Wait a cotton-pickin minute...
I just realized, Episode 4 not only didn't have Eddie, but it also didn't have any Nate (Or any of the other 400 Days characters). Not that I think they have to had appeared in Season 2 (the DLC could have been just a disparate collection of stories overviewing the outbreak from multiple perspectives), with the appearance of Roman in Episode 1, Bonnie in Episode 2, and cameos of the others in Episode 3, there was a clear effort to tie them in, but it really doesn't have any meaning... Plus we haven't seen heads or tails of Nate, who was one of the best characters of the DLC... With only one episode left, how are they going to tie in any of those characters to the central plot in any meaningful way?
Did I mention there was no Nate?
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
maybe in Season 3 when they get better writers
Or worse.......
I thought Eddie said something about going to his family? He resembles mike a lot maybe it's his brother?
Thats russel
I think adding Nate to episode five could save it. He was a blast.
We'll then who the hell is Eddie?
the stoner best friend of wyatt
no it be stupid
How?
Instead of having a random group of Russians in the middle of the post-apocalyptic United States, having Nate lead the group of bandits Alvo was a part of would have been a nice touch.
But Telltale appears to think 2 seconds of screentime for the 400 days characters followed by never being mentioned again is good enough to justify the DLC's existence. I'm going to have to differ with them on that and say I wouldn't have bought the damn thing if I knew how irrelevant it was going to be.
Or Nick Breckon is the permanent writer for all 5 episodes...