no bonnie stole it from carvers stuff he might have bin hordeing it once becca started to show he was smart just encase she died given birth he can still feed the baby
It seems like people are thinking more in terms of the here and now and not of the future, which I get but when there are so many people dead, it seems even more important to preserve as much life as you can.
I don't see how the baby can be any worst then lugging around worthless Sarah.... who pretty much shit herself in every situation... just like a baby, except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride...
That baby actually is hope. Also why use Lee's viewpoint of protecting Clementine? You are Clementine now in the story and I doubt any Clem would act like that. Must Clem be all "Clem must come first and screw the others?"
I hate babies IRL too, though. Too much nuisance and the crying just gets on my nerves. Maybe my perception would change if it was MY baby, … morebut as for other people's babies- keep those well away from me. And yes, I'm very much aware that views like this make people generally perceive me as a heartless monster.
Realistically, the baby will be dead soon anyway. I don't think it's easy to find enough of non-spoiled milk a few years after the apocalypse. They have enough problems finding water, and it's much more common.
It seems like people are thinking more in terms of the here and now and not of the future, which I get but when there are so many people dead, it seems even more important to preserve as much life as you can.
Let me put it this way. I'm not hauling a damn baby around because it's "the right thing to do." I'm sick and tired of trying to do the righ… moret thing and getting burned for it.
Clementine needs to survive, I can't do that if some baby I feel nothing for is continuously holding me back from that objective.
It's a shitty thing to do, but I am through with things holding me back.
The poll didn't really have an appropriate answer for me. I do care for the baby HOWEVER I don't want it to become the main storyline. If I … morehave to choose to save the baby over someone else, I would likely choose that someone else just because I feel that is a cheap move by Telltale. I can guarantee you that Telltale won't show any gore towards the baby so if it doesn't make it, it would have to be a peaceful way to go. I think the best possible thing for the storyline and baby is that at the end of Episode 5 its current caretaker (hopefully not Clem) takes it and leaves for his/her own. I REALLY don't want the baby to be a huge part of the storyline trying to imitate the Lee/Clem bond.
This is ridiculous . How can you say that ? The baby symbolizes HOPE ! We don't know what happened to Christa's Baby in ep1 . This is a classic foreshadowing.Christa will take care of that little baby..
how is it not my opinion? You seem to have some weird infatuation with Sarah and get all angry when I talk negatively about her... this thread is about a baby... sarah pretty much by all means had the characteristics of a baby and an actual "baby" wouldn't be much different then "lugging around Sarah"... please tell me how this is not an opinion ... relax yourself... I don't have to like the same characters you do
it's not the fact that you talk crap about sarah, but it's the way you do it. You call her a "little bitch" and basically laugh at a 15 disturbed girl dying. Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the hell is wrong with you?
how is it not my opinion? You seem to have some weird infatuation with Sarah and get all angry when I talk negatively about her... this thre… moread is about a baby... sarah pretty much by all means had the characteristics of a baby and an actual "baby" wouldn't be much different then "lugging around Sarah"... please tell me how this is not an opinion ... relax yourself... I don't have to like the same characters you do
First off bro... get your quotes straight... I never once refered to Sarah as a "little B*tch"... go check and secondly how old are you? You ever hear of a baby carrier.... you literally can "put a baby on your back and take it for a ride" or wherever you go.. unlike a teenager( Sarah)... get your head out the gutter dude...
Or do you even watch the TV SHOW... how do they get the baby around... they carry her on their backs everwhere...
it's not the fact that you talk crap about sarah, but it's the way you do it. You call her a "little bitch" and basically laugh at a 15 dist… moreurbed girl dying. Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the hell is wrong with you?
Keep this in mind: If we don't give birth to and raise babies, humanity will become extinct. Eventually, everyone's going to die, whether it be by walkers or it be by aging. If we don't raise babies, we don't have another generation. Whether that's for the better or for the worse, that's up to you, but it's just something to think about.
Personally, I would try the hardest I can to raise that baby.
Yes because they have a baby carrier right? and you see all mothers put their damn baby in backpacks and walk around in public. Also that "gutter" thing doesn't make sense at all. I'm wasting my time with you since you're trying to find loop holes and excuses for your own mistakes and poor replies.
First off bro... get your quotes straight... I never once refered to Sarah as a "little B*tch"... go check and secondly how old are you? You… more ever hear of a baby carrier.... you literally can "put a baby on your back and take it for a ride" or wherever you go.. unlike a teenager( Sarah)... get your head out the gutter dude...
Or do you even watch the TV SHOW... how do they get the baby around... they carry her on their backs everwhere...
Yes because they have a baby carrier right? and you see all mothers put their damn baby in backpacks and walk around in public. Also that "g… moreutter" thing doesn't make sense at all. I'm wasting my time with you since you're trying to find loop holes and excuses for your own mistakes and poor replies.
Also please go google baby carriers... it's a billion dollar industry... a lot of mothers and fathers put their kids on the front and back... at least here in Brooklyn,NY... all the parents do it... later bro
LOL obviously you haven't since I didn't use any sexual innuendos or anything in that matter. Hopefully you're gone for good and mature before trying to reply. Especially to me.
Really cause you didn't just say this to me "Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the hell is wrong with you?".... this wasn't meant to be sexual? Otherwise you quoting me, makes no sense...
Also people have been carrying babies without baby carriers for hundreds if not thousands of years.... just thought you should know too... you don't need a baby carrier to swaddle carry a baby if you know what that is
LOL obviously you haven't since I didn't use any sexual innuendos or anything in that matter. Hopefully you're gone for good and mature before trying to reply. Especially to me.
So what was the "later bro" and ah yes because everything in that sentence is sexual. The only person who needs to get their head out of the gutter is you. Your logic is flawed. You fail to realize this is a NEWBORN
Really cause you didn't just say this to me "Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the … morehell is wrong with you?".... this wasn't meant to be sexual? Otherwise you quoting me, makes no sense...
Also people have been carrying babies without baby carriers for hundreds if not thousands of years.... just thought you should know too... you don't need a baby carrier to swaddle carry a baby if you know what that is
So what was the "later bro" and ah yes because everything in that sentence is sexual. The only person who needs to get their head out of the gutter is you. Your logic is flawed. You fail to realize this is a NEWBORN
That is totally Carver's baby. Skin completion is the wrong color to be Alvin's, if you catch my drift. Have fun carrying a physiopaths baby around with you.
Personally, I think the idea of leaving a helpless baby to die in the cold is disgusting. There's no way I could do such a thing. I just hope there's a way to give to baby to Christa or something. Clementine, no matter what playthrough, is not the type of person to leave a baby to suffer and die. Her parents and Lee taught her better than that. What's the point in living if you completely lose your humanity? I do agree that Clementine's safety is of the utmost importance though. Children and babies are the only chance humanity has at this point. They are the future. Clementine is a child and one who could very likely make it to adulthood. The baby's chances aren't as great as Clementine's right now and until they are, Clem's protection will come first. If there's any way to give that baby a future without jeopardizing Clem's safety, I want to take that option. Ideally, both Clem and the baby will be able to grow up and continue the species. Again, the world needs children and babies. Clementine should not be burdened with the baby's upkeep though. She is only a child and had enough on her plate worrying about herself. An adult should take the baby.
We're in the minority, but I'm with you. I sincerely hope we're not railroaded into caring about and keeping the baby. I know it might be te… moreetering on too dark for them to go the route of being able to leave it or whatever, but if you put it out there, we should have the choice. Never has the presence of a baby really improved a work of fiction for me, they're basically plot devices, and it's going to be such a burden trying to take care of it in a ZA. Honestly, if Kenny or Christa or whomever wants to raise the baby on their own, more power to them, but I'm not getting stuck in that situation.
I don't care who in the group that mindset costs me, tbh. My Clem will survive, damn it.
Babies are a risk that people are going to have to start taking in the world of TWD. Once the population ages past fertility, humanity will be done for, unless they start having children. It's dangerous, but necessary for the continuation of the species. Leaving the baby on the side of the road is not only inhuman, it's also incredibly short-sighted and foolish.
Rightly so. Babies are innocent and helpless. They haven't had the time to be cruel or hurtful to anyone. They are completely at our mercy. To "hate" something that is helpless, innocent, and at your mercy is vile. Hate is a very strong feeling. I'd much rather be around a baby than some nutcase who "hates" babies. That's just irrational, hating a baby. Disliking them or not wanting be around then when they cry is much more understandable. People who "hate" babies or animals are highly suspicious in my eyes. It's very revealing when you hate the weakest among you. Maybe you worded your comment wrong, but if you truly "hate" tiny, helpless humans, then I can understand why people look at you like a monster. No offense.
I hate babies IRL too, though. Too much nuisance and the crying just gets on my nerves. Maybe my perception would change if it was MY baby, … morebut as for other people's babies- keep those well away from me. And yes, I'm very much aware that views like this make people generally perceive me as a heartless monster.
There was one child walker in season 1 episode 4. If you mean baby walkers, then, yeah. We haven't seen those. I kinda figure they can't get around anywhere, and have mo means of attacking people, so I doubt they would be with any kind of herd.
I am fine with the baby - well, other than it might be Carver's - but the baby can't help that ( that pic above - scary - loll)! To me - an… moreyone alive gets a chance and assistance if possible - especially kids. OK - maybe not the bad guys!
This subject did make me have some odd thoughts though about a baby walker (crawler?) and I realized I do not ever recall seeing a child walker in the game - I could be wrong because I generally do not like to look at them anyway and I admit it would be pretty disturbing to see children walkers but it seems pretty obvious that there would be.
Most pragmatic reason: I don't want the human race to die out. I think humanity has a shot of surviving this mess. But in order to do that, there will have to be babies.
Also, you are right. If having a kid isn't enough, you'd have to be a real asshole to attack a group with a baby.
Finnaly, it's the right thing to do. I'm not going to let my Clem abandon a helpless infant. That would be the same as murder. Hell, that's an especially twisted type of murder.
Clem will have no part in that. Not if I have a say in the matter.
Also, I want to spit in the face of carver by making sure his baby will be as caring and compassionate as a season one Clem, ie, nothing like his father.
Try to act as if this is real life. Would you leave a baby behind to die? If your answer is yes then all I can say is "wow". I'm hoping that we come across Christa who lost her baby, and she can raise this one.
I don't see how the baby can be any worst then lugging around worthless Sarah.... who pretty much shit herself in every situation... just like a baby, except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride...
Comments
Yeah, but she was pretty self-reliant.
Not many people would've scavenged for it so it makes sense for it to be scavenged by the group
no bonnie stole it from carvers stuff he might have bin hordeing it once becca started to show he was smart just encase she died given birth he can still feed the baby
It seems like people are thinking more in terms of the here and now and not of the future, which I get but when there are so many people dead, it seems even more important to preserve as much life as you can.
you're a troll how are you not banned yet?
You make a great point. You're supposed to think like Clem, not Lee and she is pretty compassionate as a rule.
[removed]
She's not and I'm sure we're all thankful for that.
i think that there is a great place in hell for people like that who leaves a baby to die
Yeah I agree, most people want to risk having the baby around for reasons I don't understand.. If it was in a big community sure why not?
You have to, unless you're going to create a community. Only then can you think about the future.
THANK YOU! thank you thank you.
Well, I put the poll together from more of a surivalist perspective than an OOC storytelling perspective.
watch your language, also what you've been saying are NOT opinions.
I see something brewing here #teamCrawford vs #TeamLee
how is it not my opinion? You seem to have some weird infatuation with Sarah and get all angry when I talk negatively about her... this thread is about a baby... sarah pretty much by all means had the characteristics of a baby and an actual "baby" wouldn't be much different then "lugging around Sarah"... please tell me how this is not an opinion ... relax yourself... I don't have to like the same characters you do
That's too bad because it's a matter of time before Jane shows up with another baby.
it's not the fact that you talk crap about sarah, but it's the way you do it. You call her a "little bitch" and basically laugh at a 15 disturbed girl dying. Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the hell is wrong with you?
First off bro... get your quotes straight... I never once refered to Sarah as a "little B*tch"... go check and secondly how old are you? You ever hear of a baby carrier.... you literally can "put a baby on your back and take it for a ride" or wherever you go.. unlike a teenager( Sarah)... get your head out the gutter dude...
Or do you even watch the TV SHOW... how do they get the baby around... they carry her on their backs everwhere...
I'll be willing to protect the baby, but if it proves to be too taxing, I'll probably end up putting it down.
You can't take care of someone else if you can't take care of yourself.
Keep this in mind: If we don't give birth to and raise babies, humanity will become extinct. Eventually, everyone's going to die, whether it be by walkers or it be by aging. If we don't raise babies, we don't have another generation. Whether that's for the better or for the worse, that's up to you, but it's just something to think about.
Personally, I would try the hardest I can to raise that baby.
Yes because they have a baby carrier right? and you see all mothers put their damn baby in backpacks and walk around in public. Also that "gutter" thing doesn't make sense at all. I'm wasting my time with you since you're trying to find loop holes and excuses for your own mistakes and poor replies.
nvm bro... if you've never heard the phrase "get your head out the gutter"....... I don't even know what to say... peace man
Also please go google baby carriers... it's a billion dollar industry... a lot of mothers and fathers put their kids on the front and back... at least here in Brooklyn,NY... all the parents do it... later bro
The Baby Among Us.
LOL obviously you haven't since I didn't use any sexual innuendos or anything in that matter. Hopefully you're gone for good and mature before trying to reply. Especially to me.
Really cause you didn't just say this to me "Also saying "except a baby you can put on your back and just take it for the ride..." What the hell is wrong with you?".... this wasn't meant to be sexual? Otherwise you quoting me, makes no sense...
Also people have been carrying babies without baby carriers for hundreds if not thousands of years.... just thought you should know too... you don't need a baby carrier to swaddle carry a baby if you know what that is
So what was the "later bro" and ah yes because everything in that sentence is sexual. The only person who needs to get their head out of the gutter is you. Your logic is flawed. You fail to realize this is a NEWBORN
dude... I really am at a loss words with you.... have a good night
Honestly not a shocker, somebody like you at a lost of words? lol bye.
? Baby will remember that.
good luck convincing Kenny of that
That is totally Carver's baby. Skin completion is the wrong color to be Alvin's, if you catch my drift. Have fun carrying a physiopaths baby around with you.
Personally, I think the idea of leaving a helpless baby to die in the cold is disgusting. There's no way I could do such a thing. I just hope there's a way to give to baby to Christa or something. Clementine, no matter what playthrough, is not the type of person to leave a baby to suffer and die. Her parents and Lee taught her better than that. What's the point in living if you completely lose your humanity? I do agree that Clementine's safety is of the utmost importance though. Children and babies are the only chance humanity has at this point. They are the future. Clementine is a child and one who could very likely make it to adulthood. The baby's chances aren't as great as Clementine's right now and until they are, Clem's protection will come first. If there's any way to give that baby a future without jeopardizing Clem's safety, I want to take that option. Ideally, both Clem and the baby will be able to grow up and continue the species. Again, the world needs children and babies. Clementine should not be burdened with the baby's upkeep though. She is only a child and had enough on her plate worrying about herself. An adult should take the baby.
Babies are a risk that people are going to have to start taking in the world of TWD. Once the population ages past fertility, humanity will be done for, unless they start having children. It's dangerous, but necessary for the continuation of the species. Leaving the baby on the side of the road is not only inhuman, it's also incredibly short-sighted and foolish.
Rightly so. Babies are innocent and helpless. They haven't had the time to be cruel or hurtful to anyone. They are completely at our mercy. To "hate" something that is helpless, innocent, and at your mercy is vile. Hate is a very strong feeling. I'd much rather be around a baby than some nutcase who "hates" babies. That's just irrational, hating a baby. Disliking them or not wanting be around then when they cry is much more understandable. People who "hate" babies or animals are highly suspicious in my eyes. It's very revealing when you hate the weakest among you. Maybe you worded your comment wrong, but if you truly "hate" tiny, helpless humans, then I can understand why people look at you like a monster. No offense.
There was one child walker in season 1 episode 4. If you mean baby walkers, then, yeah. We haven't seen those. I kinda figure they can't get around anywhere, and have mo means of attacking people, so I doubt they would be with any kind of herd.
I have a couple reasons for protecting the baby.
Most pragmatic reason: I don't want the human race to die out. I think humanity has a shot of surviving this mess. But in order to do that, there will have to be babies.
Also, you are right. If having a kid isn't enough, you'd have to be a real asshole to attack a group with a baby.
Finnaly, it's the right thing to do. I'm not going to let my Clem abandon a helpless infant. That would be the same as murder. Hell, that's an especially twisted type of murder.
Clem will have no part in that. Not if I have a say in the matter.
Also, I want to spit in the face of carver by making sure his baby will be as caring and compassionate as a season one Clem, ie, nothing like his father.
Try to act as if this is real life. Would you leave a baby behind to die? If your answer is yes then all I can say is "wow". I'm hoping that we come across Christa who lost her baby, and she can raise this one.
Hahaha This actually made me laugh.