Elanor is extremely sorry for what she did with being a traitor in season 3 and shows up to your well armed and fortified fortress looking f… moreor retribution and safety. She is a great nurse for injured members of your community. She also confesses she has romantic feelings for you and always did and maybe wants to take it to new levels. What do you do?
A. Say "This is for Tripp" before punching her in the throat
B. Allow her in and forgive her but don't pursue the romance
C. Let her in and pursue romance with her
Pretend Javier doesn't have Kate.
Elanor is extremely sorry for what she did with being a traitor in season 3 and shows up to your well armed and fortified fortress looking f… moreor retribution and safety. She is a great nurse for injured members of your community. She also confesses she has romantic feelings for you and always did and maybe wants to take it to new levels. What do you do?
A. Say "This is for Tripp" before punching her in the throat
B. Allow her in and forgive her but don't pursue the romance
C. Let her in and pursue romance with her
Pretend Javier doesn't have Kate.
Now here's a depressing one:
If every single one of your loved ones die in a split second and you have absolutely no one but yourself...would you rather search for a new life in a dead world or just end it.
Unfortunately, I might just take him and run for a while.
Of course, ignoring the fact that my brother is currently in his early 20s..
@Zombiekiller3121 If your friend/loved one was dying, and you didn't have a gun.
Would you rather: Stab/bash them in the head to stop them from turning or let them turn?
Wait for em to get either delirious or willing enough to have them take a moment or two of silence to get at peace and then finishing them as swiftly or concisely as humanely possible.
@Explodingkittens971 You have an infected wound. Your best friend also has an infected wound, but they are doing far worse than you and probably won’t live even if given antibiotics. If you get antibiotics, you’ll probably live. You only have enough of the medication for one person. Would you rather save it for yourself or give it to your friend in a desperate attempt to save them?
Oh shit...um, I'd probably try to split the dosage amongst the two of us after finding a safe place to rest.
@Tornado31619 Would you rather work for Carver at Howe’s with near-guaranteed safety from walkers, or be left out in the open, vulnerable but free and dignified? Doesn’t specifically have to be Carver or Howe’s.
Fuck Carver, but I might be inclined to spend some time at such a place if I'm desperate.
The revolution may be in the makings though.
Assuming I'm chopping my arm off right after the bite, I would do that. If it's not right then, then I might as well die from the bite slowe… morer from the infectious bite and become a walker.
Would you rather: sacrifice your baby brother to a group of raiders and forever keep your well-run, high quality of life, and clean settlement with a near unending food supply or keep your baby brother and allow the raiders to destroy such a settlement and kill all the people in it while you two make it out alive, while not knowing where to go next?
At the moment where I lost everyone, I guess I would continue on. But, if I encounter something really dangerous, a horde of walkers or a bandit gang, I wouldn't give much of an effort to protect myself. Just whatever happens will happen.
Now here's a depressing one:
If every single one of your loved ones die in a split second and you have absolutely no one but yourself...would you rather search for a new life in a dead world or just end it.
Wew lad, this is too personal but I'll answer anyways, I love them both the same, they're both great and I can't imagine my life without any one of them so.. It's more of "who's more capable" in that case, which means I'd save my dad.
You know, as much of a lying scumbag she was, she's still kind of cute. And there aren't exactly a lot of those left. So I'd probably get one of my associates to throw her into an interrogation room and make sure she doesn't have any ties with other groups or is acting as a spy to be a backstabbing scumbag once more. If she turns out to actually be a spy for another group, then option A. If she is truly not a being a traitorous snake and is really all alone, then option C.
Elanor is extremely sorry for what she did with being a traitor in season 3 and shows up to your well armed and fortified fortress looking f… moreor retribution and safety. She is a great nurse for injured members of your community. She also confesses she has romantic feelings for you and always did and maybe wants to take it to new levels. What do you do?
A. Say "This is for Tripp" before punching her in the throat
B. Allow her in and forgive her but don't pursue the romance
C. Let her in and pursue romance with her
Pretend Javier doesn't have Kate.
Suppose your group became desperate and ran out of resources, and stole some goods from another settlement and thought that they got away with it scot-free. However, it turns out that as you escaped the settlement, one of your group members shot and killed one of the members of the other settlement, while the settlement leader witnessed it. The settlement tracks you and launches a surprise ambush onto your group at night, and rounds up everyone into a firing line, taking your groups' weapons before anyone had a chance to fire. The other settlement leader then asks your entire group a question and makes a deal:
"I know that at least one of you stole from us and killed one of us. I should execute all of you for that. However, I'll make all of you an offer. I believe in an eye for an eye. If the guilty party admits their crime by saying 'it was me', we'll kill whoever they were and forget this ever happened again. If, however, no one admits to their crime, we will kill all of you."
Suppose the settlement leader will be faithful to his deal. You know it wasn't you who did it, but you are unsure if whoever actually did it will admit it. Would you rather: take the fall for the group, guaranteeing your group's protection while knowingly dying for a crime you didn't commit, or say nothing, hoping that the guilty member comes forward and preserving the rest of your group while saving your life, while also taking the risk the guilty member won't admit it and you, along with the rest of your group, will be executed.
Also, another question.
Suppose your group became desperate and ran out of resources, and stole some goods from another settlement and th… moreought that they got away with it scot-free. However, it turns out that as you escaped the settlement, one of your group members shot and killed one of the members of the other settlement, while the settlement leader witnessed it. The settlement tracks you and launches a surprise ambush onto your group at night, and rounds up everyone into a firing line, taking your groups' weapons before anyone had a chance to fire. The other settlement leader then asks your entire group a question and makes a deal:
"I know that at least one of you stole from us and killed one of us. I should execute all of you for that. However, I'll make all of you an offer. I believe in an eye for an eye. If the guilty party admits their crime by saying 'it was me', we'll kill whoever they were and forget this ever happened again.… [view original content]
You aren't in a position to open fire. They've already lined everyone in position and taken all your guns. If anyone tries anything, they'll shoot all of you instantly.
Would you rather: take the fall for the group, guaranteeing your group's protection while knowingly dying for a crime you didn't commit, or say nothing, hoping that the guilty member comes forward and preserving the rest of your group while saving your life
I'll die whether or not the guilty one says "it was me" so I guess we're all dying.
Also, another question.
Suppose your group became desperate and ran out of resources, and stole some goods from another settlement and th… moreought that they got away with it scot-free. However, it turns out that as you escaped the settlement, one of your group members shot and killed one of the members of the other settlement, while the settlement leader witnessed it. The settlement tracks you and launches a surprise ambush onto your group at night, and rounds up everyone into a firing line, taking your groups' weapons before anyone had a chance to fire. The other settlement leader then asks your entire group a question and makes a deal:
"I know that at least one of you stole from us and killed one of us. I should execute all of you for that. However, I'll make all of you an offer. I believe in an eye for an eye. If the guilty party admits their crime by saying 'it was me', we'll kill whoever they were and forget this ever happened again.… [view original content]
Would you rather: take the fall for the group, guaranteeing your group's protection while knowingly dying for a crime you didn't commit, or … moresay nothing, hoping that the guilty member comes forward and preserving the rest of your group while saving your life
I'll die whether or not the guilty one says "it was me" so I guess we're all dying.
You aren't in a position to open fire. They've already lined everyone in position and taken all your guns. If anyone tries anything, they'll shoot all of you instantly.
Exactly. You either guarantee your death and guarantee your group's safety, or you take a high risk for your life, as well as your group's safety, hoping the guilty one will admit their crime. If they don't, though, everyone dies.
Exactly. You either guarantee your death and guarantee your group's safety, or you take a high risk for your life, as well as your group's safety, hoping the guilty one will admit their crime. If they don't, though, everyone dies.
"You have an infected wound. Your best friend also has an infected wound, but they are doing far worse than you and probably won’t live even if given antibiotics. If you get antibiotics, you’ll probably live. You only have enough of the medication for one person. Would you rather save it for yourself or give it to your friend in a desperate attempt to save them?"
I would give it to my best friend in a heartbeat. If it was anyone else except for my sibling I’d save them for myself but there are a few people I’m extremely loyal to and I don’t see the reason to keep living if you have no loved ones, plus the guilt of letting them die would probably haunt you for the rest of your life. It’s better to take the risk of enchancing both of our chances of survival even if it means putting myself in harm’s way.
I'd give them all to myself in a heartbeat. It's either risking two lives for death or guaranteeing one life and making death probable for another one. Any rational individual should know, especially in a zombie apocalypse, self-preservation should be the number one goal, not being compassionate to the point that you have a good chance of dying. Even if it was a loved one, that's no excuse for me to die too.
"You have an infected wound. Your best friend also has an infected wound, but they are doing far worse than you and probably won’t live even… more if given antibiotics. If you get antibiotics, you’ll probably live. You only have enough of the medication for one person. Would you rather save it for yourself or give it to your friend in a desperate attempt to save them?"
I would give it to my best friend in a heartbeat. If it was anyone else except for my sibling I’d save them for myself but there are a few people I’m extremely loyal to and I don’t see the reason to keep living if you have no loved ones, plus the guilt of letting them die would probably haunt you for the rest of your life. It’s better to take the risk of enchancing both of our chances of survival even if it means putting myself in harm’s way.
fucks with with yall mfs? lotta interestin answers in here
this a rly diverse community
When my mom died my dad laughed
ok...
abusive father
ok...
Straight stuff is blehh to me.
ok...
fucks with with yall mfs? lotta interestin answers in here
this a rly diverse community
When my mom died my dad laughed
ok...
abusive father
ok...
Straight stuff is blehh to me.
ok...
I'm too tight and playing ANF so was imagining Prescott.
So it's a Negan situation. Am I Rick? I mean I'd probably take the blame but if I'm the leader it's kind of my duty.
"You have an infected wound. Your best friend also has an infected wound, but they are doing far worse than you and probably won’t live even… more if given antibiotics. If you get antibiotics, you’ll probably live. You only have enough of the medication for one person. Would you rather save it for yourself or give it to your friend in a desperate attempt to save them?"
Depends, you say that my friend has no chance at all to live and I'll only live if I get the antibiotics? Then I would use them on me, best way on asking this is that his chances to live are just worse than mine and I will be able to live without them but not 100%, if it was that case I'd use them on my friend so we have a chance to live together. I'll repeat myself though, in the case you mention I'd use them on me.
Would you rather join a big evil group like the Saviors, have to do little to nothing and have everything (like a King) or join a smaller group of decent people li… [view original content]
Alright, I've made enough responses to other posters' questions. So, now I'll propose another 'would you rather question:
You've contracted a bad case of botulism, which is causing your body to rapidly deteriorate, after having eaten a tainted can of food that you found after having been starving for several days. However, it is still treatable. In order to treat your case of botulism, you need 1 antibiotic pill to kill the bacteria, as well as 1 sedative pill to prevent your body from going into shock. Your group happens to stumble upon what appears to be a recently abandoned camp, which has a medicine cabinet. On the medicine cabinet is labelled how many antibiotic pills, as well as how many sedative pills there are, with the most recent label being "2 antibiotic 2 sedatives." Upon opening the cabinet, you find a total of 4 pills. However, all of the pills are identical to one another. If you end up taking 2 antibiotic pills, you will die within minutes from excessive shock. If you end up taking 2 sedative pills, you will die due to an overly reduced functioning of organs caused by the pill. If you take more than 2 pills in total, you will die from intoxication. However, you have no idea when your group will find another medicine cabinet.
Would you rather:
A. Take a risk with the current pills in the medicine cabinet, possibly saving your life or immediately killing yourself. B. Hope that your group will find another medicine cabinet with more clearly labelled drugs soon, knowing that you could die before your group finds another one.
Alright, I've made enough responses to other posters' questions. So, now I'll propose another 'would you rather question:
You've contract… moreed a bad case of botulism, which is causing your body to rapidly deteriorate, after having eaten a tainted can of food that you found after having been starving for several days. However, it is still treatable. In order to treat your case of botulism, you need 1 antibiotic pill to kill the bacteria, as well as 1 sedative pill to prevent your body from going into shock. Your group happens to stumble upon what appears to be a recently abandoned camp, which has a medicine cabinet. On the medicine cabinet is labelled how many antibiotic pills, as well as how many sedative pills there are, with the most recent label being "2 antibiotic 2 sedatives." Upon opening the cabinet, you find a total of 4 pills. However, all of the pills are identical to one another. If you end up taking 2 antibiotic pills, you will d… [view original content]
Suppose you and your group have found an abandoned farm and have decided to set up your new settlement there. However, all of the original crops in the field have been destroyed due to the elements. Luckily, your group finds a box of seeds and promptly replants the field. However, you're not sure how to manage the new massive crop field. Would you rather:
A. Set up the field as one massive communal farm, where everyone is expected to work and maintain the field for the entire group.
B. Divide up the field such that each group member gets their own small food plot, which they are expected to maintain on their own and may not steal from other group members' plots.
Suppose you and your group have found an abandoned farm and have decided to set up your new settlement there. However, all of the original c… morerops in the field have been destroyed due to the elements. Luckily, your group finds a box of seeds and promptly replants the field. However, you're not sure how to manage the new massive crop field. Would you rather:
A. Set up the field as one massive communal farm, where everyone is expected to work and maintain the field for the entire group.
B. Divide up the field such that each group member gets their own small food plot, which they are expected to maintain on their own and may not steal from other group members' plots.
Comments
That seems just a tad too specific near the end, but
B.
I'd let her in and maybe see how things work down the road.
Not gonna lie, got a chuckle outta how straightforward yet random this is.
Wait, what?
I think d is if he does have Kate new world new rules.
But I'd forgive her.
Ha-ha, my [wo]man knows!
Remember what our boat god said:
"You don't just end it because its hard, you stick it out and help the people you care about."
So yeah, as much as it would've hurt me, I would've tried to find another people to care about.
Unfortunately, I might just take him and run for a while.
Of course, ignoring the fact that my brother is currently in his early 20s..
Wait for em to get either delirious or willing enough to have them take a moment or two of silence to get at peace and then finishing them as swiftly or concisely as humanely possible.
Oh shit...um, I'd probably try to split the dosage amongst the two of us after finding a safe place to rest.
Fuck Carver, but I might be inclined to spend some time at such a place if I'm desperate.
The revolution may be in the makings though.
I'd chop off my arm then use it as a weapon.
Save my mom, for sure, even though he would be more handy in a survival situation.
At the moment where I lost everyone, I guess I would continue on. But, if I encounter something really dangerous, a horde of walkers or a bandit gang, I wouldn't give much of an effort to protect myself. Just whatever happens will happen.
Wew lad, this is too personal but I'll answer anyways, I love them both the same, they're both great and I can't imagine my life without any one of them so.. It's more of "who's more capable" in that case, which means I'd save my dad.
You know, as much of a lying scumbag she was, she's still kind of cute. And there aren't exactly a lot of those left. So I'd probably get one of my associates to throw her into an interrogation room and make sure she doesn't have any ties with other groups or is acting as a spy to be a backstabbing scumbag once more. If she turns out to actually be a spy for another group, then option A. If she is truly not a being a traitorous snake and is really all alone, then option C.
L3FT.E?
Also, another question.
Suppose your group became desperate and ran out of resources, and stole some goods from another settlement and thought that they got away with it scot-free. However, it turns out that as you escaped the settlement, one of your group members shot and killed one of the members of the other settlement, while the settlement leader witnessed it. The settlement tracks you and launches a surprise ambush onto your group at night, and rounds up everyone into a firing line, taking your groups' weapons before anyone had a chance to fire. The other settlement leader then asks your entire group a question and makes a deal:
"I know that at least one of you stole from us and killed one of us. I should execute all of you for that. However, I'll make all of you an offer. I believe in an eye for an eye. If the guilty party admits their crime by saying 'it was me', we'll kill whoever they were and forget this ever happened again. If, however, no one admits to their crime, we will kill all of you."
Suppose the settlement leader will be faithful to his deal. You know it wasn't you who did it, but you are unsure if whoever actually did it will admit it. Would you rather: take the fall for the group, guaranteeing your group's protection while knowingly dying for a crime you didn't commit, or say nothing, hoping that the guilty member comes forward and preserving the rest of your group while saving your life, while also taking the risk the guilty member won't admit it and you, along with the rest of your group, will be executed.
Open fire. You can't show weakness. Once they bend you over and make you their bitch once they'll come back for more.
You aren't in a position to open fire. They've already lined everyone in position and taken all your guns. If anyone tries anything, they'll shoot all of you instantly.
I'll die whether or not the guilty one says "it was me" so I guess we're all dying.
If the guilty one does say it was me, you'll live, along with everyone else except the guilty one. That's the risk you're taking, though.
I'm too tight and playing ANF so was imagining Prescott.
So it's a Negan situation. Am I Rick? I mean I'd probably take the blame but if I'm the leader it's kind of my duty.
There's no guarantee he'll do it
Exactly. You either guarantee your death and guarantee your group's safety, or you take a high risk for your life, as well as your group's safety, hoping the guilty one will admit their crime. If they don't, though, everyone dies.
Isn't this just an artsy version of The Prisoners dilemma
Yes, it's kind of similar to that.
Bitch me too. The fuck.
"You have an infected wound. Your best friend also has an infected wound, but they are doing far worse than you and probably won’t live even if given antibiotics. If you get antibiotics, you’ll probably live. You only have enough of the medication for one person. Would you rather save it for yourself or give it to your friend in a desperate attempt to save them?"
I would give it to my best friend in a heartbeat. If it was anyone else except for my sibling I’d save them for myself but there are a few people I’m extremely loyal to and I don’t see the reason to keep living if you have no loved ones, plus the guilt of letting them die would probably haunt you for the rest of your life. It’s better to take the risk of enchancing both of our chances of survival even if it means putting myself in harm’s way.
I'd give them all to myself in a heartbeat. It's either risking two lives for death or guaranteeing one life and making death probable for another one. Any rational individual should know, especially in a zombie apocalypse, self-preservation should be the number one goal, not being compassionate to the point that you have a good chance of dying. Even if it was a loved one, that's no excuse for me to die too.
fucks with with yall mfs? lotta interestin answers in here
this a rly diverse community
ok...
ok...
ok...
LMFAO
...
thats fine
,its just that everyone here seems fucked up in some way,nothin wrong with that tho,just sayin
True enough. I mean, what would make us unique if we weren't all fucked up in some way?
...
"too tight."
Um...ok...
Didn't say I couldn't do that, right?
I'd rather be an evil king that a kindly peasant barely being able to survive.
Kill her. My policy is that dying better than being reanimated. At least when you're downed, you're not a threat anymore.
O_O
Alright. Interesting opinion.
Alright, I've made enough responses to other posters' questions. So, now I'll propose another 'would you rather question:
You've contracted a bad case of botulism, which is causing your body to rapidly deteriorate, after having eaten a tainted can of food that you found after having been starving for several days. However, it is still treatable. In order to treat your case of botulism, you need 1 antibiotic pill to kill the bacteria, as well as 1 sedative pill to prevent your body from going into shock. Your group happens to stumble upon what appears to be a recently abandoned camp, which has a medicine cabinet. On the medicine cabinet is labelled how many antibiotic pills, as well as how many sedative pills there are, with the most recent label being "2 antibiotic 2 sedatives." Upon opening the cabinet, you find a total of 4 pills. However, all of the pills are identical to one another. If you end up taking 2 antibiotic pills, you will die within minutes from excessive shock. If you end up taking 2 sedative pills, you will die due to an overly reduced functioning of organs caused by the pill. If you take more than 2 pills in total, you will die from intoxication. However, you have no idea when your group will find another medicine cabinet.
Would you rather:
A. Take a risk with the current pills in the medicine cabinet, possibly saving your life or immediately killing yourself.
B. Hope that your group will find another medicine cabinet with more clearly labelled drugs soon, knowing that you could die before your group finds another one.
Easy, I would cut all the pills in half and eat half of every pill
Suppose you and your group have found an abandoned farm and have decided to set up your new settlement there. However, all of the original crops in the field have been destroyed due to the elements. Luckily, your group finds a box of seeds and promptly replants the field. However, you're not sure how to manage the new massive crop field. Would you rather:
A. Set up the field as one massive communal farm, where everyone is expected to work and maintain the field for the entire group.
B. Divide up the field such that each group member gets their own small food plot, which they are expected to maintain on their own and may not steal from other group members' plots.
A.
cuz otherwise someone gon b like "mf,u stole my shit!" and theyll start killin each other
so a the best/safest option