Ubisoft releasing 3 ports that have no graphical enhancements, compared to the PC version, run at 30FPS, and releases on the same day as Watch Dogs 2. Yep, seems a good idea. /s
How many fucking games are these lazy lame developers going to "re-master" for the new console generation?
For fucks sake, they're remaking Batman: Arkham Asylum and City. Games that were released not but 3 to 5 years prior to them making slightly higher-res textures and slapping a 60$ price on it.
What's next I wonder? I'm calling a Dead Space 1 and 2 "re-master."
So is this a remaster with updated graphics, or just a port? Because I've got the entire Ezio trilogy on the 360, and I'm not buying them again just for the privileged of playing them without also hearing my Xbox 360 slowly die.
So is this a remaster with updated graphics, or just a port? Because I've got the entire Ezio trilogy on the 360, and I'm not buying them again just for the privileged of playing them without also hearing my Xbox 360 slowly die.
I will wait for a sale the Ezio trilogy was a series high and in my opinion revelations was the last great game in the series, but I'm not paying $60 for games that don't even look very remastered.
Most remasters don't turn out well except for a few exceptions like bioshock collection, skyrim SE, halo MCC, and maybe 1 or 2 others. Atleast with those remasters you can see a noticeable difference. With this it just looks like it was ported over from old gen consoles just to make a quick buck.
The remasters are kinda optional, but 60$ for them isn't what I'd hope for I'll admit. I really liked how The last of us Remastered was only 20 dollars.
[Sigh]
How many fucking games are these lazy lame developers going to "re-master" for the new console generation?
For fucks sake, they… more're remaking Batman: Arkham Asylum and City. Games that were released not but 3 to 5 years prior to them making slightly higher-res textures and slapping a 60$ price on it.
What's next I wonder? I'm calling a Dead Space 1 and 2 "re-master."
I wouldn't exactly call Halo MCC a good remaster, seeing as it still has plenty of problems that were never fixed, and the Bioshock Collection is missing graphical effects and didn't bother to fix any of the glitches from the original release. And we don't even know if Skyrim is a good remaster, seeing as it's not out. The best remasters are probably Wind Waker HD, The Nathan Drake Collection, Gravity Rush Remastered and Okami HD (really Bluepoint and Hexadrive are probably the best studios when it comes to remasters, and Hexadrive deserves praise for getting Okami to run at an internal res of 4K on the PS3). The worst are by far anything High Voltage Studios touches. Thanks to their shit work, the Zone Of the Enders series died. Somehow their work on Saints Row 4 is more of a demaster.
Most remasters don't turn out well except for a few exceptions like bioshock collection, skyrim SE, halo MCC, and maybe 1 or 2 others. Atlea… morest with those remasters you can see a noticeable difference. With this it just looks like it was ported over from old gen consoles just to make a quick buck.
Comments
Well here it is I guess
Why do you make AC threads when you clearly don't like it?
It's not like it's an original title. It's a remaster of all the old Ezio games. Which are all pretty great
I like the original titles but it just pisses me off that they wanted to movie to shine and they wanted to take a step back
Ubisoft releasing 3 ports that have no graphical enhancements, compared to the PC version, run at 30FPS, and releases on the same day as Watch Dogs 2. Yep, seems a good idea. /s
[Sigh]
How many fucking games are these lazy lame developers going to "re-master" for the new console generation?
For fucks sake, they're remaking Batman: Arkham Asylum and City. Games that were released not but 3 to 5 years prior to them making slightly higher-res textures and slapping a 60$ price on it.
What's next I wonder? I'm calling a Dead Space 1 and 2 "re-master."
So is this a remaster with updated graphics, or just a port? Because I've got the entire Ezio trilogy on the 360, and I'm not buying them again just for the privileged of playing them without also hearing my Xbox 360 slowly die.
Looks barely better than it did on the 360, based on the trailer. :P Seems like pretty low effort ports.
I will wait for a sale the Ezio trilogy was a series high and in my opinion revelations was the last great game in the series, but I'm not paying $60 for games that don't even look very remastered.
Most remasters don't turn out well except for a few exceptions like bioshock collection, skyrim SE, halo MCC, and maybe 1 or 2 others. Atleast with those remasters you can see a noticeable difference. With this it just looks like it was ported over from old gen consoles just to make a quick buck.
The remasters are kinda optional, but 60$ for them isn't what I'd hope for I'll admit. I really liked how The last of us Remastered was only 20 dollars.
I wouldn't exactly call Halo MCC a good remaster, seeing as it still has plenty of problems that were never fixed, and the Bioshock Collection is missing graphical effects and didn't bother to fix any of the glitches from the original release. And we don't even know if Skyrim is a good remaster, seeing as it's not out. The best remasters are probably Wind Waker HD, The Nathan Drake Collection, Gravity Rush Remastered and Okami HD (really Bluepoint and Hexadrive are probably the best studios when it comes to remasters, and Hexadrive deserves praise for getting Okami to run at an internal res of 4K on the PS3). The worst are by far anything High Voltage Studios touches. Thanks to their shit work, the Zone Of the Enders series died. Somehow their work on Saints Row 4 is more of a demaster.