The most messed up game ever

edited September 2009 in General Chat
IGN wrote:
US, September 23, 2009 - What's the purpose of playing videogames? Entertainment? Escape? Release? Reward? If you picked the last one, you won't want to play Lose/Lose, an art project wrapped in the skin of a downloadable game.

Created by New York City-based digital artist Zach Gage, Lose/Lose gives real-world consequences to the now mundane act of blasting aliens, something most of us have been trained to do since middle school. The premise is both simple and paradoxical: You're a spaceship captain on a quest to kill attacking aliens. Kill them all without dying, and you win. But for each alien you kill, a file on your computer is deleted. If you are killed, the game itself is destroyed.
SERIOUSLY, do not play this game. It will permanently destroy files on your computer. This is not a joke. You have been warned. - Ed.

Yep, you read that right. Lose/Lose procedurally generates the aliens from files on your computer. So essentially, you are creating the game from your personal files and destroying them one by one.

Or, in other words, you're killing things that are real in order to succeed in killing things that are fake. Then again, are the files on your computer actually real in any real sense? OK, my brain hurts now.

My 800GB collection of LOLGundams is far too precious to risk playing Lose/Lose, so I'll admit to not trying it. And I in no way recommend that you do, either. But you can watch a short video of Lose/Lose being played below to get a sense of how it works. Here's how Gage describes it:


Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player.

Too precious to risk.
This calls into question the player's mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land?

Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it, that doing so is right?

By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data? What implications does trusting something so important to something we understand so poorly have?


There are more than 35 entries in the High Score section of the Lose/Lose website, ranging from 1 to 4,294,967,295 aliens killed. These are either brave and reckless souls, or tech-savvy gamers who've found a way to play without losing files they actually care about. Unless you fall into the latter category, don't try this one at home.

http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/102/1027666p1.html

Comments

  • edited September 2009
    Sounds like a pretentious computer virus.
  • edited September 2009
    I think it is genius.... it shows that violence is not alway the answer & more often than not causes more problems then it solves.
  • edited September 2009
    Sounds like a pretentious computer virus.

    Pretentious sounds about right, but an interesting idea. Except that they tell you not to play it and expose the lesson before it's learned. I'm half tempted to set up a VM with a couple hundred thousand 1 byte text files and try it out, except that it really doesn't look any better than Spheres of Chaos, so... you know, just play that.
  • edited September 2009
    I think it is genius.... it shows that violence is not alway the answer & more often than not causes more problems then it solves.

    That's wank.

    It's just a silly virus game.

    It's trying to convey a message, but people are just reading into it too much. It's not insightful, it's a virus.
  • edited September 2009
    I think it is genius.... it shows that violence is not alway the answer & more often than not causes more problems then it solves.

    I'll have to go with Robert on this one. I find it a clever way of teaching us that violence is a stupid thing. It may be taken a bit to the extreme, but still... if it's a virus disguised as a game, I think it's the second virus I trully agree with.
    The first one would be the virus that deletes stupid music (like Manele) from your computer. It was developed by a romanian and it is aimed at teaching people to listen to quality stuff.

    For those who don't know what "manele" are, check this link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manele
  • edited September 2009
    I'll have to go with Robert on this one. I find it a clever way of teaching us that violence is a stupid thing. It may be taken a bit to the extreme, but still... if it's a virus disguised as a game, I think it's the second virus I trully agree with.
    The first one would be the virus that deletes stupid music (like Manele) from your computer. It was developed by a romanian and it is aimed at teaching people to listen to quality stuff.

    For those who don't know what "manele" are, check this link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manele

    Its nice to have someone on here agree with me for once =)

    Would that Romanian happen to be.... YOU!!!! *Points Finger of Accusation*
  • edited September 2009
    I'm sure it's art on some level and trying to make some kind of point, but i'll be damned if I give it a go
  • edited September 2009
    Wait, people are agreeing that getting a virus on your computers is a good thing? Yes, please enlighten me and fck up my computer!

    You guys should go buy a copy, right now!
  • edited September 2009
    I think it is genius.... it shows that violence is not alway the answer & more often than not causes more problems then it solves.

    Heh. Violence solves everything - even in real life.

    A little common sense is not hard to come by.:p
  • edited September 2009
    Hare Krishna and all that crap. When the alien invasion comes, I'm not sitting under the death ray naked with a cardboard "piece" sign. And I don't need a game to preach how shooting little pictures on a computer screen is a bad thing. Computer games are a way to release your violent nature or relax - to just make you feel better. Why would I want to be punished for having fun or for letting my anger on a bunch of pixels? This is a stupid game and I hate how it tries to preach a lame message in such a pretentious way.
  • WillWill Telltale Alumni
    edited September 2009
    I'm with Robert on this one. As art projects go, this is a pretty nifty one. I'd hesitate to call this a virus though. It seems like the mechanics of the game are made well known beforehand. If you run it, you know perfectly well what the results will be.
  • edited September 2009
    Will wrote: »
    I'm with Robert on this one. I'd hesitate to call this a virus though. It seems like the mechanics of the game are made well known beforehand. If you run it, you know perfectly well what the results will be.

    Aye, isn't the point supposed to be a game where violence has real-life consequences. Except that pile of dungbuckets Gamer with Gerard Butler did that already and it was a pile of sh
    oes
  • edited September 2009
    It isn't a virus - it doesn't replicate it self and spread to other machines. And it's not a Trojan Horse - there is no surprise to what it does.

    Think of it more as performance art. It's a very peculiar way to make the player identify with the opposite perception of their actions 'shooting bad guys'.

    Really this may appeal to some - just like the rush from extreme sports or maybe even the lottery... :)

    /Suds
Sign in to comment in this discussion.