* S1 Ep3 - During the raid many of the bandits seen share the same character model as Vernon
* S1 Ep4 - Omids bandage disappears and reappe… morears from time to time.
* S1 Ep4 - When Lee's group goes to Crawford, Kenny can be seen holding a rife, this rifle is never seen again.
* S1 Ep4 - At the beginning of the episode when Omid uses the car to support himself the animation used is the same one as Lee's when he's cuffed back in episode 1.
There is a source, lemme pull it up.
Might take awhile to find it, so be patient pls
Here ya go, @lee4life
http://www.shacknews.com/article/77194/the-walking-dead-originally-starred-clementines-brother
"Though Lee Everett is the character you control in The Walking Dead, he wasn’t the character that the game is built around. “Clementine was literally the first idea,” says Vanaman, who planned Episode Fives’s outcome before writing a single line of dialogue. "
"Lee Everett wasn’t Telltale’s first idea for a main character. Originally, Vanaman planned for Clementine to come from a single-parent household where Clementine’s brother took care of her due to her mother not being up for the task. With this idea, Clementine’s brother became the lead, but Vanaman decided a pre-existing relationship would be too much to ask a player to take on in The Walking Dead world. The decision led to them changing Clementine’s race because they wanted her to look like she could potentially be Lee's daughter. "
Err...ok?
Give me a minute?
"Though Lee Everett is the character you control in The Walking Dead, he wasn’t the character that the gam… moree is built around. “Clementine was literally the first idea,” says Vanaman, who planned Episode Fives’s outcome before writing a single line of dialogue. "
"Lee Everett wasn’t Telltale’s first idea for a main character. Originally, Vanaman planned for Clementine to come from a single-parent household where Clementine’s brother took care of her due to her mother not being up for the task. With this idea, Clementine’s brother became the lead, but Vanaman decided a pre-existing relationship would be too much to ask a player to take on in The Walking Dead world. The decision led to them changing Clementine’s race because they wanted her to look like she could potentially be Lee's daughter. "
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2012/12/26/creating-clementine.aspx
Real enough for ya?
During the flashback of Season One during "All That Remains" Kenny is wearing the wrong outfit.
When Walter is taken hostage by Carver he remains silent, but in the flashback he insults Caver.
When Lee's group is leaving Crawford, when Kenny hands Lee the shotgun the body he takes it from is the same model as the conductor in the train.
If Sarita's hand is removed, when she screams the scream is reused from Beatrice.
S2 Ep4 when Clem and Jane are at the trailer park, if the player waits at the door your supposed to kick down, Jane can be seen reusing Molly's fight animation. Animation Used At 11 secs : Season 2 Jane Animation At 3:05:
Before reuniting with Clementine, good things hapned to Kenny.
She found a girlfriend, a safe sport with food and eletricity.
Then Clem comes and kills everyone
Really? I thougth the question was how to say Kenny is Carver 2.0 withouth sounding like bullshit.
hardly, in fact:
Mike, Bonnie, and Jane all had a good experience of Carver's dictatorship back at Howe's Hardware. It's not surprising to find Jane comparing Kenny to Carver, and Mike and Bonnie wanting to leave Kenny first chance they get.
no one has argued that kenny is carver 2.0, just that there are some similarities that people might use to compare the two (mainly in game characters at that).
Bonnie and Mike never said anything like that. Hell, Jane did even say that. She just said:
Jane: Look, I know Kenny is a good guy. I bet Carver was a good guy once, too.
and then as clem you had the choice of saying that kenny is not carver. so maybe clem misread the situation? and mike and bonnie just having to get away from that guy just like they did with carver has nothing to do with them thinking he is like carver in any way. you are right i am inferring a lot in their actions in that regard.
This is pointless. Kenny does not justify himself in anyway after taking Arvo hostage. Is pure necessity. Vitalli was still alive, so he was a danger to the ground, and taking Arvo hostage mean the situation could be endend quickly withouth wasting anymore ammunition. That was pure necessity and nothing more.
how is that any different than carver taking people hostage?
justify himself
kenny justified things to himself.
a bit different in how it is shown. if kenny felt he had no justification for taking arvo hostage, then why didn't he feel guilty about it? why did he hate arvo so much? he blamed arvo, and thus justified things to himself (i am not saying he justified things to others in any overt or eloquent way).
plus bonnie and mike. not sure about luke though, probably not though. i think we agree that bonnie isn't the most reliable of judgements, b… moreut mike's isn't too bad (probably better than jane's).
Bonnie and Mike never said anything like that. Hell, Jane did even say that. She just said:
Jane: Look, I know Kenny is a good guy. I bet Carver was a good guy once, too.
survival rates of a newborn out on the road is pretty low, so hunting down the mother to protect the newborn is easy to justify as for the greater good. killing someone for the greater good who screws up repeatedly has been argued about since ben in season one, so it is also easy to justify. not being able or not being willing to see things from other people's perspective makes it easy to justify bad things, especially to yourself. i think that is the big difference between kenny and carver. carver knew he was doing bad stuff for himself, and simply justified things … [view original content]
In episode 4, after axing a reanimated Nick (determinate) the walker you kill next has fresh blood on his mouth.
If Nick died in episode 2, that walker has no blood on him.
Nick's death was caused by that walker, he was probably weak from the gun shot, went out for help, and got chomped from the fresh blood. The blood trail goes to the fence, so Nick, seing he wasn't gonna make it, stuck his arm in the fence, most likely to not cause any harm to his fellow group members.
In episode 4, after axing a reanimated Nick (determinate) the walker you kill next has fresh blood on his mouth.
If Nick died in episode … more2, that walker has no blood on him.
Nick's death was caused by that walker, he was probably weak from the gun shot, went out for help, and got chomped from the fresh blood. The blood trail goes to the fence, so Nick, seing he wasn't gonna make it, stuck his arm in the fence, most likely to not cause any harm to his fellow group members.
Originally In No going back you have the option to kill both Mike and Bonnie. Bonnie when Luke drowns and you don't break the ice. Mike's death was patched but originally if you did nothing when he asks to get the gun from you, you will shoot him then Arvo will shoot you. Also before no going back came out on the Ps Vita it was called better to sleep for some reason. In Ep 1 in the police car there is a reference to the serial killer Thomas Richards from the comic series.
I guess it's like what Larry said... the second he turns, he kills his mom. Kat will turn fast, so it'll be two walkers. Ben will panic, Clem is just a little girl, no way could Chuck fight two walkers without proper weapons. If they get lucky, it's possible for Chuck to grab Clem and jump off the train, using his body to protect her. He's familiar with the railroad things so he may take the chance.
I like how undead Duck manages to overpower and kill Katjaa, Clem, Ben, Chuck, AND Lee without anyone doing anything about it.
Ben: Sees … moreDuck kill Katjaa "Welp."
Chuck: "Nothin we can do about it now."
Lee: Lets a child walker overpower him and throw him off a train "Well, shit."
Man...Imagine poor Ken's face when he finds this mess...
God...I REALLY don't like Thomas Richards after what he did in the comics... :l
So hearing that officer say "Kicking the back of the seat like a fussy baby" was pretty funny xP
no one has argued that kenny is carver 2.0, just that there are some similarities that people might use to compare the two (mainly in game characters at that).
Bonnie leaves because she is afraid of Kenny, and doesnt not want to look for Wellington. Mike leaves because he is disgusted by Kenny´s treatament of Arvo, afraid of Kenny, and because he does not want to go to Wellington. Not because they are reminded of Carver. You are just assuming too much.
and then as clem you had the choice of saying that kenny is not carver. so maybe clem misread the situation? and mike and bonnie just having to get away from that guy just like they did with carver has nothing to do with them thinking he is like carver in any way. you are right i am inferring a lot in their actions in that regard.
Bonnie leaves because she is afraid of Kenny, and doesnt not want to look for Wellington. Mike leaves because he is disgusted by Kenny´s treatament of Arvo, afraid of Kenny, and because he does not want to go to Wellington. Nothing do with them thinking Kenny is like Carver. You are just assuming.
As for Clem (determinantly) saying Kenny is not like Carver, you are not qouting her totally. She says:
Clem: Kenny is not like Carver. He just made a mistake.
how is that any different than carver taking people hostage?
Carver had bad intentions, Kenny had good intentions.
if kenny felt he had no justification for taking arvo hostage, then why didn't he feel guilty about it?
I am saying that he did not justify taking Arvo hostage, that was pure necesity. Of course he could not fell guilty about it.
why did he hate arvo so much?
You mean, besides that the gun figth with the Russians is Arvo´s fault? Besides that he nearly got them all killed one way or another?
Really? I thougth the question was how to say Kenny is Carver 2.0 withouth sounding like bullshit.
hardly, in fact:
Mike, Bonn… moreie, and Jane all had a good experience of Carver's dictatorship back at Howe's Hardware. It's not surprising to find Jane comparing Kenny to Carver, and Mike and Bonnie wanting to leave Kenny first chance they get.
no one has argued that kenny is carver 2.0, just that there are some similarities that people might use to compare the two (mainly in game characters at that).
Bonnie and Mike never said anything like that. Hell, Jane did even say that. She just said:
Jane: Look, I know Kenny is a good guy. I bet Carver was a good guy once, too.
and then as clem you had the choice of saying that kenny is not carver. so maybe clem misread the situation? and mike and bonnie just having to get away from that guy just like they did with carver has nothing to do with them thinking he i… [view original content]
Comments
Everyone who touched Clem hat died. (Kenny died im my play)
Don't you know? Kenny put it in his pocket and then just forgot about it. He has infinite pockets like Lee.
Yeah , but the thing is we need some sort of evidence.
I'm assuming that guy just made this up so I'm just gonna leave this here
Nope, this was confirmed by Telltale a while ago. I think this fact has been mentioned a few times on this thread.
Its not fake, I read it in a Game Informer article awhile back.
Source?
Source?
Source Engine?
No , a source that proves that what these guys are saying is true.
Ok , no source then...
Yeah , I'll assume it's fake until you give me the source.
Ok , no source then...
Yeah , I'll assume it's fake until you give me the source.
I like how undead Duck manages to overpower and kill Katjaa, Clem, Ben, Chuck, AND Lee without anyone doing anything about it.
Ben: Sees Duck kill Katjaa "Welp."
Chuck: "Nothin we can do about it now."
Lee: Lets a child walker overpower him and throw him off a train "Well, shit."
Man...Imagine poor Ken's face when he finds this mess...
There is a source, lemme pull it up.
Might take awhile to find it, so be patient pls
Here ya go, @lee4life
http://www.shacknews.com/article/77194/the-walking-dead-originally-starred-clementines-brother
If you give me the source and it's legit I will be such a fucking wreck
MY LIFE WILL BE A LIE
DON'T FUCKING DO THIS TO ME
Err...ok?
Give me a minute?
"Though Lee Everett is the character you control in The Walking Dead, he wasn’t the character that the game is built around. “Clementine was literally the first idea,” says Vanaman, who planned Episode Fives’s outcome before writing a single line of dialogue. "
"Lee Everett wasn’t Telltale’s first idea for a main character. Originally, Vanaman planned for Clementine to come from a single-parent household where Clementine’s brother took care of her due to her mother not being up for the task. With this idea, Clementine’s brother became the lead, but Vanaman decided a pre-existing relationship would be too much to ask a player to take on in The Walking Dead world. The decision led to them changing Clementine’s race because they wanted her to look like she could potentially be Lee's daughter. "
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2012/12/26/creating-clementine.aspx
Real enough for ya?
No , NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!
SHIIIIIIIT
o_o
NO
k™
Click here
You're overreacting.
Me?
Over reacting?
Pfft!
Yep.
That's Carver, yo.
Why the hell are people blaming a little girl for all the bad shit she sees?
hardly, in fact:
no one has argued that kenny is carver 2.0, just that there are some similarities that people might use to compare the two (mainly in game characters at that).
and then as clem you had the choice of saying that kenny is not carver. so maybe clem misread the situation? and mike and bonnie just having to get away from that guy just like they did with carver has nothing to do with them thinking he is like carver in any way. you are right i am inferring a lot in their actions in that regard.
how is that any different than carver taking people hostage?
a bit different in how it is shown. if kenny felt he had no justification for taking arvo hostage, then why didn't he feel guilty about it? why did he hate arvo so much? he blamed arvo, and thus justified things to himself (i am not saying he justified things to others in any overt or eloquent way).
In episode 4, after axing a reanimated Nick (determinate) the walker you kill next has fresh blood on his mouth.
If Nick died in episode 2, that walker has no blood on him.
Nick's death was caused by that walker, he was probably weak from the gun shot, went out for help, and got chomped from the fresh blood. The blood trail goes to the fence, so Nick, seing he wasn't gonna make it, stuck his arm in the fence, most likely to not cause any harm to his fellow group members.
I like this a lot better than "I'm going for help! No, a walker! I'll run away! Derp derp, I'm stuck in the fence. Guess I'll die."
That makes two of us.
Originally In No going back you have the option to kill both Mike and Bonnie. Bonnie when Luke drowns and you don't break the ice. Mike's death was patched but originally if you did nothing when he asks to get the gun from you, you will shoot him then Arvo will shoot you. Also before no going back came out on the Ps Vita it was called better to sleep for some reason. In Ep 1 in the police car there is a reference to the serial killer Thomas Richards from the comic series.
God...I REALLY don't like Thomas Richards after what he did in the comics... :l
So hearing that officer say "Kicking the back of the seat like a fussy baby" was pretty funny xP
Come on darling, I'm serious... (T_T)
We're not blaming Clem...We're just mocking the writing. Whenever a group comes across the protagonist it will just die out...
Excuse me... I'm living within the great fire wall of China so I can't see it...But I'm really wondering what's in it...could you please tell me?
I guess it's like what Larry said... the second he turns, he kills his mom. Kat will turn fast, so it'll be two walkers. Ben will panic, Clem is just a little girl, no way could Chuck fight two walkers without proper weapons. If they get lucky, it's possible for Chuck to grab Clem and jump off the train, using his body to protect her. He's familiar with the railroad things so he may take the chance.
omg i never made that connection until i read these posts my mind is blown
Bonnie leaves because she is afraid of Kenny, and doesnt not want to look for Wellington. Mike leaves because he is disgusted by Kenny´s treatament of Arvo, afraid of Kenny, and because he does not want to go to Wellington. Not because they are reminded of Carver. You are just assuming too much.
Bonnie leaves because she is afraid of Kenny, and doesnt not want to look for Wellington. Mike leaves because he is disgusted by Kenny´s treatament of Arvo, afraid of Kenny, and because he does not want to go to Wellington. Nothing do with them thinking Kenny is like Carver. You are just assuming.
As for Clem (determinantly) saying Kenny is not like Carver, you are not qouting her totally. She says:
Clem: Kenny is not like Carver. He just made a mistake.
Carver had bad intentions, Kenny had good intentions.
I am saying that he did not justify taking Arvo hostage, that was pure necesity. Of course he could not fell guilty about it.
You mean, besides that the gun figth with the Russians is Arvo´s fault? Besides that he nearly got them all killed one way or another?
From S2 E4 - E5 Buricko and Vitali Change places and weapons
Dude I don't know if you are trying to be funny but it's not working.
Not trying to be funny.