forum rules?

edited April 2012 in General Chat
hey guys, I've been hearing allot about the forum needing rules, to keep everything orderly and clean. i agree that we need rules and I'm sure that everyone else does. a forum with no rules is not a good thing.
This thread is to discuss the rules with other forum members, once we have these rules set, I'll run them by troy and get them approved to be posted.

here are a few of my thoughts:

1) Keep cursing and offensive behavior to a minimum, "ouch my ass!" is acceptable. "you f***ing a$$h01e" is not.

2) Try not to flame posts, a friendly argument and constructive group arguments are always acceptable, the second it gets out of hand and people are feeling vulnerable and attacked, the post will be warned and then if it continues it will be deleted.

3) No racist comments at all! if a racist thread or post is started it will be deleted, no question!

4) Try to keep double posting to a small degree, if you double post try to delete it if thats possible, if not a mod will get to it.

5) Try to have respect for everyone's feeling, no one wants to be disrespected.

6) No links to piracy related material, including abandonware, some may think that abandonware is not piracy, but it is. telltale can get in trouble if anything of that sort is posted.

7) keep things organized, try your best to keep things in order, always make sure you posting in the write thread and forum.

8) the most important rule of all, HAVE FUN!

if anyone has any objections, feel free to let me know, or if you have anything to add let me know as well.

Comments

  • edited November 2004

    1) Keep cursing and offensive behavior to a minimum, "ouch my ass!" is acceptable. "you f***ing a$$h01e" is not.

    Considering this point. What about the word Lucasarts? (or 1uc@5@rt5) At this moment I think it is stille pretty offensive to a lot of people. :x
  • edited November 2004

    1) Keep cursing and offensive behavior to a minimum, "ouch my ass!" is acceptable. "you f***ing a$$h01e" is not.

    Considering this point. What about the word Lucasarts? (or 1uc@5@rt5) At this moment I think it is stille pretty offensive to a lot of people. :x


    sorry treintje!
    i edited your post on accident...i was going to edit mine, but i saw the quote from my post in yours and edited away. many apologies
  • edited November 2004
    I dig, Guybrush. A few notes regarding spam: It's better if we have a few concise threads as opposed to a bunch of threads strewn all about, with about five on the same topic or so. I think we should encourage quality, not quantity, in post behavior.

    However, getting militant about it is hardly a good plan as well. I've seen some forums where every thread on a similar topic is shot down; for example, people were trying to make One Thread for anything Final Fantasy related--Of course, there are a lot of games in that series, and many things to say. I feel that level of attempted spam reduction is overboard and a little absurd.

    Other than that, I dig the set of rules you have in place. Keep it up, Telltale.
  • edited November 2004
    the new rules sound good to me. good job guybrush.
  • edited November 2004
    when that happens i'll most likey combine threads if it fits well with the other threads, if not then i'll see ware it goes. if it gets out of hand i'll remind everone to stay somewhat on topic.
  • edited November 2004
    i think each user should have his/her own inventory and we could earn items by posting. what we do with those items is beyond me. anyone? bueller? ...bueller?
  • edited November 2004
    that realy would'nt work well, it would just take up space on the servers. plus i dont think rewarding people for posting is a good idea. i dont think posting should be a race to get a prize.
  • edited November 2004
    if noone disagree's then i'm going to go ahead and post the rules. remeber if anyone has a problem in the forums just let me know and i see if i can take care of it.
  • edited November 2004
    I think that a good anti-spam rule would be that if the post is just one character (Example: an emoticon for an entire post) or if it has absolutley nothing to do with the topic it's posted in it gets deleted.
  • edited November 2004
    good point, does anyone else agree with this..
    i do..
  • edited November 2004
    If it's totally off topic and counterproductive to the thread at hand, sure, lose it. But a well placed :D or :-/ or :| can say plenty, even on their own .

    Just remember this isn't a counter-strike forum full of leet-gamers acting like morons, adventure game fans are quite a civilised breed most of the time. I don't see the point of inventing and listing lots of rules for this place, save the standard spamming, redundant threads and flaming universal common sense Messagboard guidelines.

    If something disruptive happens, sure, deal with it and put steps in place to prevent a reoccurence, but don't get too hung up on rules and regulations when everything seems to be progressing rather well.

    @};-
  • edited November 2004
    If it's totally off topic and counterproductive to the thread at hand, sure, lose it. But a well placed :D or :-/ or :| can say plenty, even on their own .


    correct. i understand what you are saying and i agree...
  • edited November 2004
    I think along the lines of spam, what's acceptable is a post with actual content (adding to a discussion, etc) and what's not is a post that completely off topic (when there is a preset static topic; and especially if it's a blantant distraction to something else or an advertisement that's uncalled for), contentless posts (ie, purely emoticons for no apparent reason; small, concise, and meaningless posts; large amounts of posts that are nearly all identical, not necessarily by the same person, that don't really add anything to the discussion; etc), etc.
  • edited November 2004
    not just that it gets deleted but you have to have a minimum of atleast 3 characters before you can summit your post.
  • edited November 2004
    How about no general discrimination of any kind. Rascism is too vague.
  • edited November 2004
    Just wait and see how the forum develops, y'all... relax.
    A lot of people in here seem to have enough common sense and don't need no written set of rules.

    Guess, I'm not wrong in assuming that people visiting this forum will show a little bit of nice behavior - it's about nice games (- or expectations, at the moment), so why play ugly? :D

    There's only one offensive thing I've read so far in this forum and that's a certain sig... but that might be a fake...

    I guess any needed rules will develop themselves, as the forum grows bigger...

    Cheers, y'all.
  • edited November 2004
    There's only one offensive thing I've read so far in this forum and that's a certain sig... but that might be a fake...

    You have a point. BUT this was a web link that you didn't have to follow. So I would consider it "out of the forum". Your reply, however, was quite harsh, and inside the forum!

    So to avoid this kind of problems, I think that we should ban posting http links in the forum (in the text body AND in the signatures), unless the link is directly relevant to the thread. We are not here to advertise personal pages or other site that we like, but to talk about adventure games and telltale's future products...
  • edited November 2004
    You're right, noone has to follow the links... but what purpose is a link used as a sig, other than to follow it? Well, I guess it was meant as plain provocation. And I fall easily for that.

    I found this nice place about adventure gaming, the kind of games I like most, then someone has me clicking on his sig, and - shazam! - I'm confronted with religious zealotism and pro-war-propaganda.
    Quite unfunny, being confronted in here with the same s**t as in every other, bigger, longer existing forum. It just took a day or two to drag some evil 'reality' in here...

    On the other hand, I clicked on another users profile and was delighted about his great MM fanpage: http://members.fortunecity.com/harang/ ;)

    You're also right about the off-topic URL posting in general - I'm gonna lose my sig about Ubuntu-Linux...

    Sorry about the harsh words,
    Martin
  • edited April 2012
    Can we have a no resurrecting old threads rule?
  • edited April 2012
    coolsome wrote: »
    Can we have a no resurrecting old threads rule?

    That's a boring rule and is prejudiced against necromancers.
  • edited April 2012
    How about one that says you can only resurrect threads if you have a valid point to make on the subject at hand?
  • edited April 2012
    How about one that says you can only resurrect threads if you have a valid point to make on the subject at hand?

    Hmm... would saying that you wanted to simulate the zombie apocalypse, forum-style, count as a valid point?
  • edited April 2012
    To simulate a forum-style zombie apocalypse would then include one or more people killing said zombies with such as a ban-hammer, a ban-shotgun, and a ban-BFG9000
  • edited April 2012
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    To simulate a forum-style zombie apocalypse would then include one or more people killing said zombies with such as a ban-hammer, a ban-shotgun, and a ban-BFG9000

    Aww. You've been snooping through my weapons locker!
  • edited April 2012
    I don't wish to alarm you, but you seem to have been affected with Silverwolfpet syndrome.
  • edited April 2012
    Sounds serious.
  • edited April 2012
    This thread has been resurected by the powers of n00bism, thy shall not resurect thy neighbor's dead thread.
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited April 2012
    Friar wrote: »
    I don't wish to alarm you, but you seem to have been affected with Silverwolfpet syndrome.
    Sounds serious.

    I hope it's not contagious...
  • edited April 2012
    Can we have a rule that bans coolsome?
  • edited April 2012
    No, because that would be the stupidest rule ever.
  • edited April 2012
    Stupider than a rule which says that all websites must change their colour scheme to psychedelic pink on the second Thursday of every month beginning with J?
  • edited April 2012
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    To simulate a forum-style zombie apocalypse would then include one or more people killing said zombies with such as a ban-hammer, a ban-shotgun, and a ban-BFG9000

    Exactly. Though I did read in the Zombie-Forum Survival Guide that a ban-katana really is the way to go. Swords don't need reloading and all that.
  • edited April 2012
    Wow, those are a lot of deleted accounts.
  • VainamoinenVainamoinen Moderator
    edited April 2012
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    Wow, those are a lot of deleted accounts.

    Not deleted. Never existed. This was before accounts or something. ;)
This discussion has been closed.