I don't know - it's in french - but I had asked my friend from back when I was an undergraduate - a fellow classicist - who had read the book in question (she's french) and she told me that she would have remembered if Ancient Greek was actually relevant within it.
I can try to translate the french book I suppose..
See now your argument has validity (nothing more than anecdotal validity, but that's more than you started with I suppose). Now had you began with this information instead of using the asinine logic you have expelled throughout the rest of this conversation you might have a leg to stand on. The fact you know Greek (and whatever other arguments you used) has absolutely nothing to do with this new information (that still isn't verified in the slightest), and actually falls into one of the three categories I gave to you way earlier... " A. Having the answer "
Now why exactly would use all of the idiotic reasoning you did when you actually had logical reasoning? "That's like wiping before you poop, it don't make no sense!"
I don't know - it's in french - but I had asked my friend from back when I was an undergraduate - a fellow classicist - who had read the boo… morek in question (she's french) and she told me that she would have remembered if Ancient Greek was actually relevant within it.
I can try to translate the french book I suppose..
She told me there was nothing to do with Greek in it. I thus know there was nothing to do with greek in it. I know this information due to having done a greek degree with her.
And I must ask you the question which you seem so eager to avoid, rather lamely if I may be so bold: why on earth are you being so harsh, cynical and blatantly cruel towards me?
See now your argument has validity (nothing more than anecdotal validity, but that's more than you started with I suppose). Now had you bega… moren with this information instead of using the asinine logic you have expelled throughout the rest of this conversation you might have a leg to stand on. The fact you know Greek (and whatever other arguments you used) has absolutely nothing to do with this new information (that still isn't verified in the slightest), and actually falls into one of the three categories I gave to you way earlier... " A. Having the answer "
Now why exactly would use all of the idiotic reasoning you did when you actually had logical reasoning? "That's like wiping before you poop, it don't make no sense!"
That wasn't the idiotic reasoning I was referring to, I expressly addressed that as an anecdotally valid reasoning. Your straw looks more and more like a solid piece of plastic.
It wasn't idiotic reasoning.
She told me there was nothing to do with Greek in it. I thus know there was nothing to do with greek in it. … moreI know this information due to having done a greek degree with her.
And I must ask you the question which you seem so eager to avoid, rather lamely if I may be so bold: why on earth are you being so harsh, cynical and blatantly cruel towards me?
Please. Give me the reason.
That wasn't the idiotic reasoning I was referring to, I expressly addressed that as an anecdotally valid reasoning. Your straw looks more and more like a solid piece of plastic.
That's not a relevant point to the conversation.
First off how is "The conversation is what we make it. or, I would really like an answer." in anyway prompting a discussion of the specification of what logic I am referring to? Secondly I shouldn't need to explain it to you. Reread the last few posts and understand the contents without having me hold your hand.
I'm not dodging anything, I have addressed it, you just don't like the answer.
What? I'm waiting for you to tell me which part of my logic specifically is idiotic. I can';t debate that fact if you refrain for saying it.
I would concurrently like to know the reason for your rudeness, which, ironically, you are dodging.
I haven't seen you address it. It seems far more than just 'I'm not sure your post was correct'.
The conversation is what we make it means that if I want to know why you seem to have it out to me not just here but in other discussions, I'm not limited by the fact that the conversation wasn't already about you being rude. Conversations change.
Secondly I shouldn't need to explain it to you. Reread the last few posts and understand the contents without having me hold your hand.
Like, the definition of dodging right there. I specifically ask you and you just go 'uh uh uh DOITYOURSELF'.
First off how is "The conversation is what we make it. or, I would really like an answer." in anyway prompting a discussion of the specifica… moretion of what logic I am referring to? Secondly I shouldn't need to explain it to you. Reread the last few posts and understand the contents without having me hold your hand.
I'm not dodging anything, I have addressed it, you just don't like the answer.
What? I'm waiting for you to tell me which part of my logic specifically is idiotic. I can';t debate that fact if you refrain for saying it.
I would concurrently like to know the reason for your rudeness, which, ironically, you are dodging.
I said it's not relevant to the conversation. I have addressed it, it's just not an answer you want to settle for.
The conversation is what we make it means that if I want to know why you seem to have it out to me not just here but in other discussions, I'm not limited by the fact that the conversation wasn't already about you being rude. Conversations change.
So... more irrelevance. Absolutely fantastic.
You can't tell the difference between dodging and not wanting to carry someone through a conversation by repeating (quite the opposition to dodging) information? I don't even know where to take that.... as the meme fanatics of the Internet might say, much wow.
I haven't seen you address it. It seems far more than just 'I'm not sure your post was correct'.
The conversation is what we make it mean… mores that if I want to know why you seem to have it out to me not just here but in other discussions, I'm not limited by the fact that the conversation wasn't already about you being rude. Conversations change.
Secondly I shouldn't need to explain it to you. Reread the last few posts and understand the contents without having me hold your hand.
Like, the definition of dodging right there. I specifically ask you and you just go 'uh uh uh DOITYOURSELF'.
I said it's not relevant to the conversation. I have addressed it, it's just not an answer you want to settle for.
The conversation is… more what we make it means that if I want to know why you seem to have it out to me not just here but in other discussions, I'm not limited by the fact that the conversation wasn't already about you being rude. Conversations change.
So... more irrelevance. Absolutely fantastic.
You can't tell the difference between dodging and not wanting to carry someone through a conversation by repeating (quite the opposition to dodging) information? I don't even know where to take that.... as the meme fanatics of the Internet might say, much wow.
You're not a troll, but your deliberate avoidance of an issue I'd really like to address is very grating, and seems to be orchestrated simply to annoy me more.
It's simply not prudent to the conversation. I'm not going to dive into a conversation unrelated to the one I'm actually in unless I feel it integral to that conversation or I want to leave that conversation for a different one, neither of which I wanted to do.
You're not a troll, but your deliberate avoidance of an issue I'd really like to address is very grating, and seems to be orchestrated simply to annoy me more.
Hold on, this is absolutely what I was talking about above that you said was irrelevant and me doding.
Look:
I was to know why you're being rude.
Conversations can change topics - for example we are no longer talking about Greek.
Hence this not being a conversation about it isn't a reason not to tell me.
Can we please address this now? How does it help anyone to continue leaving it like this, just to resurface again later down the line, as it already has done? Let's cut it at the shoot.
This is actually a little upsetting - not being told what someone has against you so you can't try to make up for it - so I'm asking you politely: please, please tell me what I've done.
As someone with pretty severe clinical anxiety, worrying about what someone tells me is just going to preoccupy my mind, so please.
It's simply not prudent to the conversation. I'm not going to dive into a conversation unrelated to the one I'm actually in unless I feel it… more integral to that conversation or I want to leave that conversation for a different one, neither of which I wanted to do.
Absolutely. I just wanted to know what I've done to personally annoy him so much so I could attempt to make amends for it.
This has happened before and it'll happen again if we don't address it, but he doesn't seem willing to do so.
I should know, It's hard for me to drop a lot of stuff on here and in real life, I always need the final word. however Flog, some things are pointless and need to be dropped, like this.
I should know, It's hard for me to drop a lot of stuff on here and in real life, I always need the final word. however Flog, some things are pointless and need to be dropped, like this.
Flog, I know, I have anxiety and depression. I don't really give a shit right now, we need to drop this whole thing as it's pointless, now please don't start another random off topic argument with me about mental disorders.
That kind of logical reasoning doesn't really work with chronic mental disorders I'm afraid.
Similar to how you can't tell a person with depression to be happier.
Flog, I know, I have anxiety and depression. I don't really give a shit right now, we need to drop this whole thing as it's pointless, now please don't start another random off topic argument with me about mental disorders.
This seems a plot hole more than anything, Items in max's inventory stay the same apart from pictures she takes. Yet ones she takes for her scrapbook do not
Talking about photos, when you are supposed to collect the bottles, at one point you can see a doe. When you come closer, you see the doe is kind of transparent. Max then says something like "this would be a perfect photo-op" or whatever, and when you do take a picture of that doe and you look at the photos in your diary, guess what? The doe is not on the photo.
When Max walks into the art room in Episode 2 and asks to sit down if you told on Nathan he'll say "Infact Max, shit is just getting started" but if you dont he just glares at Max and walks by.
I walked up to the doe without taking a picture. I got close and it took off, I tried to rewind time to get the picture but defied the time travel rules and didn't come back.
I don't know if that is a constant, or even if many people tried to get the deer to come back, but thought I would share.
Talking about photos, when you are supposed to collect the bottles, at one point you can see a doe. When you come closer, you see the doe is… more kind of transparent. Max then says something like "this would be a perfect photo-op" or whatever, and when you do take a picture of that doe and you look at the photos in your diary, guess what? The doe is not on the photo.
Another logic error that bothers me: When Max uses her powers for the first time in the girl's toilet she finds herself back in the classroom. On every other occasion she uses the power her location doesn't change.
This seems a plot hole more than anything, Items in max's inventory stay the same apart from pictures she takes. Yet ones she takes for her scrapbook do not
Comments
It has already been explained? What does it decode as?
I don't know - it's in french - but I had asked my friend from back when I was an undergraduate - a fellow classicist - who had read the book in question (she's french) and she told me that she would have remembered if Ancient Greek was actually relevant within it.
I can try to translate the french book I suppose..
See now your argument has validity (nothing more than anecdotal validity, but that's more than you started with I suppose). Now had you began with this information instead of using the asinine logic you have expelled throughout the rest of this conversation you might have a leg to stand on. The fact you know Greek (and whatever other arguments you used) has absolutely nothing to do with this new information (that still isn't verified in the slightest), and actually falls into one of the three categories I gave to you way earlier... " A. Having the answer "
Now why exactly would use all of the idiotic reasoning you did when you actually had logical reasoning? "That's like wiping before you poop, it don't make no sense!"
It wasn't idiotic reasoning.
She told me there was nothing to do with Greek in it. I thus know there was nothing to do with greek in it. I know this information due to having done a greek degree with her.
And I must ask you the question which you seem so eager to avoid, rather lamely if I may be so bold: why on earth are you being so harsh, cynical and blatantly cruel towards me?
Please. Give me the reason.
That wasn't the idiotic reasoning I was referring to, I expressly addressed that as an anecdotally valid reasoning. Your straw looks more and more like a solid piece of plastic.
That's not a relevant point to the conversation.
The conversation is what we make it.
I would really like an answer.
Nice dodging, I guess....
What? I'm waiting for you to tell me which part of my logic specifically is idiotic. I can';t debate that fact if you refrain for saying it.
I would concurrently like to know the reason for your rudeness, which, ironically, you are dodging.
First off how is "The conversation is what we make it. or, I would really like an answer." in anyway prompting a discussion of the specification of what logic I am referring to? Secondly I shouldn't need to explain it to you. Reread the last few posts and understand the contents without having me hold your hand.
I'm not dodging anything, I have addressed it, you just don't like the answer.
I haven't seen you address it. It seems far more than just 'I'm not sure your post was correct'.
The conversation is what we make it means that if I want to know why you seem to have it out to me not just here but in other discussions, I'm not limited by the fact that the conversation wasn't already about you being rude. Conversations change.
Like, the definition of dodging right there. I specifically ask you and you just go 'uh uh uh DOITYOURSELF'.
Can we stop arguing over Greek shit?
This is just turning into insults.
I said it's not relevant to the conversation. I have addressed it, it's just not an answer you want to settle for.
So... more irrelevance. Absolutely fantastic.
You can't tell the difference between dodging and not wanting to carry someone through a conversation by repeating (quite the opposition to dodging) information? I don't even know where to take that.... as the meme fanatics of the Internet might say, much wow.
Absolutely. I just wanted to know what I've done to personally annoy him so much so I could attempt to make amends for it.
This has happened before and it'll happen again if we don't address it, but he doesn't seem willing to do so.
Not rising to the bait.
There is no bait. What better way to leave than to label the other as a troll. Fantastic.
You're not a troll, but your deliberate avoidance of an issue I'd really like to address is very grating, and seems to be orchestrated simply to annoy me more.
It's simply not prudent to the conversation. I'm not going to dive into a conversation unrelated to the one I'm actually in unless I feel it integral to that conversation or I want to leave that conversation for a different one, neither of which I wanted to do.
Hold on, this is absolutely what I was talking about above that you said was irrelevant and me doding.
Look:
I was to know why you're being rude.
Conversations can change topics - for example we are no longer talking about Greek.
Hence this not being a conversation about it isn't a reason not to tell me.
Can we please address this now? How does it help anyone to continue leaving it like this, just to resurface again later down the line, as it already has done? Let's cut it at the shoot.
This is actually a little upsetting - not being told what someone has against you so you can't try to make up for it - so I'm asking you politely: please, please tell me what I've done.
As someone with pretty severe clinical anxiety, worrying about what someone tells me is just going to preoccupy my mind, so please.
Flog, let it go. It's not hard.
When you have clinical anxiety about exactly this type of thing it is very hard.
I should know, It's hard for me to drop a lot of stuff on here and in real life, I always need the final word. however Flog, some things are pointless and need to be dropped, like this.
That kind of logical reasoning doesn't really work with chronic mental disorders I'm afraid.
Similar to how you can't tell a person with depression to be happier.
Flog, I know, I have anxiety and depression. I don't really give a shit right now, we need to drop this whole thing as it's pointless, now please don't start another random off topic argument with me about mental disorders.
Im not trying to, I'm just stating that I'm not going to let it go and hope that you understand why.
Fine, I'll let the Mods handle this whole thing because it will get worse if you keep it going. You won't listen to my reasoning.
Guys, please try to be civil and stay on topic. Thanks!
If you try to use the axe on Chloe in episode 2:
Kate has a middle name:
Credit to http://mostlymilkwood.tumblr.com/
You can actually be caught by Jefferson using your phone during class when Chloe texts you near the end of episode 2.
Golden, pls
Yes I got caught :P
You seem to be able to keep photos whenever you rewind time unless they are photos of people.
Zis Pls.
This seems a plot hole more than anything, Items in max's inventory stay the same apart from pictures she takes. Yet ones she takes for her scrapbook do not
Episode 2 pls.
Talking about photos, when you are supposed to collect the bottles, at one point you can see a doe. When you come closer, you see the doe is kind of transparent. Max then says something like "this would be a perfect photo-op" or whatever, and when you do take a picture of that doe and you look at the photos in your diary, guess what? The doe is not on the photo.
When Max walks into the art room in Episode 2 and asks to sit down if you told on Nathan he'll say "Infact Max, shit is just getting started" but if you dont he just glares at Max and walks by.
Also:
I walked up to the doe without taking a picture. I got close and it took off, I tried to rewind time to get the picture but defied the time travel rules and didn't come back.
I don't know if that is a constant, or even if many people tried to get the deer to come back, but thought I would share.
Brooke has a crush on Warren
Another logic error that bothers me: When Max uses her powers for the first time in the girl's toilet she finds herself back in the classroom. On every other occasion she uses the power her location doesn't change.