Was anyone offended by the "Southern cannibal family" in episode 2?

I'd like to pose this question to players from Texas, or any of the red states for that matter. Were you annoyed by the cannibal family seen in episode 2 with the St. Johns?

Most of us guessed something was going on with the St. Johns even before we got to the dairy, but I was secretly hoping it wouldn't turn out to be cannibalism. THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE was one of the first movies to really perpetuate this stereotype, and although it's considered to be a horror classic (for good reason), the idea of people from the South inevitably turning out to be flesh-eating psychos has apparently persisted in the public subconscious.

Telltale tried to mitigate this somewhat by painting the St. Johns as a genuinely educated family (proven by the high school diplomas and college degrees Lee sees framed in the hallway), suggesting these people weren't inclined to cannibalism before the zombie outbreak, but were driven to desperate measures by desperate circumstances. Nonetheless, the cliche is still there.

(I should add that "having an education" is no guarantee someone isn't a psychopath/sociopath. One reason Jack the Ripper slipped away was very possibly due to the pompous Victorian attitude that an "educated man" would never be capable of committing such atrocities.)
«1

Comments

  • edited February 2013
    Well, resorting to cannibalism is, as you mentioned, a sign of desperation. The zombie apocalypse is supposed to give of that kind of air. Having a cannibal family was a good way to show just how messed up people get in these kinds of situations. Since the game takes place in Georgia, they kinda had no choice but to make them southern. That, and it plays off the players notion of southern hospitality (albeit not very well since it was pretty obvious something unsettling was going on).

    To answer your question, no, I'm not offended by the cliche. Though, to be honest, I'm from Ohio, so I'd be a northerner, so I don't have this kind of thing thrown at me. I have no idea what it's like for people to assume that I would be a cannibal.
  • edited February 2013
    I live in Arkansas, and I was offended by how obvious the cliche was. Nothing more.
  • edited February 2013
    If someone was actually offended by it I'll be extremely disappointed by said individual.
  • VainamoinenVainamoinen Moderator
    edited February 2013
  • edited February 2013
    ... This is too much XD
  • edited February 2013
    anonymau5 wrote: »
    I live in Arkansas, and I was offended by how obvious the cliche was. Nothing more.

    If the St. Johns absolutely had to be up to no good for the sake of the plot, couldn't Telltale have at least come up with something besides cannibalism for a change?
  • edited February 2013
    If the St. Johns absolutely had to be up to no good for the sake of the plot, couldn't Telltale have at least come up with something besides cannibalism for a change?

    Cannibalism is in most cases a realistic scenario that would possibly occur with alarming frequency in a zombie apocalypse. There is no law and you're starving. You won't be punished(naturally anyway), so it is quite a temptation. With that, it would probably be something many survivors must face, and is sort of second nature in a zombie apocalypse. Alongside bandits.

    It is very easy to do such evil deeds, and many will always take the easy way out. With no punishment, they reap the rewards and that only encourages it further. I'd be more surprised were it not included than anything.
  • edited February 2013
    What Mornai said. Cannibalism has kinda become a trope in ZA stories, and it makes sense especially in TWD universe, which is more about how messed up people can get anyway in the absence of order than about the walkers.

    In a way, I feel some slight sympathy for the St. John brothers, because if you chat with them enough you learn they initially returned to the farm from elsewhere in the state to look after their mom. It sounds like one of those situations where good people became so desperate that they go bad.

    Anyway, I guess you can see the St. John's as some type of cliche of crazy Southerners, but we also meet good Southerners in the game.
  • edited February 2013
    double_u wrote: »
    Anyway, I guess you can see the St. John's as some type of cliche of crazy Southerners, but we also meet good Southerners in the game.

    Technically, isn't everyone but Omid and Christa southerners? Almost the entire main cast is from Georgia, usually Macon or Atlanta. The most stereotypical southern character would be Kenny, and he's from Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

    As for the St. Johns, I can say with confidence that having lived my entire life in the rural south-eastern United States that there is no cannibal problem...

    And by no problem, I mean there is a small problem, but we've got it under control...mostly. :p
  • edited February 2013
    It's best to never get offended by Characters in games just because it fits some stereotype
    As long as it works towards a good story and isn't something which is real stereotype I'm fine

    They can feel free to have some crazy Cannabalistic Brits in the next season and I'd be happy with it
  • edited February 2013
    I was offended by how obvious it was, I mean, come on, all "deep south backwater families" are cannibals... everyone knows that.

    I live in Texas by the way.....
  • edited March 2013
    That's stupid. We already met a southern family on a farm in episode 1 and Hershel didn't try to eat everyone. I'm from GA and didn't have the slightest problem with them. I've never once heard anyone reference the idea that southern people are cannibals. It's just some zombie apocalypse stuff.
  • edited March 2013
    fuzzyhook wrote: »
    That's stupid. We already met a southern family on a farm in episode 1 and Hershel didn't try to eat everyone. I'm from GA and didn't have the slightest problem with them. I've never once heard anyone reference the idea that southern people are cannibals. It's just some zombie apocalypse stuff.

    Great point.
  • edited March 2013
    How so?
  • edited March 2013
    Every character in the game is a southerner

    why would these ones in particular be offensive
  • edited March 2013
    Because they're cannibals, silly.

    It sets them apart.... from.... y'know.. all those other things that eat people...... or something.
  • edited March 2013
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    Because they're cannibals, silly.

    It sets them apart.... from.... y'know.. all those other things that eat people...... or something.

    Okay, I'm sorry I asked!

    Sheesh, I wasn't trying to be a prude. :rolleyes:
  • edited March 2013
    Don't be sorry.

    I stand by my original answer, sarcastic as it was.

    The first eight words of it are absolute truth. Might be one of the reasons Episode 2 is my least favorite.
  • edited March 2013
    TWD is set in Georgia. Therefore they are southerners. You can't expect them to live in Georgia and magically have a foreign accent. It's down to probability. They live in Georgia, therefore they are likely to be from Georgia.
  • edited March 2013
    We are from Texas specifically, so I really do understand the question and the annoyance perfectly. But I don't think it applies here.

    What I'm annoyed by are movies like House of Wax, where these smart, sexy college kids stumble into this backwoods southern unspecified area where everyone is stupid, racist, sexist, and, don't forget, at least 50 and ugly as sin. :P (And usually rock the evil-Christian vibe!) These brave, young, unsuspecting folk (depending on movie) get raped and eaten, slowly tortured to death, all that kind of junk, and in the end, at least one set of silicone walks out alive to tell the tale.

    I thought that the St. Johns were very believable and that TTG did the story line very well. I didn't get The Hills Have Eyes/House of Wax/Chainsaw Massacre vibe from them at all. I mean, yeah, they're fucked up and it was creepy and we pretty much figured they were cannibals from the start, but TTG did it right.
    It wasn't a bunch of young punks defeating an evil that has been there since the start of time. There weren't unnecessary racial slurs and rape scenes stuffed in between their arrival and dinner.
    Hell, if such a thing could be called as much, I would say that TellTale did it classy, haha!

    While I am annoyed by the stereotype perpetuated by movies, I can't lay blame on TTG for going this route. There WOULD be cannibalism in any sort of apocalypse. And the fact that these were people all around the same age, various genders and backgrounds, and all from the south, really take away most of the objections I could have had with it. :)
  • edited March 2013
    Personally, I think the St. Johns were poorly done.

    3 months just isn't enough time to go the route they did.... unless they started day one or were a "Backwoods cannibal family" before the walkers started walking... which is what I think their history was.

    They're just too well adjusted as a group.....
  • edited March 2013
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    Personally, I think the St. Johns were poorly done.

    3 months just isn't enough time to go the route they did.... unless they started day one or were a "Backwoods cannibal family" before the walkers started walking... which is what I think their history was.

    They're just too well adjusted as a group.....

    Maybe they had plans for it before the apocalypse but never had a chance to do so(because law was still around and such).

    I read a story about this guy who was a cannibal but got away with it to this day because of some loophole in the law in his country. Not sure if it's true or not, but it could show that people already have these ideas in mind and the apocalypse is the perfect opportunity to execute them.
  • edited March 2013
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    Personally, I think the St. Johns were poorly done.

    3 months just isn't enough time to go the route they did.... unless they started day one or were a "Backwoods cannibal family" before the walkers started walking... which is what I think their history was.

    They're just too well adjusted as a group.....

    Man, I guess I just totally disagree. The vibe I got from them is that they would've never considered eating human meat until they were basically forced into trading it to the bandits. Three months can be a long time, especially if it all goes straight to shit on day 1.

    I don't know, I just wasn't offended by any of it and I lived my whole childhood pretty close to Macon.
  • edited March 2013
    fuzzyhook wrote: »
    Man, I guess I just totally disagree. The vibe I got from them is that they would've never considered eating human meat until they were basically forced into trading it to the bandits. Three months can be a long time, especially if it all goes straight to shit on day 1.

    I don't know, I just wasn't offended by any of it and I lived my whole childhood pretty close to Macon.

    I didn't really have a problem with it. That rugby team that crashed in the Andes had to resort to cannibalism to survive after a few days. That was a much more dire situation, but then they didn't have this guy with them...


    Danstjohn.png


    I'm pretty sure Danny not only talked Brenda and Andy into eating people, I'm convinced he's wanted to try it for the longest time. He apparently stuffed Brenda's cat as a mother's day gift and was probably already a sicko before the end. Brenda and Andy both have a very mundane attitude towards fucking eating people where as Danny seems to celebrate it. He actually seems to get excited about the idea of Lee eating him.

    I figured sometime in the confusion and chaos that followed the outbreak the St. Johns lost almost all their livestock, ran out of meat, and in the process of burying their dead farmhands and what not Danny either brought up the idea of butchering their dead or just went ahead and did without telling Andy and Brenda.

    It probably did start with people who really were dying, and then people who were probably going to die... and then just whoever they could find. At least one doctor has said cannibalism can actually be addicting, so if Danny prodded the other St. Johns into it it's not hard for me to believe they became fixated on it.
  • edited March 2013
    I find your typed post offensive to people who don't have arms. I also find your mentality offensive to infants, because they can't understand you. Your reference to texas chainsaw massacre is offensive to people who won chainsaws. Also, I find this offensive, because I eat human flesh and live in the south.
  • edited March 2013
    fuzzyhook wrote: »
    Man, I guess I just totally disagree. The vibe I got from them is that they would've never considered eating human meat until they were basically forced into trading it to the bandits. Three months can be a long time, especially if it all goes straight to shit on day 1.

    I don't know, I just wasn't offended by any of it and I lived my whole childhood pretty close to Macon.

    I wasn't offended, I honestly don't give two anal expulsions - but I thought it was poorly written.

    They had a farm - I doubt their entire stock of food and supplies disappeared day one. My grandparents were farmers - they had enough canned goods and supplies on hand to last months if need-be. I'll assume the St Johns would have done the same.

    Something doesn't add up.
  • edited March 2013
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    I wasn't offended, I honestly don't give two anal expulsions - but I thought it was poorly written.

    They had a farm - I doubt their entire stock of food and supplies disappeared day one. My grandparents were farmers - they had enough canned goods and supplies on hand to last months if need-be. I'll assume the St Johns would have done the same.

    Something doesn't add up.

    They need gas, and they need it every day. Rather than waste time only searching for it themselves, they take it from people who have already stockpiled the gas in exchange for the only renewable commodity they have - food. They always need gas, and so always give what food they don't eat away.

    That could explain how their food stores quickly dropped over time.
  • edited March 2013
    Plus, you know, the bandits were taking their food.
  • edited March 2013
    I doubt the bandits had taken anything - otherwise why attack as they did from teh safety of the trees.

    I doubt the St Johns were victims in any way - and just used the bandits.
  • edited March 2013
    DreadMagus wrote: »
    I doubt the bandits had taken anything - otherwise why attack as they did from teh safety of the trees.

    I doubt the St Johns were victims in any way - and just used the bandits.

    They say the bandits killed a lot of their farmhands in their early encounters, so they would probably continue to be harassed(like Lee's group in ep 3) unless a deal of some sorts was made. Though the bandits were probably still getting conned by getting human meat, the St. Johns weren't free from injuries.
  • edited March 2013
    The St johns state on the way to the dairy they have plenty of milk cheese and butter stored. Then they go on to say they grow their own food and they have plenty. Not to mention the house is surrounded by corn. As for Southern Cannibal Thing damn near everyone in the story is southern and only 3 of them are eating people so I am not offended. If they were the only southern people then I could see a beef.
  • edited April 2013
    I'm offended that OP didn't have any decency to make up a better name for topic. I think that might spoil the episode 2 to many people.
  • JakeJake Telltale Alumni
    edited April 2013
    I don't think people were offended. Also the story was written by someone who grew up in Georgia. I'm sure many of the ideas and subtleties Chuck had in the original pitch got lost, but it was coming from a place not aiming to offend, but entertain. I mean... I would go less chainsaw massacre and more Paula Deen with where the source is coming from, but whatever you see in it, you see in it.
  • edited April 2013
    I don't think they were eating people before the walkers showed up. Three months is a long time in a situation like an apocalypse. I think that they had plnty of food on Day 1, but everything hit the fan soquickly. Heck, Macon and Atlanta were already overrun by the end of Episode 1, which is barely a week in. Since the bandits were people from the Save-Lots, I'd imagine that since whoever was in charge of things in the area had told them to go there, they would be cared for or evacuated. Walkers get in, and the few people who survived (the bandits) had nothing left. So they got some guns and decided to take what they needed, like food. They stumble onto the St. John dairy and commence shooting the place up until they get what they want. Lots of the farmhands get killed, and the bandits decide to take all the food they can find. This would likely be after the walker attacks in the very beginning, because Andy says that they didn't have the fence at first. The crops likely got destroyedfor the most part by the walkers in the opening days, and with the bandits taking the food they had stored away from them, they then turned to cannabalism as a last resort. Probably started with the few farmhands they had left, then when they were gone they had to keep meeting the food quota for the bandits as well as keeping themselves fed.
  • edited April 2013
    My only guess as to why they became cannibals so quickly is that they were likely forced by the bandits into giving them food, they probably were made to kill their animals to feed them, but when it got down to just one cow there wasn't going to be any food afterwards for them. So maybe in just a heat of the moment, Danny killed someone, the family cut this person up and then gave him as meat to the bandits, they might of tried it to see if it tasted like actual meat, liked it and realized that this is another way of getting food.

    On it being offensive, well nearly all the characters are from Georgia, so it's really just a small couple who are sterotypical, even then I didn't think Andy was a huge stereotype, at least compared to Danny and MAMA'!
  • edited April 2013
    I thought Andy was cool. Right up until he tried shoving my face into an electric fence, I thought we could've been friends.
  • edited April 2013
    I was not, because I had the feeling how it would be to have Brenda and/or Andy in the group, I mean it would had been interesting. Danny would never had been a option for the group.
  • edited April 2013
    FoxxyFox wrote: »
    I was not, because I had the feeling how it would be to have Brenda and/or Andy in the group, I mean it would had been interesting. Danny would never had been a option for the group.

    Ha! Is it because of his face? He just looks evil, the poor sap.
  • edited April 2013
    Sounds evil too
  • edited April 2013
    Mornai wrote: »
    Ha! Is it because of his face? He just looks evil, the poor sap.

    tumblr_mhn9pyFF0s1rmsjcno10_250.jpg


    Even with Kenny's mustache he looks evil. :eek:
This discussion has been closed.