Why did they kill........?

edited September 2012 in The Walking Dead
Carley? :(

Was it Drama?

Was it planned from the beginning?

Was it budget cuts?

Was it a short straw draw by the VAs?

Who would really know this answer?

Do we really want to know the answer?

Personally, I think the entire story was set in stone before they even started coding.
«1

Comments

  • edited September 2012
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    Carley? :(

    Was it Drama?

    Was it planned from the beginning?

    Was it budget cuts?

    Was it a short straw draw by the VAs?

    Who would really know this answer?

    Do we really want to know the answer?

    Personally, I think the entire story was set in stone before they even started coding.

    TT took a memo from Kirkman. U know how when he kills off a character that people care about, it usually effects a character in a big way. The question is, how did it effect you?
  • edited September 2012
    To not spend time having to do 2 stories, one with Doug and the other with carley!
    is what i think.
  • edited September 2012
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    Carley? :(

    Was it Drama?

    Was it planned from the beginning?

    Was it budget cuts?

    Was it a short straw draw by the VAs?

    Who would really know this answer?

    Do we really want to know the answer?

    Personally, I think the entire story was set in stone before they even started coding.

    See now think that they had episode 1 in stone and the ending because they said that but all of the others I think we had a little part in because after starved for help, when there show "next time on the walking dead" there's the part where there ALL standing in a line including Kenny so they must of but the zombie scene in because I feel until after episode 1 was when they thought, okay let's kill of so and so. (sorry I'm from England so my saying might not make sense)
  • edited September 2012
    SonnyN18 wrote: »
    TT took a memo from Kirkman. U know how when he kills off a character that people care about, it usually effects a character in a big way. The question is, how did it effect you?

    The reason why I hate the comics :rolleyes:. You can never get truly attached to a character, because they can always die in the next issue or something. This is giving me second thoughts about Clem.
  • edited September 2012
    Because its based off of a comic where people die. As simple as that.

    Then also because a fan favorite dieing stirs drama online, and its a pain to keep both her and Doug's storylines parallel like that, so they killed them off. Simple as that.
  • edited September 2012
    To not spend time having to do 2 stories, one with Doug and the other with carley!
    is what i think.

    agreed
  • edited September 2012
    The same reason why they killed Katjaa and Duck.

    Because it's The Walking Dead.
  • edited September 2012
    SonnyN18 wrote: »
    TT took a memo from Kirkman. U know how when he kills off a character that people care about, it usually effects a character in a big way. The question is, how did it effect you?

    Naw, that's not the reason. Otherwise they would only kill carley but let doug live. Doug was an OK guy, but clearly not as likable as Carley or the other likable characters (Clem, Mark..)

    IMO the reason they killed both doug and carley is to not have to do double work for EP4 and EP5. So far they had to make dialogue and cutscenes etc for both characters depending on who you choose to save.
    Killing both of them was the cheapest way to save time+money.
  • edited September 2012
    Pretty much the reason why everyone one is so annoyed is because that what ever you do in the choices doesn't matter I.e. if you save Carley instead of Doug she still dies, they did say that ep.4 is meant to have a pint where all you decisions will mater but we'll have to see
  • edited September 2012
    Writing everything in bold means I am right
  • edited September 2012
    Carley is dead.. Move on

    Now to the question. TT obviously know what they're doing if killing off one character can cause this outrage. To me this is a win for them, so I think it was planned.
  • edited September 2012
    Nah, I actually thought they've expected grieve rather than outrage.
  • edited September 2012
    I was as upset as most about Carley's death, and if anything it has taught me not to get too attached to the other characters in the group. This is a protective mechanism; it's very common in the human experience- think about warfare. Quite often veteran soldiers wouldn't bother to get to know the replacements sent to their units as they would probably get killed anyway, and the repeated trauma of losing close friends will eventually affect you psychologically and will hurt your chances of survival in the long run.

    My Lee made the plan with Clem to leave the group- Kenny is a broken reed, and Christa (I believe) made a comment that left me thinking that the group is not always the best idea. Ben? At best, utterly hopeless and at worst a gutless turncoat douchebag. Chuck? A big question mark.

    It's gonna have to be some sort of Rambo-esque Michonne type walker-killing warrior maiden to make me forget Carley. She was the best, and I don't expect another to come along with her timing. marksmanship and loyalty.

    So get used to characters dying. It's a huge shit sandwich and we're all gonna have to take a bite.
  • edited September 2012
    I wanted to believe it!!
    But do you believe that the shot did not kill her! What happens then? Gets her unconscious on the road, shot in the face in a world full of zombies.
    The chances are very very very small!!
    But I also wanted her to be alive.: D: D: D
  • edited September 2012
    They needed to kill her. It was planned and it's good that she's dead. I mean it's how shit goes, TWD Kills youre favorites. Deal the fuck with it, It's TWD, What did you expect? she'd last till episode 5? No. Never.
  • edited September 2012
    Ironically, it was probably planned before people actually got Episode 1... the fact she was a favorite was just an added bonus for TTG.
  • edited September 2012
    dubesor wrote: »
    Naw, that's not the reason. Otherwise they would only kill carley but let doug live. Doug was an OK guy, but clearly not as likable as Carley or the other likable characters (Clem, Mark..)

    IMO the reason they killed both doug and carley is to not have to do double work for EP4 and EP5. So far they had to make dialogue and cutscenes etc for both characters depending on who you choose to save.
    Killing both of them was the cheapest way to save time+money.

    But at the same time, if carley lives and Doug dies everyone who picked Carley would feel cheated because they would have essentially made a "wrong choice" in a game where there are no wrong choices. If Carley was to die at some point, Doug had to die near there as well.

    That's what adds to the drama and the tension of The Walking Dead, anyone can die at any time for any reason. You're never truly safe, just safer.
  • edited September 2012
    I think a lot of it is to challenge the level of comfort that most of us had built up with the original group. There was no-one more clear to contribute to that comfort than Doug/Carley. They were the one you CHOSE to save, and they have always followed you unquestioningly.

    One other thing I see from the Doug/Carley death was that sometimes the obvious doesn't always occur. One would ASSUME that Lilly would have pulled the gun on Kenny or Lee, or someone they care about, for retribution regarding her father. The unintended consequence of acting brashly was that a good person died.
  • edited September 2012
    winner wrote: »
    http://http://http://www.youtube.com/embed/sFxfglZsn7E

    you dont understand Carley is alive becouse this film show clearly she got

    shot in the left cheek if you see carefully this film film show carley is alive

    and this link show more peaple tell Carley must back to the game


    http://http://www.telltalegames.com/...958#post664958

    So many things wrong with this statement
    1. Being shot in the cheak does not mean she lives. That is still fatal
    2. She got NO medical attention, she would bleed out
    3. She doesn't even know where the group was headed! They decided to go to savanah AFTER she was left behind.
    4. She is unarmed so any walkers would kill her
    5. HER VOICE ACTOR HAS CONFIRMED SHE IS DEAD!

    But go ahead and stay in la la land, tell me how the chocolate milk made from unicorns tastes!
  • edited September 2012
    Let me explain to you something about storytelling. We have these things called "static" or "dynamic" characters. Characters like Kenny, Ben, and Lilly are dynamic characters, who we watch change and develop over the course of the story, as Kenny goes through the pain and shock of losing his family, or Ben as he struggles with guilt and fear of being the only survivor of his initial group and being part of another group that's barely hanging by a thread, partly due to his own actions. Lilly starts as a strong-headed woman who tries to take charge of her group of survivors, but she loses her grip as she comes unhinged and the other survivors just don't want to put up with her, and by the end of episode three she's scared and alone, having betrayed or been abandoned by everyone she should have been close to.

    Carley, by contrast, is a static character. She does not have a character arc or any significant development. She's a supporting character: a likable figure who, while she's part of the story, serves as a voice of reason and morality in the bleak, inhumane world of The Walking Dead. She mainly serves to give Lee a vote of confidence in episode 2 and to provide him an impetus for his own development in episode 3 via the whole "you should be honest about your past" thing, which is also part of the episode's overall theme about coming to grips with reality (mainly with what Chuck says about Clementine's chances of survival or Kenny needing to overcome his denial about Duck). This isn't to denigrate her characterization, but she is what she is - a static, supporting character. Larry and Mark are also static characters.

    This is why your "well they could've just killed any of these other characters" thing falls apart. I'm not even going to bother with your wacko "SHE'S TOTALLY NOT DEAD GUYS" shtick. Hell, I probably shouldn't have even typed that mass of crap up, you're probably just screwing around.
  • edited September 2012
    they're probably not kidding, thats the scary part but I like the definition of static vs dynamic char. The only part I didnt like is where Ben is dynamic; this means we have to bear the sight of him because he wont be dying until we see his glorious change...Im getting sick
  • edited September 2012
    Okay, the Ben part is a bit of a stretch, I'll admit that. Personally, I don't really hate Ben as much as a lot of others do, and I'm honestly pretty impressed that they're taking the time to develop a character who seemed like such an empty throwaway character in episode 2 that I was sure he'd be thoughtlessly offed in episode 3.
  • edited September 2012
    what about the new 3 - I would say Chuck has definite potential to be a dynamic char
    Omid has red shirt written all over him, imo
  • edited September 2012
    We'll see. It's a bit early to tell, given that they're all introduced in the last half of episode 3.

    I think Chuck might be dynamic. Already we're having a transition from someone who's a loner to someone who's working with a group.

    Things like "dynamic" or "static" character are things you discern over time. Too early to tell. I do, however, like the three new characters. I think that they all have very well-established personalities and character traits that make them engaging and believable as people. I think Telltale's done great with that across the board.
  • edited September 2012
    Carley was likeable, had great aim, and gave Lee the opportunity to come clean. However, since dying, she has started to get a little annoying.
  • edited September 2012
    Hey hey hey, it's rude to speak ill of the dearly departed.
  • edited September 2012
    Personally, I think Doug or Carley whoever you picked "I picked Doug" should've died in EP5, mostly because i didn't get to know Doug enough, it's only been 3 episodes and we hardly spent time with Doug or Carley, EP1 we talked and we got a little cool, EP2 we didn't see much of them but they did save our asses from Andy, EP3 we were just looking for stolen medicine, and hardly talked to Doug or Carley, well aside from getting a kiss from Carley and Doug talking about how chalk is made or something.
    Then they just got killed off 10minutes later by Lilly because she insisted on thinking stealing is like killing... you'd think she'd have more respect for people's lives.
  • edited September 2012
    Well this whole static /dynamic characterisation has some flaws. Clem is also static by your definition and I think most people will agree that her life is pretty save until the end.

    Also if Carley was just supporting there wouldn't be so much sympathy among the people here for her. Judging from the end of ep3 not even Lee cares for her as much as the audience, at least he doesn't seem to mourn.

    In a story in which "dynamic" characters are all over the place and act totally random, a character that is reliable and plausible obviously gets more sympathy. So I don't see why her death should be common sense. This might be a bad call by the devs.

    But anyway, I don't take issue with her dying per se. But I do with it being executed so sloppily and conveying the feeling that nothing really matters you choose.
  • edited September 2012
    Well, the problem with Lee mourning, is that the player chooses Lee's responses normally.

    It doesn't really work to have the main character breakdown and have an short period of tear-fed angst. Besides, who can he really cry to?

    Kenny? (Lost more than Lee)
    Ben? (THIS IS SPARTA!...and off the train he goes)
    Clem? (She's just a kid)

    Chuck? (rofl, please)
  • edited September 2012
    Gman5852 wrote: »
    So many things wrong with this statement
    1. Being shot in the cheak does not mean she lives. That is still fatal
    2. She got NO medical attention, she would bleed out
    3. She doesn't even know where the group was headed! They decided to go to savanah AFTER she was left behind.
    4. She is unarmed so any walkers would kill her
    5. HER VOICE ACTOR HAS CONFIRMED SHE IS DEAD!

    But go ahead and stay in la la land, tell me how the chocolate milk made from unicorns tastes!

    Well man, that's just like your opinion man..
  • edited September 2012
    The Dude abides...
  • edited September 2012
    Carley was a good shot, and a good woman. She was one of us. She was a woman who loved the outdoors - and radios, and as a journalist, she reported the crimes of Southern Georgia, from Macon to Savannah and up to Atlanta.

    She died, she died as so many young women of her generation, before her time. In your wisdom, Lord, you took her as you took so many bright flowering young men at Khe Sanh, at Langdok, at Hill 364. These young men gave their lives. And so would Carley. Carley, who loved radios.

    And so, Carley Nicole Vigil, in accordance with what we think your dying wishes might well have been, we commit your final mortal remains to the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, which you loved so well. Good night, sweet princess.
  • edited September 2012
    Nice eulogy.
  • edited September 2012
    Carley was a good shot, and a good woman. She was one of us. She was a woman who loved the outdoors - and radios, and as a journalist, she reported the crimes of Southern Georgia, from Macon to Savannah and up to Atlanta.

    She died, she died as so many young women of her generation, before her time. In your wisdom, Lord, you took her as you took so many bright flowering young men at Khe Sanh, at Langdok, at Hill 364. These young men gave their lives. And so would Carley. Carley, who loved radios.

    And so, Carley Nicole Vigil, in accordance with what we think your dying wishes might well have been, we commit your final mortal remains to the bosom of the Atlantic Ocean, which you loved so well. Good night, sweet princess.

    God damnit! You f*cking asshole! It's a f*cking travesty with you, man! And what was that sh*t about Vietnam?! What the f*ck does anything have to do with Vietnam?! What the f*ck are you talking about?!!
  • edited September 2012
    Viden wrote: »
    God damnit! You f*cking asshole! It's a f*cking travesty with you, man! And what was that sh*t about Vietnam?! What the f*ck does anything have to do with Vietnam?! What the f*ck are you talking about?!!

    I truly doubt any insult was intended.
  • edited September 2012
    Cyreen wrote: »
    I truly doubt any insult was intended.

    I was actually following up on the Big Lebowski reference... :o

    F*ck it, dude. Let's go bowling.
  • edited September 2012
    I'd tell Cyreen she's out of her element, but I don't want to get hit again.
  • shammackshammack Former Telltale Staff
    edited September 2012
    I am the walrus.
  • edited September 2012
    Viden wrote: »
    I was actually following up on the Big Lebowski reference... :o

    Sorry, for all I knew you were a Vet.
    I'd tell Cyreen she's out of her element, but I don't want to get hit again.

    You're right, but don't make me demote you.
  • edited September 2012
    I wish i never bought episode three.......
    no point in finishing the series now.......
    might as well just shoot lee too.....
    right in the face....

    You know on second thought... I wouldnt feel so bad if i could just mourn her death.... let me mourn..... instead all i get is fondness, oh look a train! guess I will forget she ever existed and have a drink with a hobo and then play barber.

    You want to fix it? TELLTALE next episode let me mourn the deaths in Episode three! please.... I beg you...... You monsters......

    Props for evoking this much emotion from people though.......
    even if it was cheap and a low blow..... deep breath regret is all I know
This discussion has been closed.