Massive Sam and Max Copyright infringement.
A friend and myself were surfing through the net when we found this http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4245498
Two people are using the Sam and Max characters unlicensed to create a side scrolling beat'em up game, and are charging people from the furry fandom $50 to add their characters to said game.
This is profiting off the Sam and Max character names and franchise and a blatent copyright infringement.
I didn't know where else to post this.
-Shawni :mad:
Two people are using the Sam and Max characters unlicensed to create a side scrolling beat'em up game, and are charging people from the furry fandom $50 to add their characters to said game.
This is profiting off the Sam and Max character names and franchise and a blatent copyright infringement.
I didn't know where else to post this.
-Shawni :mad:
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Furries are gross and this is illegal!
But yeah, this probably violates copyright rules.
Do you know what furries are?
The kind that draw those inappropriate pictures of animals? Because that's disgusting.
Yeah, disgusting, eh?
Yeah because Steve Purcell all the time draws porn! -_- I was trying to avoid saying that term. Inappropriate was the keyword. So, no not Steve Purcell by any stretch of the imagination!
But yup, Steve Purcell draws furry work. Maybe it's you who got the definition wrong? (also, feel free to browse the other similarly named thread for the huge discussion...)
He doesn't have any human features added on does he? Than no it's not inappropriate. Rabbits are always naked.
I don't think I'll do that. I don't really want to get into it. The subject is too gross to me and I only kind of know what a furry is. All I've really seen is some gross Sonic picture by accident.
I was trying to avoid the word d!ck ok?
So?
But, you're not responding to what I said about the Sonic art so, you're clearly avoiding it.
Yeah. Sorry about that. I got carried away at the Steve Purcell comparison. Also, furries really creep me out.