Reboots (of game series)

edited December 2009 in General Chat
Rebooting classic series seems to become a common thing to do nowadays. Some games are getting full reboots, like the Prince of Persia had two reboots so far (the Sands of Time was the first, and the second reboot was simply called Prince of Persia, released on PS3/X360 (and pc?).

But anyone know of games that have just gotten a partial reboot? Like, pretending one or some of the sequels never existed, and just continuing from a certain point? There are a couple of games I'd like to see this happening, and one of them is obviously Monkey Island. I'd love it if LucasArts just said, "screw it, let's start over and pretend the last game was MI2", and hire Ron Gilbert and Telltale games to make a Monkey Island 3 (this time it will actually be called Monkey Island 3, and have a subtitle, just like MI2:LR did). I like CMI, and even Escape to a certain degree, and Tales is good too. But right now, I feel each game is being held back, dure to the way the story developed by the end of EMI. The canon we have now is confusing and unnecessary, and I think a reboot from MI2 to make the story go in a more "friendly" direction would be perfect.

Second game is MGS, but that was not really due to the story, but the way it's told and the overly long cutscenes that MGS2 and 4 had. Not sure where the reboot would start though. Probably MGS1, to make sure it got a good start. Or maybe just start from the beginning again.

Comments

  • edited November 2009
    I wouldn't call the Prince of Persia games reboots, as such... just different stories in the same universe. So far each 'trilogy'* has featured a different protagonist, so I'd consider them all part of the same world. And yes, the 2008 one did come out on the PC, but the DLC didn't (grr).

    It's similar to how the new Star Trek film is a reboot, but also not - chronologically it takes place after the Star Trek: Nemesis film, but through trickery involving time travel and parallel dimensions, also manages to reboot everything. It makes (a bit) more sense if you read the tie-in comic book series.

    I can see your point though. Sometimes the sheer weight of canon in a franchise means that starting again with a fresh slate can be a real positive thing. Sometimes this works really well (see Batman Begins/The Dark Knight/The Inevitable Third Film) and sometimes it doesn't (horror films, mostly).

    Generally this doesn't happen in games, because they either don't have such a complicated story that a reboot is needed, or the stories contained within a series aren't connected, like Final Fantasy. That's not to say that remakes or prequels don't happen, though!

    With Monkey Island, I agree that Monkey Island 3 would be appreciated and adored by fans of the series, but really, they'd be the only people who'd buy it. Anyone who isn't already a fan would look at it and think 'Woah, that looks complicated. No thanks'. So I can understand why it hasn't been made. It'd be nice if it was, but it probably won't.

    Maybe if we're lucky, a certain game developer will tell that story in a novel or something. Some other format that isn't so costly to produce. Hell, I'd buy it.

    *I put the word trilogy in quotes because only one of the three different PoP series has three full games. Like so:

    First Series: Prince of Persia, Prince of Persia 2: The Shadow and the Flame, Prince of Persia 3D
    Second Series: The Sands of Time, Battles of Prince of Persia (DS), Warrior Within, The Two Thrones
    Third Series: Prince of Persia (2008), Epilogue (Expansion), The Fallen King (DS)
  • edited November 2009
    StarEye wrote: »
    Second game is MGS, but that was not really due to the story, but the way it's told and the overly long cutscenes that MGS2 and 4 had. Not sure where the reboot would start though. Probably MGS1, to make sure it got a good start. Or maybe just start from the beginning again.

    " Well, I honestly don't think MGS needs a reeboot, it's find they way it was written, now Metal Gear(87)and it's sequel could use a reboot. But MGS doesn't need to be touched IMO."
  • edited November 2009
    With Monkey Island, I agree that Monkey Island 3 would be appreciated and adored by fans of the series, but really, they'd be the only people who'd buy it.

    That's no different from now. And seriously, Final Fantasy 7 was the first Final Fantasy game to be released in Europe, and people still bought it. And I doubt that was because it wasn't tied to other games in the series (most people didn't know that beforehand anyway), but because people simply didn't care. They saw this cool game on the telly, and they proceeded to buy it. I think sometimes people are overanalyzing the market. People AREN'T stupid, that's just a dumb myth, made up by elitists who think themselves as "hardcore" and put themselves above everyone. They're not going to not buy the game just because it has a number 3 behind it, at worst they'll just think it's another game in a series they've heard so much about.

    If Monkey Island 3 was made, it would sell just as well as, or even better than, any other Monkey Island game right now.
  • edited November 2009
    Is getting annoying to read that MI would be better with Ron Gilbert and CMI wasn’t good because it wasn’t made by him and they need to make the 3rd with him etc. etc. etc. Ron wasn’t the only hand working on the series so is kind of bashing everyone else's work and say Ron was the only one making the game.

    CMI was great, and it IS the third game so live with it.

    Either way having Ron Gilbert in it doesn’t mean it will be any good or better, just see how every great director has made very crapy things now, everyone blows it after a while.
    George Lucas did a great job in the old Indiana Jones and starwars, but made terrible in IJ 4 and SW 1,2 and 3.
    Robert Zemeckis did great in Back to the future but its been terrible in what he has released lately.
    The Wachowski brothers did great in Matrix, but they sucked real bad with speed racer.

    So having Ron is not guarantee it will be any better.
  • edited November 2009
    StarEye wrote: »
    If Monkey Island 3 was made, it would sell just as well as, or even better than, any other Monkey Island game right now.
    I'm going to call you out on that, because I don't think that's true. You wouldn't get people new to the series buying MI2½ - they'd get the first in the series, or Tales. They wouldn't go for one that's smack bang in the middle, the same way you wouldn't buy the third book in the Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy series. You might buy the whole series (especially as the new one is out), but not one from the middle.

    Also, people are stupid. Some are just better at hiding it then others. That's my personal motto, and every day it's proven over and over again.
  • edited November 2009
    I'm going to call you out on that, because I don't think that's true. You wouldn't get people new to the series buying MI2½ - they'd get the first in the series, or Tales. They wouldn't go for one that's smack bang in the middle, the same way you wouldn't buy the third book in the Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy series. You might buy the whole series (especially as the new one is out), but not one from the middle.

    Well... I bought the 4th Harry Potter book first. :p And before you ask, yes, it was before the *shudders* movies were made.

    I'm a big fan of Curse, and I think it is Canon, but it wouldn't hurt to see another direction that the games could've gone in.
  • edited November 2009
    Man, I thought this was all about the movie reboot of... well... yeah.
  • edited November 2009
    Also, people are stupid. Some are just better at hiding it then others. That's my personal motto, and every day it's proven over and over again.

    You see, that kind of attitude disgusts me, and you're only putting yourself up high on a pedestal. Get off your high horse and realize that most people are just like you and I.
  • edited November 2009
    StarEye wrote: »
    You see, that kind of attitude disgusts me, and you're only putting yourself up high on a pedestal. Get off your high horse and realize that most people are just like you and I.
    You have clearly never worked in retail.

    Also, I never said I wasn't stupid either. At times, I can be a right twit.
  • edited November 2009
    Never worked at retail, and I'm pretty sure it's the not-so-bright customers who are the most vocal, although perhaps in the minority? It's especially easy if you're young (between 16-23) and you're working in a gameshop, that so called "soccer moms" come in and act like they own the place. They're a lot easier to notice, but not necessarily the majority. I'm a regular visitor at a local gamestore whenever I'm nearby who pops in to see if there are some good deals or sales going on (Gamestop), and while there are a lot of different people coming in, most of them are quite normal people, politely asking for advice or prices. Sometimes I'm more appalled by the robotic replies offered by the clerks.

    I've also studied a bit of marketing, and it's a very common mistake to underestimate the customer base. Just like how it's so easy to underestimate childrens' skills and ability to understand their surroundings. Sometimes I think it's in a humans nature to underestimate eachother.

    Well, at least that's how I feel it is here in Norway. I've also noticed how most of those who underestimates people are young, normally between 16 and 25. Obviously because at that age you're still not quite able to put things in perspective. Kinda like how an 18 year old who just got their licence don't often have the ability to see their own faults, and think he/she's the greatest driver in the world.

    Sorry, I just can't stand the typical internet drivel that the common man is something of an idiot. It's become a stereotype, something that simply has no ground in reality. Just like how the stereotypic video game nerd is fat, ugly and virgin.
  • edited November 2009
    If they were going to reboot Monkey Island, they wouldn't place it after MI2. A reboot game would almost certainly pretend the entire series hasn't happened, and would probably reintroduce Guybrush, Elaine, and LeChuck as if they were new characters, and make a new story based roughly on the premise of the first game. They could also opt for an entirely unrelated story that takes place in the same world, with the same general style and attitude. But a Monkey Island 2.5-type deal would not only be a questionable decision, it would also not qualify as a "reboot," any more than Tales of Monkey Island qualifies as a reboot.

    I still think the coolest way to handle a Monkey Island 2.5 would be to do it using the exact same interface, art style, and resolution as the first two games. Nice 2D pixel art, no voice acting, and Ron's original premise would be a great way to cater to the original fans while still being clearly differentiated from the current "main" series. It would be aimed at a pretty niche market, but it would cost a great deal less than a modern game would, and it would be highly portable to things like iPhone and DSiWare, so I don't think it would be a totally unreasonable business move.

    As for the reboot thing, I don't think that would make sense anytime right after Tales, especially since Tales fairly smoothly showed that you can work within the established continuity while still remaining extremely accessible to newcomers. However, if a few years from now LucasArts wants to make a full-length epic adventure game and just call it "Monkey Island" (with no subtitle or number) and have it restart the series from scratch like Prince of Persia did, I wouldn't be against it. I don't think they'd do that with this particular series because there's no real need to, but that's definitely how I'd expect them to handle something like Loom. In Loom's case, it would make a lot of sense for a new game to totally recap the original story as maybe the first third of the game, then go on to tell a much larger story with that as the base.
  • edited November 2009
    StarEye wrote: »
    Never worked at retail, and I'm pretty sure it's the not-so-bright customers who are the most vocal, although perhaps in the minority? It's especially easy if you're young (between 16-23) and you're working in a gameshop, that so called "soccer moms" come in and act like they own the place. They're a lot easier to notice, but not necessarily the majority. I'm a regular visitor at a local gamestore whenever I'm nearby who pops in to see if there are some good deals or sales going on (Gamestop), and while there are a lot of different people coming in, most of them are quite normal people, politely asking for advice or prices. Sometimes I'm more appalled by the robotic replies offered by the clerks.

    I've also studied a bit of marketing, and it's a very common mistake to underestimate the customer base. Just like how it's so easy to underestimate childrens' skills and ability to understand their surroundings. Sometimes I think it's in a humans nature to underestimate eachother.

    Well, at least that's how I feel it is here in Norway. I've also noticed how most of those who underestimates people are young, normally between 16 and 25. Obviously because at that age you're still not quite able to put things in perspective. Kinda like how an 18 year old who just got their licence don't often have the ability to see their own faults, and think he/she's the greatest driver in the world.

    Sorry, I just can't stand the typical internet drivel that the common man is something of an idiot. It's become a stereotype, something that simply has no ground in reality. Just like how the stereotypic video game nerd is fat, ugly and virgin.
    I work at Poundland, so I get all sorts. Young, Old, Men, Women, everyone. I very rarely see anyone with enough sense to ask me to move out of their way, or to put something back from where they actually got it. I come in every morning and a little bit of me dies inside when I see the mess people have made of my department. Lord knows how I'll cope at Christmas.

    My belief isn't something I just came up with on the spot. I've believed it for several years, and I've yet to really see anything to make me change that opinion. When they try, people are capable of doing really smart things - they're the ones who, according to my motto, are good at hiding their stupidity. It's just that people can't seem to be bothered to do that these days.

    I wasn't referring to anyone here with that remark, just people in general. But now we're getting wildly off-topic, so if we could just put this down to a professional disagreement and move on, I'd appreciate it.
  • edited November 2009
    When they try, people are capable of doing really smart things - they're the ones who, according to my motto, are good at hiding their stupidity. It's just that people can't seem to be bothered to do that these days.
    Yes, let's take the entirety of human innovation...all of history's artistic expression, scientific discovery, technological advancement, social and cultural progression, and boil it down to stupid people hiding the fact that they're really idiots.

    And you know what? I've worked in retail. Cleaning up the displays? My job. Not theirs. There's a certain amount of work involved in having a job, bottom rung or not.
  • edited November 2009
    I don't know if it was mentioned yet but Prince of Persia 3D came out before Sands of Time...The trailer for the POP movie is out.
  • edited November 2009
    Yes, let's take the entirety of human innovation...all of history's artistic expression, scientific discovery, technological advancement, social and cultural progression, and boil it down to stupid people hiding the fact that they're really idiots.

    And you know what? I've worked in retail. Cleaning up the displays? My job. Not theirs. There's a certain amount of work involved in having a job, bottom rung or not.
    You're talking this way out of context. This is, and always has been, my opinion. I'm not forcing it on you. You're perfectly entitled to believe whatever you want. And I never mentioned any of that stuff about expression and advancement. I said it's what I see these days. Stop looking for a fight that I don't want. I've said I want to move on. Let's.

    doodo! - I did actually mention Prince of Persia 3D in my list of PoP games earlier in the thread, but it was in small text, so you could well have skipped over it. But my question to you is 'Do you own it, and if so, have you played it through to the very end?'. Cause I have. On both counts. It wasn't pretty.

    I haven't seen the trailer for the new movie, because I don't wanna jinx it. I saw the trailer for Max Payne (possibly the most film-worthy game around) and thought that was awesome, and look how that movie turned out. Not this time - oh no.

    Interestingly, there's going to be another Sands of Time PoP game, according to Kotaku. Not quite sure what to make of that!
  • edited November 2009

    doodo! - I did actually mention Prince of Persia 3D in my list of PoP games earlier in the thread, but it was in small text, so you could well have skipped over it. But my question to you is 'Do you own it, and if so, have you played it through to the very end?'. Cause I have. On both counts. It wasn't pretty.

    I haven't seen the trailer for the new movie, because I don't wanna jinx it. I saw the trailer for Max Payne (possibly the most film-worthy game around) and thought that was awesome, and look how that movie turned out. Not this time - oh no.

    Haha, whenever I think about POP3D I think about the horrible ending it has. :D Yes to both accounts, the very ending is ok but the maps leading up to it are horrible. The game just falls apart and goes Picasso abstract!
    It started off decent too...
  • edited November 2009
    I just kept getting fed up with the constant 'oh wait, there was a blade trap there with no warning whatsoever, ha ha' throughout. Thank god that game had quicksaves. That you oddly couldn't use if you were moving. Weird.
  • edited November 2009
    I'm sure a lot of people will grumble that the first Myst has been updated enough already.

    But I would really like to see the Myst series remade using CryEngine3 for PS3 (and PC, 360), and perhaps a PlayStation Home version of Uru Live.
  • edited November 2009
    See, I didn't enjoy the original version of Myst, but got into the realMyst remake. So that doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.
  • edited November 2009
    See, I didn't enjoy the original version of Myst, but got into the realMyst remake. So that doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.

    Myst had a remake?
  • edited November 2009
    Icedhope wrote: »
    Myst had a remake?

    Yep. realMYST ran the entire game in a free-roaming real-time 3D engine and even added the Rime Age as an "ending" of sorts; you get access to it only after freeing Atrus (it's also in the handheld versions, but I wouldn't recommend the DS one). Rime was even incorporated into the story of Revelation, the fourth game. One of the big easter eggs of the realMYST version is that you can head into the woods of Myst Island and come across a rather significant grave marker for anyone who has read the novels...
  • edited December 2009
    ...I'll take your word on that Easter Egg. But yeah, I found realMyst to be much better then the original game, because it wasn't just a set of static pictures - it was an actual fully interactive world. If Riven had been the same, I'd have played that as well, but it wasn't, so I didn't. Thus ended my brief, yet enjoyable, affair with the world of Myst.
  • edited December 2009
    I think Mortal Kombat Showlin Monks was a partal reboot since it contrdicted MK 1 & 2
  • edited December 2009
    Never played it, but I'm guessing it was more of a Retcon then a Reboot.

    For those who don't know, Retcon is an abbreviated form of the phrase 'Retroactive Continuity', and is most often used in the comics industry. Basically, it means to rewrite the established canon of something - changing a character's history, for example. Wikipedia has a surprisingly interesting entry on this.
  • edited December 2009
    Never played it, but I'm guessing it was more of a Retcon then a Reboot.

    For those who don't know, Retcon is an abbreviated form of the phrase 'Retroactive Continuity', and is most often used in the comics industry. Basically, it means to rewrite the established canon of something - changing a character's history, for example. Wikipedia has a surprisingly interesting entry on this.

    yh most MK fans decided it wasnt Canon and ignored it even though the creators say its canon (sort of like EMI XD)
  • edited December 2009
    But yeah, I found realMyst to be much better then the original game, because it wasn't just a set of static pictures - it was an actual fully interactive world. If Riven had been the same, I'd have played that as well, but it wasn't, so I didn't. Thus ended my brief, yet enjoyable, affair with the world of Myst.

    Myst V is also a fully interactive 3D game.

    If you haven't played Riven, you're missing out. It's my favorite game in the series.

    FYI: GOG.com has started releasing the Myst series (Myst Masterpiece Edition is already available with Riven coming soon). They come highly recommended and are nicely priced with NO DRM (yay!).
  • edited December 2009
    yh most MK fans decided it wasnt Canon and ignored it even though the creators say its canon (sort of like EMI XD)

    When you think about it, is MK *ever* canon? If it was, every character would be quite dead by now. :p
  • edited December 2009
    ShaggE wrote: »
    When you think about it, is MK *ever* canon? If it was, every character would be quite dead by now. :p

    Well Lui Kang(Sp?) is dead... and a zombie.

    Fighting games have the worst continuity of any video game. (Everyone knows) Letting the player beat the game with every character means that everyone "wins" the tournament.(DOA 4 switches who fights who in the storyline)

    I'm hopping for a reboot of Timesplitters, since the last game finished the storyline and that the Free Radical team is now working for Cryptic, it would be awesome to see a new comedic shooter. Monkeys!

    Telltale really needs to make an original IP Adventure game btw.
  • edited December 2009
    ShaggE wrote: »
    When you think about it, is MK *ever* canon? If it was, every character would be quite dead by now. :p

    it still has a lose storyline with lots of counity errors XD
  • edited December 2009
    it still has a lose storyline with lots of counity errors XD

    Hmmm...I can't think of a game series...like that.
  • edited December 2009
    I was a little skeptical when i heard someone was remaking TOMI, but have been very pleasantly surprised by the results. The Quest for Glory series definately needs to make up for the 3rd, 4th & 5th installments, and the Coles have expressed interest (albeit five years ago now) in expanding the story. If TT and the Coles can come to an agreement QFG would be a phenomanal series, episodic or not.
  • edited December 2009
    The Quest for Glory series definately needs to make up for the 3rd, 4th & 5th installments...

    I trust you meant that the only thing that anyone needs to "make up for" on Shadows of Darkness is the application of only 2 weeks of QA. Other than the extreme bugginess, that was a great game.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.