Children of Arkham leaders identity?

124»

Comments

  • Yes but that's an interesting change to make his parents corrupted bastards. Batman is Batman because of that crime in Crime Alley. So if they weren't so white, it changes the character, and it's an interesting take of the universe.

    While for Vicki Vale, if she's only Vicki Vale, the change sounds like simple shock value because you would never expect her to be a villain.

    Poogers555 posted: »

    I mean, Bruce's parents are never corrupt either but, here we are.

  • That's what makes it interesting that Vicki is the bad guy though, just like how the Wayne's are always portrayed as the only good people in Gotham.

    Euron posted: »

    Yes but that's an interesting change to make his parents corrupted bastards. Batman is Batman because of that crime in Crime Alley. So if th

  • Not in my opinion. I see it clearly more like a cheap shock value action if she's nothing more than Vicki Vale.

    I'll say it with better words but for the change of the parents of Bruce, it changes the whole meaning of Batman and gives the possibility to us to create our batman.

    While for "Vicky", I've got the feeling it's simply shocking for the hell of it.

    Poogers555 posted: »

    That's what makes it interesting that Vicki is the bad guy though, just like how the Wayne's are always portrayed as the only good people in Gotham.

  • edited November 2016

    It seems that Vale is Lady Arkham, yet she could only be working with them. The drug might have made Bruce think that she was the Lady. It was a very good twist and I'm enjoying the series thus far. I'm really excited about episode 4 and Walking Dead Season 3 right now.

Sign in to comment in this discussion.