The Walking Dead: The Final Season - PAX Event Discussion Thread + Links to Telltale PAX Streams

1131415161719»

Comments

  • Well, considering Ava gauged her as being 13 and Gabe was retconned into clichely being a year older in From the Gallows, I'd think that was obvious.

    Also, writers can't do math because I'm pretty sure someone said Clementine will be 16 in TFS.

    eRock92 posted: »

    I remember during the PAX Skybound panel that they said Ten (one of the kids at the new location) is 10 years old and has experience half of

  • Everything about Clementine is ambiguous: her current age, her race/ethnicity, her skin tone, her last name, the correct position of her hair. What will TTG confirm and put to rest this final season? ...or maybe they'll just add more questions we want answers to.

    DabigRG posted: »

    Well, considering Ava gauged her as being 13 and Gabe was retconned into clichely being a year older in From the Gallows, I'd think that was obvious. Also, writers can't do math because I'm pretty sure someone said Clementine will be 16 in TFS.

  • Maybe, but probably not. Cause it's some of the only interesting things left about her, tbh.

    Also, I'm sorry, but did you say the correct position of her hair?

    eRock92 posted: »

    Everything about Clementine is ambiguous: her current age, her race/ethnicity, her skin tone, her last name, the correct position of her hai

  • If these kids are around Clementine's age, then doesn't that mean they would've been around her age when the apocalypse started? Are there boarding schools for elementary students?

    OzzyUK posted: »

    With the whole boarding school thing, is there actually a running boarding school or a run-down boarding school building that happen to be w

  • Not that I know of. I think this boarding school is more for orphanage if these kids / teens were Clementine's age when it all started.

    If these kids are around Clementine's age, then doesn't that mean they would've been around her age when the apocalypse started? Are there boarding schools for elementary students?

  • Yeah. Am I the only one that notice that the place where Clem's hair parts shifted and changed in ANF? Then again, I'm one of those spot-the-detail-nobody-else-saw-and-over-analyze-it types.

    DabigRG posted: »

    Maybe, but probably not. Cause it's some of the only interesting things left about her, tbh. Also, I'm sorry, but did you say the correct position of her hair?

  • Wow, I messed the tense of that reply there, didn't i?

    Am I the only one that notice that the place where Clem's hair parts shifted and changed in ANF?

    ...Probably not, all things considered.

    eRock92 posted: »

    Yeah. Am I the only one that notice that the place where Clem's hair parts shifted and changed in ANF? Then again, I'm one of those spot-the-detail-nobody-else-saw-and-over-analyze-it types.

  • Does anyone else realizes that just because the location is at a boarding school doesn't mean that the place is run like a boarding school? I didn't see Prescott in ANF directing take-offs and taxing flights. The cabin group from S2 weren't a bunch of lumberjacks. Carver's community at Howe's weren't home improvement experts. The group in S1 wasn't performing room service at the motel. The location in the game doesn't necessarily dictate the type of community. And yes, I know one of the concept picks says grandmaster's room. That doesn't necessarily mean that it's a teacher or principle's room.

  • edited April 2018

    I think you’ve been hitting the kool aid a little too hard. If they want information to remain exclusive so it would have been worth it for those who spent money to be there instead of watching the entire thing at home for free, then they can. It’s their game, not ours.

    its the truth " STOP DEFENDING WHAT IS NOT DEFENSIBLE "

  • We bought their games, and most of the buyers were not there, people living in Europe can not go to Boston to see 4 minutes of a gameplay, we give them money, we trust them. "Hey, you who buy our games, you will not watch the gameplay because you're not in PAX kkk" It seems that only those who are a real fan were in PAX. Sorry for my english

    Melton23 posted: »

    I think you’ve been hitting the kool aid a little too hard. If they want information to remain exclusive so it would have been worth it for

  • It doesn’t matter if we buy the games, they MAKE the games and I can tell you that making games definitely isn’t cheap.

    We bought their games, and most of the buyers were not there, people living in Europe can not go to Boston to see 4 minutes of a gameplay, w

  • While I understand your position, how would you feel if you paid hundreds of dollars to attend an event and then everything revealed was available to everyone else for free? Wouldn't you feel cheated? Again, I understand your position here, as I too was disappointed about the "exclusive" footage, but it's been leaked online. It's not too hard to find it.

    All that said, @telltale, perhaps a better way to handle PAX/E3/whatever exclusive rewards for attendees is not information that is not supposed to leave the room, but perhaps some swag. Nothing overly lavish, maybe some of those funko pop things or some shirts or even a code for a free game of choice (except for the game being showcased), redeemable on the TellTale website, which then gives a steam code to redeem the chosen game via steam? Something small like that so attendees do get something exclusive to them but the rest of the world doesn't feel like they missed out (well except for those extra entitled people who feel like they should have everything just because someone else got it, too).

    We bought their games, and most of the buyers were not there, people living in Europe can not go to Boston to see 4 minutes of a gameplay, w

  • Thank you for talking in peace.

    While I understand your position, how would you feel if you paid hundreds of dollars to attend an event and then everything revealed was ava

  • It's the consumer money that pays them to make new games.

    Melton23 posted: »

    It doesn’t matter if we buy the games, they MAKE the games and I can tell you that making games definitely isn’t cheap.

  • Which is a fuck all amount of money in the first place. I’m not gonna pay $20 for a game and then get pissed only because the developers, the people who put their time and effort in an attempt to entertain us, held a single exclusive event that would be worthwhile for those who actually spent money to go. When they create their games I doubt they had constant whining on their minds over the smallest things that mean absolutely nothing, most of the info was going to get leaked soon after anyway so why are you even bothered?

    It's the consumer money that pays them to make new games.

  • It seems that what really matters is PAX money, and NOT your real fans, it's very sad

    Melton23 posted: »

    Which is a fuck all amount of money in the first place. I’m not gonna pay $20 for a game and then get pissed only because the developers, th

  • I'm gonn laugh if there actually is an old account for @telltale.

    While I understand your position, how would you feel if you paid hundreds of dollars to attend an event and then everything revealed was ava

  • In the end, it all boils down to profit just like any capitalist company. The problem is that we, our fans and our consumers put a lot of passion into our pleasures.

    It seems that what really matters is PAX money, and NOT your real fans, it's very sad

  • What are you talking about? I’ve always seen it as ripping people off by charging them a fuck load of money to attend an event in person when you can always watch it online for free, with better quality, better audio and there’s replay value, so giving those who actually paid for the information more news than people who watched it for free and who still got at least most of the news, it extremely fair, and it isn’t opinion it’s fact.

    It seems that what really matters is PAX money, and NOT your real fans, it's very sad

  • Everyone watching for free, and still being humiliated by Greg. FAIR

    Melton23 posted: »

    What are you talking about? I’ve always seen it as ripping people off by charging them a fuck load of money to attend an event in person whe

  • edited April 2018

    Yeah, real humiliating having someone tell you that if you wanted to see the full information fair hand you should have showed up. That’s half-assed, not unfair. The definition of unfair is to go against acting for equality, he only remarks that if you wanted more info n an EXCLUSIVE event then you should have attended, I admit it was extremely cheeky but it was not in any way shape or form unfair for the circumstances.

    Everyone watching for free, and still being humiliated by Greg. FAIR

  • lol I doubt they'd monitor such an account. Also I didn't know it would tag like that. I wasn't trying to do that.

    DabigRG posted: »

    I'm gonn laugh if there actually is an old account for @telltale.

  • /curto

    Sharples65 posted: »

    "They just cut the stream to show the people at PAX some stuff" PaxMod said this

  • Maybe we should petition Telltale to produce a RE based on the first three?

    AronDracula posted: »

    Is this TWD or Resident Evil?

  • That is the sort of personality that Greg Miller has. I think that if it were a different host then viewers may not have been as upset as they were. I liked Greg Miller but I wasn't a major fan of what he said. But yeah you are correct. They have been saying for weeks it was PAX Exclusive so we shouldn't be as disappointed

    Melton23 posted: »

    Yeah, real humiliating having someone tell you that if you wanted to see the full information fair hand you should have showed up. That’s ha

  • DeltinoDeltino Moderator

    That is the sort of personality that Greg Miller has. I think that if it were a different host then viewers may not have been as upset as they were.

    Daily reminder that when he worked at IGN, he took points off Around Every Corner for having too much Ben

    That is the sort of personality that Greg Miller has. I think that if it were a different host then viewers may not have been as upset as th

  • edited April 2018

    Did he actually? I am not defending him as he was horrible to Twitch viewers but he always had that aspect of his personality. I also meant that if there was a different host that they wouldn't have rubbed it in viewers' face like Greg did

    Deltino posted: »

    That is the sort of personality that Greg Miller has. I think that if it were a different host then viewers may not have been as upset as th

Sign in to comment in this discussion.