This anti-gay talk is starting to annoy me.

edited October 2013 in The Walking Dead

I have just read the 'would you like a wider range of sexual identities in the walking dead'.

Many people said no because they said that the game wasn't about 'sex' so there was no need.

Are you people really so narrow minded that you think gay relationships are only about sex? Are you kidding me?

In series 1 we had, off the top of my head, at least 6 straight relationships presented (not including people like Wyatt Eddie and Nate wearing their heterosexuality on their sleeve). If the walking dead shouldn't be about things like that, why didn't people get in an uproar about the fact that Kenny and Katjaa were married? Why wasn't there claims of bioware ism when omid and christa entered the frey?

Yet people do seem to have problems with a gay couple being in season two, and I just want an actual good reason why not, that isn't rooted in homophobia.

So here it is, why shouldn't gay couples in future series of the walking dead be treated as straight couples were in series one? Are they inferior?

And please don't say 'because people wouldn't be comfortable with them'. I'm not comfortable with the straight relationships in it, but I don't think they should remove them.

Comments

  • Is there a particular reason why you're not replying in the thread you're referring to? Most of your arguments are already in that thread.

This discussion has been closed.