If Nate is in S2...

edited July 2013 in The Walking Dead
Do you think he'd be better as an antagonist or someone in your group?

Comments

  • edited July 2013
    Definitely Antagonist,too crazy too have as a group member.If he was in my group i'd shoot him straight away,tried to with Russell but he chickened out.
  • edited July 2013
    Why not both, like Kenny? Depending on your decisions, he could either be a team player, or your worst nightmare. Unfortunately, to have Nate fight on your side would mean turning a blind eye to his nastier compulsions.
  • edited July 2013
    I'd rather have him as a recurring antagonist because he fits that role more
  • edited July 2013
    I mean he is more then likely a antagonist, but having him as a group member is not impossible, he seems fiercely loyal and will do what ever his friend or friends want, but he also has a mind of his own and will do what ever he wants when he wants to, and when he is on his own he is little more then a ticking time bomb.
  • edited July 2013
    I'd say antagonist. He fits that role better than being a friend, because he's so psychotic.
  • edited July 2013
    I just hope to god he isn't the one to find Clementine. Think of how uncomfortable that would be, I'd be shitting myself.
  • edited July 2013
    Nate along with Clementine is the scariest thing I could think of, and I mean it he may be a very well done character but that won't matter the moment he gets close to Clem.
  • edited July 2013
    I like people like Nate so why not, have him in the group.
  • edited July 2013
    Have Nate in the group. Best character from the dlc by far!
  • edited July 2013
    No way anyone with sense would have him in their group. He would get everyone killed just acting like a psycho.
This discussion has been closed.