You can only imagine who they'd put on Trial I can think of a few dozen off the top of my head. Including Nationalist Chinese. What was that, the nationalist Chinese Army destroyed some levies and dams to slow the Japanese down, caused massive flooding that directly wiped out cities and villages, estimated it killed over 600,000 of their own people from the flooding alone, overshadowing the CCP's most demonized version of Nanjing's body count. That is just from the flooding let alone the famine that followed from the massive destruction to crops, farm land being literally destroyed There are a lot of reasons the Japanese ended up having almost a million Chinese fighting on their side. Some were even happy being China was already fighting a series of civil wars ever since the Imperial Royal Family was dethroned. Hoping the Japanese would bring order and stability to a nation that hadn't seen peace in a very long time. Of course the current CCP or Taiwan will never admit to that. lol
Just remember the losers are almost always the bad guys, who knows who could be put on trail if the nazis won. I dont agree with punishing a old man for the crimes of a scared boy with a gun at the back of his head.
Charlton Heston, who worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all his career, said that "Gay rights should not be given any greater consideration than my rights, or your rights." And for that he was called a homophobe.
But if you think about it, it makes sense. Equality is when you give an equal amount of time and energy toward every group. But when you give a greater amount of time and energy toward a particular group, at the expense of another, that it's no longer equal. And that rule applies to every group, both majorities, and minorities.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the sort of mentality that the civil rights movement of the 1960s tried to fight against? Judgin… moreg someone on the basis of race rather than who they are as a person? Looking back on the sixties, I don't recall any instances of people blaming all men or all white people for injustices committed against women or racial minorities. It was about bringing people together instead of dividing people. These days, it all seems to be about negativity and placing blame. These people calling out so-called 'hate speech' are acting more hateful than the people they claim are spreading hate speech. Example:
enter link description here
Comments
You can only imagine who they'd put on Trial I can think of a few dozen off the top of my head. Including Nationalist Chinese. What was that, the nationalist Chinese Army destroyed some levies and dams to slow the Japanese down, caused massive flooding that directly wiped out cities and villages, estimated it killed over 600,000 of their own people from the flooding alone, overshadowing the CCP's most demonized version of Nanjing's body count. That is just from the flooding let alone the famine that followed from the massive destruction to crops, farm land being literally destroyed There are a lot of reasons the Japanese ended up having almost a million Chinese fighting on their side. Some were even happy being China was already fighting a series of civil wars ever since the Imperial Royal Family was dethroned. Hoping the Japanese would bring order and stability to a nation that hadn't seen peace in a very long time. Of course the current CCP or Taiwan will never admit to that. lol
Charlton Heston, who worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all his career, said that "Gay rights should not be given any greater consideration than my rights, or your rights." And for that he was called a homophobe.
But if you think about it, it makes sense. Equality is when you give an equal amount of time and energy toward every group. But when you give a greater amount of time and energy toward a particular group, at the expense of another, that it's no longer equal. And that rule applies to every group, both majorities, and minorities.