Would you kill sarah?

edited June 2014 in The Walking Dead

If there was a choice if you could kill Sarah - That had no reprecautions come up later, Would you do it? you would shoot her in the head, she wouldnt know what hit her and it would be painless, what would you do? Why?

I personally would keep Sarah because Sarah is my BFF. I want her to be in season 2 PLEASE TELLTALE.

Comments

  • well i mean if she a walker then yes i would killer, bu if she wasnt a walker i wouldnt kill her.

  • She would have to fuck up big time for me to even consider killing her. Even more than Lizzie from the show.

  • edited June 2014

    I don't think so. If anything happens to Sarah it's going to be very sad, that's for sure. She's lost everything and has already showed signs of being suicidal. I really hope Telltale keeps her character and she develops into being strong and brave like Clementine and they become a team.

  • If she was bit, and suffering then yes as I did the same for Lee. But i'm not just going to kill her for no good reason.

  • Only if she was bit when it was too late or a walker.

  • i may be playing devil's advocate here but when i think about group maybe its better to leave sarah behind or you know

  • If she is a walker, or bitten and in pain.
    Or if she become a real danger to the group.

  • That is messed up.

  • edited June 2014

    Alt text

    Jk, I actually thought she was a lot less annoying the last episode.

  • Why would anyone kill her? If I spared Ben, I'll spare Sarah!

  • let her live.

  • Kill Sarah? No can do. She and Clem-Clem are best friends now.

  • "I'll have what she's having."

    Sarangholic posted: »

    Jk, I actually thought she was a lot less annoying the last episode.

  • Yes please!

  • Hell no!! Sarah needs someone like Clementine to teach her how to survive not a fucking bullet in the head >:(

  • edited June 2014

    No I woudn't kill Sarah. She grew a lot in Ep. 3 so I think shes going to become a much better character.

  • Hard to say. I mean, as soon as you start to consider someone's value to a group in terms of their survival skills or resourcefulness, you step into the "pool of Crawford" thought that Carver seemed to dole out quite well on his own.

    Unfortunately the situation everyone's in gets people thinking about themselves moreso than others in a narrowed down, creaturely way, so I don't know if I'd "keep" Sarah, but if I were Clem I'd do everything I could to have a friend in that world, even if they're not the best survivalist.

    Also, it's spelled; repercussions.

  • The good thing is, Clem proably wont have to kill Sarah, Sarah will proably get herself killed.. Maybe by screaming and running through a herd of walkers for example! My Clem wouldnt just murder Sarah without reason, even if she is a liability, unless she does something that cost's lives or put's the rest of us in a terrible situation, or if she is bitten.. Then it's out of mercy or overall group survival. But, I think, in E4 if we even see Sarah again, she'll be a torn apart walker and someone will have to put her down.. Then yes, without hesitation!

  • Yes. I killed Ben, and he's a much more likable character.

  • I wonder if Telltale will do a Of Mice and Men kinda thing with Sarah.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.