That's true. For the slide "In Harm's Way" it's Rebecca on the ground with Clementine looking worried. I heard they were going to have Rebecca give birth, but that didn't happen.
Not trying to sound like a pervert(even though I am one, that's not what I mean by it). I won't be bothered in the slightest by any sexual things in the game so there's only room for hype for me.
the same way a mother feeding her baby from the titty in public is considered sexual, i have no idea why people think it is but apparently here in the south that how people feel.
It's the same level of sexual content that 400 Days got, and that all came from Nate talking about women and Eddie's joke about his dick. I wouldn't expect anything particularly intense.
Probably both. The sexual content rating here is so low, though, that I highly doubt it's going to be a scene of that nature. Keep in mind it's the same rating that 400 Days got, and the rape reference in that was the prisoners on the bus discussing it in a very non-graphic manner.
Probably both. The sexual content rating here is so low, though, that I highly doubt it's going to be a scene of that nature. Keep in mind i… moret's the same rating that 400 Days got, and the rape reference in that was the prisoners on the bus discussing it in a very non-graphic manner.
It could be anything, really. I'm banking it on either Eddie returning with more delightful dick jokes, or Jane utilizing her "feminine wiles" again. Maybe Rebecca talks about what happened with Carver.
I would love a conversation about Rebecca's history with Carver. None of us know for sure under what circumstances they became sexual. Was it forced? Or was it a moment Rebecca came to later regret?
It could be anything, really. I'm banking it on either Eddie returning with more delightful dick jokes, or Jane utilizing her "feminine wiles" again. Maybe Rebecca talks about what happened with Carver.
Actually that makes me wonder. Obviously straight couples kissing isn't anything the rating boards find deserving of a warning, but would it be possible that the inclusion of non-heteronormative couples in an episode would warrant a warning? Matthew and Walter existed, sure, but they were so lightly implied that half the players still don't even think of them as a couple. I don't want to get my hopes up, though. Telltale's come a long way since season 1 and I love the more diverse cast, but I still doubt seeing any more queer representation outside of Walter and Matthew.
Of course, it's probably just going to end up being along the same vein as 400 Days, since that got a similar warning. Still, a person can dream, right?
Actually that makes me wonder. Obviously straight couples kissing isn't anything the rating boards find deserving of a warning, but would it… more be possible that the inclusion of non-heteronormative couples in an episode would warrant a warning? Matthew and Walter existed, sure, but they were so lightly implied that half the players still don't even think of them as a couple. I don't want to get my hopes up, though. Telltale's come a long way since season 1 and I love the more diverse cast, but I still doubt seeing any more queer representation outside of Walter and Matthew.
Of course, it's probably just going to end up being along the same vein as 400 Days, since that got a similar warning. Still, a person can dream, right?
I don't know. I wouldn't consider it worthy of the warning, but I know there are people out there who would consider it so. It depends on the person who gives the ratings. I just thought it could be a kiss because none of the other episodes had a sex rating (even though they had references to rape and sex) and none of them had onscreen kisses either. So who knows how serious the rating person considers onscreen kisses to be? I just think an onscreen kiss is a real possibility and I hope that's what it turns out to be, because it's nice and innocent.
Okay. I'm going to assume you're not being homophobic and you're just commenting on what you think the likelihood is that a gay relationship will be shown. :P I mean, when I first saw your comment I was really confused and disappointed in you because I thought you were saying 'no they shouldnt ever show a gay couple...' Which would be really weird, because I thought you were pretty accepting. :P
Okay. I'm going to assume you're not being homophobic and you're just commenting on what you think the likelihood is that a gay relationship… more will be shown. :P I mean, when I first saw your comment I was really confused and disappointed in you because I thought you were saying 'no they shouldnt ever show a gay couple...' Which would be really weird, because I thought you were pretty accepting. :P
I should hope not at this point. LGBT+ characters getting sexualized in ratings for simply being LGBT+, that is. That would be a problem. I don't know how Australian classification works, though (this is the Aussie classification everyone's talking about, in case some folks weren't aware).
As for more representation beyond the uber subtle attempt that was Walter and Matthew, yeah, that'd be ideal. I'm crossing my fingers but I wouldn't bet money on it. But maybe they'll surprise us. Just have to wait and see, I suppose.
Actually that makes me wonder. Obviously straight couples kissing isn't anything the rating boards find deserving of a warning, but would it… more be possible that the inclusion of non-heteronormative couples in an episode would warrant a warning? Matthew and Walter existed, sure, but they were so lightly implied that half the players still don't even think of them as a couple. I don't want to get my hopes up, though. Telltale's come a long way since season 1 and I love the more diverse cast, but I still doubt seeing any more queer representation outside of Walter and Matthew.
Of course, it's probably just going to end up being along the same vein as 400 Days, since that got a similar warning. Still, a person can dream, right?
I don't know. I wouldn't consider it worthy of the warning, but I know there are people out there who would consider it so. It depends on th… moree person who gives the ratings. I just thought it could be a kiss because none of the other episodes had a sex rating (even though they had references to rape and sex) and none of them had onscreen kisses either. So who knows how serious the rating person considers onscreen kisses to be? I just think an onscreen kiss is a real possibility and I hope that's what it turns out to be, because it's nice and innocent.
Comments
Rebecca's birth maybe?
Or, birthing.
rebecca baby? or something happen to sarah
Maybe Nick gets some!
I think this confirms Rebecca is having her baby this episode.
I think that was confirmed in the EP4 teaser.
The teasers aren't always right though :<
That's true. For the slide "In Harm's Way" it's Rebecca on the ground with Clementine looking worried. I heard they were going to have Rebecca give birth, but that didn't happen.
How does giving birth count as sexuality? The act itself is very nonsexual...Well...for most women...
How can we witness Rebecca's birthing when there is nothing labeled under nudity?
if i see a baby head popping out of a vagina im gonna throw up
It can easily be obscured. Unless Clem is delivering it and the camera is staring right in the direction.
Rebecca's child birth most likely... or a raping scene
Bonnie and Luke perhaps?
Rating boards are kinda anal about this kinda thing.
Chances are we're not even gonna see anything due to camera angles.
If anything it'll just get me more hyped.
Not trying to sound like a pervert(even though I am one, that's not what I mean by it). I won't be bothered in the slightest by any sexual things in the game so there's only room for hype for me.
the same way a mother feeding her baby from the titty in public is considered sexual, i have no idea why people think it is but apparently here in the south that how people feel.
It's the same level of sexual content that 400 Days got, and that all came from Nate talking about women and Eddie's joke about his dick. I wouldn't expect anything particularly intense.
That would count for Nudity, not Sex, and it wasn't given any kind of Nudity rating. You can rest easy.
oh no, no no no no.
Most likely Rebecca's baby being born... they don't have time to engage in sexual intercourse
Would rape go under sexuality or violence?
Probably both. The sexual content rating here is so low, though, that I highly doubt it's going to be a scene of that nature. Keep in mind it's the same rating that 400 Days got, and the rape reference in that was the prisoners on the bus discussing it in a very non-graphic manner.
Very true and it makes sense for it to fall under both. I don't think they would put that in either. They probably will just make a joke or comment.
It could be anything, really. I'm banking it on either Eddie returning with more delightful dick jokes, or Jane utilizing her "feminine wiles" again. Maybe Rebecca talks about what happened with Carver.
I would love a conversation about Rebecca's history with Carver. None of us know for sure under what circumstances they became sexual. Was it forced? Or was it a moment Rebecca came to later regret?
I think it could just be a kiss between Kenny and Sarita. Like a real kiss. On the mouth. I hope that's all it is.
Rebecca's baby confirmed for episode 4.
Nuke Confirmed
Since when is kissing something that warrants a mild impact sex warning?
Actually that makes me wonder. Obviously straight couples kissing isn't anything the rating boards find deserving of a warning, but would it be possible that the inclusion of non-heteronormative couples in an episode would warrant a warning? Matthew and Walter existed, sure, but they were so lightly implied that half the players still don't even think of them as a couple. I don't want to get my hopes up, though. Telltale's come a long way since season 1 and I love the more diverse cast, but I still doubt seeing any more queer representation outside of Walter and Matthew.
Of course, it's probably just going to end up being along the same vein as 400 Days, since that got a similar warning. Still, a person can dream, right?
no
... What?
What did that comment even accomplish? What "no"?
I don't know. I wouldn't consider it worthy of the warning, but I know there are people out there who would consider it so. It depends on the person who gives the ratings. I just thought it could be a kiss because none of the other episodes had a sex rating (even though they had references to rape and sex) and none of them had onscreen kisses either. So who knows how serious the rating person considers onscreen kisses to be? I just think an onscreen kiss is a real possibility and I hope that's what it turns out to be, because it's nice and innocent.
To qoute you "A person can Dream, right?" and I put a simple answer :P
Okay. I'm going to assume you're not being homophobic and you're just commenting on what you think the likelihood is that a gay relationship will be shown. :P I mean, when I first saw your comment I was really confused and disappointed in you because I thought you were saying 'no they shouldnt ever show a gay couple...' Which would be really weird, because I thought you were pretty accepting. :P
Haha, no, I'm not a homphobe, I was indeed commenting on the likelihood, sorry to confuse you.
I should hope not at this point. LGBT+ characters getting sexualized in ratings for simply being LGBT+, that is. That would be a problem. I don't know how Australian classification works, though (this is the Aussie classification everyone's talking about, in case some folks weren't aware).
As for more representation beyond the uber subtle attempt that was Walter and Matthew, yeah, that'd be ideal. I'm crossing my fingers but I wouldn't bet money on it. But maybe they'll surprise us. Just have to wait and see, I suppose.
It depends on the nature of the kiss, I suppose.
Um, am i missing something? What mild sexuality??