Dragon Age Inquisition: Trespasser Expansion trailer
The speech at 0:46 is...wow.
"Could ONE THING in this BLOODY WORLD STAY FIXED"
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
The speech at 0:46 is...wow.
"Could ONE THING in this BLOODY WORLD STAY FIXED"
Comments
I guess finding the main thread was simply way too hard.
https://www.telltalegames.com/community/discussion/83202/dragon-age-fan-thread-dlc-the-descent-out-now/p37
Yes, are the DLCS worth getting or are they crappy like the previous DLCS.
Don't know, never got 'em, haven't played the game since February. People in the main thread, however, have given their opinions.
I looked but couldn't see the site rule against making a thread about something which hadn't been discussed in another. I mean, there's a thread for 'Jane vs Kenny' but if I wanted to ask about whether Kenny is sympathetic making a new thread would be fine, as would making a new thread about a dlc expanding on said Jane vs Kenny decision.
Regardless, your snark isn't necessary, I was excited so I made a thread. I'll hardly get banned.
Personally i enjoyed the witcher 3 than DA. The combat was just so much more engaging, but the boss fights were pretty lackluster and easy IMO.
I like the word snark. It sounds like shark. I'm sure if it becomes a problem one of the mods won't mind merging them or whatever. They do it all the time.
I think Witcher gameplay is better than DAI's, but careful, we shouldn't discuss this here, you're only allowed to talk about dragon age on one thread of general chat it seems.
If it's a problem, they sure will. Making Lingvort's comment even more redundant.
Did I ever say it was against the rules? I pointed out that there was already a thread for that, so creating another one was unnecessary.
Or making your thread more redundant. It all depends.
And yet I was simply pointing out the lack of necessity for another thread about Dragon Age...
After Witcher 3, DA Inquisition seems very... bleh. Story, gameplay, and especially characters all pale in comparison. I recently tried to play through the DLC they already had released and I was sooo bored.
Well, all threads are 'unnecessary' aren't they?
In addition, having one thread about one thing doesnt make having another thread about a different part of that one thing completely ridiculous to make. There's a spoiler free review thread for Until Dawn as well as 3 other Until Dawn threads for example.
Flog, really? That's your argument? Really?
Maybe make a 'Witcher vs Dragon age' thread? This is supposed to be about the Trespasser DLC.
Talk of necessity is rather silly in this situation, so yes it's part of my argument.
This whole argument is silly, or stupid, depending on how you perceive it. Flog, you should've put this news in the already established Dragon Age thread like all the other DLC news previously announced. However, it's already done with so there's no point in arguing about it like we're attempting to convince you to not make it.
As I said, I was excited, and I don't frequent the Dragon Age Thread so it didn't immediately present itself as a place to put the trailer.
Mocking me saying 'it was just too hard to find the proper thread huh' is just pointless, so I responded as such.
Additional threads that exist beside a larger thread created for discussing the same subject are unnecessary, sure.
Also, I didn't say it was ridiculous to make a thread, only that it was unnecessary.
I understand you, this can be a little of a learning experience. Look for already immediate established threads for discussion rather than immediately make a thread about it. Simple thing to get out of this rather than having a pointless argument which will eventually end up as insults and snarky comments.
True, he also shouldn't have put such a sarcastic comment but come on, it has some leverage to it. Again, all apart of the learning experience.
Ridiculous was just a word to mean 'you wouldn't have done it in my situation' a generic 'bad thing' word.
As I said, I was excited. If I had known about the dlc for days, and if I went on the thread long enough to have it present itself as an option to me the very second I saw the trailer, then yeah I'd have put it here. I didn't because I was excited and very very rarely go on the thread, nor was the thread close to being in eyesight let alone forethought.
Wasn't making a snide comment about the thread also unnecessary?
There are lots of threads about, say, how people's days are going. Such as the Vent thread and the Whatevers on your mind megathread. I've never seen you post on the Vent thread saying it is unneccesary baring this in mind, though, oddly.
..it wouldn't make my thread redundant as it would still have a point. Your comment wouldn't.
There no 'learning experience' to be had when making more than one thread about one thing discussed elsewhere (see Vent thread and whatevers on your mind megathread) is not only allowed, but common. I need not learn any lesson vis a vis thread creation, the only lesson I would learn is to encourage people in a disclaimer of every thread I make to discuss the actual thread, and remind them that if there was an actual problem with the threads existence, a mod would deal with it.
Perhaps I should start a thread each time assuming people shan't comment on the discussion materiel within the thread, but it'd be hardly expected of me.
I don't think the manner in which I commented would matter much. If I simply said "There's a thread for DA" and left a link, it'd have garnered the same reaction, only with less focus on how "snide" it was.
If you wish to ignore the fact that you could've actually just put this whole thing in the Dragon Age thread then go on ahead, someone else already did it for you. Not like this thread has any real discussion in it other than arguments...So, I find this a waste of my time, and therefore I'm out.
Whatever's on Your Mind thread is more of a thread for general chat, from what I gather. The Vent Thread isn't. Some people may use them for same purposes, but it doesn't make the threads themselves same.
Obviously I could have. Someone could have posted the Vent thread in the Whatevers on your mind megathread, someone coudl post every thread about Rhys in the biggest threads about Rhys.
I'm saying that complaining about me making the thread is completely pointless.
You've dodged my question. I merely said 'snide' to specify which comment I meant. If you like I can rephrase it.
Wasn't your first comment unnecessary?
Not really. The first post of a merged thread retains its name. So, for anyone who'd bother to read it from the beginning (after the merged thread's title, that is), it would still make sense.
Flog, you don't understand what "waste of time" means. These arguments about it is a waste of time.
No, it wasn't unnecessary.
Now, to answer your original question, which you didn't have to rephrase and yet you did, making a comment was necessary to remind you about the existence of the DA thread. Making it snide may not have been, but, believe me, it was done without any malicious intent on my part.
Well I haven'played any DA since I completed it, but this looks interesting if anything just to see what Solas has to say!
Looks like they're finally trying to move the plot forward and answer a lot of questions (not). Well, I hope this will be the last DLC and they move on to Dragon Age 4 or something. Inquisition was a complete disappointment.
Sorry for giving my input on DA DLC in a thread about the new DA DLC. Won't happen again, Boss.