyone's story! We need more different paths.
    AbstractWolf posted: »

    That would be so confusing and unnecessary lol

  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    Damn, the dislike trolls .-.
  • LeeAintDeadFFSLeeAintDeadFFS
    How does this even make remotly sense?
  • LeeAintDeadFFSLeeAintDeadFFS
    edited May 2014
    .....
  • BubadooBubadoo
    That wouldn't make sense cus how can having someone live change the baby's dad. Most choices with determinant characters just have 1 person live and the other die.
  • WhatTheDuckWhatTheDuck
    What?
  • AbstractWolfAbstractWolf
    Different paths would be different choices being made. We all have the same ending anyway so it wouldn't matter
    TDMshadowCP posted: »

    Unnecessary? That would change everyone's story! We need more different paths.

  • SergeantSnookieSergeantSnookie
    I'm kind of hoping it's Alvin's either way, because I get the feeling Rebecca isn't going to live through it and it would be so incredibly...bittersweet if the last thing she saw was a baby with features that just screamed 'Alvin' before death.
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    I'm just saying it would create more drama and cause anger to Carver or Alvin.
    Bubadoo posted: »

    That wouldn't make sense cus how can having someone live change the baby's dad. Most choices with determinant characters just have 1 person live and the other die.

  • Cart_hero_2010Cart_hero_2010
    It was confirmed by Alvin's VA it's Carver's child
  • SpoochSpooch
    It would be kind of immersion breaking. I hate it when something like that happens, the choice should only affect things it would make sense to affect, not change other stuff in the game that are technically completely unrelated to that choice.
  • DomeWing333DomeWing333
    Morbo: PATERNITY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY! GOOD NIGHT!
  • BigBlindMaxBigBlindMax Banned
    It would change too many variables. It would completely change the way Carver and Rebecca act and interact. If the baby was Alvin's, Carver would be furious, probably violent. If it turns out to be Carver's, Rebecca would be really conflicted, maybe to the point of being resentful toward the baby (that would be so sad).
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    I agree
    BigBlindMax posted: »

    It would change too many variables. It would completely change the way Carver and Rebecca act and interact. If the baby was Alvin's, Carve

  • ClementineForLifeClementineForLife
    I don't care who's baby is who's, Clementine is the only reason why I follow TWD.
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    I don't know. Clementine feels less... "special". I'm not saying I don't like her, trust me I do, but you don't get to take care of her and worry about her like in season 1.
    ClementineForLife posted: »

    I don't care who's baby is who's, Clementine is the only reason why I follow TWD.

  • ZyphonZyphon
    ...That's not how that kind of stuff works, and it would be ridiculous if that were the case.
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    How?
    Zyphon posted: »

    ...That's not how that kind of stuff works, and it would be ridiculous if that were the case.

  • ZyphonZyphon
    Because Alvin being alive or dead would not magically change whose baby it is. Science does not work that way, and it would just be dumb and, as someone said above, "immersion breaking" if that were the case.
    TDMshadowCP posted: »

    How?

  • GoneButLivedOnGoneButLivedOn
    I see what you're going for, but the TellTale writers dont go that in depth, they complain already about writing determinate characters, interesting thought tho!
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    Thanks, apparently you're the only one that gets it.
    GoneButLivedOn posted: »

    I see what you're going for, but the TellTale writers dont go that in depth, they complain already about writing determinate characters, interesting thought tho!

  • GoneButLivedOnGoneButLivedOn
    I'm all for complicated storylines, maybe Telltale can attempt something like that in the future! :D
    TDMshadowCP posted: »

    Thanks, apparently you're the only one that gets it.

  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    Yeah, but apparently people only care how a person dying doesn't affect a baby's gender.
    GoneButLivedOn posted: »

    I'm all for complicated storylines, maybe Telltale can attempt something like that in the future! :D

  • NoncyFlippledorpNoncyFlippledorp
    No.
  • Rock114Rock114
    Would the kid just decide to become Carver's if Alvin were alive? I'm fairly certain that's not how it goes.
  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    No, the game would decide.
    Rock114 posted: »

    Would the kid just decide to become Carver's if Alvin were alive? I'm fairly certain that's not how it goes.

  • TDMshadowCPTDMshadowCP Banned
    Guys, of course babies don't work like that. But the game would change if the baby is Alvin's or Carver's.
  • ClemRoxClemRox
    edited May 2014
    We're not against you, dude. A lot of people just think it would be incredibly unrealistic. I know the game is about zombies, which is already unrealistic, but Telltale, besides zombies, tries to make the episodes as realistic as possible. I personally think it would break immersion and, to be honest, I think it would kind of ruin the game for me....
Sign in to comment in this discussion.