I don't think we've seen the last of ******

Carver lasted for two episodes, tops, yet it goes without saying he probably had an impact on Clementine - more so than just about everyone else she's encountered so far, which is saying something.

I suspect Carver is going to become the "anti-Lee" in Clem's mind (or the devil to Lee's angel, if you want to be metaphorical). The scene in Carver's office, while short, definitely saw him turning into a twisted tutor of sorts for Clem. While Lee could be Clem's inner voice of compassion and humanity, Carver would take on a different role inside her subconscious; he'd be the voice of ruthless, empirical reality. I wouldn't be surprised if Clem had a hallucination/dream sequence in ep. 4 or 5 showing Lee and Carver talking to her directly, with one arguing as Clem's morality, and the other pulling Clem in the direction of post-apocalyptic survival.

Comments

  • For a second i thought this was a ''Carver is alive'' theory.

  • BigBlindMaxBigBlindMax Banned
    edited June 2014

    MUSH FACE CONFIRMED FOR EPISODE 4

    For a second i thought this was a ''Carver is alive'' theory.

  • On a more serious note, I like your theory, but there are some flaws.

    Lee doesn't have to be played as a paragon of idealism. He can be brutal and violent. He can drop Ben from the bell tower, because he's a detriment to the group, merrily steal supplies from the car, etc. To those of us with anti-hero playthroughs Lee would sound like a hypocrite if he argued or morality.

  • Lee doesn't "merrily" steal supplies from the car, and nor can he drop Ben because he's a "detriment". (I think you've been listening to that "Nick imitating Carlos" gag one too many times). You have the option of dropping Ben simply because he endangered Clem's life twice in a row by that point, and keeping Ben alive was a more understandably dangerous choice then, say, killing Nick.

    Regardless of Lee's actions in season 1, Clem still looks up to him as a guardian, so it would make sense her memory would distort Lee into a more positive father figure, even if that wasn't how you chose to play him.

    BigBlindMax posted: »

    On a more serious note, I like your theory, but there are some flaws. Lee doesn't have to be played as a paragon of idealism. He can be

  • Why is there so many dislikes on every single post? :-:

  • CrazyGeorgeCrazyGeorge Banned
    edited June 2014

    First of all i don't dislike posts. I do give people likes from time to time when i laugh or am amused by something. Now i made this gif for another another thread, but i think it fits here too.

    Alt text

  • BigBlindMaxBigBlindMax Banned
    edited June 2014

    His facial expression seemed pretty merry (that is, after he finished telling Clem why they had to take the stuff).

    Ben was a detriment to the group and everyone knew it, including Ben. Dropping him can be seen as a pragmatic choice to ensure he doesn't get anyone else killed.

    She looks up to Lee either way, but some of the lessons he teaches her differ between playthroughs.

    EDIT: Why the hell did you get five dislikes for sharing your opinion?! Someone must really have it in for you...

    Lee doesn't "merrily" steal supplies from the car, and nor can he drop Ben because he's a "detriment". (I think you've been listening to tha

Sign in to comment in this discussion.