Episode 4 is When 400 Days Matters (Eddie)

2»

Comments

  • Damn, good theory. If all of this is going to happen though... I will never get a break, i'll be on the edge of my seat during the entire episode.
  • I refuse to believe that they would beg me to pay five bucks for an hour long DLC for a few lines of potential dialogue. Episode Four better have something changeable by the DLC. I don't expect the DLC to mean as much, but I expect it to be a LOT more than a few sentences of determent dialogue.
  • How about Tavia being a bad person after Carvers death.
    iorek21 posted: »

    Tavia and Nate as antagonists would be nice

  • edited May 2014
    I feel like Eddie and Clem's groups will form an alliance or merge together because Eddie is a good guy and probably would not be apart of some evil group... but then again, most of the 400 days characters seemed like good people and those who went with Tavia seem perfectly happy as Carver's groupies. But if Eddie and Clem's groups do meet up and become friendly, then there has to be something after them and the best bet could be the survivors of the zombie attack on Carver's camp. That would be epic.
  • it would be a twist in the plot if wyatt is in carvers group and eddie in our group and they both have to fight each other in episode 4
  • Tavia seems a vague choice to become the main antagonist, simply because her character sketch itself is still vague. But, even if none were particularly close with Carver, Clementine assisted in the destruction of their livelihood, which serves as more than enough motive to go hunting for them.

    I have a feeling that if there is a cult in the next episode, we're going to learn more about Jane's background.
  • Imagine the interaction between Becca and Clem.

    Spider-Matt posted: »

    I think it would be awesome if Tavia and the rest of the 400 Day's crew show up seeking revenge and Wyatt runs into Eddie at the Museum. N

  • Nate would be the best antagonist IMO..

    iorek21 posted: »

    Tavia and Nate as antagonists would be nice

  • I hate to be the party pooper but what if Eddie isnt in episode 4? Carley and Doug wont be and they are in there.

  • Maybe there will be team switches? Like Clementine could try to convince the characters not to fight and if there are no 400 Days characters with Tavia, I would think that would make a rather large impact on how she goes about seeking revenge... if she does.

  • So you're telling me that there is still an antagonist going against Clem's group?

    Fuck yes! See, I was worried because they killed Carver too early and he wasn't going to be there to start a war with Clem's group, but now I realize that they don't need Carver to start a war.

    BRING ON THE DEATH!

  • Tavia comes for revenge.

    Rigtail posted: »

    So you're telling me that there is still an antagonist going against Clem's group? Fuck yes! See, I was worried because they killed Carve

  • Isn't Wyatts story before Russells? If so, how come Eddie is not with Nate when he picks up Russ.

    Pride posted: »

    About Nate and Eddie becoming buddies, I think something extreme would have to happen for Nate to forgive Eddie. Like, Eddie finding Na

  • They would only after 400 days,offscreen. There's a 2 year gap where they could have met.

    Tyranitar posted: »

    Isn't Wyatts story before Russells? If so, how come Eddie is not with Nate when he picks up Russ.

  • Oh ok. Somehow I misread your post as Eddie saving Nate in Wyatts story

    Pride posted: »

    They would only after 400 days,offscreen. There's a 2 year gap where they could have met.

  • Don't get too cocky oand get your hopes up yet.for all we know,it might be like episode 3 again.the choices might actually never matter.

  • i don't understand the love people have for "nate". i didn't connect with him at all, i actually saw him as a whiny little kid for some reason, i cared for pete a lot more. someone explain to me why Nick is so popular because i don't see it (sorry just imo)

  • I want Eddie and that is all

    weed

Sign in to comment in this discussion.