Special Edition looks way better

13»

Comments

  • edited August 2009
    ^ I personally find the PS2 era graphics to be the best, in terms of 3D. I'm probably alone on that, though.
  • edited August 2009
    2d better? Tis to laugh!
  • edited August 2009
    The only reason why the 2.5D in the SE looks awefull, is because it had to work with switching between the old and new version.

    Next time, I rather have them do 2 games in 1 without the switching, so that the animation can be smoother.
    That and voices in the old graphics version as an extra option.
  • edited August 2009
    Irishmile wrote: »
    ^^^^ thats awesome ^^^^^


    Here is what I would have done differently.... His forehead was too high... his hair is all wrong.. Something odd about his eyes and lighting between them... and he had elf ears.

    32516927.jpg

    That... looks... GREAT!
  • edited August 2009
    I'm a 3D fan. I think, when done well, it makes for a more immersive, fun-to-explore world.
    If ToMI was originally released in 2D, and then someone posted shots of a 3D project they were doing of it everybody would go ga-ga over them. I've seen that happen all the time with Secret and Curse , and most recently Lechuck's Revenge.

    Unfortunately no game has looked as good as it could in 3D. The technology wasn't advanced enough in EfMI. There were too many visible pixels on the character models, but the pre-rendered backgrounds looked awesome.
    Telltale is running in an old graphics engine, but you can tell they're pushing its capabilities to the max. The ocean scenes don't looks so fine, but the buildings look as good as the pre-renderd Escape ones, and the character models aren't quite so blocky.
    Things look a bit plasticy in parts, so it would probably help if the environment textures were dirtied up a little.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.