For all they knew, the car was abandoned. Also, you know, they were starving.
They didnt know, they assumed. Being hungry doesnt justifty it either.
Mike and Bonnie were just dicks because they left Jane, Kenny, Clem and AJ for death, when they could have taken only half the supplies, and the very least.
Then how come Kenny and the rest werent dicks, just because they stole everything from the Stranger?
The problem is that Mike and Bonnie did not have to steal all the supplies. But they did.
Stranger lost his wife and daughter because of that, which drove him insane.
For all they knew, the car was abandoned. Also, you kno… morew, they were starving.
So Mike and Bonnie were dicks, just because they didnt want to be around stubborn and violent man, who wanted to drag them to the north, the opposite way they wanted to go?
Mike and Bonnie were just dicks because they left Jane, Kenny, Clem and AJ for death, when they could have taken only half the supplies, and the very least.
Mike and Bonnie stole from rest of the group in order to survive and decide where to go.
The problem is that Mike and Bonnie did not have to steal all the supplies. But they did.
I think it makes it more justificable that simply being scared of somebody, but maybe that is just me.
Then how come Kenny and the rest werent dicks, just because they stole everything from the Stranger?
Maybe because they did not know, but Bonnie and Mike did?
Just a thougth.
Neither did Lee's group, but they did anyway.
Double standards are so strong.
The problem is that Lee´s group was starving, and they did not know the car was not abandoned. It was morally grey. But Mike and Bonnie knew that those supplies were all the group had, that by taking them they could condem three people and a baby to death. That is bad, no matter how you look at it.
For all they knew, the car was abandoned. Also, you know, they were starving.
They didnt know, they assumed. Being hungry doesnt jus… moretifty it either.
Mike and Bonnie were just dicks because they left Jane, Kenny, Clem and AJ for death, when they could have taken only half the supplies, and the very least.
Then how come Kenny and the rest werent dicks, just because they stole everything from the Stranger?
The problem is that Mike and Bonnie did not have to steal all the supplies. But they did.
Neither did Lee's group, but they did anyway.
Double standards are so strong.
This list is automatically shit because there's no supergod tier that has Edith in it. Shame on thee who disrespects thy lord Edith and may thy lord Edith have no mercy on your disgusting soul.
Not a bad thing at all, I actually sympathised with the kid when Kenny tried to drag him away from his sister and use him as a meat shield..… more Right up until the point where he shot Clem I was ok with him.. I have no sympathy for those who shoot kids, just goes to show people will still screw you over.
I think it makes it more justificable that simply being scared of somebody, but maybe that is just me.
Kenny either forces them to go to north or they have to walk, and going to north wasnt an option to them.
The problem is that Lee´s group was starving, and they did not know the car was not abandoned. It was morally grey. But Mike and Bonnie knew that those supplies were all the group had, that by taking them they could condem three people and a baby to death. That is bad, no matter how you look at it.
The problem is Kenny left them no choice, but to betray the group.
They didnt know, they assumed.
It was pretty likely.
Being hungry doesnt justifty it either.
I think it makes it more … morejustificable that simply being scared of somebody, but maybe that is just me.
Then how come Kenny and the rest werent dicks, just because they stole everything from the Stranger?
Maybe because they did not know, but Bonnie and Mike did?
Just a thougth.
Neither did Lee's group, but they did anyway.
Double standards are so strong.
The problem is that Lee´s group was starving, and they did not know the car was not abandoned. It was morally grey. But Mike and Bonnie knew that those supplies were all the group had, that by taking them they could condem three people and a baby to death. That is bad, no matter how you look at it.
Kenny either forces them to go to north or they have to walk, and going to north wasnt an option to them.
Does not change they could have stolen only half of the supplies. They arewillingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
The problem is Kenny left them no choice, but to betray the group.
They could have talked in out, but beyond that one argument, they didn´t.And it does not change that they are willingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
It was pretty likely.
But not certain
I think it makes it more justificable that simply being scared of somebody, but maybe th… moreat is just me.
Kenny either forces them to go to north or they have to walk, and going to north wasnt an option to them.
The problem is that Lee´s group was starving, and they did not know the car was not abandoned. It was morally grey. But Mike and Bonnie knew that those supplies were all the group had, that by taking them they could condem three people and a baby to death. That is bad, no matter how you look at it.
The problem is Kenny left them no choice, but to betray the group.
yes because I have heard through the grape vine that you are a big jane supporter and you have had many arguments before so that is why I brought up jane.
Does not change they could have stolen only half of the supplies. They are willingly and knowinly leave four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
So? Why should they feel sorry for them? They were thinking about their own survival. Kenny is ready to let some poor girl get eaten alive so they could pillage more supplies, cant see how its wrong to do the same to Kenny.
They could have talked in out, but beyond that one argument, they didn´t.And it does not change that they are willingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
Since when talking with Kenny has solved anything? No point trying to reason with that guy.
But not certain
And?
Kenny either forces them to go to north or they have to walk, and going to north wasnt an option to them.… more
Does not change they could have stolen only half of the supplies. They arewillingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
The problem is Kenny left them no choice, but to betray the group.
They could have talked in out, but beyond that one argument, they didn´t.And it does not change that they are willingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
So? Why should they feel sorry for them? They were thinking about their own survival.
Did you forget that the whole reason Mike betrayed the group was because of Kenny´s treatment of Arvo? How is hitting a defenseless kid any worse that leaving two kids to die? Bonnie can stop caring about Clem if you don´t help Luke, but if you do, she seems distraught and disgusted when Arvo shoots her. And if you don´t help Luke, Mike is the one disgusted and distraught. They are show to care, but they leave three innocent people to die.
Kenny is ready to let some poor girl get eaten alive so they could pillage more supplies, cant see how its wrong to do the same to Kenny.
Is not about doing the same thing to Kenny, but doing the same thing to two children. Also, you can´t really compare the situation´s. With the bitten girl it was shooting or not shooting her-there was no middle way. But Bonnie and Mike could have stolen only half the supplies, and they didn´t.
Since when talking with Kenny has solved anything?
The point was that Mike and Bonnie had lots of less bad options, and they didn´t take then.
Does not change they could have stolen only half of the supplies. They are willingly and knowinly leave four people-three of which were inno… morecent in their eyes-to die.
So? Why should they feel sorry for them? They were thinking about their own survival. Kenny is ready to let some poor girl get eaten alive so they could pillage more supplies, cant see how its wrong to do the same to Kenny.
They could have talked in out, but beyond that one argument, they didn´t.And it does not change that they are willingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
Since when talking with Kenny has solved anything? No point trying to reason with that guy.
God of boats till the end! And yeah fuck Arvo. Try my best to get Kenny to lay off and he just decides to shoot me. Wonder if we will see him again in Season 3. Would love to get some much deserved revenge.
Did you forget that the whole reason Mike betrayed the group was because of Kenny´s treatment of Arvo? How is hitting a defenseless kid any worse that leaving two kids to die? Bonnie can stop caring about Clem if you don´t help Luke, but if you do, she seems distraught and disgusted when Arvo shoots her. And if you don´t help Luke, Mike is the one disgusted and distraught. They are show to care, but they leave three innocent people to die.
The reason Mike betrayed the group was because Kenny kept beating Arvo and he acted stubborn about where to go. They knew if they want the car, they would have to leave Clem behind, because she wouldnt just leave Kenny (which is pretty weird, because you get option to leave Kenny behind there, but later in the car she doesnt want to leave him behind anymore).
With the bitten girl it was shooting or not shooting her-there was no middle way.
He was more than happy to leave that girl to get eaten. He would deny merciful death just so they would get more supplies.
So? Why should they feel sorry for them? They were thinking about their own survival.
Did you forget that the whole reason Mike betr… moreayed the group was because of Kenny´s treatment of Arvo? How is hitting a defenseless kid any worse that leaving two kids to die? Bonnie can stop caring about Clem if you don´t help Luke, but if you do, she seems distraught and disgusted when Arvo shoots her. And if you don´t help Luke, Mike is the one disgusted and distraught. They are show to care, but they leave three innocent people to die.
Kenny is ready to let some poor girl get eaten alive so they could pillage more supplies, cant see how its wrong to do the same to Kenny.
Is not about doing the same thing to Kenny, but doing the same thing to two children. Also, you can´t really compare the situation´s. With the bitten girl it was shooting or not shooting her-there was no middle way. But Bonnie and Mike could have stolen only half th… [view original content]
What makes kids more valuable human beings than adults? Nothing.
I know.
Jane "killed" AJ and Kenny tries to murder her for that and its ok and "justified"
Because she was planning to murder Kenny in the first place, because it was not really a accident.
Arvo fails to kill Clem, who murdered his sister and Arvo is most evil person in the world.
Arvo lives in a situation on his own making, as far as we know. Besides, its hard to care about a character idiotic enougth to think CPR could save anybody for a bullet wound.
But let´s stop here. I was not planning of making this a argument. I just wanted to say that Legendary12 view´s did not have anything to do with what you said.
What makes kids more valuable human beings than adults? Nothing.
Jane "killed" AJ and Kenny tries to murder her for that and its ok and "justified"
Arvo fails to kill Clem, who murdered his sister and Arvo is most evil person in the world.
The reason Mike betrayed the group was because Kenny kept beating Arvo and he acted stubborn about where to go. They knew if they want the car, they would have to leave Clem behind, because she wouldnt just leave Kenny
You are still ignoring that they did not have to take all the supplies, that they are leaving three innocent people to die.
He was more than happy to leave that girl to get eaten. He would deny merciful death just so they would get more supplies.
He was not happy about it. It was a decision made for survival and nothing more. Besides, you are ignoring my point. Kenny did not have a middle way-it was shooting her or not shooting here-but Mike and Bonnie did have a middle away and they did not take it.
And talking to Kenny doesnt solve anything...
I said less bad options. I was not referring to talking with Kenny especially.
Did you forget that the whole reason Mike betrayed the group was because of Kenny´s treatment of Arvo? How is hitting a defenseless kid any … moreworse that leaving two kids to die? Bonnie can stop caring about Clem if you don´t help Luke, but if you do, she seems distraught and disgusted when Arvo shoots her. And if you don´t help Luke, Mike is the one disgusted and distraught. They are show to care, but they leave three innocent people to die.
The reason Mike betrayed the group was because Kenny kept beating Arvo and he acted stubborn about where to go. They knew if they want the car, they would have to leave Clem behind, because she wouldnt just leave Kenny (which is pretty weird, because you get option to leave Kenny behind there, but later in the car she doesnt want to leave him behind anymore).
With the bitten girl it was shooting or not shooting her-there was no middle way.
He was more than happy to leave that girl to g… [view original content]
It's not idiotic to believe CPR could save your own sister, especially if you are desperate for your sibling to live. We have no idea where the bullets hit and Arvo was probably just hoping beyond hope she'd make it. We also have no idea whether or not he knows about reanimation after death, because if he and his group are Russian it would probably make it a whole lot harder to learn more information from other survivors. He wasn't stupid, just desperate.
What makes kids more valuable human beings than adults? Nothing.
I know.
Jane "killed" AJ and Kenny tries to murder her for th… moreat and its ok and "justified"
Because she was planning to murder Kenny in the first place, because it was not really a accident.
Arvo fails to kill Clem, who murdered his sister and Arvo is most evil person in the world.
Arvo lives in a situation on his own making, as far as we know. Besides, its hard to care about a character idiotic enougth to think CPR could save anybody for a bullet wound.
But let´s stop here. I was not planning of making this a argument. I just wanted to say that Legendary12 view´s did not have anything to do with what you said.
Just FYI zykelator, it's gotten to the point where as soon as I see your name I just start scrolling really fast.
I might peep catch a glance of "jane this" or "jane that" every now and again as I'm scrolling, but I've "almost" got you on mute now.
It's ridiculous how many people feed you, and FYI I ended my game with Jane, but it's freaking silly that every time you ever comment on a thread ever it's to try and make yourself feel better about your end game choices.
Anyway, I just wanted to let you know, for your own sake, that I (and likely many others) effectively have you on mute because of the way you've been behaving. I think it would be prudent for you to tone it down, but I guess that's up to you.
Just FYI zykelator, it's gotten to the point where as soon as I see your name I just start scrolling really fast.
I might peep catch a gl… moreance of "jane this" or "jane that" every now and again as I'm scrolling, but I've "almost" got you on mute now.
It's ridiculous how many people feed you, and FYI I ended my game with Jane, but it's freaking silly that every time you ever comment on a thread ever it's to try and make yourself feel better about your end game choices.
Anyway, I just wanted to let you know, for your own sake, that I (and likely many others) effectively have you on mute because of the way you've been behaving. I think it would be prudent for you to tone it down, but I guess that's up to you.
The reason Mike betrayed the group was because Kenny kept beating Arvo and he acted stubborn about where to go. They knew if they want the c… morear, they would have to leave Clem behind, because she wouldnt just leave Kenny
You are still ignoring that they did not have to take all the supplies, that they are leaving three innocent people to die.
He was more than happy to leave that girl to get eaten. He would deny merciful death just so they would get more supplies.
He was not happy about it. It was a decision made for survival and nothing more. Besides, you are ignoring my point. Kenny did not have a middle way-it was shooting her or not shooting here-but Mike and Bonnie did have a middle away and they did not take it.
And talking to Kenny doesnt solve anything...
I said less bad options. I was not referring to talking with Kenny especially.
You are still ignoring that they did not have to take all the supplies, that they are leaving three innocent people to die.
Why should they care more about Clems & others survival than their own?
Why should they care more about Clems & others survival than their own?
Because stealing only half the supplies it’s not caring more for the survival of Clem and the others, is just not condemning them to death.
We have no idea where the bullets hit and Arvo was probably just hoping beyond hope she'd make it.
Actually, we do have a idea where the bullets hit.
Vitalli: You killed Nathasha, you bastard. You only be doing him a favor.
Okay, this does not tell use exactly where the bullet landed, but considering that Nathasha was dead as Vitalli said, it was definitivily in a letal spot. Something that could not be cured by CPR.
We also have no idea whether or not he knows about reanimation after death, because if he and his group are Russian it would probably make it a whole lot harder to learn more information from other survivors.
And? You are forgetting that Nathasha had 'the zombie face' when Clem shoot her. Arvo had to see that.
It's not idiotic to believe CPR could save your own sister, especially if you are desperate for your sibling to live. We have no idea where … morethe bullets hit and Arvo was probably just hoping beyond hope she'd make it. We also have no idea whether or not he knows about reanimation after death, because if he and his group are Russian it would probably make it a whole lot harder to learn more information from other survivors. He wasn't stupid, just desperate.
Because Mike is appaled to see Kenny hit Arvo, and his why he betrayed the group. Leaving Clem and the others for death was just not in his character. This is not out for debate; Mike cares. And he is one of the ones participing him the plan. If you don´t save Luke, Mike could have at least had to try to make Bonnie see his side of the issue. And if you do go to save Luke, then is even more engregious. Bonnie obviously cares for Clementine. So I don´t see how that somehow traslated in leaving everybody else to die.
Arvo only sees the side of here face. Natasha's hair actually covers her only visible eye. For the rest of the scene Arvo just stands there in the same position, so his viewpoint of her does not change, therefore he has no idea she has become a zombie, to him it looks like an execution.
We have no idea where the bullets hit and Arvo was probably just hoping beyond hope she'd make it.
Actually, we do have a idea where… more the bullets hit.
Vitalli: You killed Nathasha, you bastard. You only be doing him a favor.
Okay, this does not tell use exactly where the bullet landed, but considering that Nathasha was dead as Vitalli said, it was definitivily in a letal spot. Something that could not be cured by CPR.
We also have no idea whether or not he knows about reanimation after death, because if he and his group are Russian it would probably make it a whole lot harder to learn more information from other survivors.
And? You are forgetting that Nathasha had 'the zombie face' when Clem shoot her. Arvo had to see that.
Dude, Nathasha has obviously turned into a walker here, even if her hair covers her only visible eye. Don´t you see how her skin, so pale and obviously walker like?
And? You are forgetting that Nathasha had 'the zombie face' when Clem shoot her. Arvo had to see that.
Go to 3:32
https://www.you… moretube.com/watch?v=wnJuqRUilhY
Arvo only sees the side of here face. Natasha's hair actually covers her only visible eye. For the rest of the scene Arvo just stands there in the same position, so his viewpoint of her does not change, therefore he has no idea she has become a zombie, to him it looks like an execution.
You think Arvo would equate that with reanimation? Even if he did not know what reanimation was? her skin isn't rotten yet, and she's only partially pale, someone who does not know any better, especially if you were 16 (like Arvo was most likely) when your education stopped, he would have no basis to instantly assume this is reanimation, especially if he has no idea that can occur.
Dude, Nathasha has obviously turned into a walker here, even if her hair covers her only visible eye. Don´t you see how her skin, so pale and obviously walker like?
You think Arvo would equate that with reanimation? her skin isn't rotten yet, and she's only partially pale, someone who does not know any better, especially if you were 16 (like Arvo was most likely) when your education stopped, he would have no basis to instantly assume this is reanimation, especially if he has no idea that can occur.
I think it could be the obvious thing. She is just got shot; she is not going to be like that in less that a minute. I know he has no idea reanimation will happen even if you die normally-is ridicolous, because he should have see somebody dying of natural causes before, but is the only thing that makes sense counting the fact that he did not know Natasha had turned-, but at least, he should have thougth that something was not rigth.
You think Arvo would equate that with reanimation? Even if he did not know what reanimation was? her skin isn't rotten yet, and she's only p… moreartially pale, someone who does not know any better, especially if you were 16 (like Arvo was most likely) when your education stopped, he would have no basis to instantly assume this is reanimation, especially if he has no idea that can occur.
Because Mike is appaled to see Kenny hit Arvo, and his why he betrayed the group. Leaving Clem and the others for death was just not in his … morecharacter. This is not out for debate; Mike cares. And he is one of the ones participing him the plan. If you don´t save Luke, Mike could have at least had to try to make Bonnie see his side of the issue. And if you do go to save Luke, then is even more engregious. Bonnie obviously cares for Clementine. So I don´t see how that somehow traslated in leaving everybody else to die.
Comments
I love you too.
Ahahaha I love those vids too, his season 2 episode 4 and 5 ones are coming out in a few days
That's great! Thanks for letting me know
They didnt know, they assumed. Being hungry doesnt justifty it either.
Then how come Kenny and the rest werent dicks, just because they stole everything from the Stranger?
Neither did Lee's group, but they did anyway.
Double standards are so strong.
It was pretty likely.
I think it makes it more justificable that simply being scared of somebody, but maybe that is just me.
Maybe because they did not know, but Bonnie and Mike did?
Just a thougth.
The problem is that Lee´s group was starving, and they did not know the car was not abandoned. It was morally grey. But Mike and Bonnie knew that those supplies were all the group had, that by taking them they could condem three people and a baby to death. That is bad, no matter how you look at it.
This list is automatically shit because there's no supergod tier that has Edith in it. Shame on thee who disrespects thy lord Edith and may thy lord Edith have no mercy on your disgusting soul.
Do you have no sympathy for Christa as well?
But not certain
Kenny either forces them to go to north or they have to walk, and going to north wasnt an option to them.
The problem is Kenny left them no choice, but to betray the group.
Revenge is only justified if its done by Kenny.
And?
Does not change they could have stolen only half of the supplies. They arewillingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
They could have talked in out, but beyond that one argument, they didn´t.And it does not change that they are willingly and knowingly leaving four people-three of which were innocent in their eyes-to die.
Completely irrelevant to the topic, but you mentioned the title so I have to post it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXJQOWsp6f4
So? Why should they feel sorry for them? They were thinking about their own survival. Kenny is ready to let some poor girl get eaten alive so they could pillage more supplies, cant see how its wrong to do the same to Kenny.
Since when talking with Kenny has solved anything? No point trying to reason with that guy.
Did you forget that the whole reason Mike betrayed the group was because of Kenny´s treatment of Arvo? How is hitting a defenseless kid any worse that leaving two kids to die? Bonnie can stop caring about Clem if you don´t help Luke, but if you do, she seems distraught and disgusted when Arvo shoots her. And if you don´t help Luke, Mike is the one disgusted and distraught. They are show to care, but they leave three innocent people to die.
Is not about doing the same thing to Kenny, but doing the same thing to two children. Also, you can´t really compare the situation´s. With the bitten girl it was shooting or not shooting her-there was no middle way. But Bonnie and Mike could have stolen only half the supplies, and they didn´t.
The point was that Mike and Bonnie had lots of less bad options, and they didn´t take then.
God of boats till the end! And yeah fuck Arvo. Try my best to get Kenny to lay off and he just decides to shoot me. Wonder if we will see him again in Season 3. Would love to get some much deserved revenge.
Note the bolded part.
The reason Mike betrayed the group was because Kenny kept beating Arvo and he acted stubborn about where to go. They knew if they want the car, they would have to leave Clem behind, because she wouldnt just leave Kenny (which is pretty weird, because you get option to leave Kenny behind there, but later in the car she doesnt want to leave him behind anymore).
He was more than happy to leave that girl to get eaten. He would deny merciful death just so they would get more supplies.
And talking to Kenny doesnt solve anything...
What makes kids more valuable human beings than adults? Nothing.
Jane "killed" AJ and Kenny tries to murder her for that and its ok and "justified"
Arvo fails to kill Clem, who murdered his sister and Arvo is most evil person in the world.
I don't know about Bonnie. She did have a thing for Luke.
We all know what Kenny told Clem when Clem chopped Sarita's arm off..
I don't know how I feel..
I know.
Because she was planning to murder Kenny in the first place, because it was not really a accident.
Arvo lives in a situation on his own making, as far as we know. Besides, its hard to care about a character idiotic enougth to think CPR could save anybody for a bullet wound.
But let´s stop here. I was not planning of making this a argument. I just wanted to say that Legendary12 view´s did not have anything to do with what you said.
You are still ignoring that they did not have to take all the supplies, that they are leaving three innocent people to die.
He was not happy about it. It was a decision made for survival and nothing more. Besides, you are ignoring my point. Kenny did not have a middle way-it was shooting her or not shooting here-but Mike and Bonnie did have a middle away and they did not take it.
I said less bad options. I was not referring to talking with Kenny especially.
It's not idiotic to believe CPR could save your own sister, especially if you are desperate for your sibling to live. We have no idea where the bullets hit and Arvo was probably just hoping beyond hope she'd make it. We also have no idea whether or not he knows about reanimation after death, because if he and his group are Russian it would probably make it a whole lot harder to learn more information from other survivors. He wasn't stupid, just desperate.
Just FYI zykelator, it's gotten to the point where as soon as I see your name I just start scrolling really fast.
I might peep catch a glance of "jane this" or "jane that" every now and again as I'm scrolling, but I've "almost" got you on mute now.
It's ridiculous how many people feed you, and FYI I ended my game with Jane, but it's freaking silly that every time you ever comment on a thread ever it's to try and make yourself feel better about your end game choices.
Anyway, I just wanted to let you know, for your own sake, that I (and likely many others) effectively have you on mute because of the way you've been behaving. I think it would be prudent for you to tone it down, but I guess that's up to you.
I still like Bonnie and Mike. Jane is worse than Arvo.
I've slowed down, if you havent noticed.
Why should they care more about Clems & others survival than their own?
Because stealing only half the supplies it’s not caring more for the survival of Clem and the others, is just not condemning them to death.
I ask again, why should they care?
Actually, we do have a idea where the bullets hit.
Vitalli: You killed Nathasha, you bastard. You only be doing him a favor.
Okay, this does not tell use exactly where the bullet landed, but considering that Nathasha was dead as Vitalli said, it was definitivily in a letal spot. Something that could not be cured by CPR.
And? You are forgetting that Nathasha had 'the zombie face' when Clem shoot her. Arvo had to see that.
God Tier: Clem, Lee, Luke, and Kenny
Juice Box Tier: Alvin
Mean Person Turned Nice Tier: Rebecca
RIP In Peace: Omid
Never Seen Again Tier: Christa
2Pure4DisWorld Tier: Walter and Matthew
Cease To Function Tier: Carlos and Sarah
FUBAR Tier: Pete
Knows Where The Fucking River Is Tier: Nick
Governor 2.0 Tier: Carver
Little Chickens Tier: Troy
Molly 2.0 Tier: Jane
Shitty Aim Tier: Vitali, Buricko, and Natasha
VernonWouldBeProudTier: Mike and Bonnie
Boat 2.0: Truck
Stupid Fucking Little Fucking Shitbird Tier: Arvo
Because Mike is appaled to see Kenny hit Arvo, and his why he betrayed the group. Leaving Clem and the others for death was just not in his character. This is not out for debate; Mike cares. And he is one of the ones participing him the plan. If you don´t save Luke, Mike could have at least had to try to make Bonnie see his side of the issue. And if you do go to save Luke, then is even more engregious. Bonnie obviously cares for Clementine. So I don´t see how that somehow traslated in leaving everybody else to die.
Go to 3:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnJuqRUilhY
Arvo only sees the side of here face. Natasha's hair actually covers her only visible eye. For the rest of the scene Arvo just stands there in the same position, so his viewpoint of her does not change, therefore he has no idea she has become a zombie, to him it looks like an execution.
Dude, Nathasha has obviously turned into a walker here, even if her hair covers her only visible eye. Don´t you see how her skin, so pale and obviously walker like?
You think Arvo would equate that with reanimation? Even if he did not know what reanimation was? her skin isn't rotten yet, and she's only partially pale, someone who does not know any better, especially if you were 16 (like Arvo was most likely) when your education stopped, he would have no basis to instantly assume this is reanimation, especially if he has no idea that can occur.
Lee is Love
I think it could be the obvious thing. She is just got shot; she is not going to be like that in less that a minute. I know he has no idea reanimation will happen even if you die normally-is ridicolous, because he should have see somebody dying of natural causes before, but is the only thing that makes sense counting the fact that he did not know Natasha had turned-, but at least, he should have thougth that something was not rigth.
Do you have to derail every thread and turn it into a argument?
I don't know... I think they are both pretty manipulative people.
How about stopping? You are ruining a lot of threads..
Me?
If you dont help luke, Bonnie will pretty much hates you.