Overrated Video Games: Your Opinions

edited May 2010 in General Chat
What game(s) have you played, that you felt got really good reviews or quite a bit of hype, but when you played it, it turned out to be boring, underimpressive, or just suck?




I've been listening to the Zelda: Twilight Princess OST (one of my favorite games) and it got me thinking. I bought a ps2slim two years ago, and since then had been looking around for good games and such when I came across a game called Shadow of the Colossus.

In reviews of this game that I read/watched, about every one I can remember said it was awesome, epic, and "kind of like Zelda with just boss battles and no item collection." Well, I bought the game from GameStop at some point and though it didn't suck exactly, I just wasn't all that impressed. Sure, there are no load times, the scenery is pretty and the colossi are fricken huge, but that's about all there is to it. At some point in the game, I stopped killing them for a while and just wandered around trying random things like standing on the horse's back and jumping into the air to grab on to a bird (which serves no purpose) just to make the game longer.

Maybe I'm underimpressed because I played Shadow of the Colossus after Twilight Princess came out (which I mention because people compare the two) when it actually was released a year before, and so I felt the graphics in Zelda were better anyway and didn't see the point in all the hype. Not to mention I was bored with Colossus's storyline, or lack thereof.
«134

Comments

  • edited April 2010
    Oh, I think it's harder to ask which games aren't... a few examples:

    Oblivion
    Half Life
    Half Life 2
    Halo
    Diablo II
    Warcraft III
    Portal
    BioShock

    Also, funny, an "overratted" game ;):
    Deus Ex
    Hopefully Sam & Max season 3?
  • edited April 2010
    I hate this word. Overrated.
    Everything's overrated.
  • edited April 2010
    Pokemon D/P/P. I just don't get why those games are so "OMGBRILLIANT".

    And what overrated games list is complete without the Call of Duty series?
  • edited April 2010
    I hate this word. Overrated.
    Everything's overrated.


    Well... thanks for the input. -.-


    I meant specifically, what game or games might you have personally played that you were told were fricken awesome and all that, but you just didn't like it when you actually got down to playing it.
  • edited April 2010
    And what overrated games list is complete without the Call of Duty series?

    Amen.

    I'll add Pro Evolution Soccer, FIFA, NBA Live and Madden series to the list.
  • edited April 2010
    I'd go for Halo as well, and the Final Fantasy series. ESPECIALLY 7.

    Also, Ocarina of Time. Now hold on, that doesn't mean it isn't an excellent game, but when a new Zelda game comes out everyone seems to want to compare it to that one and I don't think that's fair nor do I think it should be the one to set the best example of how a Zelda game should be done.
  • edited April 2010
    PecanBlue wrote: »
    I'd go for Halo as well, and the Final Fantasy series. ESPECIALLY 7.

    I like 7. I DO know it has so many flaws and I can see that the main anxiety behind the game was MONEY but... Tifa's my favorite character >->

    I hate 8. I totally despise 8. It's even more overrated IMO.
  • edited April 2010
    PecanBlue wrote: »
    I'd go for Halo as well, and the Final Fantasy series. ESPECIALLY 7.

    Also, Ocarina of Time. Now hold on, that doesn't mean it isn't an excellent game, but when a new Zelda game comes out everyone seems to want to compare it to that one and I don't think that's fair nor do I think it should be the one to set the best example of how a Zelda game should be done.

    Agreed on both. I loved FF up until 7 and then didn't even play them until 12. I just didn't like 7 and it annoys me how it's the one people keep calling the best.

    As for Ocarina of Time, I loved the game, and didn't think it overrated when I first played it (or second, or third), but I agree that people seem to consider it the ultimate Zelda games or something and I feel there have been better Zelda games both before and since.
  • edited April 2010
    Falanca wrote: »
    I hate 8. I totally despise 8. It's even more overrated IMO.

    There was an 8? I just believed it skipped from VII to IX instantly and there CERTAINLY couldn't have been a terrible game where the main character is a wussy emo who used an impossible weapon, and it CERTAINLY wouldn't have been riddled with plot holes, and the main character CERTAINLY wouldn't have died and then become a live again in a totally different location with no mention of it afterwards. I mean, a game like that would be AWFUL :rolleyes:

    Super Paper Mario indefinitely. The game is ok, But it wasn't a colourful RPG like the prior two- instead, it was a gimmicky platformer.
  • edited April 2010
    Halo, without a doubt. Did nothing for me.
  • edited April 2010
    It is ironic that you mention Twilight Princess, because that is totally it for me... I beat the water temple & just said screw it.

    Now on a personal level & not media buzz kinda thing, I would have to say Sonic 06 (The worst game ever made in my opinion). I was quite naively expecting it to be Sonic Adventure 3. I mean the team thing from Sonic Heroes (which I hated) was gone, it had an overworld which you could explore between stages (much Like SA1 *my favorite Sonic game* had), There were single character stories (once again similar to SA1) instead of the good or evil paths (the style in which SA2 used... I love the game itself, but the way the story was handled always annoyed me), the graphics were great (for the time)... I mean what could go wrong? Well besides the terrible control, camera & level design absolutely nothing.
  • edited April 2010
    There was an 8? I just believed it skipped from VII to IX instantly and there CERTAINLY couldn't have been a terrible game where the main character is a wussy emo who used an impossible weapon, and it CERTAINLY wouldn't have been riddled with plot holes, and the main character CERTAINLY wouldn't have died and then become a live again in a totally different location with no mention of it afterwards. I mean, a game like that would be AWFUL :rolleyes:

    Super Paper Mario indefinitely. The game is ok, but it's not, by any standards, a zany RPG with a host of weird characters who all have bright and colourful sprites (this a key thing- all of the new characters in SPM are made with nothing but basic shapes)

    In-DEED.

    But still I think the idea of the gunblade is pretty great and it would be nice to see if it was used correctly. You know, like in a sitcom or something.
  • edited April 2010
    There was an 8? I just believed it skipped from VII to IX instantly and there CERTAINLY couldn't have been a terrible game where the main character is a wussy emo who used an impossible weapon, and it CERTAINLY wouldn't have been riddled with plot holes, and the main character CERTAINLY wouldn't have died and then become a live again in a totally different location with no mention of it afterwards. I mean, a game like that would be AWFUL

    FFVIII destroys VII any day of the week. I would say it is the 4th best in the series, behind VI, IV & IX.
  • edited April 2010
    Shadow of the Colossus =/= Zelda.

    Different games, so when you say it's overrated in your opinion I say you are completely wrong and played it the wrong way.
    And I also say reviewers and reviews are laughable matters.

    Also, of course, SotC is far more innovative and ground breaking to videogames than Twilight Princess - which anyway has still some of the best dungeons in the series.
  • edited April 2010
    FFVIII destroys VII any day of the week. I would say it is the 4th best in the series, behind VI, IV & IX.

    I would like to have an argument about that but it'll be pointless since personal taste is an involving aspect so I'll just say this;



    :(
  • edited April 2010
    I didn't mind FF8 all that much. Of course, having a PocketStation with which to basically disregard the Junction System probably helped.
  • edited April 2010
    And what overrated games list is complete without the Call of Duty series?

    I'm gonna be the forum meathead and stick up for CoD for the sake of Devils Advocate. If anything i'd say there's a big ol' backlash against the franchise. It sells well because people like it, and for ages it was the media darling, but now everyone's bitching about it (whilst still playing it, the Stimulus DLC sold like crazy on Xbox Live)

    My point, outside of personal opinion when you've got those sales numbers and player numbers that Infinity Ward have then it's probably not that overrated.

    Though I understand the many many valid reasons why people don't like the franchise, ye just have to swuitch off and have fun at the end of the day to enjoy it I think.

    I think a lot of indie games aren't exactly overrated, but I think opinion tends to be a lot more lenient on them than big studios. Wether this is good or bad is a whole different kettle of fish
  • edited April 2010
    The Force Unleashed. C'mon, is not THAT good. It's entertaining, but after the first three levels I got bored because it was so incredible repetitive: Kill everyone, first boss, kill everyone again, second boss, kill everything you see and final boss.
  • WillWill Telltale Alumni
    edited April 2010
    Oh god, Shadow of the Colossus was SO GOOD. And Ico. Seriously, I can't wait for Trico. SERIOUSLY.
  • edited April 2010
    Trenchfoot wrote: »
    The Force Unleashed. C'mon, is not THAT good. It's entertaining, but after the first three levels I got bored because it was so incredible repetitive: Kill everyone, first boss, kill everyone again, second boss, kill everything you see and final boss.

    Hey, its just like an FPS!

    For me I have to say most modern FPS like Gears of War or Modern Warfare, as well as the entire GTA series. It's boring. Drive around, do some stuff you don't care about, blow some stuff up, shoot people, meh. Boring. I had more fun playing Simpsons Hit and Run than I did playing GTA 4. Oh, and Super Mario RPG. While it's great, don't get me wrong, plenty of better Mario RPGs have come down the pike by now and it's hardly still the greatest among them.
  • edited April 2010
    Wizpig wrote: »
    Shadow of the Colossus =/= Zelda.

    Also, of course, SotC is far more innovative and ground breaking to videogames than Twilight Princess - which anyway has still some of the best dungeons in the series.

    People compared the two in the store and in reviews so I'm gonna mention that.


    Also, I don't CARE about "innovative" and "groundbreaking." I didn't play it until 2008, and by then I had already played other games with similar or better graphics.

    Innovative and groundbreaking... hmph. I've seen movies that won academy awards for being innovative and groundbreaking, yet they still sucked. I'm not playing games merely for artistic value.

    The only dialogue is from the "gods" which tell you what Colossus to kill next. You have the ability to ride your horse in different ways (hanging from the side, standing on it or crouching on it) yet they never have a use so it doesn't matter. The colossi are huge, but the difficulty lies in learning the right tactic to kill them. Actually doing it is easy so replayability is low. AND I hadn't played Ico before playing SotC, so I had to look up in Wikipedia what the ending to SotC was all about. By itself the ending is, though unexpected, kind of a letdown.

    idk about playing it after playing Ico (for which it's said to be a "spirital prequel" not a direct one), but as a standalone game, the story is weak and the game is short once you know the right tactics.


    Suffice it to say, I bought it from GameStop, beat it in a few days and then took it back for a different game. And I didn't even no-life playing it at all. It really is that short. It might be a good rental, but it certainly is not a good game to buy.
  • edited April 2010
    Most overrated games? I could make posts that are paragraphs long about each of these, so I'll just go against my nature and post a list.

    1. Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
    2. Fallout 3
    3. Day of the Tentacle
    4. Curse of Monkey Island
    5. World of Warcraft
    6. Scribblenauts
    7. LittleBigPlanet
    8. Bioshock
    9. Animal Crossing
    10. Harvest Moon
  • edited April 2010
    I really didn't enjoy Indigo Prophecy very much, even before the story started wandering into WTF territory. It felt more like I was just steering the characters from one cutscene to the next instead of playing a game, and the whole "move your mouse this way to simulate opening a door!" schtick didn't make me feel very immersed. I eventually got stuck at this one quicktime event and discovered that a bug in the PC version made it all but impossible to pass, so I gave up and watched a walkthrough on Youtube instead. I am infinitely glad I did, because holy cow does it get bad. All in all I can see the potential it had to be revolutionary and genre-breaking and worthy of glowing praise, but I think it fell flat.
  • edited April 2010
    I eventually got stuck at this one quicktime event and discovered that a bug in the PC version made it all but impossible to pass
    Odd... I completed the PC version 3 times... on hard.
  • edited April 2010
    The part I got stuck at was the snowstorm in the apartment. No matter how quickly and perfectly I did the quicktime events the game would just randomly decide that I didn't do them right and I would fail. It got really frustrating really fast. :(
  • edited April 2010
    5. World of Warcraft

    Oh god yes, and so many other MMO's. I remember when I had the trial for World of Warcraft and finally decided to try it. My friend was all "NO DON'T DO IT, I DON'T WANT TO LOSE YOU" and I said "relax, how addictive can it possibly be?" So I loaded it up...

    I ran around and button mashed a few things to death, then sat in a pumpkin patch and went "hmmm, yep" and logged out. That was that.

    Oh and Persona 3. My friends wouldn't stop talking about this damn game. Thus I am playing it RIGHT NOW so I can get to playing the supposedly superior Persona 4. Now the story can get pretty interesting and it has hilarious moments, (holy crap you have a knife-wielding dog for a party member) but the gameplay is so horrid. Normally I dislike mostly all other turn-based rpg's but at least some of them have interesting settings. Tartarus is soooo boring to explore and the full moon bosses are nothing special.
  • edited April 2010
    Chyron8472 wrote: »
    People compared the two in the store and in reviews so I'm gonna mention that.


    Also, I don't CARE about "innovative" and "groundbreaking." I didn't play it until 2008, and by then I had already played other games with similar or better graphics.

    Innovative and groundbreaking... hmph. I've seen movies that won academy awards for being innovative and groundbreaking, yet they still sucked. I'm not playing games merely for artistic value.

    The only dialogue is from the "gods" which tell you what Colossus to kill next. You have the ability to ride your horse in different ways (hanging from the side, standing on it or crouching on it) yet they never have a use so it doesn't matter. The colossi are huge, but the difficulty lies in learning the right tactic to kill them. Actually doing it is easy so replayability is low. AND I hadn't played Ico before playing SotC, so I had to look up in Wikipedia what the ending to SotC was all about. By itself the ending is, though unexpected, kind of a letdown.

    idk about playing it after playing Ico (for which it's said to be a "spirital prequel" not a direct one), but as a standalone game, the story is weak and the game is short once you know the right tactics.


    Suffice it to say, I bought it from GameStop, beat it in a few days and then took it back for a different game. And I didn't even no-life playing it at all. It really is that short. It might be a good rental, but it certainly is not a good game to buy.


    I mean clearly if you played it 2008 for the first time, of course there were games with better graphics! That doesn't stop people like me from loving Megaman 2 though. It might not be your taste, but ignoring what the game did in the time it was released is a bit harsh
    Also you have to know where the focus point of this game is. For me it always seemed that the main focus of this game is exploration and epic battles. You can basically go everywhere you like. Even better, in the second playthrough you can get even more power ups and items which will help you explore even more. This is the replayability, along with trying to fight them as fast as possible.
    It never seemed really fair to me to compare it to Zelda, only because there was a boy on a horse wielding a sword. That would be like me comparing Silent Ocean (that diving game for the Wii) with Tomb Raider.

    Also they different poses on the horse DO have a use. If you strife for killing those bosses as fast as possible, you need ways to get from your horse to the weak point of that enemy very fast. Those poses do help a lot with that.
  • edited April 2010
    My pick? Fallout 3. I actually wanted to say Command and Conquer 4, but thankfully so far no one is overrating that game apart from its makers and I don't think that counts.
  • edited April 2010
    Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Super Smash Bros. Melee even more. Doesn't mean they aren't fun, though, it's just that it's really overrated.
  • edited April 2010
    There many games are overrated like :


    Bioshock
    Resistance
    Yakuza
    Resident Evil 5
  • edited April 2010
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Super Smash Bros. Melee even more. Doesn't mean they aren't fun, though, it's just that it's really overrated.

    I would say Brawl is even underrated. Not so many gamers care Wii anymore so Brawl kinda bit the dust.

    I mean lots of people buying it, playing it, I know that but, I can't see the hype I expected.
  • edited April 2010
    most overrated games? I could make posts that are paragraphs long about each of these, so i'll just go against my nature and post a list.

    1. Elder scrolls iv: Oblivion
    2. Fallout 3
    7. Littlebigplanet
    9. Animal crossing

    blasphemy!!!
  • edited April 2010
    Dead Man wrote: »
    there many games are overrated like :


    Yakuza

    EVEN BIGGER BLASPHEMY!!!

    If anything, Yakuza is heavily underrated. Hell, I couldn't name 2 other people in my general area who have played any of them.
  • edited April 2010
    5. World of Warcraft

    You've kind of won my heart.
  • edited April 2010
    blasphemy!!!
    Fallout 3 is a hairy, puss-filled blemish in the series history. Not to say the series doesn't have its blemishes already(Tactics, Brotherhood of Steel), but Bethesda's installment is hardly a return to form. It's a piss-easy, limited RPG with very few customization options outside of "Max Out Everything". Eventually, when you are given EVERYTHING, you have no options. Also, the story sucked on its own terms while screwing up an established canon that was actually good and well thought-out. And that's before the expansions, each and every one acting as a punch in the balls to anyone who actually likes the Fallout series.

    Very much a similar deal with Oblivion. What happened, Bethesda? You did great things with Daggerfall and Morrowind. And then OBLIVION came out, and I honestly stopped caring about the Elder Scrolls franchise.

    Also, nobody can hate or dislike World of Warcraft and in the same breath think that Animal Crossing is worth a damn.

    LittleBigPlanet is my most liked on that list. I just don't think it's a "game" so much as a "software toy". A pretty competently put-together toy, but it's so rare to find good user-made levels. Because a lot of the users are idiots that flood the level space with crap.
  • edited April 2010
    The part I got stuck at was the snowstorm in the apartment. No matter how quickly and perfectly I did the quicktime events the game would just randomly decide that I didn't do them right and I would fail. It got really frustrating really fast. :(
    Well, it was difficult, more so than most other minigames there, true, but nowhere near impossible.
    I assume you mean that one left-right button mash one, that required you to be very fast?
  • edited April 2010
    Also, nobody can hate or dislike World of Warcraft and in the same breath think that Animal Crossing is worth a damn.

    I can. What are you going to do now Mr. Philosopher?
  • edited April 2010
    Dude... just because a series gets widespread popularity doesn't mean that it sucks. I get that some people think that being underground is cool & liking anything mainstream is a crime against humanity (I think that philosophy is idiotic personally, but to each there own), but if you honestly think that just because Bethesda "screwed up the canon" that Fallout 3 sucked, then you are crazy. I played 2 before 3 even came out & thought it was the biggest piece of garbage that I had ever played (enter Sonic 06)... as a matter of fact, the only reason that I even considered playing it is that I loved the Elder Scrolls series & was hoping it would be similar (thankfully it was). This is why it is so hard to work with established IPs... there will always be at least one bitter fanboy who will claim the game sucks just because one little detail doesn't add up. That being said, I do admire Telltale for having the balls to work exclusively with other people's shit... I mean it has to be disheartening to hear your games
  • edited April 2010
    suck just because of one small detail of the story is off (& this is coming from a heavy critic).

    On another important note... You wanted to know how someone could dislike WoW & like Animal Crossing? Really? Well for starters Animal Crossing is a casual, calm & relaxing single player game (with the option of inviting your friends into your town for multiplayer) whereas WoW is a life consuming, anger inducing MMO game where 45 year old men pretend to be hot 18 year old chicks just so they can live out there weird sexual fetish of dirty talking to young men over the internet.... there is a BIG difference
  • edited April 2010
    Dude... just because a series gets widespread popularity doesn't mean that it sucks. I get that some people think that being underground is cool & liking anything mainstream is a crime against humanity (I think that philosophy is idiotic personally, but to each there own), but if you honestly think that just because Bethesda "screwed up the canon" that Fallout 3 sucked, then you are crazy. I played 2 before 3 even came out & thought it was the biggest piece of garbage that I had ever played (enter Sonic 06)... as a matter of fact, the only reason that I even considered playing it is that I loved the Elder Scrolls series & was hoping it would be similar (thankfully it was). This is why it is so hard to work with established IPs... there will always be at least one bitter fanboy who will claim the game sucks just because one little detail doesn't add up. That being said, I do admire Telltale for having the balls to work exclusively with other people's shit... I mean it has to be disheartening to hear your games
    No, it doesn't suck because it sold a lot of copies, it doesn't suck ONLY because it fucked with a canon that is INTELLIGENT and WELL-ESTABLISHED(though it's certainly a huge detraction). It sucks because it's easy, because the idiots that play Fallout 3 can't stand a game that has any measure of challenge. It sucks because the story is insanely weak and full of plot-holes even when you DON'T consider the rest of the series. It sucks because EVERY CHARACTER you make will play EXACTLY THE SAME no matter how hard you work to differentiate them, and that's inexcusable in an RPG. It sucks because it cuts off the ability to kill off quest-important characters, destroying a level of freedom that was a huge part of the original Fallouts and Morrowind. It sucks because it's insanely linear. It sucks because it takes factions with BELIEVABLE motives and turns them into heroic fantasy knights in shining armor. It sucks because playing on Insanity actually made the game EASIER because it barely affected combat and it insanely supercharged your leveling. It sucks because the [Intelligence]-dependent responses are always your character REPEATING WHAT THE NON-PLAYER CHARACTER SAID in layman's terms. Great, so just in case you were way too stupid to understand the very simple exposition given, an Intelligent character can explain it to you, I guess. They don't get to have any intelligent revelations or ideas, they're just parrots. Fallout 3 sucks because dialog is insipidly basic. Fallout 3 sucks because the combat is STUPID, compared to Fallout 1 and 2's intelligent grid-based tactical combat. Fallout 3 sucks.

    Why yes, the MAIN REASON the game sucks is that it takes what is a well-known and beloved franchise and replaces it with something that has only passing, cosmetic similarities to it. That tends to make something a HORRIBLE SEQUEL in almost anybody's eyes. And no, not in the tiny details. The entire moral of the story is raped by Mothership Zeta's audio logs. The very character of the Brotherhood of Steel is changed completely. The black humor is almost completely removed in favor of something a lot safer. The core values of atmosphere, of how the stories are told, of how the game is played? EVERYTHING. No, it's only in the small details that you find something that was done even remotely right.

    But it's also a terrible game in its own right.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.