In your opinion he's not trustworthy. We are not discussing opinion, we are discussing fact.
I never said anything about surrendering, I … moresaid he should stay and fight. That is the complete opposite of surrendering. And no he didn't help rescue the group, he got himself captured after trying to steal some food.
What was she supposed to "hold against her head?" A piece of clothing that could be infested with bacteria and germs, and get her sicker than she already was? Or perhaps, a rock would've sufficed judging by your amazing logic. Another thing I'm sure your unaware of, seeing as you seem to know nothing about pregnancy or labor, is that is extremely difficult to move on your own without assistance. Which is why she's only able to move when Bonnie helps her. Both Kenny and Rebecca were waiting for Bonnie, Mike, and Clem to return. That's why they stayed put, also because they didn't know where the new shelter was. Kenny, as well as ev… [view original content]
That you don't know how to have a proper debate, and your only means of attempting to prove your point(keyword being attempting) is to fling insults and claim that "it's bullshit". You're also proving you're just a troll.
And now you're resorting to pointing out grammatical errors, because you have no other way to prove me wrong, or win this argument. If it bothers you so much I fixed it.
oh and btw, it's "useless", not "uselles". You are most welcome little one.;)
You're the one trying to escape from this debate by saying I don't know how to have a debate, I guess if I didn't know how it would have been much easier to prove me wrong, right?
Yet you can't.
That you don't know how to have a proper debate, and your only means of attempting to prove your point(keyword being attempting) is to fling insults and claim that "it's bullshit". You're also proving you're just a troll.
And now you're resorting to pointing out grammatical errors, because you have no other way to prove me wrong, or win this argument. If it bothers you so much I fixed it.
oh and btw, it's "useless", not "uselles". You are most welcome little one.;)
I'm not trying to escape anything, I'd just rather debate with someone who actually was a challenge. That's why I'm asking you to put more effort into your side of the argument. Then how come you haven't negated any of the points I've made? Or is saying it's bullshit, or that it's just plain wrong what constitutes a debate in that small brain of yours?
You're the one trying to escape from this debate by saying I don't know how to have a debate, I guess if I didn't know how it would have been much easier to prove me wrong, right?
Yet you can't.
There you go again. Trying to win an argument with insults and slurs. I didn't respond to the rest of your comment because I wasn't about dignify any of that with a response. Again, you are making assumptions, for English isn't my first language either. Do you really think you are going to win this sorry excuse for a debate, or that you're hurting my feelings by calling me out on one typo? This is just sad really.
I negated every argument you've brought to this discussion, yet you could only refute mine with unfounded situations that could never happen or blindly defending your viewpoint, now saying that I don't know how to debate and etc...Do you have so much pain in your ass you need to react like this? Jesus.
I'm not trying to escape anything, I'd just rather debate with someone who actually was a challenge. That's why I'm asking you to put more e… moreffort into your side of the argument. Then how come you haven't negated any of the points I've made? Or is saying it's bullshit, or that it's just plain wrong what constitutes a debate in that small brain of yours?
Yeah, sure, "typo". Now seeing that you're (See?that's how we use it) mumbling about "OMG, you need to prove your point", "OMG, you need to argue in a right way". Look back, Sherlock, I clearly stated you're only making up unfounded arguments to try winning a discussion in which you know you're wrong and ocasionally commented about your english mistake, then you converted this entire argument into the "typo" (HHAHAHA). That's what I call sad.
There you go again. Trying to win an argument with insults and slurs. I didn't respond to the rest of your comment because I wasn't about di… moregnify any of that with a response. Again, you are making assumptions, for English isn't my first language either. Do you really think you are going to win this sorry excuse for a debate, or that you're hurting my feelings by calling me out on one typo? This is just sad really.
I negated every argument you've brought to this discussion, yet you could only refute mine with unfounded situations that could never happen… more or blindly defending your viewpoint, now saying that I don't know how to debate and etc...Do you have so much pain in your ass you need to react like this? Jesus.
-Jesus Christ, I can't even believe I'm arguing with someone who confuses you're with your.-
-"YOU'RE" LOL-
-Yeah, sure, "typo". Now seeing that you're (See?that's how we use)-
Then why are you the one who keeps bringing it up?
See, here is where a debate can start. In what instances did I make "unfounded arguments", or, "make up unfounded situations"? Point them out, and tell me why. When this debate was still a debate, I responded to your points and told you why they were invalid. That's when you pointed out my grammatical error and started a fight over that,
-Jesus Christ, I can't even believe I'm arguing with someone who confuses you're with your. Did your mom let you use the internet? All I can read is BLA BLA BLA, you're so blind you have to keep making up reasons for Kenny being uselles so you can defend him? Please, thank you.-
you have yet to refute anything I said in my comment. Which leads me to believe you had no idea how to respond to it, so in order to protect your ego, you had to point out a grammatical error to take the attention off the fact that you've lost the debate. I know this must be shocking for a troll such as you.
Yeah, sure, "typo". Now seeing that you're (See?that's how we use it) mumbling about "OMG, you need to prove your point", "OMG, you need to … moreargue in a right way". Look back, Sherlock, I clearly stated you're only making up unfounded arguments to try winning a discussion in which you know you're wrong and ocasionally commented about your english mistake, then you converted this entire argument into the "typo" (HHAHAHA). That's what I call sad.
Why do people still use the "Luke dropped Clem in episode 1" excuse?
He was carrying her, he saw she was bitten, what did you expect him to do? "Oh well what do ya know, she's bitten. Let me just gently place you on the ground because that's the first thing anyone would think to do while carrying someone who was bitten."
I think it would have been weird if he reacted THAT way.
Luke drops clementine the first time meeting her, when he sees the dog bite.
He thought she was bitten. nuff's said
**Luke loc… moreks her in a shed and doesn't do anything to help. **
He argues with the whole group to give her a chance of staying with them and living a bit more normally than locked in a shed, but the majority won.
Luke wants to lie to Walter about shooting Matthew,
He didn't trust Nick with that kind of information, he could have just messed up just like he did at the bridge.
** Luke goes off missing during the fight at the Ski Lodge**
Being caught by Carver would surely have been worse, he'd probably end up like Alvin.
Luke gets caught at Carver's camp (not saying that its his fault, but again he got caught proving a trend of unreliability.
Yeah, because it's super easy to avoid armed guards patrolling all over the place, hungry and sleepy as fuck.
Luke abandon… [view original content]
Yeah that bugged me too. It would've made a lot more sense to have Kenny and Bonnie stay behind to watch Rebecca and the baby, and have Luke, Clem, and Mike go on ahead to gather supplies.
It was no one's fault that Sarah died at the observation deck. And Luke WANTED Rebecca to rest, whereas Kenny was the one pushing everyone … moreto leave. Why they couldn't have just had Bonnie and Mike scout ahead to the town for supplies while leaving Rebecca to rest is a plot-hole that the writers apparently didn't consider.
It was no one's fault that Sarah died at the observation deck. And Luke WANTED Rebecca to rest, whereas Kenny was the one pushing everyone … moreto leave. Why they couldn't have just had Bonnie and Mike scout ahead to the town for supplies while leaving Rebecca to rest is a plot-hole that the writers apparently didn't consider.
How did Clementine lose more loved ones Kenny? He lost more actual family members like his wife and son! And then looses his girlfriend. You do know that the same "loved ones" that Clementine lost were also cared about by Kenny, right?
Clementine also orders Kenny to kill one of Carver's men that led to Walter's death (depending on your choices) and ordered him to kill Carver that led to Alvin's death (also, dependent on your choices).
He told them to leave, they chose to waste those minutes. Also, Troy could've caught them even if they left earlier. And I don't think Kenny's murder of Carver had anything to do with any sexual satisfaction, Kenny was just vengeful, rightfully so.
Kenny explicitly tells a little girl, who he knows has gone through unspeakable traumas and has lost even more loved ones than he has that i… moret was all her fault that his girlfriend died and never apologizes (except in one very very specific dialogue choice).
He shoots one of Carver's soldiers even after Clem explicitly warns him against it, leading to Walter's senseless death. As Bonnie rightfully says, Carver only killed Walter because "he was protecting his people and Kenny could've killed [them] all."
He puts the entire group at risk by indulging in his murder porn torture fantasy even after everyone tells him several times to just shoot Carver so they can escape. He never acknowledges that said murder porn torture fantasy is the reason they wasted a half dozen precious minutes they could've used to escape, which led to them being caught by Troy, leading to another half dozen minutes wasted.
The group could've been long gone before… [view original content]
There are no things people should choose. It's only their decision. And this reason is not enough for me to abandon a man who's been useful and helping for me for a long time.
I always thought that the Pizza vs Ice Cream choice was saving Luke or Kenny, whoever you don't save will save themselves and know that you would rather live with the other. I think that would make the Kenny or Luke choice a lot harder.
I always thought that the Pizza vs Ice Cream choice was saving Luke or Kenny, whoever you don't save will save themselves and know that you would rather live with the other. I think that would make the Kenny or Luke choice a lot harder.
I always thought that the Pizza vs Ice Cream choice was saving Luke or Kenny, whoever you don't save will save themselves and know that you would rather live with the other. I think that would make the Kenny or Luke choice a lot harder.
It wouldn't make the choice harder, but it'd certainly make for a fucked up aftermath.
... Especially seeing as I'm probably going to try and save Luke. Kenny would hate my fucking guts. Luke would only be a little offended.
Comments
[removed]
That you don't know how to have a proper debate, and your only means of attempting to prove your point(keyword being attempting) is to fling insults and claim that "it's bullshit". You're also proving you're just a troll.
If I had to rank people for a group, it would be something like this (including relevant people that we don't know if they are alive or not):
-Mike (he's strong, useful, cool, funny and urban. He's like Lee 2.0).
-Molly.
-Christa.
-Jane.
-Kenny.
-Luke (I like him better than Kenny, but he's almost useless).
-Baby (sorry man
).
-400 days' guys (I really like Vince tho).
-Lilly.
-Bonnie (I can't stand her
).
And now you're resorting to pointing out grammatical errors, because you have no other way to prove me wrong, or win this argument. If it bothers you so much I fixed it.
oh and btw, it's "useless", not "uselles". You are most welcome little one.;)
Which is exactly why Telltale is probably going to kill them off in the gunfight.
Like, fuck.
You're the one trying to escape from this debate by saying I don't know how to have a debate, I guess if I didn't know how it would have been much easier to prove me wrong, right?
Yet you can't.
[removed]
And?
FUCK YOU !
LUKE IS THE BEST, HE'S THE TRUE ANGEL SAVIOR OF THE ZOMBOCAPLYPSE.
I'm not trying to escape anything, I'd just rather debate with someone who actually was a challenge. That's why I'm asking you to put more effort into your side of the argument. Then how come you haven't negated any of the points I've made? Or is saying it's bullshit, or that it's just plain wrong what constitutes a debate in that small brain of yours?
There you go again. Trying to win an argument with insults and slurs. I didn't respond to the rest of your comment because I wasn't about dignify any of that with a response. Again, you are making assumptions, for English isn't my first language either. Do you really think you are going to win this sorry excuse for a debate, or that you're hurting my feelings by calling me out on one typo? This is just sad really.
I negated every argument you've brought to this discussion, yet you could only refute mine with unfounded situations that could never happen or blindly defending your viewpoint, now saying that I don't know how to debate and etc...Do you have so much pain in your ass you need to react like this? Jesus.
Yeah, sure, "typo". Now seeing that you're (See?that's how we use it) mumbling about "OMG, you need to prove your point", "OMG, you need to argue in a right way". Look back, Sherlock, I clearly stated you're only making up unfounded arguments to try winning a discussion in which you know you're wrong and ocasionally commented about your english mistake, then you converted this entire argument into the "typo" (HHAHAHA). That's what I call sad.
How deluded can you be? You just described exactly what you are doing. Just..wow, you're such a hopeless cause.
-Jesus Christ, I can't even believe I'm arguing with someone who confuses you're with your.-
-"YOU'RE" LOL-
-Yeah, sure, "typo". Now seeing that you're (See?that's how we use)-
Then why are you the one who keeps bringing it up?
See, here is where a debate can start. In what instances did I make "unfounded arguments", or, "make up unfounded situations"? Point them out, and tell me why. When this debate was still a debate, I responded to your points and told you why they were invalid. That's when you pointed out my grammatical error and started a fight over that,
-Jesus Christ, I can't even believe I'm arguing with someone who confuses you're with your. Did your mom let you use the internet? All I can read is BLA BLA BLA, you're so blind you have to keep making up reasons for Kenny being uselles so you can defend him? Please, thank you.-
you have yet to refute anything I said in my comment. Which leads me to believe you had no idea how to respond to it, so in order to protect your ego, you had to point out a grammatical error to take the attention off the fact that you've lost the debate. I know this must be shocking for a troll such as you.
Why do people still use the "Luke dropped Clem in episode 1" excuse?
He was carrying her, he saw she was bitten, what did you expect him to do? "Oh well what do ya know, she's bitten. Let me just gently place you on the ground because that's the first thing anyone would think to do while carrying someone who was bitten."
I think it would have been weird if he reacted THAT way.
Take a chill pill xD You are clearly brainwashed by the Devil called Luke! He has taken over your mind and your keyboard and made u spam in CAPS
cool
[removed]
Well, will you look at that, now you're banned.
Yeah that bugged me too. It would've made a lot more sense to have Kenny and Bonnie stay behind to watch Rebecca and the baby, and have Luke, Clem, and Mike go on ahead to gather supplies.
1v1 me in rap battle biches! (don't take this seriously xD)
http://youtu.be/lpvG6G97vp0
I am pretty much in complete disagreement with you... but I will upvote for the video!
Yeah they should have had Bonnie and Mike scout out, but Rebecca STILL would have died. So either decision wouldn't have mattered.
I don't really hate luke xD
Says the piece of shit.
How did Clementine lose more loved ones Kenny? He lost more actual family members like his wife and son! And then looses his girlfriend. You do know that the same "loved ones" that Clementine lost were also cared about by Kenny, right?
Clementine also orders Kenny to kill one of Carver's men that led to Walter's death (depending on your choices) and ordered him to kill Carver that led to Alvin's death (also, dependent on your choices).
He told them to leave, they chose to waste those minutes. Also, Troy could've caught them even if they left earlier. And I don't think Kenny's murder of Carver had anything to do with any sexual satisfaction, Kenny was just vengeful, rightfully so.
The only asshole here is you.
[removed]
There are no things people should choose. It's only their decision. And this reason is not enough for me to abandon a man who's been useful and helping for me for a long time.
Because of this:
I'm probably going to side with Luke if shit hits the fan, but this thread is a pretty weak argument for it.
I always thought that the Pizza vs Ice Cream choice was saving Luke or Kenny, whoever you don't save will save themselves and know that you would rather live with the other. I think that would make the Kenny or Luke choice a lot harder.
It wouldn't make the choice harder, but it'd certainly make for a fucked up aftermath.
... Especially seeing as I'm probably going to try and save Luke. Kenny would hate my fucking guts. Luke would only be a little offended.
Fuck Kenny.
Luke is the best!
I think that if one dies if you help the other would be harder.
I think Luke would despise me at that point, I've been siding with Kenny way more.
Think about it. Kenny or Luke would live knowing you left one of them to die.