But that's just it. Him not caring for her is a direct representation of his personality. Him not caring for her means he was a bad person, … morenot a bad physician.
Take this for example:
A man had a piece of metal in his leg. He enters the home of a doctor and pleaded for help. The doctor being completely capable of helping the man decides to turn him away back onto the streets. The doctor could have helped him but chose not to. That speaks of his personality/morals/ethics and not of his actual skills as a physician. The same rules apply.
He could have helped her, as evidenced later in the cabin, but chose not to. His skills as a doctor are fine, his skills at being a good person are lacking.
EDIT: Also, "nearly impossible" was a scaping remark, I meant that very few people could identify the bite type, doctor or otherwise.
Sorry the picture didn't show the first time. All I saw was the comment about the small house, which still is not applicable in the slightest.
The two bites actually look fairly similar in those two pictures (that one, and the screen shot of the dog bite that is on the forum). Both look nothing like a real, large, fresh open wound. Not to mention the dog bite photo doesn't even make sense unless the dog bit her length wise down the arm, which it didn't. I'm not basing my argument on flawed, cartoon depictions, but rather real world, empirical truth.
Comments
"There's a little house by the bridge"
"How big is it?"
That says absolutely nothing, at all, about his doctoring skills.
PS: You've never said anything without thinking it through?
I was showing that it's easy to tell the diffrence between a dog bite and a human bite.
I've never been skiing.
Sorry the picture didn't show the first time. All I saw was the comment about the small house, which still is not applicable in the slightest.
The two bites actually look fairly similar in those two pictures (that one, and the screen shot of the dog bite that is on the forum). Both look nothing like a real, large, fresh open wound. Not to mention the dog bite photo doesn't even make sense unless the dog bit her length wise down the arm, which it didn't. I'm not basing my argument on flawed, cartoon depictions, but rather real world, empirical truth.