Rate The Last Movie(s) You Watched

1568101144

Comments

  • edited January 2011
    Last movie I watched was Metal Gear Solid 4.

    Pretty epic! 10/11
  • edited January 2011

    Secret Fawful's Top Five Movies of 2010

    1. Shutter Island

    I remember, I was totally gonna shout at you for this, but I was too lazy to post at the time. Anyways, what the hell man? Shit sucked!
  • edited January 2011
    Origami wrote: »
    Last movie I watched was Metal Gear Solid 4.

    Pretty epic! 10/11

    I'll still have to play watch that. It's sitting on my shelf... staring at me.
  • edited January 2011
    Schindler's Liste 9/10, great movie in almost every aspect.
  • edited January 2011
    JedExodus wrote: »
    I remember, I was totally gonna shout at you for this, but I was too lazy to post at the time. Anyways, what the hell man? Shit sucked!

    I only have one thing to say to you, Mr. I Don't Watch Cowboy Bebop The Coolest Show Ever.


    Anyway. On to what I have seen.

    The Land That Time Forgot (2009) - 0/11 - STAY AWAY FROM ASYLUM MOVIES. Turned it off after twenty or so minutes.

    Battlefield Earth - 0/11 - An entertainingly bad movie, like Plan 9 From Outer Space.

    Twilight - 0/11 - This movie is a bland, boring piece o' shit. However, add Rifftrax commentary, and it becomes an instant classic! Which is what I did, as I only watched this movie to hear it made fun of.

    MST3K: Pod People - 11/11

    MST3K: Devil Fish - 11/11

    The Great Race - 11/11 -
    Jack Lemmon's best role is this film's villain. Blake Edwards once again proves himself as a slapstick master, and this is honestly my favorite of his films.

    Visit to A Small Planet - 4/11 - Jerry Lewis tries to rip off My Favorite Martian or sort of anyway, and while Jerry always makes me laugh, this movie on the whole is too bland for him to fix. It just kind of ends too, leaving you with an empty feeling, and making Earth and Earthlings look like evil assholes. The storylines the movie set out to do just get tossed out the window by the end, making the whole thing pointless.

    The Scalphunters - 10/11 - Quite possibly the best Burt Lancaster westerns I've ever seen. He plays a racist cowboy who goes on a journey with a black man and gets taught a lesson about the equality of man. I won't spoil anymore, but this movie has one of the best, most satisfying endings I've seen in years.
  • edited January 2011
    The Great Race - 11/11 - Jack Lemmon's best role is this film's villain. Blake Edwards once again proves himself as a slapstick master, and this is honestly my favorite of his films.

    YES. I caught the last 3/4 of the movie a couple months ago and have been dying to get my hands on it ever since. Finally, I managed to get it and haven't had a chance to watch it since. I had thought that Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis were brilliant together in Some Like it Hot, and The Great Race absolutely managed to surpass that. Easily one of my favorite movies now.
  • edited January 2011
    MacGruber - 8.5/10

    Just got this from Netflix for the hell of it, didn't really expect to enjoy it. It was genuinely funny and just plain awesome. Could've done without some parts (the celery distraction comes to mind) but it was great.
  • edited January 2011
    Wonderland, maybeee 7/10, never heard of it before but it was strangely entertaining.
  • edited January 2011
    What? Stuff didn't pop out at you, but it still had 3D depth.
    I did not see a 3d depth at all

    Yes, but they did save the outside world from the Grid.

    It wouldn't have been needed if that guy didnt screw up

    Good boy. :p
    Thank you

    comments in bold.
  • edited January 2011
    The Shining - Well, what do I think? IT'S AWFUL. IT'S BORING. NOTHING HAPPENS. Wendy is HORRID. She's a BUFFOON. WHY WAS TONY THERE? TO WARN THEM? IT'S NEVER EXPLAINED. HE'S THERE FOR NO REASON, BECAUSE EVEN IF HE WAS MEANT TO WARN THEM HE DOES SO A LITTLE TOO DAMN LATE. DICK IS THERE FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO DIE. EVERYTHING IS ANTICLIMACTIC. There are very few creepy moments, most of the film makes me laugh out loud hysterically (like the ONLY killing scene), few successful horror attempts (admittedly the lady in bathtub and what was on the book pages reveal got me), and I felt like every second of the film was Kubrick's attempt to troll me, even the ones that managed to be scary. Any time Wendy was on screen any semblance of terror was ruined by the fact that LOU COSTELLO IS SMARTER THAN HER. AT LEAST WHEN PEOPLE ARE ACTING WEIRD OR WANT TO KILL HIM HE GETS AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE. It drags on far too long without giving any payoff to almost each scene until you realize that almost every scene that you're supposed to be tense during isn't going to go anywhere. Oh yeah, and when a movie resorts to making someone HANDING A PIECE OF A PAPER TO SOMEONE A JUMP MOMENT ITS A TROLL MOVIE. Congratulations, Kubrick. You have successfully trolled beyond the grave. I tip my hat to you.


    Five frozen Jacks-
    xhU79.png
    xhU79.png
    xhU79.png
    xhU79.png
    xhU79.png


    out of Eleven.
  • edited January 2011
    The Great Race - 10/10

    I finally had a chance to watch the beginning of the film, and it was just as brilliant as what I'd already seen. Now that I've seen it in its entirety, I feel I can rate it. This film featured a sense of humor that the film industry is sorely missing today. No recent movie can compare. Practically every scene in the movie was both hilarious and memorable. And as Fawful said, this was absolutely one of Jack Lemmon's best roles.

    lemmon1.jpg

    And that, ladies and gentlemen, was my 4000th post.
  • edited January 2011
    The law of Stephen King movies. It doesn't matter if the book (or story) is awesome or not, The movie will suck.
  • edited January 2011
    Remolay wrote: »
    The law of Stephen King movies. It doesn't matter if the book (or story) is awesome or not, The movie will suck.

    With a handful of exceptions, o' course. Misery, for example, was fantastic.
  • edited January 2011
    Repo man:
    10/10
    It's about some kid working as a car repo man. It's very funny and has subleties like items in the grocery store are packaged in plain boxes with "MEAT" or "ALCOHOL" on them
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited January 2011
    Remolay wrote: »
    The law of Stephen King movies. It doesn't matter if the book (or story) is awesome or not, The movie will suck.

    Ditto Michael Crichton, with the exception of Jurassic Park.
  • edited January 2011
    Note: Jurassic Park is on my list of top 10 worst movies I've ever seen.
  • edited January 2011
    Remolay wrote: »
    The law of Stephen King movies. It doesn't matter if the book (or story) is awesome or not, The movie will suck.
    ShaggE wrote: »
    With a handful of exceptions, o' course. Misery, for example, was fantastic.
    puzzlebox wrote: »
    Ditto Michael Crichton, with the exception of Jurassic Park.

    Have we all forgotten Shawshank Redemption folks?
  • edited January 2011
    He did say that there were a few exceptions, Shawshank would have to be one as would the Green Mile.

    I hope that The Dark Tower films & TV series will join that list.
  • edited January 2011
    Choke 7/10
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited January 2011
    The last movie I saw was A Cry in the Dark (also known as Evil Angels), a docudrama about the disappearance of the Chamberlain baby in outback Australia and the ensuing media trial of the parents. We watched it with the sound off and mostly just laughed at the early 80s fashions. I rate Meryl Streep's bowl cut 1/10, and Sam Neill's short shorts 6/10.
  • edited January 2011
    puzzlebox wrote: »
    Ditto Michael Crichton, with the exception of Jurassic Park.

    I thought that The Thirteenth Warrior was a pretty good adaptation of Eaters of the Dead.
  • puzzleboxpuzzlebox Telltale Alumni
    edited January 2011
    I thought that The Thirteenth Warrior was a pretty good adaptation of Eaters of the Dead.

    I wasn't aware of that one... let me rephrase to "Crichton movie adaptations are often (but not always) disappointing". Same as any other author really. ;)
  • edited January 2011
    puzzlebox wrote: »
    I wasn't aware of that one... let me rephrase to "Crichton movie adaptations are often (but not always) disappointing". Same as any other author really. ;)

    Well, to be honest, it's not a very well known film. Good, though. Made me feel like a Viking. :D
  • edited January 2011
    Can't we just say "Literary adaptations are a gamble at best"?
  • edited January 2011
    Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the worst book to film adaption of all time-

    kjSlU.jpg

    YOU DO NOT CUT OUT THE MAIN CHARACTER OF THE BOOK FROM THE MOVIE.
  • edited January 2011
    I think I've been told the King rule was that movie adapted from his novels tend to be bad while movies adapted from his short stories tend to be good.

    Honestly, I could see that with most adaptations. Books are a much more dense media, movies aren't that long, I could see how a short story would convert well into a movie, but a full-length novel would work better as, say a TV series.
  • edited January 2011
    The Graduate 10/10, more than just a movie.
  • edited January 2011
    No Country for Old Men - It's good, but is it four Oscars good? I give it 8/10. Maybe would've gave it a point more if i'd been paying attention to Tommy Lee Jones at the end and not fiddling with the alarm on my phone
  • edited January 2011
    I think I've been told the King rule was that movie adapted from his novels tend to be bad while movies adapted from his short stories tend to be good.

    It and Mysery would like to have a word with you.
  • edited January 2011
    Origami wrote: »
    It and Mysery would like to have a word with you.

    IT is horrible, with the only redeeming quality being Tim Curry, who is just there to be hilarious. I'll be glad to have a word with IT though. Maybe I'll make it cry.
  • edited January 2011
    Speaking of Tim Curry, how about The Rocky Horror Picture Show? The soundtrack is brilliant, it's full of wonderful weird ideas and the end is touching but the film has its meh moments as well. 8-9/10?
  • edited January 2011
    IT is horrible, with the only redeeming quality being Tim Curry, who is just there to be hilarious. I'll be glad to have a word with IT though. Maybe I'll make it cry.

    Ooh, me too! I wanna call it unpleasant things! :D

    Really though, the book is so damn good that I can't even stand to watch the movie.
  • edited January 2011
    The soundtrack to the Rocky Horror Picture Show is more addicting to listen to than it should be, and with Tim Curry in it as well, how could you go wrong?
  • edited January 2011
    How would you rate the film?

    Btw i'm always confused by these two names. Do you adore Tim Curry or Jim Carrey or both of them?
  • edited January 2011
    The soundtrack to the Rocky Horror Picture Show is more addicting to listen to than it should be?

    I am sorry, but this has been bugging me for months. Is that really proper grammar?

    Also I hate how the word grammar and grammer are rife for a grammer error of their own.

    hurr hurr
  • edited January 2011
    JedExodus wrote: »
    I am sorry, but this has been bugging me for months. Is that really proper grammar?

    I'll misuse grammar to my liking and you'll STFU when I do it, you Cowboy Bebop-hating paddy.
  • edited January 2011
    Avistew wrote: »
    I think I've been told the King rule was that movie adapted from his novels tend to be bad while movies adapted from his short stories tend to be good.

    Children of the corn is an exception, and that spawned 6 sequels somehow.
  • edited January 2011
    Avistew wrote: »
    I think I've been told the King rule was that movie adapted from his novels tend to be bad while movies adapted from his short stories tend to be good.

    Honestly, I could see that with most adaptations. Books are a much more dense media, movies aren't that long, I could see how a short story would convert well into a movie, but a full-length novel would work better as, say a TV series.
    The Shining is great. As far as TV series I still think the vampire at the end of the original Salem's Lot is one of the creepiest ever put on film.

    I think the rule is any movie based off King after the late 80's is a flop. Carrie, Cujo, Christine, Stand by me & Dead zone are all good movies IMO. With a few flops in between like Firestarter.
  • edited January 2011
    I've always liked the miniseries of The Langoliers. Though mainly just because Dean Stockwell is in it.
  • edited January 2011
    I'll misuse grammar to my liking and you'll STFU when I do it, you Cowboy Bebop-hating paddy.

    I don't hate it, I just haven't watched it yet, too busy cutting turf and cleaning pig shite off my tractor. I MAY just stream it this weekend though, I was thinking about it

    Anyway, being a paddy isn't too bad, we're 'the niggers of Europe' yo!
Sign in to comment in this discussion.