What the fudge?

2

Comments

  • edited December 2009
    I understand your feelings Gary, I think, since I feel the same way about using vulgarities. At the same time I accept that other people don't feel the same way that I do, and I feel everyone has the right to live their life as they see fit, as long as they don't specifically harm another person or group.

    If somebody uses the occasional cuss, and it isn't directed at any one person or group in particular I can accept that, personally, especially if they usually express themselves in a courteous and considerate manner. I also feel that some people have made posts that I considered rude or disrespectful without resorting to "bad" language.
  • edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    Okay, so some people don't mind swear words and other people do. How about we all agree to respect one another opinions as best we can, and live in peace and love and harmony and enjoy some tasty pancakes?
    pancakes.png
    OOh!
    I've just given some pancakes slathered with maple syrup to a bloke in "broken sword 2"
    He wasn't best pleased with me as he was chased by a hive of angry wasps.:D
  • edited December 2009
    Hello
    you guys. It's
    topics
    like this that really
    divide
    people up. On one hand, you have
    folks
    like Gary, who think swearing is
    very
    stupid, and on the other, you have
    people
    like Rather Dashing, who don't see what is so
    awfully
    wrong with it.

    Personally, I think people who swear should
    stop
    themselves in the
    case
    that they
    offend
    someone with it.
    Use
    your
    imagination
    to
    fill in
    the
    blanks
    , you
    fine citizens
    !
    I am
    off!
  • edited December 2009
    That was
    fucking
    stupid, Pale Man. D:
  • edited December 2009
    Let the Pale Man have his fun.
  • edited December 2009
    In my opinion, I think it's just very stupid for Nikki to try and avoid cursing only for the forum to do the exact opposite.

    And I do take Nikki for an example because she was probably the one with the most trouble during the webcast if I should believe her after-comments.
  • edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    Do you dislike waffles as well?

    No, but i preffer the potato variety. Yum.
  • edited December 2009
    Bird's eye?
  • edited December 2009
    I try not to swear, but I don't see why it even exists. They're just words. And the 'F word' does not mean to rape someone, it just means to fornicate with them. Why isn't fornicate the 'bad word?' F*** has been around since 1503. Bad words are just words that people dislike for no reason.

    F*** is worse then fornicate while they mean the same thing?
    S*** and feces?
    C*** and female genitalia?
  • edited December 2009
    Well, all I can say is that you are seriously underestimating the power of words.
  • edited December 2009
    Haggis wrote: »
    Well, all I can say is that you are seriously underestimating the power of words.

    I have to agree with Haggis, words alone stared the third reich, words themselves cause each other to hate, and be disgusted by others.
    Words can be a weapon of mass destruction.
  • edited December 2009
    Stick's and stones...
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited December 2009
    Joop wrote: »
    Stick's and stones...

    Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will only cause permanent psychological damage!
    ~ Lano & Woodley
  • edited December 2009
    So nobody likes pancakes? What if I can guarantee you real maple syrup?
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    So nobody likes pancakes? What if I can guarantee you real maple syrup?

    I'd only be tempted by lemon and honey. And you gotta promise to let me flip them.
  • edited December 2009
    I'd like a cheese pancake, please!
  • edited December 2009
    How do you make a cheese pancake? Is it like a chocolate chip pancake only with cheese ... chips? (Shreds?)
  • edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    So nobody likes pancakes? What if I can guarantee you real maple syrup?


    I'm in!
  • edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    So nobody likes pancakes? What if I can guarantee you real maple syrup?

    I don't think i've ever had maple syrup...:o
  • edited December 2009
    You should be able to find a pancake house even there in the UK. At least in the Netherlands we have pancake houses, some which actually serve American pancakes, with Maple Syrup. It's the thing I always take when I go to Bataviastad.
  • edited December 2009
    Lena_P wrote: »
    How do you make a cheese pancake? Is it like a chocolate chip pancake only with cheese ... chips? (Shreds?)
    I suppose that would work... but just put a slice (or two) of cheese in the pan with the pancake, yummy! But then, I'm a sucker for melted cheese.
  • edited December 2009
    Icedhope wrote: »
    I have to agree with Haggis, words alone stared the third reich, words themselves cause each other to hate, and be disgusted by others.
    Words can be a weapon of mass destruction.

    This is where you overestimate the power of words. Words can be the most powerful force in the world. The same word can be the best thing ever, or the your worst nightmare. It all depends on how the listener takes it.


    Now please pass the strawberry jam.
  • edited December 2009
    Doesn't change the fact that for some people words mean things differently from other people's definitions. That doesn't make them wrong either.

    I'll get in on this pancake action. I love me my maple syrup...
  • edited December 2009
    Instead of giving you some kind of philosophical rant about how imprecise language can be, I will tell you a little story to make my point (Christmas time is storytime-don't you think?):


    A few years ago (I was still in school back then) my friends and I played that really terrible game of cards. "Terrible" because I really sucked at it. I know "suck" is not a nice word, but I really sucked at this game.
    Anyways, to win the game you have to get rid of all your cards, how you lose your cards I can't remember, but there were tons of rules how to get more cards. One of those rules was, that you are not allowed to curse while playing the game.

    Well, I'm the kind of person who curses a lot, if he gets frustrated. After I lost several rounds, I tried to trespass the rule by exchanging the "dirty" words with harmless ones.

    Instead of the word "Scheiße" (which I will not translate for you) I used the word "Apfelmuß" (which is quite delicious).

    To make it short: It didn't work, why you may ask?

    Because it doesn't matter which words you are using, what matters is the intention you have, when you are saying theese words.

    Ok, while reading this post I ask myself an age old question: "Does this wasteland of words add something new to this discussion?"
    The answer is: No, but I always wanted to tell this story, thank you for reading.


    By the way, I'm more the waffle-person, with whipped cream and strawberry Jam. Pancakes are far too thin for my taste.


    Merry Christmas!
  • edited December 2009
    The whole concept of swearing is so fucking backwards in my opinion, it's untrue. The very negativity it supposedly portrays is completely circular in that suppressing "swear words" perpetuates their need to be suppressed. If nobody was bothered by them then there wouldn't be a problem. And what's more, how in hell is it less rude to impede on another persons free will and right to free speech than it is to say arbitrarily forbidden words? As I see it, it's way more rude to think you have dominion over another person's choices, espeically if you don't even know them.

    Having said this, if I ever have kids I'll probably tell them not to swear in public, purely because it can cause negativity. I still believe that said negativity is derived only from the actual prohibition of swearing itself, but one person boycotting something so popular isn't going to make much difference. That's the same reason I'm not a vegetarian.
  • edited December 2009
    It's not just about morality, it's also a form of discipline. In fact, there should be no reason to even act angry, to be angry, hateful or anything. Swearing is a way of venting your anger. Sure, it's not right to keep building up your rage, but that's why we can save things for later, so we can vent in in an unguarded time, when nobody is near, when you can do no harm. And even then we shouldn't release your anger. In fact, why be angry about something? Mostly we are angry because something trivial bothers us, like, we stub our toe, or somebody's being annoying.

    There really is no use to being mean, to be angry, and subsequently, there really is no use to use swear words, and that's the thing we should teach our children. Not just that swear words are bad, but that anger should be suppressed, or at least not be let shown in the presence of others. It can potentially alienate you from others if you let it happen.
  • edited December 2009
    Yes, there's the free speech argument. However, I think that human consideration, compassion, and politeness are more important than free speech.
  • edited December 2009
    I also think that "freedom of speech" is used too liberally. Just because you CAN say something doesn't mean you SHOULD. You can't go say to everybody to go screw themselves. That's just stupid and impolite.
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    It's not just about morality, it's also a form of discipline. In fact, there should be no reason to even act angry, to be angry, hateful or anything. Swearing is a way of venting your anger. Sure, it's not right to keep building up your rage, but that's why we can save things for later, so we can vent in in an unguarded time, when nobody is near, when you can do no harm. And even then we shouldn't release your anger. In fact, why be angry about something? Mostly we are angry because something trivial bothers us, like, we stub our toe, or somebody's being annoying.

    There really is no use to being mean, to be angry, and subsequently, there really is no use to use swear words, and that's the thing we should teach our children. Not just that swear words are bad, but that anger should be suppressed, or at least not be let shown in the presence of others. It can potentially alienate you from others if you let it happen.

    I'd feel more alienated from somebody if I never saw them get angry about anything. It's normal and healthy to feel and express anger, as long as you aren't doing it in ways that are hurtful to those around you.
  • edited December 2009
    Being angry is human, being able to control it however requires discipline. You can't just burst into a tantrum every time you feel angry, most of the times, and not even sometimes, most of the times you need to swallow that anger. Yes, you can rant about it afterwards, but for the moment, it's always better to stay shut.

    Not getting angry might alienate you from others, but being too easily pissed has the very same effect.
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    It's not just about morality, it's also a form of discipline. In fact, there should be no reason to even act angry, to be angry, hateful or anything.

    Here, I totally agree with you.

    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    Not just that swear words are bad, but that anger should be suppressed, or at least not be let shown in the presence of others. It can potentially alienate you from others if you let it happen.

    Here, I disagree. It's way more healthy to let out your anger than to suppress it. Teaching your children to suppress their anger is like introducing them to the world of stress related diseases. Instead teach them the consequences if they do it in an innapropriate way.

    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    I also think that "freedom of speech" is used too liberally. Just because you CAN say something doesn't mean you SHOULD. You can't go say to everybody to go screw themselves. That's just stupid and impolite.

    Personally I think "freedom of speech" can't be used too liberally, because then the word "freedom" will lose it's sense. If you're not allowed to say anything, than there is no "freedom" at all, don't you think?
    But, being allowed to say everything doesn't mean that others have to tolerate what those people are saying. "Freedom of speech" implies at the same time "freedom of listening" and if you want to ignore people who are using to much swear words, it's ok.
    Just don't expect that everyone else will follow your lead.
  • edited December 2009
    People freak out too much about freedom. It's ok to be restricted some times. In fact it's more healthy than being free in everything you do.

    I can't stand the "It's my rite to say what I want" attitude at the expense of others. Just saying "Well you don't have to listen to it then" is obnoxious and simply inconsiderate and alienates you from people. I know I don't want to be anywhere near people like that. Then again if you want to be alienated go right ahead. You're certainly free to do so.
  • edited December 2009
    I tend to agree with MusicallyInspired here. Showing constraint is hard, but it does show that you are mature. That thought comes across well in Rudyard Kipling's poem If.
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    It's not just about morality, it's also a form of discipline. In fact, there should be no reason to even act angry, to be angry, hateful or anything. Swearing is a way of venting your anger. Sure, it's not right to keep building up your rage, but that's why we can save things for later, so we can vent in in an unguarded time, when nobody is near, when you can do no harm. And even then we shouldn't release your anger. In fact, why be angry about something? Mostly we are angry because something trivial bothers us, like, we stub our toe, or somebody's being annoying.
    While I agree that releasing your anger by punching stuff and shouting and stuff like that is unhealthy (since the adrenaline it releases can be addictive and being addicted to hitting things can be seen as a bad thing), I also think that suppressing it can be unhealthy. The best way to deal with anger is to rationalise it, in my opinion. Someone once said "the best way to get rid of a problem is to solve it", and that's true for anger.

    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    There really is no use to being mean, to be angry, and subsequently, there really is no use to use swear words, and that's the thing we should teach our children. Not just that swear words are bad, but that anger should be suppressed, or at least not be let shown in the presence of others. It can potentially alienate you from others if you let it happen.
    I think you've made a false leap in logic here. You've understandably mixed up content and context, which is what I think a lot of people are doing. Swearing doesn't imply anger or nastiness. For example, I could say "I fucking love ice cream" or "this ice cream is the shit" without expressing anything negative. Similarly, I could say "You're a childish brat with no prospects and I hope you die" (not you, that was just a random sentence :P) and cause a lot of unhappiness in someone. By the very nature of modifiers (grammatical ones), they can't imply too specific a notion. Frankly, the idea of censoring any words other than nouns in order to prevent offence betrays a grave misunderstanding of the English language.

    On reflection, that last sentence actually sounds a tad offensive (it wasn't supposed to be; it wasn't directed at anybody here), and you'll notice that not only are there no swear words, but also that it's the idea conveyed, rather than the letters used, that effects the offensiveness. Proves my point pretty well :P. Obviously, the letters used facilitate the idea conveyed, but the point is that they can be changed without also changing the idea.
    Yes, there's the free speech argument. However, I think that human consideration, compassion, and politeness are more important than free speech.
    Human consideration, compassion and politeness are monumentally impaired by censoring words. It is not only lazy, but ineffective to say "you shouldn't say this word or this word" rather than "you shouldn't imply this or this". Simply put, again, there's a mix-up between context and content.
  • edited December 2009
    Let me put it this way.

    In the Netherlands, we use cancer (kanker) in the same way as the f-word, both in negative and positive sense. Would you feel great if you are either a victim of cancer or somebody close to you died because of cancer and somebody uses the word as much as possible? Sure there are debates about those people being over-sensitive, but we still should be considerate.

    I mean, if you were to say "kanker kutjood", translated freely to stupid Jew, where "Jood" is Dutch for jew (what "kut" means I leave behind, that's an offensive word in itself, but not as much as "kanker"), people really would have no respect for you.

    Also, considering the games thus far only have a PG-13 rating, where the F-bomb can't be freely used, and this actually being a family board (up until Tales of Monkey Island, because that's when the crap hit the fan), I really feel like this board is starting to degenerate if we were to allow everybody to just freely use these words. I mean, I can understand a one-time slip, or a once in a long time occasion, but not in nearly 1 out of 10 topics I come to.

    Sorry, but that's where I draw a line. I imagine Telltale Games to be family friendly, and I also expect the forums to be quite similar.
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    There really is no use to being mean, to be angry, and subsequently, there really is no use to use swear words, and that's the thing we should teach our children.

    Yeah! Who needs anger. F
    ..
    c
    ..
    it!

    Sorry for hinting a swearing but no anger?! Anger is a wonderful emotion. It shows so much. You have to show your anger! What the hell man?! People need anger. If you don't get angered, then what the hell do you care about swear words?
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    I mean, if you were to say "kanker kutjood", translated freely to stupid Jew, where "Jood" is Dutch for jew (what "kut" means I leave behind, that's an offensive word in itself, but not as much as "kanker"), people really would have no respect for you.
    Racial epitaphs are not the same as swearing.
  • nikasaurnikasaur Telltale Alumni
    edited December 2009
    As with all the forums, keep it classy in here, folks.
  • edited December 2009
    Shwoo wrote: »
    Racial epitaphs are not the same as swearing.

    How about "kankerhoer", which means "cancer whore"?

    Seriously, I'm really getting sick of people completely missing the point. It makes people look like freaking idiots.
  • edited December 2009
    GaryCXJk wrote:
    In fact, there should be no reason to even act angry, to be angry, hateful or anything.
    GaryCXJk wrote:
    Seriously, I'm really getting sick of people completely missing the point. It makes people look like freaking idiots.
    I think you just contradicted yourself.

    Besides, your post was kind of unclear on what your point was. All you really said was "these words are offensive". I was just sick of swearing and racial epitaphs being treated as the same thing.
This discussion has been closed.