My theory of what Season 2 will be

edited December 2012 in The Walking Dead
They can choose to follow group for season 2 instead of following Clem. At the end of that season, there will be two survivors that you see in this ending. The two survivors of one story meets up with Clem, the survivor in this story. Then there will be a final, third season with their journey!

Comments

  • edited November 2012
    This was actually an idea I had at one point. Rather then the shadowy figures being Omid and Christa they could be the last two members of a different group of survivors who also happened to choose the countryside as a place to retreat after things went downhill. Hell they could have one shadow be from one group and one shadow from another group and they just happened to meet up before Clem sees them.
  • edited November 2012
    sounds good as long as we dont follow ricks group.
  • edited November 2012
    sounds good as long as we dont follow ricks group.

    Ricks group already has the comic. And Kirkman would not be okay with it, I think.
  • edited November 2012
    I'm curious if Campman's son might pop up during season 2. He said they never found him and him joining up with a new group with Clem would be very ironic.
  • edited November 2012
    Jow about ep one. Like Lee two survivors walking cross country see Clem at end of Ep 1. A whole season is too long.
  • edited December 2012
    I'm curious if Campman's son might pop up during season 2. He said they never found him and him joining up with a new group with Clem would be very ironic.

    that would be cool, maybe not revealed until Clementine and Adam are friends
  • edited December 2012
    that would be cool, maybe not revealed until Clementine and Adam are friends

    I sitll think the st johns got him
  • edited December 2012
    zeke10 wrote: »
    I sitll think the st johns got him

    :mad: you are probably right
  • edited December 2012
    :mad: you are probably right

    Just saying it seems likely:)
  • edited December 2012
    zeke10 wrote: »
    Just saying it seems likely:)

    i am mad at the st johns not you :)

    just thinking about them eating a child alive :mad:
  • edited December 2012
    i am mad at the st johns not you :)

    just thinking about them eating a child alive :mad:

    Could be worse coulod have been clem
This discussion has been closed.