Oh yeah, I forgot something else. Just saying that something is either true or false with no actual proof just so that it supports what you said.
You do that a lot as well.
I mean, how can you possibly say that you don't insult people? You just said that Saltlick acts like a "genuinely insane person". You can't deny that you don't insult people.
You show all the signs of being a bad poster. The whole reason this argument started is that you said that everyone who voted Luke didn't count. That is basically the definition of not seeing both sides of an argument.
And if you say some bullshit about wanting to bait people, then that must mean that you are hungry for attention, negative or not. In other words: a troll. So, yeah, don't make that excuse, because it really doesn't work.
Quite contrary, actually everything you've just said was false.
If you look in this thread you see I address every single point someone b… morerings up in genuine, honest argument.
That I'm direct and sometimes bait you into terrible unfocused decisions leaves you feeling salty, which is why you side with an emotionally unbalanced, terrible poster like SaltLick305. A poster who has for the last 3 hours engaged in a piece of performance art where he acts like a genuinely insane person in the hopes it washes out your deep-seated shame of being wrong.
Oh yeah, I forgot something else. Just saying that something is either true or false with no actual proof just so that it supports what you … moresaid.
You do that a lot as well.
I mean, how can you possibly say that you don't insult people? You just said that Saltlick acts like a "genuinely insane person". You can't deny that you don't insult people.
You show all the signs of being a bad poster. The whole reason this argument started is that you said that everyone who voted Luke didn't count. That is basically the definition of not seeing both sides of an argument.
And if you say some bullshit about wanting to bait people, then that must mean that you are hungry for attention, negative or not. In other words: a troll. So, yeah, don't make that excuse, because it really doesn't work.
Yo are sooo mad that you replied to about three people in less than two seconds just because they told you you lost this argument, Which is … moresomething you know just don't admit.
LemonCakes just leave man don't make me destroy what's left of you I'll give you time to recover.
@Zyphon is a much better guy than you I take it you don't even know who he is.
It's just too easy, because your fanclub has perhaps gone literally retarded from being so mad at little ol' me.
I see how you'd have this inflated sense of worth, if I had a gaggle of obsequious dimwits huffing my farts that I needed to call in to defend my wounded ego I'd imagine I'd have some mental problems too
But...this doesn't change anything...you still haven't even made an argument, let alone won one.
You've shown you can't even spell truth, let alone handle it.
For your own sake I think you need to carefully look over the thread and note all the instances where you've behaved like an insane teenager screaming "I WIN I WIN I WIN" and wonder why that sense of victory never seems to lead you to a sense of accomplishment here.
Because if you actually felt like you won, you would've made good on actually leaving...like you've said you would a half-dozen times.
Yo are sooo mad that you replied to about three people in less than two seconds just because they told you you lost this argument, Which is … moresomething you know just don't admit.
LemonCakes just leave man don't make me destroy what's left of you I'll give you time to recover.
@Zyphon is a much better guy than you I take it you don't even know who he is.
It's just too easy, because your fanclub has perhaps gone literally retarded from being so mad at little ol' me.
I see how you'd have thi… mores inflated sense of worth, if I had a gaggle of obsequious dimwits huffing my farts that I needed to call in to defend my wounded ego I'd imagine I'd have some mental problems too
But...this doesn't change anything...you still haven't even made an argument, let alone won one.
You've shown you can't even spell truth, let alone handle it.
For your own sake I think you need to carefully look over the thread and note all the instances where you've behaved like an insane teenager screaming "I WIN I WIN I WIN" and wonder why that sense of victory never seems to lead you to a sense of accomplishment here.
Because if you actually felt like you won, you would've made good on actually leaving...like you've said you would a half-dozen times.
Oh yeah, I forgot something else. Just saying that something is either true or false with no actual proof just so that it supports what you … moresaid.
You do that a lot as well.
I mean, how can you possibly say that you don't insult people? You just said that Saltlick acts like a "genuinely insane person". You can't deny that you don't insult people.
You show all the signs of being a bad poster. The whole reason this argument started is that you said that everyone who voted Luke didn't count. That is basically the definition of not seeing both sides of an argument.
And if you say some bullshit about wanting to bait people, then that must mean that you are hungry for attention, negative or not. In other words: a troll. So, yeah, don't make that excuse, because it really doesn't work.
It's just too easy, because your fanclub has perhaps gone literally retarded from being so mad at little ol' me.
I see how you'd have thi… mores inflated sense of worth, if I had a gaggle of obsequious dimwits huffing my farts that I needed to call in to defend my wounded ego I'd imagine I'd have some mental problems too
But...this doesn't change anything...you still haven't even made an argument, let alone won one.
You've shown you can't even spell truth, let alone handle it.
For your own sake I think you need to carefully look over the thread and note all the instances where you've behaved like an insane teenager screaming "I WIN I WIN I WIN" and wonder why that sense of victory never seems to lead you to a sense of accomplishment here.
Because if you actually felt like you won, you would've made good on actually leaving...like you've said you would a half-dozen times.
I know you're mad that you couldn't make an argument in the fourish hours you've loitered around here trying to fill up your sense of self-esteem by trying to play tough guy, but at any time you want to have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke you're welcome to start it off.
Less mad at you, more laughing at you. Your arguments and the things that come out of your mouth(er... hands), is just laughable.
I'll admit, I don't agree with Saltlick saying that he's won, and saying multiple times that he'd leave without making good on it(sorry Saltlick, but that is kind of lame), but still, the things that you say are far worse. I mean, you're not unintelligent, that much is obvious.
So I've determined that you're just an attention seeking asshole. This whole thing spawned from a comment that was clearly meant to attract negative attention, and a moment ago you told me that you were "baiting people". So yeah, not much better than what trolls do. And then you continue to throw insults at people. Example, the first line of what you just said.
Really, the only thing that you've got going for you that makes you better than the common troll is that you're smarter than them, but honestly, that just makes this back and forth all the more entertaining.
It's just too easy, because your fanclub has perhaps gone literally retarded from being so mad at little ol' me.
I see how you'd have thi… mores inflated sense of worth, if I had a gaggle of obsequious dimwits huffing my farts that I needed to call in to defend my wounded ego I'd imagine I'd have some mental problems too
But...this doesn't change anything...you still haven't even made an argument, let alone won one.
You've shown you can't even spell truth, let alone handle it.
For your own sake I think you need to carefully look over the thread and note all the instances where you've behaved like an insane teenager screaming "I WIN I WIN I WIN" and wonder why that sense of victory never seems to lead you to a sense of accomplishment here.
Because if you actually felt like you won, you would've made good on actually leaving...like you've said you would a half-dozen times.
How so? I simply thanked my friend for saying that I'm better than you. What you said does not at all apply(unless you replied to something different, with the forums set up the way they are, I can't really tell).
Yeah, I remember when Luke smiled and suggested "let's put her in the shed to die. " Those were some good times. Anyways, putting sarcasm aside I have a question for you. If Kenny didn't know Clementine at all, was in a group of seven, and Clem was bit. Would he not put her in the shed if most of the group demanded it and felt like it was his only choice to save her? For instance, Kenny didn't trust Bonnie and was against letting her go. Walter not only told Kenny to stand down, but also gave Bonnie a whole box of food which Kenny was against. Kenny was not happy about this, but you know what he did? He complied. I'm willing to bet that if Kenny were in Luke's shoes by being in that same group, even thought he might have been against putting Clem in the shed just like Luke, he would've reluctantly complied to the group. Remember this is a situation where he doesn't know Clem.
You know where you can spot the anger ? I'll help you out.
-Long replies filled with empty words and false statements you made Three hour… mores ago.
-You keep replying to eveybody at the same time which supports my theory that you've gone insane after losing this battle.
You feel inferior to us, That's understandable.
Calm down, SaltLick305.
I know you're mad that you couldn't make an argument in the fourish hours you've loitered around here trying to f… moreill up your sense of self-esteem by trying to play tough guy, but at any time you want to have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke you're welcome to start it off.
Actually, I'm quite happy and entertained by this back and forth, I love doing this sort of stuff on the internet. You simply just repeating the same thing, that no one's opinion counts because they're mad, as if you need to convince yourself is genuinely hilarious. So now that we've got out of this way...
Those "examples" are you just throwing insults. And it doesn't change the fact that it's an insult. Regardless of if you believe it's true, you're being insulting.
I'm sorry, what? Emotional blindness because they like Luke over Kenny? That doesn't make any sense. And as I've said before, I'm not mad. I think it's hilarious that you believe yourself to be a good poster. You insult people, call their arguments useless without looking at both sides of the argument, and your excuse is that they're "emotionally blinded".
...I'm not sure I've got much else to say to that, it's honestly ridiculous. The real answer is that you are in fact blinded and are incapable of even thinking of accepting anyone's opinion but your own. Their opinion's are just as valid as yours. The excuses you make to try and deny that are insane.
Clearly I can think, I just thought enough to dismantle most everything you just said. Also, you're just being purely insulting again. Bad. Poster. You're barely above a common troll.
I've listed examples of how SaltLick305 acts like a genuinely insane person in this thread. You didn't notice them because you're mad.
I … moregave evidence of why Luke posters don't count, in the same way that your opinion doesn't really matter: Emotional blindness. Same thing: You're mad.
Basically what you're telling me is you're mad and can't think, which is fine, but don't try to reason your way out of it, it's inherently impossible.
How could he have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke with you when according to you anyone who says anything positive about Luke is blinded by their emotions?
Calm down, SaltLick305.
I know you're mad that you couldn't make an argument in the fourish hours you've loitered around here trying to f… moreill up your sense of self-esteem by trying to play tough guy, but at any time you want to have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke you're welcome to start it off.
Uh oh Saltlick305, Zyphon says you lost the argument and are a lame poster, trouble in paradise!
Seriously Zyphon you're a much better poster than SaltLick305. Sure, you fall for the punji-pits of baited argumentation, but that's just part of forum sport. In regard to your being mad...well, you are. That's why you're adopting a defensive posture like "actually I'm just laughing at you because you're laughable, so there!"
But still that's much better than what SaltLick305 does. You're at least trying to have somewhat of an argument instead of trying to bully and troll people. I can address points in a give and take, all that can be done with someone who posts dumb fratboy shit like "duh I'm winning you're losin you mad bro I'm leaving but BEFORE I LEAVE(x6)" is taunt and goad. It's fun, but it never really goes anywhere.
Less mad at you, more laughing at you. Your arguments and the things that come out of your mouth(er... hands), is just laughable.
I'll ad… moremit, I don't agree with Saltlick saying that he's won, and saying multiple times that he'd leave without making good on it(sorry Saltlick, but that is kind of lame), but still, the things that you say are far worse. I mean, you're not unintelligent, that much is obvious.
So I've determined that you're just an attention seeking asshole. This whole thing spawned from a comment that was clearly meant to attract negative attention, and a moment ago you told me that you were "baiting people". So yeah, not much better than what trolls do. And then you continue to throw insults at people. Example, the first line of what you just said.
Really, the only thing that you've got going for you that makes you better than the common troll is that you're smarter than them, but honestly, that just makes this back and forth all the more entertaining.
Yeah keep assuming the worst of Kenny, locking a little kid in a shed for what clearly seemed to be a dog bite is a whole new level of stupity that not even Kenny drop down to. Unlike the cabin group Kenny has a sense of remorse which is why he felt terrible about what happened to Shawn and why he risked his life tor Ben.
Yeah, I remember when Luke smiled and suggested "let's put her in the shed to die. " Those were some good times. Anyways, putting sarcasm as… moreide I have a question for you. If Kenny didn't know Clementine at all, was in a group of seven, and Clem was bit. Would he not put her in the shed if most of the group demanded it and felt like it was his only choice to save her? For instance, Kenny didn't trust Bonnie and was against letting her go. Walter not only told Kenny to stand down, but also gave Bonnie a whole box of food which Kenny was against. Kenny was not happy about this, but you know what he did? He complied. I'm willing to bet that if Kenny were in Luke's shoes by being in that same group, even thought he might have been against putting Clem in the shed just like Luke, he would've reluctantly complied to the group. Remember this is a situation where he doesn't know Clem.
No no no, the second part. The "dog die slowly" part. That's veering away from an argument and into a personal space, both against the person putting forward the argument itself and in your own emotional response to the visual stimuli.
To your credit, however, you correctly noticed it was a living dog not yet dead. That puts you in maybe the top 20% percentile of people who get offended by the pic.
How so? I simply thanked my friend for saying that I'm better than you. What you said does not at all apply(unless you replied to something different, with the forums set up the way they are, I can't really tell).
Sorry I'm talking with Zyphon now, this got stale and you can't even really put forth the effort to insult me with the same delusional vigor you had even 5 minutes ago.
Uh oh Saltlick305, Zyphon says you lost the argument and are a lame poster, trouble in paradise!
Seriously Zyphon you're a much better po… morester than SaltLick305. Sure, you fall for the punji-pits of baited argumentation, but that's just part of forum sport. In regard to your being mad...well, you are. That's why you're adopting a defensive posture like "actually I'm just laughing at you because you're laughable, so there!"
But still that's much better than what SaltLick305 does. You're at least trying to have somewhat of an argument instead of trying to bully and troll people. I can address points in a give and take, all that can be done with someone who posts dumb fratboy shit like "duh I'm winning you're losin you mad bro I'm leaving but BEFORE I LEAVE(x6)" is taunt and goad. It's fun, but it never really goes anywhere.
How could he have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke with you when according to you anyone who says anything positive about Luke is blinded by their emotions?
I never said that Saltlick "lost". Honestly, I hate when anyone says that they "win" an argument, or say that someone else "lost". Arguments and debates rarely have a win or lose situation. Also, I still stand by that he's a great poster, better than you.
And I can see how you think I'd be taking a defensive stance, and I want to clear that up right now. I'm a little mad at you. You're insulting me, and you're insulting my friends. Hell, you're insulting and being an ass to almost everyone. Of course I'm a little mad. Is it clouding my judgment, as is your excuse for when people make a legitimate point? Hell no. Stop using that excuse, it doesn't make a damn lick of sense.
What you've got to understand is me saying I'm happy, means that I' actually entertained by this. I love internet arguments, I find the back and forth to be enjoyable in almost any situation. So here: I'm a little mad, and me saying I'm entertained is not being defensive, I'm legitimately entertained.
I'll stop saying that I'm laughing at you... but seriously, some of the stuff you say is ridiculous.
Uh oh Saltlick305, Zyphon says you lost the argument and are a lame poster, trouble in paradise!
Seriously Zyphon you're a much better po… morester than SaltLick305. Sure, you fall for the punji-pits of baited argumentation, but that's just part of forum sport. In regard to your being mad...well, you are. That's why you're adopting a defensive posture like "actually I'm just laughing at you because you're laughable, so there!"
But still that's much better than what SaltLick305 does. You're at least trying to have somewhat of an argument instead of trying to bully and troll people. I can address points in a give and take, all that can be done with someone who posts dumb fratboy shit like "duh I'm winning you're losin you mad bro I'm leaving but BEFORE I LEAVE(x6)" is taunt and goad. It's fun, but it never really goes anywhere.
Truth can be insulting, but it's not inherently an insult.
You didn't dismantle anything, you made a fairly empty equivalency statement. Relativism renders arguments moot, it doesn't win them.
Really, explain to me how Luke would be a better guardian then Kenny and I'll show you how not only is it wrong, the error is based first and foremost on emotional response that circumvents reasoning.
Actually, I'm quite happy and entertained by this back and forth, I love doing this sort of stuff on the internet. You simply just repeating… more the same thing, that no one's opinion counts because they're mad, as if you need to convince yourself is genuinely hilarious. So now that we've got out of this way...
Those "examples" are you just throwing insults. And it doesn't change the fact that it's an insult. Regardless of if you believe it's true, you're being insulting.
I'm sorry, what? Emotional blindness because they like Luke over Kenny? That doesn't make any sense. And as I've said before, I'm not mad. I think it's hilarious that you believe yourself to be a good poster. You insult people, call their arguments useless without looking at both sides of the argument, and your excuse is that they're "emotionally blinded".
...I'm not sure I've got much else to say to that, it's honestly ridiculous. The real answer is that you are in fact… [view original content]
Luke didn't want to lock Clementine in the shed. The group did. Kenny wouldn't want to lock Clementine in the shed if he didn't know her, but if his group demands that or a worse alternative. What do you think he's going to pick? Kenny can be impulsive, but he wouldn't turn against his whole group for a girl that he didn't even know and who was bit. Especially if you're being hunted down by a ruthless tyrant by the name of Carver. Bonnie was scouting ahead for Carver and we didn't even know it. The group probably thought that Clementine was scouting ahead for Carver. Carver seems to be known for sending scouts around.
Yeah keep assuming the worst of Kenny, locking a little kid in a shed for what clearly seemed to be a dog bite is a whole new level of stupi… morety that not even Kenny drop down to. Unlike the cabin group Kenny has a sense of remorse which is why he felt terrible about what happened to Shawn and why he risked his life tor Ben.
He never said I lost dummy.. But others people did say YOU lost soo...
Also, You know how much you need help ? He called you an asshole and you're still trying to make goods with him that's what this has become for you.
Isn't if funny how he is so hungry for a Luke/Kenny argument when the reason this argument started was him dismissing any opinion supporting Luke ? He lost it.
I never said that Saltlick "lost". Honestly, I hate when anyone says that they "win" an argument, or say that someone else "lost". Arguments… more and debates rarely have a win or lose situation. Also, I still stand by that he's a great poster, better than you.
And I can see how you think I'd be taking a defensive stance, and I want to clear that up right now. I'm a little mad at you. You're insulting me, and you're insulting my friends. Hell, you're insulting and being an ass to almost everyone. Of course I'm a little mad. Is it clouding my judgment, as is your excuse for when people make a legitimate point? Hell no. Stop using that excuse, it doesn't make a damn lick of sense.
What you've got to understand is me saying I'm happy, means that I' actually entertained by this. I love internet arguments, I find the back and forth to be enjoyable in almost any situation. So here: I'm a little mad, and me saying I'm entertained is not being defens… [view original content]
Calling people retarded is not truth, it's fucking rude.
We're both going to say that we "won", so instead, let's let the general public decide who "won". I'm fairly confident that they'll agree with me.
I won't be able to give you good examples because I don't believe that Luke would be a better guardian. What I will say is that I get where Luke Fans are coming from. He's a nice guy, a good person. He's a good survivor too. Those are things that people can observe, and if you don't believe it, then that's your opinion, just as it's their opinion that Luke is better than Kenny. You can't prove either one because they're opinions, and neither is "better" than the other. It's perfectly reasonable.
Truth can be insulting, but it's not inherently an insult.
You didn't dismantle anything, you made a fairly empty equivalency statement. … moreRelativism renders arguments moot, it doesn't win them.
Really, explain to me how Luke would be a better guardian then Kenny and I'll show you how not only is it wrong, the error is based first and foremost on emotional response that circumvents reasoning.
There's no evidence that one would be better than the other. I believe that Kenny is better than Luke. This is my opinion. Some people believe that Luke is better than Kenny. That is their opinion. Their opinion is just as valid as mine, and who are you to judge either of those opinions and prove them to be "false".
Sorry I'm talking with Zyphon now, this got stale and you can't even really put forth the effort to insult me with the same delusional vigor you had even 5 minutes ago.
You've reached a point where you literally have no conception of an argument, SaltLick305. "Hey guys is funny how he wants a Luke/Kenny argument in a Luke/Kenny thread where he made argument about Luke and Kenny? huhuhuh"
Isn't if funny how he is so hungry for a Luke/Kenny argument when the reason this argument started was him dismissing any opinion supporting Luke ? He lost it.
Kenny didn't care too much about Clemetine in Season 1 Episode 4, when she was gone. (When Clem found the boat in the shed)
Lee: Kenny, you know where is Clementine?
Kenny: Somewhere... (drunk, drunk)
So...
First off, you're objectively incorrect. SaltLick305 is a bad poster. In fact he's done something you "hate" repeatedly throughout his posting in addition to doing something you find "lame". That you simultaneously defend him as a "great poster" is evidence of motivated reasoning: You want to make me mad as I made you mad by saying he's better than me while proving he's not.
It's too late. You've already established you think SaltLick305 isn't a great poster with your predicates. If you don't recognize it it's because your judgment is clouded. Either that or you're not arguing in good faith. Each makes your arguments suspect.
If at any time you want to talk about the topic of this thread and stop trying to derail it as SaltLick305 has aggressively tried to do for the last few hours (I'm sure you hate that too) you're free to offer something up.
I never said that Saltlick "lost". Honestly, I hate when anyone says that they "win" an argument, or say that someone else "lost". Arguments… more and debates rarely have a win or lose situation. Also, I still stand by that he's a great poster, better than you.
And I can see how you think I'd be taking a defensive stance, and I want to clear that up right now. I'm a little mad at you. You're insulting me, and you're insulting my friends. Hell, you're insulting and being an ass to almost everyone. Of course I'm a little mad. Is it clouding my judgment, as is your excuse for when people make a legitimate point? Hell no. Stop using that excuse, it doesn't make a damn lick of sense.
What you've got to understand is me saying I'm happy, means that I' actually entertained by this. I love internet arguments, I find the back and forth to be enjoyable in almost any situation. So here: I'm a little mad, and me saying I'm entertained is not being defens… [view original content]
Oh yeah, sure, that part was more personal. Honestly, I can maybe understand why someone would leave the dog, but you seem to relish in the fact that it was in pain. I think that at least for that, some part of you is inherently awful. My own beliefs. Still, it wasn't blinding me to any argument or point made, it was just me making a small personal jab against you.
No no no, the second part. The "dog die slowly" part. That's veering away from an argument and into a personal space, both against the perso… moren putting forward the argument itself and in your own emotional response to the visual stimuli.
To your credit, however, you correctly noticed it was a living dog not yet dead. That puts you in maybe the top 20% percentile of people who get offended by the pic.
Although i sat with luke, im more inclined now towards kenny, as long as he doesn't loose it and go all physco (Especially if Katjaa 2.0 dies)
Even then, We still don't know enough about luke..HARD CHOICE
Comments
Oh yeah, I forgot something else. Just saying that something is either true or false with no actual proof just so that it supports what you said.
You do that a lot as well.
I mean, how can you possibly say that you don't insult people? You just said that Saltlick acts like a "genuinely insane person". You can't deny that you don't insult people.
You show all the signs of being a bad poster. The whole reason this argument started is that you said that everyone who voted Luke didn't count. That is basically the definition of not seeing both sides of an argument.
And if you say some bullshit about wanting to bait people, then that must mean that you are hungry for attention, negative or not. In other words: a troll. So, yeah, don't make that excuse, because it really doesn't work.
He lost his mind after realizing he got owned.
At this point he's just writing random stuff because he feels wayyy below our level.
Kenny would give his life to protect Clem, and not lock her in a shed to die like some certain "others".
Aww, thanks pal. Though, it doesn't take much to be better than the guy who was happy to see a dog die slowly.
It's just too easy, because your fanclub has perhaps gone literally retarded from being so mad at little ol' me.
I see how you'd have this inflated sense of worth, if I had a gaggle of obsequious dimwits huffing my farts that I needed to call in to defend my wounded ego I'd imagine I'd have some mental problems too
But...this doesn't change anything...you still haven't even made an argument, let alone won one.
You've shown you can't even spell truth, let alone handle it.
For your own sake I think you need to carefully look over the thread and note all the instances where you've behaved like an insane teenager screaming "I WIN I WIN I WIN" and wonder why that sense of victory never seems to lead you to a sense of accomplishment here.
Because if you actually felt like you won, you would've made good on actually leaving...like you've said you would a half-dozen times.
Your response continues to highlight that your emotional triggers blinds you to actual argumentation and points made.
This is unsurprising.
I'm still wondering how you got 1243 likes. I guess you WERE a nice person in the beginning.
I've listed examples of how SaltLick305 acts like a genuinely insane person in this thread. You didn't notice them because you're mad.
I gave evidence of why Luke posters don't count, in the same way that your opinion doesn't really matter: Emotional blindness. Same thing: You're mad.
Basically what you're telling me is you're mad and can't think, which is fine, but don't try to reason your way out of it, it's inherently impossible.
You know where you can spot the anger ? I'll help you out.
-Long replies filled with empty words and false statements you made Three hours ago.
-You keep replying to eveybody at the same time which supports my theory that you've gone insane after losing this battle.
You feel inferior to us, That's understandable.
Calm down, SaltLick305.
I know you're mad that you couldn't make an argument in the fourish hours you've loitered around here trying to fill up your sense of self-esteem by trying to play tough guy, but at any time you want to have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke you're welcome to start it off.
Less mad at you, more laughing at you. Your arguments and the things that come out of your mouth(er... hands), is just laughable.
I'll admit, I don't agree with Saltlick saying that he's won, and saying multiple times that he'd leave without making good on it(sorry Saltlick, but that is kind of lame), but still, the things that you say are far worse. I mean, you're not unintelligent, that much is obvious.
So I've determined that you're just an attention seeking asshole. This whole thing spawned from a comment that was clearly meant to attract negative attention, and a moment ago you told me that you were "baiting people". So yeah, not much better than what trolls do. And then you continue to throw insults at people. Example, the first line of what you just said.
Really, the only thing that you've got going for you that makes you better than the common troll is that you're smarter than them, but honestly, that just makes this back and forth all the more entertaining.
How so? I simply thanked my friend for saying that I'm better than you. What you said does not at all apply(unless you replied to something different, with the forums set up the way they are, I can't really tell).
Yeah, I remember when Luke smiled and suggested "let's put her in the shed to die.
" Those were some good times. Anyways, putting sarcasm aside I have a question for you. If Kenny didn't know Clementine at all, was in a group of seven, and Clem was bit. Would he not put her in the shed if most of the group demanded it and felt like it was his only choice to save her? For instance, Kenny didn't trust Bonnie and was against letting her go. Walter not only told Kenny to stand down, but also gave Bonnie a whole box of food which Kenny was against. Kenny was not happy about this, but you know what he did? He complied. I'm willing to bet that if Kenny were in Luke's shoes by being in that same group, even thought he might have been against putting Clem in the shed just like Luke, he would've reluctantly complied to the group. Remember this is a situation where he doesn't know Clem.
You know how I know you're mad?
You're still here after saying you were going to leave half-a-dozen times.
You know how I know you know I'm a better poster than you?
You're adopting my phrasing.
Even that "spot the anger" line? I used that on you in a previous thread that was deleted.
Now that it looks like you're my #1 fan...I guess all of your fans by proxy are mine too!
Cool your jets there Rambo. Two straight replies....
Why so mad ?
Actually, I'm quite happy and entertained by this back and forth, I love doing this sort of stuff on the internet. You simply just repeating the same thing, that no one's opinion counts because they're mad, as if you need to convince yourself is genuinely hilarious. So now that we've got out of this way...
Those "examples" are you just throwing insults. And it doesn't change the fact that it's an insult. Regardless of if you believe it's true, you're being insulting.
I'm sorry, what? Emotional blindness because they like Luke over Kenny? That doesn't make any sense. And as I've said before, I'm not mad. I think it's hilarious that you believe yourself to be a good poster. You insult people, call their arguments useless without looking at both sides of the argument, and your excuse is that they're "emotionally blinded".
...I'm not sure I've got much else to say to that, it's honestly ridiculous. The real answer is that you are in fact blinded and are incapable of even thinking of accepting anyone's opinion but your own. Their opinion's are just as valid as yours. The excuses you make to try and deny that are insane.
Clearly I can think, I just thought enough to dismantle most everything you just said. Also, you're just being purely insulting again. Bad. Poster. You're barely above a common troll.
How could he have an actual argument about Kenny or Luke with you when according to you anyone who says anything positive about Luke is blinded by their emotions?
Uh oh Saltlick305, Zyphon says you lost the argument and are a lame poster, trouble in paradise!
Seriously Zyphon you're a much better poster than SaltLick305. Sure, you fall for the punji-pits of baited argumentation, but that's just part of forum sport. In regard to your being mad...well, you are. That's why you're adopting a defensive posture like "actually I'm just laughing at you because you're laughable, so there!"
But still that's much better than what SaltLick305 does. You're at least trying to have somewhat of an argument instead of trying to bully and troll people. I can address points in a give and take, all that can be done with someone who posts dumb fratboy shit like "duh I'm winning you're losin you mad bro I'm leaving but BEFORE I LEAVE(x6)" is taunt and goad. It's fun, but it never really goes anywhere.
I'm a really good poster. You'll understand one day.
Yeah keep assuming the worst of Kenny, locking a little kid in a shed for what clearly seemed to be a dog bite is a whole new level of stupity that not even Kenny drop down to. Unlike the cabin group Kenny has a sense of remorse which is why he felt terrible about what happened to Shawn and why he risked his life tor Ben.
No no no, the second part. The "dog die slowly" part. That's veering away from an argument and into a personal space, both against the person putting forward the argument itself and in your own emotional response to the visual stimuli.
To your credit, however, you correctly noticed it was a living dog not yet dead. That puts you in maybe the top 20% percentile of people who get offended by the pic.
Sorry I'm talking with Zyphon now, this got stale and you can't even really put forth the effort to insult me with the same delusional vigor you had even 5 minutes ago.
He never said I lost dummy.. But others people did say YOU lost soo...
Also, You know how much you need help ? He called you an asshole and you're still trying to make goods with him that's what this has become for you.
How are you not?
What evidence is there to suggest Luke would be a better guardian than Kenny?
I never said that Saltlick "lost". Honestly, I hate when anyone says that they "win" an argument, or say that someone else "lost". Arguments and debates rarely have a win or lose situation. Also, I still stand by that he's a great poster, better than you.
And I can see how you think I'd be taking a defensive stance, and I want to clear that up right now. I'm a little mad at you. You're insulting me, and you're insulting my friends. Hell, you're insulting and being an ass to almost everyone. Of course I'm a little mad. Is it clouding my judgment, as is your excuse for when people make a legitimate point? Hell no. Stop using that excuse, it doesn't make a damn lick of sense.
What you've got to understand is me saying I'm happy, means that I' actually entertained by this. I love internet arguments, I find the back and forth to be enjoyable in almost any situation. So here: I'm a little mad, and me saying I'm entertained is not being defensive, I'm legitimately entertained.
I'll stop saying that I'm laughing at you... but seriously, some of the stuff you say is ridiculous.
Truth can be insulting, but it's not inherently an insult.
You didn't dismantle anything, you made a fairly empty equivalency statement. Relativism renders arguments moot, it doesn't win them.
Really, explain to me how Luke would be a better guardian then Kenny and I'll show you how not only is it wrong, the error is based first and foremost on emotional response that circumvents reasoning.
Luke didn't want to lock Clementine in the shed. The group did. Kenny wouldn't want to lock Clementine in the shed if he didn't know her, but if his group demands that or a worse alternative. What do you think he's going to pick? Kenny can be impulsive, but he wouldn't turn against his whole group for a girl that he didn't even know and who was bit. Especially if you're being hunted down by a ruthless tyrant by the name of Carver. Bonnie was scouting ahead for Carver and we didn't even know it. The group probably thought that Clementine was scouting ahead for Carver. Carver seems to be known for sending scouts around.
Shhh. Talking to Zyphon. Much more interesting than you.
Even your fanclub and friends are calling you lame and said you won nothing at this point, just DWI.
Isn't if funny how he is so hungry for a Luke/Kenny argument when the reason this argument started was him dismissing any opinion supporting Luke ? He lost it.
Calling people retarded is not truth, it's fucking rude.
We're both going to say that we "won", so instead, let's let the general public decide who "won". I'm fairly confident that they'll agree with me.
I won't be able to give you good examples because I don't believe that Luke would be a better guardian. What I will say is that I get where Luke Fans are coming from. He's a nice guy, a good person. He's a good survivor too. Those are things that people can observe, and if you don't believe it, then that's your opinion, just as it's their opinion that Luke is better than Kenny. You can't prove either one because they're opinions, and neither is "better" than the other. It's perfectly reasonable.
Kenny didn't care too much about Clemetine in Season 1 Episode 4, when she was gone. (When Clem found the boat in the shed)
Lee: Kenny, you know where is Clementine?
Kenny: Somewhere... (drunk, drunk)
So...
There's no evidence that one would be better than the other. I believe that Kenny is better than Luke. This is my opinion. Some people believe that Luke is better than Kenny. That is their opinion. Their opinion is just as valid as mine, and who are you to judge either of those opinions and prove them to be "false".
Luke, I like Kenny ,but he's acting kinda weird. Luke seems pretty trustworthy.
That's because it's a reference to the game, not meant to be insulting you with "vigor".
Episode Two, they get to the farm, Larry's talking to Kenny and he says, "Cool your jets there Rambo, these are nice people."
You've also got a massive ego!
You've reached a point where you literally have no conception of an argument, SaltLick305. "Hey guys is funny how he wants a Luke/Kenny argument in a Luke/Kenny thread where he made argument about Luke and Kenny? huhuhuh"
perhaps the fact that his whole family died a few hours prior to that had something to do with it.
First off, you're objectively incorrect. SaltLick305 is a bad poster. In fact he's done something you "hate" repeatedly throughout his posting in addition to doing something you find "lame". That you simultaneously defend him as a "great poster" is evidence of motivated reasoning: You want to make me mad as I made you mad by saying he's better than me while proving he's not.
It's too late. You've already established you think SaltLick305 isn't a great poster with your predicates. If you don't recognize it it's because your judgment is clouded. Either that or you're not arguing in good faith. Each makes your arguments suspect.
If at any time you want to talk about the topic of this thread and stop trying to derail it as SaltLick305 has aggressively tried to do for the last few hours (I'm sure you hate that too) you're free to offer something up.
Oh yeah, sure, that part was more personal. Honestly, I can maybe understand why someone would leave the dog, but you seem to relish in the fact that it was in pain. I think that at least for that, some part of you is inherently awful. My own beliefs. Still, it wasn't blinding me to any argument or point made, it was just me making a small personal jab against you.
Although i sat with luke, im more inclined now towards kenny, as long as he doesn't loose it and go all physco (Especially if Katjaa 2.0 dies)
Even then, We still don't know enough about luke..HARD CHOICE