Front lines? Supply run whatever just not camps?
Would you honestly risk your life for nothing?
Is anyone a member of organiza… moretion responsible for millions of deaths?
No. No one member of any organization should be responsible for all the organization's actions, especially if they weren't important in it.
Would you honestly risk your life for nothing?
Better than murdering defenseless women, men and childern....
No. No one member… more of any organization should be responsible for all the organization's actions, especially if they weren't important in it.
Let's agree do disagree then. We won't reach any understanding on that matter so let's just end it here.
Would you honestly risk your life for nothing?
Better than murdering defenseless women, men and childern....
No. No one member… more of any organization should be responsible for all the organization's actions, especially if they weren't important in it.
Let's agree do disagree then. We won't reach any understanding on that matter so let's just end it here.
Not to mention that it's not an easy thing to risk your life for what's right. People who just expect selflessness should stop and think about what they'd do if their life was threatened.
Maybe make a choice to remain human? But he was a coward and decied to just follow orders.
You didn't answer the question. What could he have done? Don't avoid it.
Not to mention that it's not an easy thing to risk your life for what's right. People who just expect selflessness should stop and think about what they'd do if their life was threatened.
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
Since we're talking past tense, yes, my ancestors did suffer death and destruction. As did everybody who exists ancestors. My Swedish ancest… moreors suffered the brutal Christianization of Scandinavia, and my German ancestors more recently suffered the destruction and rape of their country at the hands of the Soviets, not that they didn't start the war, but they still suffered as a result. Those are just two examples. Maybe a sixth of their populations weren't killed, but they still suffered. War and death has plagued all people, and despite the atrocities committed against yours, that doesn't somehow excuse inhumanity on your behalf.
If you ever want to move on in life from events that happened most likely not within the scope of your own lifetime, you need to learn that doing unto others as they have done to you is not a means of creating a better and more peaceful world. The Nazi party in Germany was destroyed, the people involved stood tria… [view original content]
Actually, the ONLY camp he served in was Auschwitz, at which he served one month (August, 14 - September, 14 of 1944) before being transferred west to other duties.
Again, what does this one person represent? I have to bring it to a personal level because any other level of blame for this man is ridiculo… moreus.
He represents the worst of human nature, he did all of that willingly. He was stationed and multiple camps, joined HItler's scouts. I bet if he tried hard enough he could be relocated to different post but he stayed till the very end so yeah not buying that.
So your idea is guilty till proven innocent? A lot of innocent people die because of that thinking.
Is an SS member innocent by definition? So yeah guilty till proven is only way for those people.
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
Actually, the ONLY camp he served in was Auschwitz, at which he served one month (August, 14 - September, 14 of 1944) before being transferred west to other duties.
So easy to say when you don't suffer from the consequences till this day, say did you country ever got razed to the ground with sixth of the… more population killed hm?
Oh I didn't know you suffered from the actions of this one man. How in the hell is this one man responsible for the past razing and killings of people in your country?
you can't dehumanize something that is not human to begin with.
Ironic.
Since we're talking past tense, yes, my ancestors did suffer death and destruction. As did everybody who exists ancestors. My Swedish ancest… moreors suffered the brutal Christianization of Scandinavia, and my German ancestors more recently suffered the destruction and rape of their country at the hands of the Soviets, not that they didn't start the war, but they still suffered as a result. Those are just two examples. Maybe a sixth of their populations weren't killed, but they still suffered. War and death has plagued all people, and despite the atrocities committed against yours, that doesn't somehow excuse inhumanity on your behalf.
If you ever want to move on in life from events that happened most likely not within the scope of your own lifetime, you need to learn that doing unto others as they have done to you is not a means of creating a better and more peaceful world. The Nazi party in Germany was destroyed, the people involved stood tria… [view original content]
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
I found this on polish wikipedia but here on the tweet from Auschwitz memorial it says so. Till now this organization was accurate with the data they provided.
I can find no such website. Can you provide a link to where you found this information?
Also, If this is so, then why is he not being charged for his involvement in those camps?
I found this on polish wikipedia but here on the tweet from Auschwitz memorial it says so. Till now this organization was accurate with the data they provided.
link
Doesn't crimes out-date so that the dick moves like this don't usually happen?
I mean, that guy already served for his "claimed" crimes and now they're just using him.
Comments
Better than murdering defenseless women, men and childern....
Let's agree do disagree then. We won't reach any understanding on that matter so let's just end it here.
Allow me to throw my hat in too.
Yup it's for the best.
He didn't even do that, there's no proof he ever did.
Sure.
Witold Pilecki
Anyone who wasn't a resistance fighter.
Not to mention that it's not an easy thing to risk your life for what's right. People who just expect selflessness should stop and think about what they'd do if their life was threatened.
Exactly. People can easily say they'd risk their lives for what's right when their life isn't on the line.
Guys, guys, guys. Calm down. This thread got really hostile, really quickly. Calling someone a "Nazi sympathizer" is generally insulting, so let's avoid that.
He was only stationed there for one month? Oh Cheesus.
Actually, the ONLY camp he served in was Auschwitz, at which he served one month (August, 14 - September, 14 of 1944) before being transferred west to other duties.
August, 14 to September, 14 of 1944.
Brace yourselves; the Thread Mjölnir is coming.
You're a bit late to the party, I'm afraid...
Nate_Kenny you're a Nazi sympathiser
Wrong he served at
Sachsenhausen, Neuengamme and Auschwitz-Birkenau go to the site where the Camps personel was listed and he figures in all three
Shut the fuck up nazi scum (I'm just joking)
all your arguments are now invalid because you said that.
YOU ARE NAZI SCUM TOO!
I noticed.
I was just waiting for this comment.
I can find no such website. Can you provide a link to where you found this information?
Also, If this is so, then why is he not being charged for his involvement in those camps?
I found this on polish wikipedia but here on the tweet from Auschwitz memorial it says so. Till now this organization was accurate with the data they provided.
link
Hm, this is interesting. I find it odd that they bother to charge him for his time at Auschwitz, yet not that of the other camps.
Now that you mention it is quite odd, maybe because Auschwitz was most ,,popular"
Could very well be.
And why is that? Is it because I'm supposedly a Nazi sympathizer?
All of your arguments are invalid because you don't read, nor do you do any research before you post.
Doesn't crimes out-date so that the dick moves like this don't usually happen?
I mean, that guy already served for his "claimed" crimes and now they're just using him.
Well, I'm not sure about double-jeproady, but I doubt there's a statue of limitations for what he's charged with.