The only thing I know about That 70's Show is that Laura Prepon is still one of the most attractive women on the planet, Mila Kunis doesn't have shit on my home girl.
The only thing I know about That 70's Show is that Laura Prepon is still one of the most attractive women on the planet, Mila Kunis doesn't have shit on my home girl.
So beautiful.
Yeah, I gotta go Laura on this one. The fact she looks just as radiant without her makeup on as she does with it really shows that she's got magical skin or some shit.
And although I'm sure the Laura pic has a filter over it, it doesn't change the fact that it's well known Mila Kunis looks like a dog without her makeup on whereas Ms. Prepon is still extremely attractive without it.
Yeah, I gotta go Laura on this one. The fact she looks just as radiant without her makeup on as she does with it really shows that she's got… more magical skin or some shit.
And although I'm sure the Laura pic has a filter over it, it doesn't change the fact that it's well known Mila Kunis looks like a dog without her makeup on whereas Ms. Prepon is still extremely attractive without it.
Catch anyone when they're a little under the weather and they'll look terrible. Besides, natural beauty is overrated. Sure you can look good without makeup, but they make makeup for a reason
Personally in my opinion beauty on the outside is not what matters on a person its more i judge them by if they are a good person thats just my opinion pretty much i never judge by facial beauty or race or religion im just stating my opinion on this matter also i think makeup blocks ur pores and is just un-natrual just decided to state a opinion u know
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2318016/Mila-Kunis-voted-1-FHMs-100-Sexiest-Women-In-The-World-list.html
Catch anyone when t… morehey're a little under the weather and they'll look terrible. Besides, natural beauty is overrated. Sure you can look good without makeup, but they make makeup for a reason
A lot of makeup contains chemicals that absorb into the skin causing long term damage to skin pigmentation. So to say that makeup is the justification for Ms. Kunis' winning a beauty contest is slightly dampening to the fact that the "100 sexiest women" ballet is completely subjective.
I don't think she's' 1, 2, or 1000. She's ok looking, but not someone I'd do a double take for. I've always been into natural looking women, which is why I've always been drawn to Laura. Because on That's 70 Show, she somehow manages to be the most alluring yet is set up to be a fairly plain-Jane looking tom boy. She's more gorgeous than Mila Kunis in my opinion.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2318016/Mila-Kunis-voted-1-FHMs-100-Sexiest-Women-In-The-World-list.html
Catch anyone when t… morehey're a little under the weather and they'll look terrible. Besides, natural beauty is overrated. Sure you can look good without makeup, but they make makeup for a reason
Obviously it's subjective, you can't argue against an objective stance. Not sure why people feel compelled to point this out during every discussion. "Opinion, subjective, point of view..." of course it is....
Anyways, this conversation has lost its "buddy buddy, who's better" allure. Cya.
Anything in excess is bad.
A lot of makeup contains chemicals that absorb into the skin causing long term damage to skin pigmentation. So… more to say that makeup is the justification for Ms. Kunis' winning a beauty contest is slightly dampening to the fact that the "100 sexiest women" ballet is completely subjective.
I don't think she's' 1, 2, or 1000. She's ok looking, but not someone I'd do a double take for. I've always been into natural looking women, which is why I've always been drawn to Laura. Because on That's 70 Show, she somehow manages to be the most alluring yet is set up to be a fairly plain-Jane looking tom boy. She's more gorgeous than Mila Kunis in my opinion.
You certainly tried earlier when you made the statement "they make makeup for a reason" as if to notion that natural beauty looks worse than touch ups and foundation being caked unto a celeb for a photo shoot. But, I digress.
Obviously it's subjective, you can't argue against an objective stance. Not sure why people feel compelled to point this out during every di… morescussion. "Opinion, subjective, point of view..." of course it is....
Anyways, this conversation has lost its "buddy buddy, who's better" allure. Cya.
Not sure toy know the difference between objective and subjective. I argued a purely subjective point, just didn't feel the need to say "Hey, it's subjective."
you can't argue against an objective stance
You certainly tried earlier when you made the statement "they make makeup for a reason" … moreas if to notion that natural beauty looks worse than touch ups and foundation being caked unto a celeb for a photo shoot. But, I digress.
Bye, I guess.
Well, the whole discussion was started when you challenged my opinion with yours. We all the right to think whatever, and beauty is absolutely subjective so you should've known that when I said "Mila Kunis don't have shit on my home girl," that was a subjective standpoint.
Most people would say Mila is better looking than Laura, I don't see it remotely, but then again I have the tastes I have and you have yours. Leave it at that.
Not sure toy know the difference between objective and subjective. I argued a purely subjective point, just didn't feel the need to say "Hey, it's subjective."
Well, the whole discussion was started when you challenged my opinion with yours. We all the right to think whatever, and beauty is absolute… morely subjective so you should've known that when I said "Mila Kunis don't have shit on my home girl," that was a subjective standpoint.
Most people would say Mila is better looking than Laura, I don't see it remotely, but then again I have the tastes I have and you have yours. Leave it at that.
Comments
I recall it on tv land & nick and nite but never really watched it is it good?
The only thing I know about That 70's Show is that Laura Prepon is still one of the most attractive women on the planet, Mila Kunis doesn't have shit on my home girl.
So beautiful.
I think so it does have it's kinda cheesy moments but a really great cast and hilarious episodes
It was awesome, but went a season too long. They should've ended it when they realized that Ashton Kutcher and Topher Grace were leaving.
Agreed. Season 8's cast were boring and unoriginal
Miss it so much, season 8 was kind of boring though tbh.
I miss it, it was a great show, Red was always my favorite.
I'll never forget this quote lol
Nope. Nope nope nope.
Mila Kunis is the epitome of beauty.
EDIT: Not sure why the picture turned so dark...
Yeah, I gotta go Laura on this one. The fact she looks just as radiant without her makeup on as she does with it really shows that she's got magical skin or some shit.
And although I'm sure the Laura pic has a filter over it, it doesn't change the fact that it's well known Mila Kunis looks like a dog without her makeup on whereas Ms. Prepon is still extremely attractive without it.
You can find bad pictures of any celebrity.
True, doesn't change the fact that some celebs look better without their makeup than others though.
Click here
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2318016/Mila-Kunis-voted-1-FHMs-100-Sexiest-Women-In-The-World-list.html
Catch anyone when they're a little under the weather and they'll look terrible. Besides, natural beauty is overrated. Sure you can look good without makeup, but they make makeup for a reason
Personally in my opinion beauty on the outside is not what matters on a person its more i judge them by if they are a good person thats just my opinion pretty much i never judge by facial beauty or race or religion im just stating my opinion on this matter also i think makeup blocks ur pores and is just un-natrual just decided to state a opinion u know
Anything in excess is bad.
A lot of makeup contains chemicals that absorb into the skin causing long term damage to skin pigmentation. So to say that makeup is the justification for Ms. Kunis' winning a beauty contest is slightly dampening to the fact that the "100 sexiest women" ballet is completely subjective.
I don't think she's' 1, 2, or 1000. She's ok looking, but not someone I'd do a double take for. I've always been into natural looking women, which is why I've always been drawn to Laura. Because on That's 70 Show, she somehow manages to be the most alluring yet is set up to be a fairly plain-Jane looking tom boy. She's more gorgeous than Mila Kunis in my opinion.
Obviously it's subjective, you can't argue against an objective stance. Not sure why people feel compelled to point this out during every discussion. "Opinion, subjective, point of view..." of course it is....
Anyways, this conversation has lost its "buddy buddy, who's better" allure. Cya.
You certainly tried earlier when you made the statement "they make makeup for a reason" as if to notion that natural beauty looks worse than touch ups and foundation being caked unto a celeb for a photo shoot. But, I digress.
Bye, I guess.
I love this show, used to catch reruns everyday. Is it on Netflix? I'd really like to just sit down and watch the whole series :P
i love this show
i think so
Not sure toy know the difference between objective and subjective. I argued a purely subjective point, just didn't feel the need to say "Hey, it's subjective."
Well, the whole discussion was started when you challenged my opinion with yours. We all the right to think whatever, and beauty is absolutely subjective so you should've known that when I said "Mila Kunis don't have shit on my home girl," that was a subjective standpoint.
Most people would say Mila is better looking than Laura, I don't see it remotely, but then again I have the tastes I have and you have yours. Leave it at that.
Yes, that's how the discussion started. Arguing two subjective stances. That's the point, you didn't have to say it for me to know it. Making sense?
Whatever, Lee.
Goodbye now.
I think it's a really funny and somewhat creative show.
That a no?