The Beatles suck

edited November 2011 in General Chat
Yes they do. It is true.

Comments

  • edited November 2011
    bobber, saying something sucks without any reason why will only delve into a flame war.

    If you want to say why you don't like the Beatles and start discussion, that's fine. But typing in "beatles suck" has no value to anybody. If you can't make this a discussion, rather than a flat opinion that goes nowhere, I will have to close this thread.

    Thanks.
  • edited November 2011
    I don't think Beetles can suck. I mean, their mouthparts are rigid and unyielding, which does not lend itself to the movements required for such an action. It's the exoskeleton, see?

    Primates can, though.
  • edited November 2011
    I should have put my reasons first. Harrison and Lennon are awful guitar players and singers, McCartney can't play for sh*t, and Ringo is only so-so. They're lyrics are also pretty stupid (except for Taxman), and I don't think anyone gives a damn who the Walrus was.
  • edited November 2011
    bobber, saying something sucks without any reason why will only delve into a flame war.

    If you want to say why you don't like the Beatles and start discussion, that's fine. But typing in "beatles suck" has no value to anybody. If you can't make this a discussion, rather than a flat opinion that goes nowhere, I will have to close this thread.

    Thanks.

    Just close it, man. Nothing to feel bad about. It's conceivable that there's a decent Beatles-related discussion to be had but it's certainly not going to occur in a thread that starts like this.
  • edited November 2011
    Since it seems that this conversation won't be going anywhere, I'm closing this thread. There's already a music thread and a guitarists thread, anyway.
This discussion has been closed.