Hasn't done anything wrong? She borrowed money from Frank and was planning to leave Arcadia Bay without paying him back, tried to rob Nathan to pay Frank (By the way, why isn't she working? It's not like she's studying or anything), stole David's pistol, doesn't respect David at all (Even though she's basically living on his paycheck) and she may steal money from the handicapped fund to pay Frank. While I don't hate Chloe (I actually think she is one of the most interesting characters in the game) she does stupid things.
I disagree she hasn't done anything wrong to anyone, she's also the only person that cared about the disappearing of a girl while the rest of the town just ignored it.
I disagree she hasn't done anything wrong to anyone, she's also the only person that cared about the disappearing of a girl while the rest of the town just ignored it.
Cope, what we're trying to say is: if you don't wanna get into a discussion about homosexuality and bla bla, why did you reply him in the first place?
I mean, when you dislike people for being gay, that's just your ''opinion''. When someone dislikes homophobia, they're disrespecting you and others' opinions. Does that make sense to you? Cause in my opinion it doesn't. If you think you have the right to despise homosexuality, people should have the right to despise homophobia, otherwise you don't believe in free will at all.
Let's try to keep things civil, but I'll never understand how you think that some types of discrimination (such as sexism and racism) are bad and shouldn't be tolerated, when you support other kind of discrimination. In your opinion, racism and sexism shouldn't be tolerated, but when YOU go homophobic, you're just ''giving your opinion''? You either believe in free speech or you don't, there's no middle ground.
Yes it is. Homosexuals don't choose to be homosexuals.
And if you really believe they do choose to be gay, please, show me some evidence.
Otherwise we can't take your opinion seriously. It would be the same if I said something like ''I believe soda can cure cancer'', and then someone replied me ''How so? There's no evidence of it.'' and then I said ''It is my opinion. Respect it''.
Saying ''it's my opinion'' doesn't give you a free pass to say whatever you like. Without any scientific basis, your opinion can't be taken seriously.
Yes it is. Homosexuals don't choose to be homosexuals.
And if you really believe they do choose to be gay, please, show me some evidence.… more
Otherwise we can't take your opinion seriously. It would be the same if I said something like ''I believe soda can cure cancer'', and then someone replied me ''How so? There's no evidence of it.'' and then I said ''It is my opinion. Respect it''.
Saying ''it's my opinion'' doesn't give you a free pass to say whatever you like. Without any scientific basis, your opinion can't be taken seriously.
Yes it is. Homosexuals don't choose to be homosexuals.
And if you really believe they do choose to be gay, please, show me some evidence.… more
Otherwise we can't take your opinion seriously. It would be the same if I said something like ''I believe soda can cure cancer'', and then someone replied me ''How so? There's no evidence of it.'' and then I said ''It is my opinion. Respect it''.
Saying ''it's my opinion'' doesn't give you a free pass to say whatever you like. Without any scientific basis, your opinion can't be taken seriously.
Tbh, there are worse movies, those new JJ Abrams Startrek films have just as many plot holes and cliches and most people love them for some reason so who knows.
And around , and around we go..
Yes I once thought so . That it was a lifestyle choice . Clearly it isn't . I was wrong on that. Happy? N… moreo?
No it's not my place to judge you nor is it to tell you or anyone else who they can or can not screw .
But do I have to like it / approve ? Absolutely not .
So don't label me a pobe for doing so .
Now I'm done talking to you now.
Screw? Gee, stay classy. We're talking about loving, not screwing.
Oh, I thought you were saying it was a choice. Of course being black and being gay are not the same thing, since they're skin color and sexual orientation, respectively. But they both are not a choice.
Wasn't so difficult to keep things civil, was it? Always nice talking to you.
And around , and around we go..
Yes I once thought so . That it was a lifestyle choice . Clearly it isn't . I was wrong on that. Happy? N… moreo?
No it's not my place to judge you nor is it to tell you or anyone else who they can or can not screw .
But do I have to like it / approve ? Absolutely not .
So don't label me a pobe for doing so .
Now I'm done talking to you now.
Hasn't done anything wrong? She borrowed money from Frank and was planning to leave Arcadia Bay without paying him back, tried to rob Nathan… more to pay Frank (By the way, why isn't she working? It's not like she's studying or anything), stole David's pistol, doesn't respect David at all (Even though she's basically living on his paycheck) and she may steal money from the handicapped fund to pay Frank. While I don't hate Chloe (I actually think she is one of the most interesting characters in the game) she does stupid things.
I myself am religious but I have unfortunately met many people who are pretty homophobic and their answer to "Why?" is most of the time stupid and simply bullshit.
But still, let's not hate anyone now, it'd be better that way.
I despise or HATE people that hates the gay community for religion. I don't care who they are, I just fucking hate them.
Its just the arrogance, and the lack of IQ.
I thought Star Trek: Into Darkness was good. Nothing spectacular about it, but it was a serviceable movie. I've never seen an original Star Trek movie before, so I guess that's why I liked it. :P
Tbh, there are worse movies, those new JJ Abrams Startrek films have just as many plot holes and cliches and most people love them for some reason so who knows.
BlackLivesMatter is a movement for those black people being unlawfully killed/imprisoned by racially/egotistically motivated police officers.
Purpose and aims of groups is just a justification for any action they do hidden behind the real headline.
I prefer looking at the actions of groups over what their purposes are
hmmm are all police evil do they not have families to get home too, can they not protect themselves as well? and are all the people blacklivesmatter defending innocent citizens? nah shoot back at the police any race is getting shot back at not a race issue the polices lives are just as important as your's always will be they deserve to live too.
Feminazi's want equality for all sexes purpose Vs actions
Again purpose is always merely a shield to hide real intentions a justification to do anything without consequence I judge people for their actions not for their aims.
BlackLivesMatter is a movement for those black people being unlawfully killed/imprisoned by racially/egotistically motivated police officers… more.
Of course all lives matter, but why would you name a movement for black people AllLivesMatter when it's not about other races?
She never stated that she wanted to leave without paying Frank. The fact that she was trying to get money from Nathan proves the exact oposite.
Ges stealing from Nathan is low. I wasn't thinking about that when I replied. In her defense I can say that she knew that Nathan had a lot of money that he didn't need. (I know that doen't justify the act).
Well stealing the gun is understandable: she had almost been shot at and she was also dealing with dangerous drug dealers, that gun (as she stated) was for self defense not to piss David.
She doesnt respect David because she feels like he is trying to replace her father, he also tries to put limits on her. Her anger is understandable and believable.
The Handicaped funds stealing has no justification. Luckly Max was there to restrain her.
Hasn't done anything wrong? She borrowed money from Frank and was planning to leave Arcadia Bay without paying him back, tried to rob Nathan… more to pay Frank (By the way, why isn't she working? It's not like she's studying or anything), stole David's pistol, doesn't respect David at all (Even though she's basically living on his paycheck) and she may steal money from the handicapped fund to pay Frank. While I don't hate Chloe (I actually think she is one of the most interesting characters in the game) she does stupid things.
I think you need to Read my unpopular post again I clearly state they are different I like feminism and they are different but feminazi's still do exist hidden behind feminism more about not getting them mixed up :P
Sorry to be that guy, but is it really necessary to comment that? I mean, it adds nothing to the topic and there is a like button if you agree with the comment...
Sorry to be that guy, but is it really necessary to comment that? I mean, it adds nothing to the topic and there is a like button if you agree with the comment...
But if it's your thing, then it's cool...
I clearly state they are different I like feminism and they are different but feminazi's still do exist hidden behind feminism more about not getting them mixed up :P
And look at what you've said about BlackLivesMatter.
I think you need to Read my unpopular post again I clearly state they are different I like feminism and they are different but feminazi's still do exist hidden behind feminism more about not getting them mixed up :P
Yes, we can expect more.
Our last 'unpopular opinion thread' was shut down due to flaming. It would suck if this one met the same fate.
So please turn it down a notch.
Comments
Hasn't done anything wrong? She borrowed money from Frank and was planning to leave Arcadia Bay without paying him back, tried to rob Nathan to pay Frank (By the way, why isn't she working? It's not like she's studying or anything), stole David's pistol, doesn't respect David at all (Even though she's basically living on his paycheck) and she may steal money from the handicapped fund to pay Frank. While I don't hate Chloe (I actually think she is one of the most interesting characters in the game) she does stupid things.
EDIT: Double Post
Eh, you still didn't answer Golden's question.
Cope, what we're trying to say is: if you don't wanna get into a discussion about homosexuality and bla bla, why did you reply him in the first place?
I mean, when you dislike people for being gay, that's just your ''opinion''. When someone dislikes homophobia, they're disrespecting you and others' opinions. Does that make sense to you? Cause in my opinion it doesn't. If you think you have the right to despise homosexuality, people should have the right to despise homophobia, otherwise you don't believe in free will at all.
Let's try to keep things civil, but I'll never understand how you think that some types of discrimination (such as sexism and racism) are bad and shouldn't be tolerated, when you support other kind of discrimination. In your opinion, racism and sexism shouldn't be tolerated, but when YOU go homophobic, you're just ''giving your opinion''? You either believe in free speech or you don't, there's no middle ground.
But you do realize that Islam isn't a monolithic religion and that many schools of Islam discourage this kind of behavior. Right?
Then how do you see it?
Can I be mad at you for being black?
Let's try not to get into too much drama guys. Remember to be civil and not starting a flame war.
Well, theres nothing much less to expect from a place with unpopular opinions..
It's not the same thing . But I'm sure you knew that.
Not exactly, you don't choose to be gay.
Gay is something that you is, if your body likes the same gender. You can't force an sexuality on yourself.
Yes it is. Homosexuals don't choose to be homosexuals.
And if you really believe they do choose to be gay, please, show me some evidence.
Otherwise we can't take your opinion seriously. It would be the same if I said something like ''I believe soda can cure cancer'', and then someone replied me ''How so? There's no evidence of it.'' and then I said ''It is my opinion. Respect it''.
Saying ''it's my opinion'' doesn't give you a free pass to say whatever you like. Without any scientific basis, your opinion can't be taken seriously.
See .
Now you could have just said that from the start.
I get what you're saying.
But you choose to like and hate.
Being gay is not wrong; They can't do anything about it, and they are nice people with good hearts and good intentions.
Hating gays is wrong; You choose to hate people that is good, and just wanna live a life without having thousands behind them kicking them.
Theres a difference.
And around , and around we go..
Yes I once thought so . That it was a lifestyle choice . Clearly it isn't . I was wrong on that. Happy? No?
No it's not my place to judge you nor is it to tell you or anyone else who they can or can not screw .
But do I have to like it / approve ? Absolutely not .
So don't label me a pobe for doing so .
Now I'm done talking to you now.
Tbh, there are worse movies, those new JJ Abrams Startrek films have just as many plot holes and cliches and most people love them for some reason so who knows.
Thats good. I'm glad that you see that now.
Its okay not to like them, I dont like a lot of things, but I still respect these things, because its the right thing to do.
Screw? Gee, stay classy. We're talking about loving, not screwing.
Oh, I thought you were saying it was a choice. Of course being black and being gay are not the same thing, since they're skin color and sexual orientation, respectively. But they both are not a choice.
Wasn't so difficult to keep things civil, was it? Always nice talking to you.
Yes, we can expect more.
Our last 'unpopular opinion thread' was shut down due to flaming. It would suck if this one met the same fate.
So please turn it down a notch.
^
This
I myself am religious but I have unfortunately met many people who are pretty homophobic and their answer to "Why?" is most of the time stupid and simply bullshit.
But still, let's not hate anyone now, it'd be better that way.
She's not perfect, nobody really is. But seriously, calling somebody a burden is the worst thing you could say to anyone, generally speaking.
I thought Star Trek: Into Darkness was good. Nothing spectacular about it, but it was a serviceable movie. I've never seen an original Star Trek movie before, so I guess that's why I liked it. :P
Purpose and aims of groups is just a justification for any action they do hidden behind the real headline.
I prefer looking at the actions of groups over what their purposes are
hmmm are all police evil do they not have families to get home too, can they not protect themselves as well? and are all the people blacklivesmatter defending innocent citizens? nah shoot back at the police any race is getting shot back at not a race issue the polices lives are just as important as your's always will be they deserve to live too.
whitelivesmatter? nah all lives matter
enter link description here
awww I just love this I'm putting this in
Bonus hypocrisy
Feminazi's want equality for all sexes purpose Vs actions
Again purpose is always merely a shield to hide real intentions a justification to do anything without consequence I judge people for their actions not for their aims.
She never stated that she wanted to leave without paying Frank. The fact that she was trying to get money from Nathan proves the exact oposite.
Ges stealing from Nathan is low. I wasn't thinking about that when I replied. In her defense I can say that she knew that Nathan had a lot of money that he didn't need. (I know that doen't justify the act).
Well stealing the gun is understandable: she had almost been shot at and she was also dealing with dangerous drug dealers, that gun (as she stated) was for self defense not to piss David.
She doesnt respect David because she feels like he is trying to replace her father, he also tries to put limits on her. Her anger is understandable and believable.
The Handicaped funds stealing has no justification. Luckly Max was there to restrain her.
Hah, you're hilarious.
Okay, Mark. Before you even think about replying to my comments, remember what you say about feminism.
Extremists =/= Feminists.
Same goes for this.
Slightly exaggerative in this instance, perhaps.
I think you need to Read my unpopular post again I clearly state they are different I like feminism and they are different but feminazi's still do exist hidden behind feminism more about not getting them mixed up :P
Sorry to be that guy, but is it really necessary to comment that? I mean, it adds nothing to the topic and there is a like button if you agree with the comment...
But if it's your thing, then it's cool...
Oh you mean the ^ .
Yeah I do that sometimes.
Heh, I expected you to go off. Good thing that didn't happen d:
Serously?
Apparently I have a reputation it seems.
Civility is boring. Let's burn something. . .
No, definitely not at all.
And look at what you've said about BlackLivesMatter.
If nothing else is said about you, InfiniteDawn, you catch on quick.
I think MC:SM is 1 of telltales best 1st episodes
illegal immigration
Something needs to be done about it . And fast .
It's not exactly hard.
Wasn't the last one shut down over that Nazi comment?
It is for most.