No-one should hit anyone; sex and gender are irrelevant to that.
If the hypothetical woman hitting you actually poses a danger to your li… morefe/wellbeing, fighting back in self defence may be justified. Otherwise, it's just two wrongs and no rights. That would be the case if it was a man hitting a woman too.
Morals never change depending on the gender, race or sexuality of x person in y situation. Morals apply to humans, not specific sections of humans.
Women have equal rights in the law and should have equal punishments...in the law.
Hitting someone for hitting you isn't justified. Nor is stealing from someone who steals from you, raping someone who rapes you, etc. etc.
A real woman wouldn't hit a man just because she wants to, I really hate the hypocrisy and double standards on subjects like this, yet women want equality. Well guess what, that is equality, hit a man expect to get hit back like one, that's equality. You all just want equality on good things but not the bad things.
No, go with defensive instead of offensive and just restrain her. If you are weaker than her or if she actually is a danger to yourself or o… morethers, than hitting her might be your only option.
A real man wouldn't hit a girl unless it was absolutely necessary. If a girl gets angry and slaps a man, he shouldn't respond by hitting her back. I know that sounds unfair, but men shouldn't hurt those weaker than them (if that is the case with the person who hit them). The girl would of course be wrong for slapping him, but an actual gentleman would defend himself/restrain her instead of resorting to that level.
it depends on the situation. If she's just playfully hit you then no she doesn't deserve to be hit back. If she's crazy and trying to act li… moreke a man by domestic violence then yes she should be hit.
Either way a man and woman shouldn't hit each other unless it's for play play, or joking around, or training for something.
P.S
a man probably shouldn't hit a woman because, feminists will be on you, and try to take you down for defending yourself.
Double standards: It's statistically proven that when a man is abusing a female, he gets in trouble for it. And when a female abuses a man, she gets respected and not get punished that much as a man. That's the feminist movement for ya XD
Violence is justified in many situations, one of them is self defense. Are you just gonna let some beat the shit out of you or kill you or are you gonna defend yourself? Do you think it's not justified then?
I don't get it, all feminists aim for is equality in how they're treated alongside men. When men get into fights or get hit, they fight back… more or deal with it. Women seem to be a bit more resistant to the idea, I mean it's a bit hypocritical how they stride for equal rights but believe they get special privileges when they get hit cause they claim "women aren't able to defend themselves" then that's just a load of bullshit.
You either want to be treated equally or you don't, now I'm not saying violence is justified in any scenario, cause it's not. But it just annoys me how women can ask for one thing yet claim they themselves can have special privileges in the face of other scenarios.
I try not to get into situations where I'd get hit by anybody.
But say you see two women hitting each other, and you want to break them up and diffuse the situation. What's the best way to do that?
So if a 10 year old girl runs up to to you and punches you in the stomach, you would feel justified in decking her? I'm sorry, but we should… moren't be so black-white about this. We need to take an honest look at what is actually legitimate self defense and what is not. Going back to the topic on hand, I wouldn't lay a finger on a girl that posed no threat to me... regardless of what she did to me to begin with. It would be screwed up to hit her if did not actually pose any sort of threat to my safety.
Yes, he should. If he did not anger her into it, then yes. If he did, then no. I don't attack girls verbally or physically, so said woman wouldn't hit me without feeling retaliation. It really depends on the male and female is my answer.
Well we're all animals. Anyway, I'm 17 and kids always fight their younger siblings and nothing happens. It's not as if I would beat them to a pulp, just one hit to the gut.
I in no way condone women hitting men out of nowhere or for unjustified reasons, I'm not sure exactly where you got that from.
What I'm trying to say is, would it be fair if a 160 pound man returns the punch to a 100 pound woman who is 10 inches smaller than him?
Let's face it: women, most of the time, are physically weaker than men. That's just biology. I hate to equate women to children, but would you punch a child if they hit you? Of course not, they are much weaker and the damage you could do to them is far greater than they could do to you.
A defensive strategy would ensure that she stops, but you also aren't hurting her. I saw a fight once between 2 teenagers, where the girl tried to punch the guy in the face and at most gave him a red mark. He returned the punch, and she was knocked flat onto the ground. Unless the woman is stronger than you, it's unfair.
A real woman wouldn't hit a man just because she wants to, I really hate the hypocrisy and double standards on subjects like this, yet women… more want equality. Well guess what, that is equality, hit a man expect to get hit back like one, that's equality. You all just want equality on good things but not the bad things.
I think we should be sophisticated enough to not fall back on the idea of "you hit me, I hit you back no matter what" as if it is some sort of reasonable justification. At 17 years of age, there is no reason for you to hit a defenseless 10 year old kid just for the sake of getting even or for the sake of teaching them a lesson. That's honestly pretty inexcusable.
Well we're all animals. Anyway, I'm 17 and kids always fight their younger siblings and nothing happens. It's not as if I would beat them to a pulp, just one hit to the gut.
Comments
Even in self defense i wouldn't hit a woman. I have been known to break a few cell phones however.
I advise any man to do their best to not lay hands on a woman. Restrain her because the court system is not on your side.
It's not childish to defend yourself.
Morals are not real.
Who are you to say what's "justified"? And that is the definition of justified. You can hit someone if they hit you, period.
A real woman wouldn't hit a man just because she wants to, I really hate the hypocrisy and double standards on subjects like this, yet women want equality. Well guess what, that is equality, hit a man expect to get hit back like one, that's equality. You all just want equality on good things but not the bad things.
But you don't hate the girls who hit guys huh?
No, it's equality, they bitch and moan about it all the time.
Exactly.
Violence is justified in many situations, one of them is self defense. Are you just gonna let some beat the shit out of you or kill you or are you gonna defend yourself? Do you think it's not justified then?
If a little kid happens to kick you in the knee, would you honestly feel justified in returning the favor?
Only if that woman has a penis.
Leave them.
Yes, a 10 year old is old enough to know about that and they hit you hard in your gut, hell yeah.
My man, not letting society's double standards and hypocrisy hold you down like those sheep do. Don't let those scumbags dictate your life.
[removed]
K
I'm stating facts.
I mean I've heard of people feeling strongly about their opinions, but holy fuck.
Funny that the only thing I've ever said to you is, "What the duck?" Months and months later, that trend continues, because, what the duck?
That's pretty animalistic of you, but alrighty. Good luck in court.
Yes, he should. If he did not anger her into it, then yes. If he did, then no. I don't attack girls verbally or physically, so said woman wouldn't hit me without feeling retaliation. It really depends on the male and female is my answer.
Well we're all animals. Anyway, I'm 17 and kids always fight their younger siblings and nothing happens. It's not as if I would beat them to a pulp, just one hit to the gut.
It's funny, I was about to say 'What the Duck' but I was like nahhhhhhh
I in no way condone women hitting men out of nowhere or for unjustified reasons, I'm not sure exactly where you got that from.
What I'm trying to say is, would it be fair if a 160 pound man returns the punch to a 100 pound woman who is 10 inches smaller than him?
Let's face it: women, most of the time, are physically weaker than men. That's just biology. I hate to equate women to children, but would you punch a child if they hit you? Of course not, they are much weaker and the damage you could do to them is far greater than they could do to you.
A defensive strategy would ensure that she stops, but you also aren't hurting her. I saw a fight once between 2 teenagers, where the girl tried to punch the guy in the face and at most gave him a red mark. He returned the punch, and she was knocked flat onto the ground. Unless the woman is stronger than you, it's unfair.
So, that's basically you?
How can you possibly think that.
A human with the right to hold an opinion.
Who do?
And what I said was equality.
I think we should be sophisticated enough to not fall back on the idea of "you hit me, I hit you back no matter what" as if it is some sort of reasonable justification. At 17 years of age, there is no reason for you to hit a defenseless 10 year old kid just for the sake of getting even or for the sake of teaching them a lesson. That's honestly pretty inexcusable.
The hell kind of thread is this?!
Neither of them should hit the other, but i guess he has the "right" to hit back, but i wouldn't
I'm not saying wail them in the face or anything but you should be allowed to like lightly tap them back or push them away.
The best kind. :P
This is venturing way too far into offensive territory, so I'm going to close it here.