PETA Strikes Again FTL

2»

Comments

  • edited November 2011
    PETA is the stupidest bunch of loons I've ever heard of in my life.

    Just last week they accused SeaWorld of violating the 13th amendment that abolished slavery. They say keeping Killer Whales and Dolphins in captivity is wrong. Even under the right circumstances. But, really? Doesn't the amendments only apply for human beings?

    And now this? Ridiculous!
  • edited November 2011
    I contribute to PETA but I don't agree with everything they do.
  • edited November 2011
    I would reconsider funding them if I were you, since one wonders how much money they spent developing that stupid Mario parody game.

    To spend time, money and effort protesting Mario accomplishes nothing at all.
  • edited November 2011
    shamuboy wrote: »
    Just last week they accused SeaWorld of violating the 13th amendment that abolished slavery. They say keeping Killer Whales and Dolphins in captivity is wrong. Even under the right circumstances. But, really? Doesn't the amendments only apply for human beings?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5AJ5xGaIdM&feature=related
  • edited November 2011
    I generally support them, especially their exposure of abuse practices in farms. For reference, I also support groups like Green Peace and the Sea Shepards.
  • edited November 2011
    The only way I can begin to rationalize this is to assume that they're not really objecting to Mario's use of animal-themed suits, but are merely using the parody as a platform to protest the use of fur in real life. I have to assume that they just do the video game parodies because they know that video game parodies will bring them some media attention, and not because they really believe that video games affect people's lifestyle decisions.

    On a tangentially related note, I had forgotten that the tanuki is a real animal. I had read that before, but for a while I've been thinking that they were purely a creature from Japanese folklore, which made this particular issue seem even more bizarre.
  • edited November 2011
    LuigiHann wrote: »
    The only way I can begin to rationalize this is to assume that they're not really objecting to Mario's use of animal-themed suits, but are merely using the parody as a platform to protest the use of fur in real life. I have to assume that they just do the video game parodies because they know that video game parodies will bring them some media attention, and not because they really believe that video games affect people's lifestyle decisions.

    On a tangentially related note, I had forgotten that the tanuki is a real animal. I had read that before, but for a while I've been thinking that they were purely a creature from Japanese folklore, which made this particular issue seem even more bizarre.
    This might be true. Remember Super Tofu Boy?
  • edited November 2011
    I don't think it was. I think this is just their way of issuing a retraction--by trying to play it all off as a joke.
  • edited November 2011
    Likewise, I can smell the back-pedalling a mile off.
  • edited November 2011
    Puh-lease. People would love the premise and gory execution if this were made by some random kid on Newgrounds, but just because PETA did it it has to be because they are overzealous and hate games..
  • edited November 2011
    I really don't think it was as extreme as SOME people made it out to be. I obviously don't think they were attacking Mario in any seriousness.
  • edited November 2011
    One never really knows. Remember when Roger Ebert trolled the gaming community on his blog last year?

    Some people just like to make a stink.
  • edited November 2011
    Scnew wrote: »
    Who actually funds PETA?

    I know a lot of people who donate to them without knowing how crazy their heads are.
  • edited November 2011
    I believe that there is a difference between eating meat and animal cruelty.
  • edited November 2011
    Peta wrote:
    "Our spoof is simply making a serious point: that there is a much darker story behind tanuki skins than Mario lets on. In games like Call of Duty, where characters shoot and kill animals, or in Dog Wars, where players have fun fighting and torturing dogs, it sends a dangerous message that this kind of behavior is acceptable."

    "Shooting and killing digital people is fine, but digital ANIMALS? Now you've crossed the line!"

    It's just so ridiculous. My buddy was telling me the other day that he was annoyed by the dog he bought in Skyrim so he decided to set it on fire. That hardly means he's going to go ignite real dogs, anymore than it means that me playing Assassins Creed means I'm going to practice my rooftop assassinations. I don't remember hearing about lots of kids trying to pit their pets against one another during the Pokemon craze.
  • edited November 2011
    Speak for yourself. I always used to make snails race against each other for my own entertainment and then force them to estivate for long periods of time.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.