Anita Sarkeesian Attacks Fallout 4 and DOOM 4

«1

Comments

  • edited July 2015

    Knowing my opinion about Anita Sarkeesian's work, I can say that I disagree with her without even watching the video.

  • I consider myself a feminist, but I'm okay with make believe violence. Not real violence, but digital people's heads exploding on a screen? Go nuts. I love Fallout. More for the environment and the humor (I LOVE easter eggs...), but still, good stuff.

  • I disagree with her a lot, but I have a bit of a softie for Sarkeesian. I blame McIntosh. He seems like the real liberal douche behind the curtain. But she's the one who has to eat the shit (some of which is merited). I'm sure that's somehow going to be interpreted as misandrist, but fuck it.

    Lingvort posted: »

    Knowing my opinion about Anita Sarkeesian's work, I can say that I disagree with her without even watching the video.

  • BigBlindMaxBigBlindMax Banned
    edited July 2015

    In the wise and thoughtful words of Young Dro...

    Fuck dat bitch.

    I'll play whatever violent video games I damn well please.

  • Not on my side. I mean, you dislike McIntosh for his views and not for a fact that he's a man, right? That's all fine by me.

    I can see your point, though. McIntosh is most likely the progressive (or, IMO, regressive) mastermind behind a lot of the stuff she puts out, but most of the people are largely unaware of him, so she gets most of the blame.

    Sarangholic posted: »

    I disagree with her a lot, but I have a bit of a softie for Sarkeesian. I blame McIntosh. He seems like the real liberal douche behind the c

  • IMO everyone is entitled in to their opinion, and i would say Anna that is yours, where i preordered my copy, and will be playing it, November 11, so now go in the kitchen and make me a sandwhich. She looks at me like i just killed her family, It was just a joke.

  • Anita has the right to criticise whatever she wants, but she should be prepared to get shit for it. I honestly can't stand her. On the odd occasion that she does use fact, she twists it so that it supports her crazy conspiracy that game developers are out to reinforce female stereotypes. There's a blogger who points out a lot of her bullshit, I'll link to his site.

    Here's one post of his that never gets old:

    https://rejzor.wordpress.com/2015/01/17/games-dont-discriminate-games-emulate/

    Also, thumbs up to AlphaOmegaSin. Listening to him say it for what it is was enough to make me subscribe to him.

  • Of course she did... Anita is just annoying at this point finding any reason to start an argument about something.

  • She is just a cute troll. Why do you take what she says so seriously, don't you understand its all a troll?

    Anita has the right to criticise whatever she wants, but she should be prepared to get shit for it. I honestly can't stand her. On the odd o

  • Although I agree sexism does need addressing in the industry, Anita is not the person to spear head it. She's simply not educated enough in the subject and can't tell the difference between what is and what isn't - this also applies to her other subject matters. She seems like a nice girl who knows her games, but when she tries to put a slant on anything, she just comes off as a troll and an attention seeker.

  • And yet in that picture with the huge stack of video games she plays, she has some of the most violent games. Go figure, she doesn't even try to not look fake anymore.

  • She plays them so she can have something to complain about. For her, complaining = profit.

    And yet in that picture with the huge stack of video games she plays, she has some of the most violent games. Go figure, she doesn't even try to not look fake anymore.

  • You know you're a modern feminist when you're complaining about "oppression" in video games rather than actual oppression and sexism in third world countries. Honestly, the whole thing pisses me off. How she has such a huge fanbase that eat up her bullshit is beyond me

  • Wait SHE has a problem with something, not like her

  • which is why the hashtag isn't #fullAnita

    Sarangholic posted: »

    I disagree with her a lot, but I have a bit of a softie for Sarkeesian. I blame McIntosh. He seems like the real liberal douche behind the c

  • that's probably the objective, getting patreon $ from people feeling sorry for her when she gets bullied by the meanies in the internet

    she doesn't actually care about the medium

    Anita has the right to criticise whatever she wants, but she should be prepared to get shit for it. I honestly can't stand her. On the odd o

  • I always take I seriously when someone starts badmouthing video games, troll or not.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    She is just a cute troll. Why do you take what she says so seriously, don't you understand its all a troll?

  • Also notice she has Fallout 3, even though she apparently hates violent games. She probably just took that picture so gamers wouldn't hate her.

    And yet in that picture with the huge stack of video games she plays, she has some of the most violent games. Go figure, she doesn't even try to not look fake anymore.

  • And there's the fact that she gets more sympathy than actual rape victims.

    You know you're a modern feminist when you're complaining about "oppression" in video games rather than actual oppression and sexism in thir

  • I bet that even if she made a game herself she would still find something wrong with it.

  • No if she made a game it'd have no male characters, no violence whatsoever, only one or two white people, and a couple of those people who identify as genderfluid or whatever biology defying thing that's floating around Tumblr nowadays.

    Gary-Oak posted: »

    I bet that even if she made a game herself she would still find something wrong with it.

  • Fuck off Anita, no one takes your shit seriously.

  • Ya, know, if you feed a stray cat you will never get rid of them. The more people repeat her BS the more she is encouraged to do it. The more people react, the more of a victim she can make herself out to be. If gamers just started to ignore her and her ilk they will slink back under the garbage heap they crawled out from under.

  • AWESOMEOAWESOMEO Banned
    edited July 2015

    True. I don't see why we should parade her stupidity around.

    Ya, know, if you feed a stray cat you will never get rid of them. The more people repeat her BS the more she is encouraged to do it. The mor

  • Yeah just shun her.

    Ya, know, if you feed a stray cat you will never get rid of them. The more people repeat her BS the more she is encouraged to do it. The mor

  • [removed]

  • Alt text

    Exactly

    You know you're a modern feminist when you're complaining about "oppression" in video games rather than actual oppression and sexism in thir

  • Pick the most famous games at E3 be offended and outraged not matter the content to guarantee maximum attention which leads to more donations she is a con artist she never played games in her life she found a way to make easy money simple

    It's genius get donations tax free make cheap videos for complaining about sexism while changing nothing because of use of this issue nobody dares question her because it's sexism defeat any counter argument or logical complaint against it by just screaming SEXISM

    I think she is getting really desperate now tbh she will disappear completely in the coming months imo and stop being relevant

  • Did you just call her "cute"? She isn't an object. ;)

    Yeah, these kind of people are somewhat crazy.

    CrazyGeorge posted: »

    She is just a cute troll. Why do you take what she says so seriously, don't you understand its all a troll?

  • edited July 2015

    This woman again? I fail to understand how she is still relevant (or could still be relevant).

    Alas, let us do a quick google search in relation to this issue.....Are you kidding me?..........Righto, this has to be a joke..................

    Dear god, is she even trying to appear credible anymore?

    .Alt text

  • Oh my god, how dare she criticise a video game? It should be prohibited to state one's opinion.

  • You obviously don't know who she is. Either she's a troll or the biggest (for lack of a better term ever) twat ever. All she does is complain about how woman are "treated badly" in video games and how much violence there is, and then thinks she's an actual feminist who's making a difference when all she is doing is pissing a ton of people off with her "logic", if you can even call it that

    rousseau posted: »

    Oh my god, how dare she criticise a video game? It should be prohibited to state one's opinion.

  • So you do think it's not okay to point out what displeases you about a video game. Interesting attitude.

    You obviously don't know who she is.

    No, I'm just a self-balanced person who disapproves of witch hunts.

    All she does is complain about how woman are "treated badly" in video games

    Really? Then how come that her last two videos are about examples of positive female characters?

    thinks she's an actual feminist who's making a difference when all she is doing is pissing a ton of people off

    She is making a difference, because she's the first person to start a discussion about this topic while having an actual audience. And the pissed-off people and their aggressive reactions are just part of this audience. It's funny.

    You obviously don't know who she is. Either she's a troll or the biggest (for lack of a better term ever) twat ever. All she does is complai

  • a) I don't think there is anything wrong about pointing out what displeases you j. A game

    b) "Her last two videos are about positive female characters." That's the thing, all she does is rant about male oppression and wants to talk female characters....in video games. She has such s bit audience, why not focusing it to ACTUAL oppression in the Middle East and other similar areas.

    c) If you get a kick out of people getting upset that someone that doesn't have two brain cells to rub together has a huge audience, then good for you.

    rousseau posted: »

    So you do think it's not okay to point out what displeases you about a video game. Interesting attitude. You obviously don't know who

  • "These kind"? Way to paint with a broad brush.

    Clord posted: »

    Did you just call her "cute"? She isn't an object. Yeah, these kind of people are somewhat crazy.

  • Her critique of games isn't the issue. Her using victim-hood as a money making scheme is. She is the Al Sharpton of games. She goes where the action is and then gets up on her soap box for the attention and donations. She doesn't have an honest or legitimate critique either. She regularly manipulates scenes, misrepresents, or even lies to prove her 'point'.
    And think about her concept 'tropes in video games'. Tropes are universal to story telling no mater what the form. Tropes are tropes because they have a universal appeal and touch on something about being human that makes the story compelling. This idea that these tropes are unique to video games and are harmfully sexist is ridiculous. Tropes are tropes because humans, men and women, respond to them.

    rousseau posted: »

    Oh my god, how dare she criticise a video game? It should be prohibited to state one's opinion.

  • edited July 2015

    That's the thing, all she does is rant about male oppression and wants to talk female characters....in video games. She has such s bit audience, why not focusing it to ACTUAL oppression in the Middle East and other similar areas.

    Because she chooses to criticise video games. We're free to choose our occupations, right? There's also people who analyze literature and movies concerning sexism and other social issues. Why not include video games?

    If you get a kick out of people getting upset that someone that doesn't have two brain cells to rub together has a huge audience, then good for you.

    I don't exactly get a kick out of it. It's more like watching a tragicomedy. People should just take a step back and look at how ridiculous all this upset is. A pathetic display of what's going on in many gamer's minds.

    a) I don't think there is anything wrong about pointing out what displeases you j. A game b) "Her last two videos are about positive fema

  • Okay. But this:

    She regularly manipulates scenes, misrepresents, or even lies to prove her 'point'

    is regular business among critics. Some of them will do everything to prove their point, that's how over-damning or over-praising reviews come up since there exists art and entertainment. This is something every popular piece of media has to undergo sooner or later, and it'd only a step in the right direction this has finally reached video games too. She may be wrong with what she's saying, so what? Should we start a hate campaign over every wrong or exaggerative review or youtube video now?

    Her critique of games isn't the issue. Her using victim-hood as a money making scheme is. She is the Al Sharpton of games. She goes where th

  • Well you listening to her,talking about her..., you fell for her bait. Have you ever heard the expression, "Any publicity is good publicity?" Why is she now a millionaire. Do you really think she cares about games or the effects on womankind, , or do you think its about making her money? Obviously she is about herself, and when anyone calls her out on her bullshit, she plays the victim.

    OBVIOUSLY she wants to charge people 1000s of dollars for speeches she hasn't given.

    Stop falling for Ondore's lies. Don't let yourself be manipulated BY ANYone.

    Alt text

    I always take I seriously when someone starts badmouthing video games, troll or not.

  • CrazyGeorgeCrazyGeorge Banned
    edited July 2015

    Do you have a problem with me calling her cute? Would you prefer ugly instead? I got tons of words in my vocab, i consider myself a wordsmith. Perhaps , cheap, greedy, manipulative, all come to mind.

    Clord posted: »

    Did you just call her "cute"? She isn't an object. Yeah, these kind of people are somewhat crazy.

This discussion has been closed.