Lady Forrester being the traitor makes no logical sense.

2»

Comments

  • True, he is the most likely. The second would be Royland given the state of affairs currently.

    JohnKersky posted: »

    To be honest, the only logical person being the traitor is Maester Ortengryn, only 4 people to suspect, and all the others are trustworthy.

  • I'm sure the Forresters owning ALL of Westeros' supply of Ironwood doesn't make them strong in any way...

    LukaszB posted: »

    Still strong after having 98-99.8% of their soldiers killed? That's ridiculous.

  • Seems I've met my competition, huh?

    That1Guy posted: »

    Hey, I mentioned that first. THERE IS ONLY ONE GRAMMAR SHERIFF AROUND THESE PARTS AND THAT IS ME, YA HEAR ME?!

  • Owning ironwood makes them rich, not strong.

    MrHazer posted: »

    I'm sure the Forresters owning ALL of Westeros' supply of Ironwood doesn't make them strong in any way...

  • This thread has nothing to do with rodriks name :/

    Lewsblake23 posted: »

    Seems I've met my competition, huh?

  • A rich house = a strong house. There's more to power than the size of your garrison.

    LukaszB posted: »

    Owning ironwood makes them rich, not strong.

  • A rich house can become a strong house, but only if it hires mercenaries. Being rich and without men is dumb, this is Game of Thrones.

    MrHazer posted: »

    A rich house = a strong house. There's more to power than the size of your garrison.

  • Well, it HAD nothing to do with it. Now it does. ;) I only brought it up due to a few people misspelling his name on this thread, is all.

    Killah posted: »

    This thread has nothing to do with rodriks name

Sign in to comment in this discussion.