Arkham Asylum

edited October 2009 in General Chat
So I took a risk considering comic books and tie-in franchises really aren't my thing and picked up the PC version. Just finished playing it there and i'm very very impressed. I could go on but it's all stuff that's been gushingly said a thousand times before, but I gotta mention Marc Hamill as the Joker, absolutely brilliant!

Anyone else here play it, and what'd you all think of it? I'd really like to see if anyone disliked it actually :eek:
«1

Comments

  • edited September 2009
    Truly amazing, and I never get bored with the Challenge Maps. Although Joker needs a few more one-liners for them... he repeats himself far too often. On the bright side, his laugh at the end of the "Take it easy on 'em, would ya?" line is the best Joker laugh I've ever heard. Hamill outdid himself.

    I think the only thing that's missing is an Adam West mode. Bright blue cloth suit, bright environments, onomatopoeic signs, The Batusi... I'd be on cloud 9. :D

    Also,
    the third Scarecrow encounter. That was so cruel, and yet so brilliant. And playing as "zombie Batman"? Greatest thing ever.
  • edited September 2009
    I loved it. I wasn't expecting much but i was glued to the game.
  • edited September 2009
    I've just got it myself for the 360 and even though I've not played it very long I like it a lot already.
  • edited September 2009
    It's game of the year, put simply.
  • edited September 2009
    It's the Batman game that the character has deserved all these years. The stealth is a little shallow, but when you get into the flow of the combat you really feel like you're in control of the greatest martial artist in the world. And yes, ShaggE, that bit you mention is very good indeed.
  • edited September 2009
    anyone watch ben yahtzee ? sorry about the bad MI episode review(thought it did make me laugh sorry x2)
    he made a nice review on batman arkham.

    personally its just an overbloated console actioner.. with nothing special, and steath not really working like it should, whats the point when your powers are so limited you only have a few options.. death from above or death from floor fighting.. whooot..

    this game seemed to try to hard to focus in all areas that it lacked fullness in any one area, and instead just became another popin generic game much like assasins creed 1..

    whoot to the pointless upgrades and running about to find pointless things (esp on pc where achievements dont exist like 360)
  • edited September 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    whoot to the pointless upgrades and running about to find pointless things (esp on pc where achievements dont exist like 360)

    Well they do actually, it runs on Games For Windows Live, which is esentially Xbox live, gives gamerpoints and everything exactly like on Xbox
  • edited September 2009
    windows live doesnt give you the same achievements nor does it make a port coded for pc better. :P

    bottom line..
    its not bad but its still a port with tons of issues in gameplay and visuals. mainly shadows.

    course i have seen worse ports, and this is at least playable.but GOTY? hell no lol
  • edited September 2009
    Without the license I think you could say this was a mediocre game, yet with it: it became something truly special. The Riddler Challengers added a lot of welcome reprieve from the endless combat and traversing and the game overall was drowning in charm, style and character that it was difficult not to feel like you were within the madhouse. My only real grievance with it would be the heavy reliance upon vents and the fact the Asylum becomes completely vacated post-completion.

    Yet outside of that: this title went a long way to appeasing the comics fan within me. All of the subtle nods to villains such as Calendar Man, Black Mask, The Mad Hatter went a long way and added a real sense of depth to the Asylum and its history. And of course - the voice cast.
  • edited September 2009
    Excellent game!
  • edited September 2009
    Wouldn't even play it, I'm so so sick of this dark BS and this gore and violence and it's so...over done and boring and I rather stick a poisonous snake in my face than watch Halo 4 or play another Doom clone that's long since evolved. Bastardized the whole industry it has, there used to be more than one genre evolving, now all we have is mediocre action games with great graphics and over praised video game engines that don't take us away from the fact that we're playing evolved clones of Doom 2...

    Adventure games always had a life of there own, action games suck. In the earlier days at least Lucas Arts did something original with games like Rebel Assault.
  • edited September 2009
    doodo! wrote: »
    Wouldn't even play it, I'm so so sick of this dark BS and this gore and violence and it's so...over done and boring and I rather stick a poisonous snake in my face than watch Halo 4 or play another Doom clone that's long since evolved. Bastardized the whole industry it has, there used to be more than one genre evolving, now all we have is mediocre action games with great graphics and over praised video game engines that don't take us away from the fact that we're playing evolved clones of Doom 2...

    Adventure games always had a life of there own, action games suck. In the earlier days at least Lucas Arts did something original with games like Rebel Assault.

    Arkham Asylum is more like Metroid if it were a beat-em-up, I don't know what all that stuff about FPS games has to do with it.
  • edited September 2009
    Pale Man wrote: »
    Arkham Asylum is more like Metroid if it were a beat-em-up, I don't know what all that stuff about FPS games has to do with it.

    I have stories man! I don't know I rant, I'm just bored of a lot of things in life right now so bored that I went from classic rock and classical music to rap and I'm even bored or porn...and so many other things. I love adventure games, can't wait to see more of them. I'm waiting for AVS2

    Back on topic , I just feel like The FPS inspired second person shooters eventually and everything just went down hill from there. Not really but I strive to be coherent in some way here, I don't know why my hate for FPS came up, even though I'd play Wolfenstein and Prey because of who is behind those projects. Hell I'd even play DOOM 4 just to go OOOOW, AWEEEEE but over all even the most dated adventure games are still my favorites.

    Wolf 3D because it didn't take itself too seriously and was fun didn't date too bad either.
  • edited September 2009
    doodo! wrote: »
    I'm even bored or porn...

    what is it with you? :p
  • edited September 2009
    metriod as a beatup up...

    interesting way of describing it :P

    pretty accurate too XD
  • edited September 2009
    doodo! wrote: »
    Wouldn't even play it, I'm so so sick of this dark BS and this gore and violence and it's so...over done and boring and I rather stick a poisonous snake in my face than watch Halo 4 or play another Doom clone that's long since evolved. Bastardized the whole industry it has, there used to be more than one genre evolving, now all we have is mediocre action games with great graphics and over praised video game engines that don't take us away from the fact that we're playing evolved clones of Doom 2...

    Adventure games always had a life of there own, action games suck. In the earlier days at least Lucas Arts did something original with games like Rebel Assault.

    Bwah? Have you even seen this game before? It's not a shooter at all, first-person or otherwise. Enemies get knocked out, not killed. And it certainly isn't like Halo or Doom.
  • edited September 2009
    Great game!

    I'm still working through the challenge maps.
  • edited September 2009
    I think arkham asylum is somthing that that batman, had deserved. Some of the points to me were frustrating like the boss fights( Bane, And Croc.)
    But the game mixed every element of batman for the last 70 years, and being a huge batman fan it's somthing that I was glued to for about week.
    That and I couldn't get over the fact kevin conroy, and Mark Hamil were the voices, yeah it made me feel like a kid again.
  • edited September 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    windows live doesnt give you the same achievements nor does it make a port coded for pc better. :P
    Yes it does. Same achievements and the same account. A person can actually have the same game's achievements twice if they own it on PC and the XBOX 360.
  • edited September 2009
    I hope this isn't overrated or something(I really hated the Halo games, for some reason).
    Everyone's throwing up mighty praise for it, but from the demo I'd say it's just a pretty game that's actually mediocre. Still, getting the game. Hopefully I won't be dissapointed.


    You have just been NEGATIVE CREEP'D.
  • edited September 2009
    TookiGuy wrote: »
    I hope this isn't overrated or something(I really hated the Halo games, for some reason).
    Everyone's throwing up mighty praise for it, but from the demo I'd say it's just a pretty game that's actually mediocre. Still, getting the game. Hopefully I won't be dissapointed.


    You have just been NEGATIVE CREEP'D.

    The story really drives the game, it's like a bog-standard idea put pulled off brilliantly, the gameplay just makes you feel like you're Batman. I've no idea of your personal tastes, but i'd put good money on you enjoying it :)
  • edited September 2009
    I hated halo.. no story, no substance, duck hide heal... weee

    at least in batman you CAN and will die, unless you play on easyyyyyy

    the gameplay makes you feel like batman? wahh.... ive tried doing many things and unless you are in what the game feels is the right spot you cant do dives on people or whatnot, you must just glide, there is no independent JUMP button so you just walk off edges HOPING he jumps not climbs or just falls in sneak mode instead of a glide.

    the cap when out takes 80% of the screen, xray vision is on 90% of the time destroying detail but really why not wear it...

    id wait if you plan on paying for it, play it on a friends console NOT THE PC first..
    this game was never ever ever meant for the pc, sickens me how PCs get the ports now and it used to be the other way around for many years.

    TOOKiguy, believe yourself and that demo.. its just MEDIOCRE.. not bad in any sense, but far to consolish and the story,? ooooook... seems they just crammed everyone in one place and said LET LOOSE...
    thats not genius thats called running out of ideas lol

    newwwww gaaaaaaaameeee
    and btw was negative creep'ed referring to nirvana? love that song
  • edited September 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    the gameplay makes you feel like batman? wahh.... ive tried doing many things and unless you are in what the game feels is the right spot you cant do dives on people or whatnot, you must just glide,

    Correct, for it would be impossible to glide kick someone directly below you and dropping down without the glide would result in batman with his kneecaps coming out of his skull
    Kaldire wrote: »
    there is no independent JUMP button so you just walk off edges HOPING he jumps not climbs or just falls in sneak mode instead of a glide.

    Correct, no independent jump button, you run towards a ledge, he glides if you hold the run button, if there's somewhere he can jump to and you direct him to he jumps to it, you want him to drop don't hold it at all, simple.
    Kaldire wrote: »
    the cap when out takes 80% of the screen, xray vision is on 90% of the time destroying detail but really why not wear it...

    Yeah whatever Yahtzee :p. The cape does certainly not take up 80% of the screen or would I say the detective mode on 90% of the time (at least the way I played the game, enter an area turn it on, check out the enemies flick it off, maybe on or off f af ew more times to track their movements and see any items of detail or investigate suspect stuff), you need to go back to the calculator with that one

    Kaldire wrote: »
    id wait if you plan on paying for it, play it on a friends console NOT THE PC first..
    this game was never ever ever meant for the pc, sickens me how PCs get the ports now and it used to be the other way around for many years.

    I never played it on a console but i'd no problems with the PC port besides the the odd minor graphical glitch which were few and far between

    Kaldire wrote: »
    and the story,? ooooook... seems they just crammed everyone in one place and said LET LOOSE...
    thats not genius thats called running out of ideas lol

    :confused:

    Kaldire wrote: »
    and btw was negative creep'ed referring to nirvana? love that song

    For one final sting, I hate that song :p
  • edited September 2009
    it wont sting me that you hate that song, its not nirvanas best work mate :P haha
    im not offended like that.

    when you glide, it does take up 80% of the screen.. not when walking XD

    the ?? about the story and craming everyone in... you do realize this was a comic series...im hoping you do anyway.. the persons responsible did great justice to bringing the COMIC aspect back from a serious standpoint.. i personally never thought batman should be serious like the new movie... never was the joker meant to be this way.. though RIP.. he played it well..

    but besides the point.. it had no real base.. you take said villian into known trap.. you know its all a trap.. just swarm the place with swats or whatnot from your lil gal on the com. easy pie.
    you meet up with like 3 officers in the field randomly in places.. only to come back and find them vanished or dead somehow..
    scenes change and items change depending on events.. IE triggers.. this is insane in a fighting game.. its like saying you cant combine the pen and the paper until you find out what you want to copy by looking at it.

    the pc port.. as you know it is a port.. has major memory leaks, as well as glitches dealing with physx textures.. if you turn physx off or dont have it, it just looks.. like well crap.. shadows are or are not in places they should be and the atmosphere looks unclear even on the highest settings. (proof of console again and bad conversion in coding.)

    check some resource monitors for the memory leaks... its only a few of the levels that have them.. i assume patches will address this.. as they are evident as heck

    -common you know you love yahtzee, he makes me pee myself and thats saying alot.. sorry about the bad MI review again but, its something telltale should watch and address in future games!! seriously jake if you read this, watch that review

    as for the jumping and being in the right position.. you misunderstand..
    ive been right near an enemy.. right above him.. 3-4 feet, and i cant attack him without first GLIDING or moving to the exact trigger point that allows the glide KICK to show up.. (which it does in a console fashion)

    and not having a button for jump is sick and sad.. making me feel like im in the army wearing an 80lb pack.. no you should NOT have to jump by walking near a ledge quickly.. thats just bad programing again.. and no jump button for combos? jump KICK.. jump PUNCH.. only special moves use these and dont allow you to actually jump yourself just by chance of combos raised.

    hope i covered everything..
    as yahtzee says.. which i agree with.. its not a bad game.. at all.. just not that great.. but somehow it works enough for me to say, its worth a play.. but common game of the year?
  • edited September 2009
    Mark Hamill is this game. His Joker (from what I understand, he does it in the animated series of Batman) is superbly apt for this comic book version of the character. He just rocks.

    The game's so misleadingly long, I thought I've been coming to the end for ages now, but I keep having more thrown at me. I must be near the end now, it seems like just me, the Joker, and a couple of those fast-moving lunatics left now.

    Its a fun game, the gameplay works well enough for me to get immersed into that whole superhero thing and either jump headlong into a group of ten enemies and start cracking skulls, or stealthily take out each enemy one by one and watch as the heartbeats on the others goes from calm to nervous to terrified as they fire into the air not knowing where I am... I love the Joker's commentary on these bits: "Looks like there's only two of you left! I bet you're dying to know which one of you is going to be next. I know I am!", etc etc.

    The worst part is the boss fights. They're, well, boss fights. When was the last time you saw a good boss fight? The way you deal with Killer Croc is fun, but the Scarecrow platform moments (though the build-up to the first one I found quite spine-chilling) and the Poison Ivy boss fight just beat cliches long supposed to be dead.

    Still, an enjoyable game all round.
  • edited September 2009
    I was really impressed with the game, it's fun, and the detail that went into it was great, comic fans should like it for all the info and easter eggs they've thrown in, etc. Though the boss fights are pretty much the same bar a few, and I admit, I did love the Scarecrow parts, the whole messing with the gamer thing is brilliant and I like it when games do it properly (MGS2 as an example).

    Considering this game came from like nowhere, from a studio no one cared about, published by Eidos, etc, it just kind of surprised people really at how good it is and how much, well, I'll be honest, Geeky it is too, haha.
  • edited September 2009
    @ Kaldire (the whole post's too long to quote :p)

    Ah right, I thought you were just completley hating on it and I couldn't get my head round it. We could go back and forth for ages but we'll agree to disagree cos it's getting late over here. I was dissapointed with a lot of the boss fights all the same though for what its worth :)
  • edited September 2009
    the geek factor is high i admit! this is one reason alone to own it.. but only select geeks care for the DK series...
    DK was just .. to dark... and this makes it like .. well,. combining the comedy of monty python with the workings of Sam Raimi

    boss fights omg dont get me started.. and side dodge and hit.. and side dodge and hit.. wooooow this is like pong..
  • edited September 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    the geek factor is high i admit! this is one reason alone to own it.. but only select geeks care for the DK series...
    DK was just .. to dark... and this makes it like .. well,. combining the comedy of monty python with the workings of Sam Raimi

    boss fights omg dont get me started.. and side dodge and hit.. and side dodge and hit.. wooooow this is like pong..

    Considered me utterly bemused. What is DK and what is comedic about it? And I think you are mistaking Sam Raimi for someone else entirely, as he focuses more upon the ridiculous and "spoof" rather than brooding and grisly tales.
  • edited September 2009
    you think i dont know who sam raimi is?

    his style is to have scary horror with humor...

    hence... add terror of arkham and the joker... joker is non stop humor even when insane, same with his partner in crime...

    DK= dark knight? or DONKEY KONG lol and whats comic about it is they stayed true to the comic styled characters instead the new series. ... that simple.. if you were a batman nerd you woulda known that. And ill assume you didnt read the comic set for arkham either.
    (imagine this, have you seen batman forever the movie with robin and poison ivy and arnold as mr freeze? to me this is the MOST REAL batman movie made.. on the side of course of the ORIGINAL.)

    its characters were so fake it was very COMICAL.. not HA HA funny comical.. but comic book comical

    also this is not a brooding grisly tale.. its some screw off between res evil, metroid and some really badly written sequel to a futuristic evil dead in where psychos reign but you can cold cock them with a single punch as they charge you (sounds VERY Raimi to me...)

    now .. have the info, are you happy?

    or still not understanding,
    utterly bemused indeed... the nerve ( this is why most dont post in forums)

    ive already said it was an ok game just NOT GOOD... sorta like bioshock... and fallout...
    ok ... coulda been vastly better...

    (runs from the fallout 3 crowd) YES FALLOUT 3 WAS AND IS shat...(but now im digressing)
  • edited September 2009
    S@bre wrote: »
    Mark Hamill is this game. His Joker (from what I understand, he does it in the animated series of Batman) is superbly apt for this comic book version of the character. He just rocks.

    You are correct. Mark Hamill is The Joker for all of the DCAU properties in which the character appeared along with a few others (he also voiced Hobgoblin in the Spider-Man series that ran in the 90s as well, among many other VA roles). Amusingly enough, while the live-action Birds of Prey series was pretty dang bad, the opening of the first episode had the Joker laughing offscreen. Guess who supplied the laugh?
  • edited September 2009
    Excellent game, def benefited from fact expectations from all gamers was pretty low based on past license games. Voice acting was brilliant, thought story was great. Hope Joker is in sequel (not necessarily main role). A great building block for a franchise
  • edited September 2009
    i cant knock the voice acting :P

    nor can I say its horrid vs other batman games,

    course Adventures of Fatman is greater than all batman games but I wont go there,... thats for nerds..
  • edited October 2009
    doodo! wrote: »
    Back on topic , I just feel like The FPS inspired second person shooters eventually and everything just went down hill from there.

    Second person shooters? A second person shooter would technically have the player viewing the game through the eyes of a non-interactive character who is watching another non-interactive character play the game.

    I mean there is boring and there is boring. That would be the latter.
  • edited October 2009
    Woodsyblue wrote: »
    Second person shooters? A second person shooter would technically have the player viewing the game through the eyes of a non-interactive character who is watching another non-interactive character play the game.

    I mean there is boring and there is boring. That would be the latter.

    Somebody actually made a second-person shooter. You played from the viewpoint of an NPC, and if you left his line of sight... well, good luck. :p
  • edited October 2009
    Lol

    i think he meant 3rd lol
  • edited October 2009
    I knew he meant third person, I was just having some lols. Anyhow, we have gotten dangerously off topic.

    Um, yeah. I plan to play Arkham Asylum but I don't feel like paying full price for it. I'm prepared to wait until it hits the bargain bins. I've heard it's a damn fine game though.
  • edited October 2009
    wait until its like 10$ then maaybe id buy it,
    beating it in about 5-6 hrs WITH all secrets didnt help either. (not on HARDEST but normal)
    and no that does not include challange stages.. which again are pointless

    be warned.. if you get the pc version, it was ported so poorly it even displays the 360 controller buttons when it should show you the keyboard controls.

    sooo tarded
  • edited October 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    be warned.. if you get the pc version, it was ported so poorly it even displays the 360 controller buttons when it should show you the keyboard controls.

    Woah woah woah there fella! I played through it all on the PC and it did no such thing. Were you playing other games with the 360 controller or something?
  • edited October 2009
    Kaldire wrote: »
    be warned.. if you get the pc version, it was ported so poorly it even displays the 360 controller buttons when it should show you the keyboard controls.

    That's not true. I played the PC version and it displayed the PC controls (mouse & keyboard).
Sign in to comment in this discussion.