«1

Comments

  • edited May 2011
    horrornerd.gif
  • edited May 2011
    And there I was thinking that my good self was 50% responsible for the title of this thread.

    Having read the details, I have this to say; more chicken feed for the idiotic masses.
  • edited May 2011
    Somebody nuke these gorram frakking sons of bitches.
  • edited May 2011
    Two words:
    Natural Selection
  • edited May 2011
    Oh no, not again.

    I like parodies, but only when they're actually funny.
  • Blind SniperBlind Sniper Moderator
    edited May 2011
    God help the suckers who pay to see this trash.

    Oh, I have an idea! Let's predict what they will poorly attempt to parody in this movie.

    I think we can expect parodies of...
    Charlie Sheen
    Tiger Woods
    Justin Bieber
    Rebecca Black
  • edited May 2011
    Scnew wrote: »
    horrornerd.gif

    2mxjpnd.jpg
  • edited May 2011
    Can't wait, most anticipated movie since Epic Movie, thumbs up, A++, will watch again
  • edited May 2011
    Charlie Sheen
    Tiger Woods
    Justin Bieber
    Rebecca Black

    Good list. Along with Antoine Dodson from the linked article, I also have a feeling Betty White will be mentioned in some fashion. And also someone you wouldn't expect to use Twitter will use Twitter at some point in the movie.

    These movies are so awful. I have never seen an entire one of these films, but having worked at a movie theater during the time period when most of them came out, I can vouch for them all being just absolutely awful. Meet the Spartans had an American Idol ending. Ugh.
  • edited May 2011
    Scnew wrote: »
    horrornerd.gif
    1239883733_Angry_Video_Game_Nerd.gif
  • edited May 2011
    Charlie Sheen
    Tiger Woods
    Justin Bieber
    Rebecca Black

    Donald Trump
    Any pop star that released a song in the past year
    Any movie from the past five years that was even mildly successful
    At least seven internet memes
    Osama Bin Laden
  • edited May 2011
    Oh joy, let another film to avoid, but avoiding the trailer(s) of said film will be nigh on impossible.

    This thread though has at least brought it to my attention who is responsible for these "films", though to be honest I never really put that much thought into it. For all I knew it was some computer just spitting out parody scripts from data garnered from current events.
  • edited May 2011
    Some of their earlier movies weren't that bad, they were actually entertaining, however their newest movies have been almost unwatchable...

    I tried to watch vampires suck, and it was so bad that I basically repressed the entire memory...
  • edited May 2011
    Some of their earlier movies weren't that bad, they were actually entertaining, however their newest movies have been almost unwatchable...

    I tried to watch vampires suck, and it was so bad that I basically repressed the entire memory...

    Their first movie:
    date_movie_ver3.jpg

    If you're going to do movies with 2 of the SIX writers from Scary Movie (which is okay, but not exactly another Airplane!), you would do it with the Wayans Brothers, not 'WE SHOULD MAKE THEM POOP AND FARY ON JUSTIN BIEBER' people.
  • edited May 2011
    Are they...serious? I must be dreaming, no wait i'm not!!!
    RobotnikNotHappy.jpg

    I may be a bit off subject here, but am I the only one who thinks the only thing good about Date Movie was that wedding planner scene?
  • edited May 2011
    Just to play devils advocate, those guys did Spy Hard, and I love Spy Hard and so should you.

    I think the whole spoof genre may have ran its course, at the very least it needs seriously revised
  • edited May 2011
    JedExodus wrote: »
    Just to play devils advocate, those guys did Spy Hard, and I love Spy Hard and so should you.

    ...oh my. What happened to them?!
  • edited May 2011
    Darkblader wrote: »
    Are they...serious? I must be dreaming, no wait i'm not!!!
    UWXW9.png

    I may be a bit off subject here, but am I the only one who thinks the only thing good about Date Movie was that wedding planner scene?

    Fixed.
  • edited May 2011
    JedExodus wrote: »
    Just to play devils advocate, those guys did Spy Hard, and I love Spy Hard and so should you.
    They... did? Oh god! Oh my gooooooooooood! I... I actually like that movie. Not as much as Wrongfully Accused, but still... where did they go wrong?
  • edited May 2011
    JedExodus wrote: »
    Just to play devils advocate, those guys did Spy Hard, and I love Spy Hard and so should you.

    Leslie Nielsen helped make Spy Hard a decent film. Plus I do love Al Yankovic's theme song as well.
  • edited May 2011
    Oh god not another one of those things that they call a movie. Many people told me to go see Vampires Suck due to the fact I hated Twilight. I told them "I could see all the twilight parodies on youtube for free. Why would I want to see a poorly written 2 hour version of something that is better in free short chunks?" The same can be said about any of they're movies.
  • edited May 2011
    There's a great review of Epic Movie on Bad Movie Beatdown which goes into great detail as to why these movies are so terrible. Tellingly, the review is funnier than the movie it's reviewing.
  • edited May 2011
    attachment.php?attachmentid=2575&stc=1&d=1306423805

    This pretty much sums up my feelings on Vampires Suck. I can't believe these people are still making movies! What baffles me even more is that people keep paying to see them.
  • edited May 2011
    The-J23 wrote: »
    I can't believe these people are still making movies! What baffles me even more is that people keep paying to see them.

    You haven't figured it out yet? Most people are moronic. Man, I wish I was joking but just take a glance at the film or music charts and you'll realise that I'm speaking the truth.
  • edited May 2011
    Oh, now you've prompted me to speak my personal mantra:

    People are stupid, but some are better at hiding it than others.

    People who go to see Seltzerburg movies aren't even trying to disguise how stupid they are.
  • edited May 2011
    People are stupid, but some are better at hiding it than others.

    Hey! I resemble that remark.
  • edited May 2011
    Davies wrote: »
    You haven't figured it out yet? Most people are moronic. Man, I wish I was joking but just take a glance at the film or music charts and you'll realise that I'm speaking the truth.

    Oh believe me, I know. Just seeing these movies is just too much idiocy for me to handle.
  • edited May 2011
    Davies wrote: »
    Hey! I resemble that remark.
    As do we all. As do we all.
  • edited May 2011
    The-J23 wrote: »

    This pretty much sums up my feelings on Vampires Suck. I can't believe these people are still making movies! What baffles me even more is that people keep paying to see them.

    My mind is blown that the guy was right. Vampires Suck DID make more money than Scott Pilgrim.
  • edited May 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    My mind is blown that the guy was right. Vampires Suck DID make more money than Scott Pilgrim.

    Because MY GOD, Scott Pilgrim is definately a good film that deserved to make tons of money. Definately.
  • edited May 2011
    Ribs wrote: »
    Because MY GOD, Scott Pilgrim is definately a good film that deserved to make tons of money. Definately.

    Learn to spell before you start mocking people.
  • edited May 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    My mind is blown that the guy was right. Vampires Suck DID make more money than Scott Pilgrim.

    That's the single worst movie related injustice I've ever seen =/
  • edited May 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    Learn to spell before you start mocking people.

    To be honest, Scott Pilgrim is not deserving of proper grammer or spelling in any respect.
  • edited May 2011
    Ribs wrote: »
    To be honest, Scott Pilgrim is not deserving of proper grammer or spelling in any respect.

    Regardless of how you feel about Scott Pilgrim(I personally thought it was great), you can't seriously say Vampires Suck is better.
  • edited May 2011
    Ribs wrote: »
    To be honest, Scott Pilgrim is not deserving of proper grammer or spelling in any respect.

    What's wrong with Scott Pilgrim?
    NOTHING
  • edited May 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    My mind is blown that the guy was right. Vampires Suck DID make more money than Scott Pilgrim.

    This... this hurts me...

    I, uh, need to go reevaluate my feelings on humanity. And by "reevaluate my feelings on humanity", I mean "eat the hearts of Friedberg and Seltzer".

    And for legal purposes, by "eat the hearts", I mean "donate money to an orphan puppy hospital".
  • edited May 2011

    That is a great example of why I hate the film. It was nothing and a lot of it was nonsensical.
  • edited May 2011
    Ooohhhh, I know... "Shaun of the Dead" was a classic and Simon Pegg is the De Niro of modern society. Viva-La-Crap-Taste-In-Movies, mo-fo. Kubrick has fuck all on Edgar Wright.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggXmKPMaHMo&NR=1
Sign in to comment in this discussion.