Would YOU kill the St Johns?

edited July 2013 in The Walking Dead
Im no hard man, but in that situation, the dead walking, No laws, and of corse the guys tried to make me eat my buddy...I think i would, in real life i have sufferd alot at the hands of bullies or people who saw that i had something and took it because they simply wanted it, I supress it, bottle it up, yes i know thats not wise but what can i do? So yeah, in that situation, that pitch fork would likely end up in his FACE......then after that, my first kill, i doubt i would have the stomach to kill andy...even more so after seeing how he broke down.....

Comments

  • edited July 2013
    I would have if Clem wasn't in the game. She was my moral compass throughout.
  • edited July 2013
    Dildor wrote: »
    I would have if Clem wasn't in the game. She was my moral compass throughout.

    really? coz i just wanted her to fuking die lol seriously you spend 4 damm episodes looking after her only to get bit because the little retarded fish monkey human with a dick for a face could not get her head around the fact that her parents were dead..........
  • edited July 2013
    really? coz i just wanted her to fuking die lol seriously you spend 4 damm episodes looking after her only to get bit because the little retarded fish monkey human with a dick for a face could not get her head around the fact that her parents were dead..........

    The trolls are upon us...


    I can smell it in the air.



    That smell...


    That...



    Scent....
  • edited July 2013
    The trolls are upon us...


    I can smell it in the air.



    That smell...


    That...



    Scent....

    So im a troll for not liking clem that much? I liked lee alot better than clem, and it WAS because of her not listening that got Lee killed.....Hell i wish there was an option to tell clem its all her fault, Im not trolling, its how ifeel.
  • edited July 2013
    So im a troll for not liking clem that much? I liked lee alot better than clem, and it WAS because of her not listening that got Lee killed.....Hell i wish there was an option to tell clem its all her fault, Im not trolling, its how ifeel.

    Lol I know I feel you bro. just the part about the monkey dick for face part was funny and I felt it was to troll all the Clem fans around here
  • edited July 2013
    Lol I know I feel you bro. just the part about the monkey dick for face part was funny and I felt it was to troll all the Clem fans around here

    No, im just quoting our good friend Edward lol
  • edited July 2013
    No, im just quoting our good friend Edward lol

    I know I know. Eddie better be back I need those hilarious rants and one liners! Him and Omid must meet! It'd be a comedy explosion in the walking dead!
  • edited July 2013
    I vote Waffles. The most compelling option, which also sums up my thoughts about mortality and man's inhumanity to man perfectly.

    I only killed Danny. And even then, I didn't want to, I just didn't want him to come after us, or do the same thing to other people in case he got out. I spared Andy because I thought that there had been enough killing.
  • edited July 2013
    Honestly that's a hard one. If I was Lee I don't know if I would have the guts to kill anyone. At the same time not killing Andy seems like a real safety hazard considering he's not trapped like Danny. Yes walkers probably got him, but is there a chance they didn't. Of course and is that chance worth the any risk that he may come back? Who knows.
  • edited July 2013
    I wouldn't kill either of them. Danny was bleeding out, and he wasn't going anywhere any time soon. He's dead anyway, I wont make it easy for him. I thought long and hard about killing Andy but I chose to leave. Seeing zombie Brenda walk towards him actually made me happy. I would call it poetic justice.

    I'm not letting them live, I'm letting them die in the worst way I can imagine.
  • edited July 2013
    Waffles da da da Waffles da da da Waffles da da da (it's a quote from a cartoon but instead of waffles it's fossils, yeah I watch cartoons got a problem with that?)
  • edited July 2013
    Yes kill both without a seconds thought,you'd be a fool not too.
  • edited July 2013
    I didn't kill both when I was playing because of Clem, but it seems like they would have died either way. Andy barely could move after the fight, and Danny was trapped. They were easy targets for the walkers.
  • edited July 2013
    I chose 'Waffles', but in my game I didn't kill either one of them. Too bad they had to die either way, they were nice people before the apocalypse; but after it, it turned them to horrific monsters eating their own kind. :(
  • edited July 2013
    I think killing them is merciful. Why would I want to show them mercy? Danny was in pain, his leg was caught in a bear trap that couldn't be opened. Killing him would have ended his pain which is more than he deserved. Even if he did get free how far would he really be able to go? He would never out run the walkers coming through the fence that I sabotaged earlier. As for Andy he was beaten to a pulp and could barely stand let alone run. I like the idea of him being left a broken man believing his family are dead. I told him his family weren't coming to help him which implied I killed them then he broke down.

    Even if he was able to escape the walkers he would have had to flee the farm without going back to the house for weapons. He would have been a target for walkers and the bandits and even if he escaped them and came to the motor inn what could he do without weapons against 6 adults with guns?

    I can see how killing them directly would feel gratifying, a way of saying a final "Fu*k you, I won" but I like to let them see how big the consequences for screwing with us were. The longer they live the longer they suffer and there is no unnecessary blood on my hands. As Rick said to Carl when he said killing humans isn't the same as killing the dead, "it never should be". It shouldn't be easy to kill a person. If the threat can be eliminated without me having to take a life it's even better especially if sparing their lives causes them more suffering.
  • edited July 2013
    Remember in season 3 Rick didn't kill someone and it came back to bite him and the group in the ass
  • edited July 2013
    I'll not. Not when Clem there
  • edited July 2013
    really? coz i just wanted her to fuking die lol seriously you spend 4 damm episodes looking after her only to get bit because the little retarded fish monkey human with a dick for a face could not get her head around the fact that her parents were dead..........

    right on, and yes I would because they can come back and be more dangerous the next time (unlikely but possible).
  • edited July 2013
    (What is it with waffles in polls today? lmao)

    I would have killed them both and felt bad about it. They were human, but they were eating humans. They're just as bad as walkers. <__<
  • edited July 2013
    WantaFanta wrote: »
    (What is it with waffles in polls today? lmao)

    I would have killed them both and felt bad about it. They were human, but they were eating humans. They're just as bad as walkers. <__<

    I have no idea it is usually bacon :P.
  • edited July 2013
    WantaFanta wrote: »
    I would have killed them both and felt bad about it. They were human, but they were eating humans. They're just as bad as walkers. <__<

    Walkers don't express cruelty. They're like dumb animals driven by single-minded instinct.

    The St. Johns knew what they were doing and went out of their way to do it. Like Larry said, they're worse than the walkers.
This discussion has been closed.