* Telltale needs to stop producing more episodes for The Walking Dead.
* Anything R-18 is the funniest crap ever and I will never under… morestand how people can take it so seriously.
* I absolutely hate Coke and will only drink it as a last resort.
* Telltale needs to stop producing more episodes for The Walking Dead.
* Anything R-18 is the funniest crap ever and I will never under… morestand how people can take it so seriously.
* I absolutely hate Coke and will only drink it as a last resort.
I'm actually relieved that you share a lot of the views I hold on this matter. I agree with pretty much everything you said. There are just … moresome tidbits feminists bring up sometimes, like how men are more numerous in the highest paying jobs.
Other than that, I pretty much agree. First world women on most counts have the same rights and opportunities as men do.
don't find WWE watchable now that both CM Punk and AJ are gone
Don't blame you there, they lost a huge part of their talent because of their mistreatment towards Punk. AJ may have retired but I'm going to assume it's because of how WWE may have treated her after CM Punk got fired.
Oh shit, here we go.
* I like Tales from The Borderlands more than The Walking Dead Game S1 + S2.
* I really like my vegetables.
* Re… moreferring to my age group in my country, I don't like the music they do.
* Not to sound all 'MySpace 2008 emo', but I like getting needles. (I just can't watch them going in.)
* I don't fully ship either of the two main ships in Tales from The Borderlands (Rhyiona and Rhysha). Although if I had to pick one, it wouldn't be Rhysha. (Last part probably wasn't unpopular.)
* I want the down vote button back again. Y'all just need to get over the butt hurt, it's not hard.
* I don't find WWE watchable now that both CM Punk and AJ are gone.
Yep . The more people or 'Weepers' (crazed plague people) you kill the more people hate you, the more the plague spreads, the more evil people you like become and you get the bad ending.
In theory and what really happens are two very different things.
For example, on a small scale Communism or Anarchy could work fairly well however in mass scale it doesn't. Therefore, despite what it means in theory, in reality it means chaos.
In theory and what really happens are two very different things.
For example, on a small scale Communism or Anarchy could work fairly well however in mass scale it doesn't. Therefore, despite what it means in theory, in reality it means chaos.
You mean that I said it does under right circumstances?
Yes, I did. However, in my original post I meant on large scale process like my friend thinks and from what Snookie said, I'm guessing he meant large scale too. Of course, any ideology can work on small scales, but history tells us about large scales.
Here's an American exclusive one. I'm not sure about the opinions of people in other countries.
I think that religious organizations should have their tax-exempt statuses revoked unless they can prove that a large portion of their tithes and earnings go towards reputable, charitable causes.
Taxes would put a serious hurting on churches like Westboro Baptist who put all their funds toward advancing hateful rhetoric. Of course, such a reform would never pass because the religious right would start howling "Christian persecutiiioooonnn!" from the goddamn rooftops as soon as it hit Congress.
If you intend to harm me, I will stop you. In a split second judgement call I decide what is the right action, and if that means I punch a woman than so be it. Malice is malice, I will stop you whether you are a woman, a kid, a dog, or an angry sentient tree. If I do more damage to her than she would have done to me, then perhaps she should not have tried to harm me.
The discrepancy in physical ability matters. If we're comparing an average guy to an average girl, the girl is obviously going to take the w… moreorse of a scenario where punches are traded. A girl punching a guy is not equatable to a guy punching a girl, so it's really not a matter of her getting what she gave.. considering how the consequences are not the same at all. That isn't to say they should get away with violence, but meeting that violence with more violence is generally completely unnecessary, unless we're talking about an all out attack where it is necessary to defend yourself. Again, there are more suitable responses to the situation. I mean really, what's the justification for returning a punch in this situation? Payback purposes, while completely disregarding the large natural difference in strength? You wouldn't deck a ten year old kid if they punched you, right..? I would hope not. If the girl is no threat to you, then punching her … [view original content]
Women are different. They are demons or witches. Maybe not all but I'm sure women are controlling men. Spells, pheromones, they have their cruel ways. Don't ask my why they do that. I'm not sure which actions/thoughts are really mine. Worst part - there's no escape. You'll be found and/or punished. We are doomed.
Another unpopular opinion, that is actually extremely unpopular.
Dr. Pepper is one of the most disgusting things I have ever had in my whole life. I would rather drink raw sewage.
Another unpopular opinion, that is actually extremely unpopular.
Dr. Pepper is one of the most disgusting things I have ever had in my whole life. I would rather drink raw sewage.
Yeah, it's really sad. It's even more shitty how they kept forcing the "I'm better than you because I'm (x) type of girl and don't like girly stuff!" storyline on AJ. Especially since the "WeWantDivas" hashtag (or something like that) was popular and going around at the time. It just tore down the divas a lot while trying to build them up.
don't find WWE watchable now that both CM Punk and AJ are gone
Don't blame you there, they lost a huge part of their talent becaus… moree of their mistreatment towards Punk. AJ may have retired but I'm going to assume it's because of how WWE may have treated her after CM Punk got fired.
Now flame me!
Okay, sure. You have been challenged
I think feminism should adopt a more gender-neutral name.
If you me… morean as in equality for all people, such as equality with men and women, you are thinking of egalitarianism.
The movement now deals with issues concerning both women and men.
Citation needed. The movement of feminism is to achieve equal rights for women. As said before, egalitarianism is a better movement, because it has been, is and will be a movement to achieve equality amongst sexes, races and classes.
I understand that women still have it harder
I hope you're not talking about the First World Women, because they have it quite easy (as easy as man). The "lucky" people in First World Countries have it quite easy as a whole. People should pay more attention to countries and people who really need the help.
but a social movement should have a name that accurately represents… [view original content]
I understand that women still have it harder,
Yeah. Not being able to avoid paying for a child regardless of want or income. Wait, n… moreo. Well, poor women being vastly under-choosen to raise their kids after a divorce. Oh, shit, hang on. Oh the tragedy of all those applicably merited women being turned away because of male worker quotas. Damn it! Poor women, always getting their genitals chopped up as babies. Crap! I'll get this! Gastly that solely women must sign up for selective service. This is hard! So sorry for women, since they have such a higher rate of suicide directly tied to social expectations. Fuck, I know I can do this! Poor women... getting whistled at. Nailed it
(Obviously this is not all inclusive and is satirical, but saying one has it worse than the other is highly dependant on context.)
* Telltale needs to stop producing more episodes for The Walking Dead.
* Anything R-18 is the funniest crap ever and I will never under… morestand how people can take it so seriously.
* I absolutely hate Coke and will only drink it as a last resort.
Women are different. They are demons or witches. Maybe not all but I'm sure women are controlling men. Spells, pheromones, they have their c… moreruel ways. Don't ask my why they do that. I'm not sure which actions/thoughts are really mine. Worst part - there's no escape. You'll be found and/or punished. We are doomed.
Telltale needs to stop producing more episodes for The Walking Dead.
lol??????
Anything R-18 is the funniest crap ever and I will never understand how people can take it so seriously.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
-Five Nights at Freddy's is overrated. The creator seems like a great guy but FNAF is too overhyped.
I agree. FNAF is not scary anyways. I mean, there are so many better horror games out there and many people think FNAF is a great horror game? I know it's all opinions but I have to disagree with them. FNAF is not a horror game that will make you have nightmares. At least I'm glad that no more FNAFs will be released since the 4th one is the 'final chapter'.
To be fair it doesn't, it just means a society without government and laws, social norms are technically still fair-game under the the anarchic philosophy and the original proponents believed that the combination of general societal pressure and that people were naturally good were more than enough to keep society not only functional but also thriving.
Anyway, point is, it really doesn't mean chaos, sure chaos is related to anarchy and arguably caused by it but if even theoretically one can exist without the other it means the terms aren't mutually exclusive and therefore do not share the same meaning which does mean he would be quite right, even if modern anarchists are proponents of chaos.
Also practically speaking if there was some sort of catastrophe that destroyed the government and people managed to keep living in a fairly good and orderly way without an existing organized governmental structure it would mean that anarchy without chaos is plausible and considering the extremely philanthropic way Japanese people acting after the 2011 tsunami I wouldn't say it's necessarily impossible although it is highly improbable.
This is true, as an atheist that grew up as around an extremely religious environment I can't say I don't understand them but precisely because of the same I also know there's tons of nice and highly intelligent religious people, but anyway people tend to lash-out when they are wronged and I know religious people can be downright abusive towards atheists, specially family members and considering that it is in people's nature to categorize and generalize this negative view does make some sense but I think we all have enough intelligence to realize that these assessments are wrong pretty much like those of some of the religious people that assume that all atheists are evil and amoral because their actions aren't held to a holy moral authority.
To me, it feels like that atheism is starting to get out of hand, and people are just starting to hate religion because it's the cool thing … moreto do. I'm not really a religious person, and if you don't like religion, that's perfectly fine, but I think it's starting to go a little overboard. (I do however, agree that there are a shit ton of stupid christians in America, but a lot of atheists from what I've seen just treat it like ALL of them are stupid)
Also, please keep in mind, I'm not hating on atheism. As I said earlier, if you're atheist, I don't really care. Please don't take this the wrong way. Because a lot of people on other forums certainly have.
They also bombed Pearl Harbor after declaring peaceful intentions... only intending to declare war hours before the surprise attack. They couldn't be trusted.
Another unpopular opinion, that is actually extremely unpopular.
Dr. Pepper is one of the most disgusting things I have ever had in my whole life. I would rather drink raw sewage.
Comments
* Anything R-18 is the funniest crap ever and I will never understand how people can take it so seriously.
* I absolutely hate Coke and will only drink it as a last resort.
Yeah, I mean, we have 2 seasons already and I think these are enough. We don't really need a S3 but.... yeah...
I agree. Pepsi is much better.
Yes, and they're only interested in equality when the dinero is involved. They don't care much about having women as garbage collectors. Fancy that.
Don't blame you there, they lost a huge part of their talent because of their mistreatment towards Punk. AJ may have retired but I'm going to assume it's because of how WWE may have treated her after CM Punk got fired.
Thanks, I'll remember that! :P
I wish we could see who upvoted any comment. That would cause a little chaos though. :P
It doesn't, not in its original theoretical meaning. Just like communism doesn't mean slavery in its base theoretical form.
For example, on a small scale Communism or Anarchy could work fairly well however in mass scale it doesn't. Therefore, despite what it means in theory, in reality it means chaos.
You mean that I said it does under right circumstances?
Yes, I did. However, in my original post I meant on large scale process like my friend thinks and from what Snookie said, I'm guessing he meant large scale too. Of course, any ideology can work on small scales, but history tells us about large scales.
Here's an American exclusive one. I'm not sure about the opinions of people in other countries.
I think that religious organizations should have their tax-exempt statuses revoked unless they can prove that a large portion of their tithes and earnings go towards reputable, charitable causes.
Taxes would put a serious hurting on churches like Westboro Baptist who put all their funds toward advancing hateful rhetoric. Of course, such a reform would never pass because the religious right would start howling "Christian persecutiiioooonnn!" from the goddamn rooftops as soon as it hit Congress.
The way I see it is this:
If you intend to harm me, I will stop you. In a split second judgement call I decide what is the right action, and if that means I punch a woman than so be it. Malice is malice, I will stop you whether you are a woman, a kid, a dog, or an angry sentient tree. If I do more damage to her than she would have done to me, then perhaps she should not have tried to harm me.
Women are different. They are demons or witches. Maybe not all but I'm sure women are controlling men. Spells, pheromones, they have their cruel ways. Don't ask my why they do that. I'm not sure which actions/thoughts are really mine. Worst part - there's no escape. You'll be found and/or punished. We are doomed.
I hate Dr. Pepper too. But I wouldn't say its the most disgusting thing I ever tasted though.
I loooove gotham
Edit:Shit didn't mean to reply lol
Why would you insult such an amazing beverage? Sewage is great!
Sewage is great. Much better than that Dr. Pepper shit.
You don't like it, you love it!
Yeah, it's really sad. It's even more shitty how they kept forcing the "I'm better than you because I'm (x) type of girl and don't like girly stuff!" storyline on AJ. Especially since the "WeWantDivas" hashtag (or something like that) was popular and going around at the time. It just tore down the divas a lot while trying to build them up.
Feminism is actually equality for both genders, don't be fooled by the name. And, uh, the people who misuse the word feminism.
You do realize that feminism is trying to get rid of everything you just said.
Isn't "it" referring to objects?
A little?
Hahahahahaha.
lol??????
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Pepsi's definitely better.
I would like that too, tbh. Something like what Facebook does.
Watch out!
Is this not an unpopular opinion or? :'D
I agree. FNAF is not scary anyways. I mean, there are so many better horror games out there and many people think FNAF is a great horror game? I know it's all opinions but I have to disagree with them. FNAF is not a horror game that will make you have nightmares. At least I'm glad that no more FNAFs will be released since the 4th one is the 'final chapter'.
I lol'd because that was the most unpopular thing I've ever heard in my life time, actually. :P
To be fair it doesn't, it just means a society without government and laws, social norms are technically still fair-game under the the anarchic philosophy and the original proponents believed that the combination of general societal pressure and that people were naturally good were more than enough to keep society not only functional but also thriving.
Anyway, point is, it really doesn't mean chaos, sure chaos is related to anarchy and arguably caused by it but if even theoretically one can exist without the other it means the terms aren't mutually exclusive and therefore do not share the same meaning which does mean he would be quite right, even if modern anarchists are proponents of chaos.
Also practically speaking if there was some sort of catastrophe that destroyed the government and people managed to keep living in a fairly good and orderly way without an existing organized governmental structure it would mean that anarchy without chaos is plausible and considering the extremely philanthropic way Japanese people acting after the 2011 tsunami I wouldn't say it's necessarily impossible although it is highly improbable.
This is true, as an atheist that grew up as around an extremely religious environment I can't say I don't understand them but precisely because of the same I also know there's tons of nice and highly intelligent religious people, but anyway people tend to lash-out when they are wronged and I know religious people can be downright abusive towards atheists, specially family members and considering that it is in people's nature to categorize and generalize this negative view does make some sense but I think we all have enough intelligence to realize that these assessments are wrong pretty much like those of some of the religious people that assume that all atheists are evil and amoral because their actions aren't held to a holy moral authority.
Haha. Riiiiiiiiight...
Finally, someone who agrees with me! I mean I don't HATE coke, but I'd take a Pepsi Max any pday.
This does not justify the use of atomic weapons against CIVILIAN targets.
I read chaos doet I would love this tbh
Believe what you want then, pal. Doesn't bother me.
What's it taste like, Gary?