Yes, to tie up any 'loose ends'. I never saw Arvo as the bad guy as such, but I couldn't see how letting him stay alive after robbing him could ever work well for the group. I don't think this would be the 'right' thing to do, but I feel it would be a necessity and something a 'darker' Clem (after ordering and witnessing Carver's death) was capable of.
Guys, Arvo isn't a bad person. The only reason it seemed like he was, is because his group was telling him to say the things he did. In real… moreity, he was actually trying to refrain his group from firing and starting a war, and more like him trying to keep things calm. If you read the translations, ALL of it, then you would see that he wanted nobody to die.
Is this a face of somebody who wants to start a war?
yes i probably would have, i stayed silent hoping jane would kill him, and i figured the place was quite a good fortified position against a… more retaliation, but i would have wanted to hide the body and denied seeing him if anybody came along, as to reduce the risk of retaliation, because in a zombie apocalypse people go "missing" all the time.
i might kill him for what he did i didn't steal from him but he tryed to rob clementine and her group for that i might kill him. what do you think about that
It just seems too Carver-ish, i mean people hated that guy because he killed Regggie, then some people want the option to murder Arvo a una… morermed cripple, just to possibly avoid trouble later. We are more alike than you realize, i think your just not comfortable with it yet.
Im sure bandits dont think of themselves as bandits but survivors doing what they need to do, just like our group. Maybe he's someone son or maybe they keep him because he looks so harmless and can talk to people without, you know, setting off alarms. Like when Luke tried to send Clem to talk to that guy, Walters boyfriend, because she looked like less of a threat.
His physical disability, nervous demeanor and broken glasses do bring to mind a male equivalent to Sarah. It makes you wonder exactly why a group of 'bandits' would keep him around.
i might kill him for what he did i didn't steal from him but he tryed to rob clementine and her group for that i might kill him. what do you think about that
In a heartbeat, yes. Not that I have anything against Arvo, I don't. But the fact remains he could be linked to some dangerous people and it is better to have them not know who we are. Can't risk him going and telling them, so it is a situation exactly like was seen in Shel's story.
It just seems too Carver-ish, i mean people hated that guy because he killed Regggie, then some people want the option to murder Arvo a una… morermed cripple, just to possibly avoid trouble later. We are more alike than you realize, i think your just not comfortable with it yet.
Yes, to tie up any 'loose ends'. I never saw Arvo as the bad guy as such, but I couldn't see how letting him stay alive after robbing him co… moreuld ever work well for the group. I don't think this would be the 'right' thing to do, but I feel it would be a necessity and something a 'darker' Clem (after ordering and witnessing Carver's death) was capable of.
I kind of wanted to shoot him. Mainly because a cripple alone with medical supplies? Kind of implies he has a group, having survived so long.
But then if the shot had attracted attention? Rebecca's baby would be in trrrouble.
I totally thought that choice would present itself, but nah, I couldn't even rob him. I remember from All That Remains how it feels to be an innocent stranger facing possible murder, and I didn't care for it. Couldn't do that to someone who specifically told me: "I don't want to shoot. I don't want to shoot anyone... especially little girl." when he had a gun on me and easily could have.
His physical disability, nervous demeanor and broken glasses do bring to mind a male equivalent to Sarah. It makes you wonder exactly why a group of 'bandits' would keep him around.
there was no way i could have let him walk away. i might not have killed him but i definitely would have taken him hostage or some shit. i dont think im a bad person, but he was obviously with a group and groups + groups = death.
In a heartbeat, yes. Not that I have anything against Arvo, I don't. But the fact remains he could be linked to some dangerous people and it… more is better to have them not know who we are. Can't risk him going and telling them, so it is a situation exactly like was seen in Shel's story.
If they're threatening our group, like at the end of ep4, I agree with you completely. However killing him after taking his medicines on the observation deck would be... just wrong.
From what I have learned from Shell's story and considering I was fully immersed into Survivor mode, I would have made Jane kill him. Nothing against the guy, but I can't take that risk.
If they're threatening our group, like at the end of ep4, I agree with you completely. However killing him after taking his medicines on the observation deck would be... just wrong.
Comments
Yes, to tie up any 'loose ends'. I never saw Arvo as the bad guy as such, but I couldn't see how letting him stay alive after robbing him could ever work well for the group. I don't think this would be the 'right' thing to do, but I feel it would be a necessity and something a 'darker' Clem (after ordering and witnessing Carver's death) was capable of.
I would kill him because you cant take any risks in ZA.
EDIT: Depends on who dies in the shootout because of him.If Mike dies,I'm killing him first chance I get.
I would have killed him myself if I could.
looks like harry potter
just toss his body in the river
i might kill him for what he did i didn't steal from him but he tryed to rob clementine and her group for that i might kill him. what do you think about that
Im sure bandits dont think of themselves as bandits but survivors doing what they need to do, just like our group. Maybe he's someone son or maybe they keep him because he looks so harmless and can talk to people without, you know, setting off alarms. Like when Luke tried to send Clem to talk to that guy, Walters boyfriend, because she looked like less of a threat.
Things aren't so black and white.
Russian Voldemort dislikes that.
In a heartbeat, yes. Not that I have anything against Arvo, I don't. But the fact remains he could be linked to some dangerous people and it is better to have them not know who we are. Can't risk him going and telling them, so it is a situation exactly like was seen in Shel's story.
Who is Russian Voldemort then, the bald tattoo guy.
So?
I am.
That's why you're supposed to kill him.
Finally, someone with sense!
I changed it :P
His group was gonna take everything from our group that has a baby.
I could care less about humanity if they're threatening our group.
I kind of wanted to shoot him. Mainly because a cripple alone with medical supplies? Kind of implies he has a group, having survived so long.
But then if the shot had attracted attention? Rebecca's baby would be in trrrouble.
No, I don't hate him like most players do.
I would have off'd jane instead. She was a bigger danger to the group as an unreliable and uncontrollable variable.
Unless i knew his reasoning for lying that i stole supplies, i wouldn't flat out let jane kill him.
I totally thought that choice would present itself, but nah, I couldn't even rob him. I remember from All That Remains how it feels to be an innocent stranger facing possible murder, and I didn't care for it. Couldn't do that to someone who specifically told me: "I don't want to shoot. I don't want to shoot anyone... especially little girl." when he had a gun on me and easily could have.
Yep! xP
Well, he seems to be the only one who can speak english, so that might be reason XD
there was no way i could have let him walk away. i might not have killed him but i definitely would have taken him hostage or some shit. i dont think im a bad person, but he was obviously with a group and groups + groups = death.
Exactly.
If they're threatening our group, like at the end of ep4, I agree with you completely. However killing him after taking his medicines on the observation deck would be... just wrong.
From what I have learned from Shell's story and considering I was fully immersed into Survivor mode, I would have made Jane kill him. Nothing against the guy, but I can't take that risk.
I know... But someone's gonna shoot and it was Buricko who shot before our group.
They're marked for death now.