Doodo's Musings

1246713

Comments

  • edited May 2011
    The universe is simple... its all fortunate accidents and domino effects that as a race we have had the good fortune to have benefited from its like winning the universes lottery.

    Life on earth is pretty simple too... find the means to eat and sleep and make it each day.. If you are lucky you will find someone to take that journey with you.. making it to the next day is the goal... all else is extras... The hardest part is being happy and content with what you have the means to provide for yourself...

    See simple.
  • edited May 2011
    Davies wrote: »
    Doodo! changes his avatar more frequently than a curry addict frequents the toilet.

    Speaking of which BRB.
  • edited May 2011
    Irishmile wrote: »
    The universe is simple... its all fortunate accidents and domino effects that as a race we have had the good fortune to have benefited from its like winning the universes lottery.

    Life on earth is pretty simple too... find the means to eat and sleep and make it each day.. If you are lucky you will find someone to take that journey with you.. making it to the next day is the goal... all else is extras... The hardest part is being happy and content with what you have the means to provide for yourself...

    See simple.

    But local nodes of information must be local, and their for within a local frame of reference things must show constraint, purpose, order. Things don't happen by mistake in my life, universe. Our system of reality has constraints, and constants. We can not fly out windows without the invention of wings.

    Life, life is beautiful, I'll agree with you on that, but it's not that simple, my friend.
  • edited May 2011
    I was asked why good things happen to bad people. Easy for me to explain, much easier than understanding women. I envy any genius who has a girlfriend.

    Bad things happen, that may be a local node, where within certain conditions, constraints, "bad" things happen, within what we comprehend, perceive, imagine and are able to perceive comprehend , imagine as bad things. It might be a sort of a program if you would where good people can observe bad things happening, especially people who are good and realize how bad these things are.

    Think of it as a spectrum where things exist in layers or very thin lines. And human experience makes up this spectrum where all and anything may exist whether through choices or observations.

    Every one is within this spectrum and the spectrum changes colors and warps while people make changes/ observations, yet it only happens locally, as like a node. The true spectrum never changes, colors changes are temporal, waves off of the spectrum, radiating away from the true spectrum.

    And everything can manifest within degree as in opposition things exist in layers where an opposing layer or thin line of existence may occur. Everything must happen , be able to happen within a realm of possibility and probability.

    But, our physical universe is of physical mind, physical brain, physical body.

    Take alien grays for example, possibility fictional , but in theory of concept.
    If we're all the same, and just in different versions of reality, then simply this must version of reality must exist, in opposition of other realities. Simply the laws of which it exist must show constraint and remain constant, meaning we have natural laws created for our visual/ physical state that our consciousness has developed in opposition to other choices, observations of and for the reality we've made through our selves through source, God, through consciousness. Our reality must be constrained as it's a constant degree and node, if you would, which has been reflected off of the universe spectrum! The local must remain local.

    The local must remain local as it is a true line or color on the spectrum if you would. But beyond the color, line on the spectrum, is again, the true spectrum.

    The true spectrum is unbiased opposition, it's everything, and yet it's nothing. And everything can occur in opposition because it creates a universal sense of one-ness, whole ness.
    I'm not sure what creates our visual world, but perhaps it's through consciousness, symbols and metaphors as both those things resemble op art and can be used as universal truths with multiple meanings.But local nodes of information must be local, and their for within a local frame of reference things must show constraint, purpose, order. Things don't happen by mistake in my life, universe. Our system of reality has constraints, and constants. We can not fly out windows without the invention of wings.

    The spectrum, or "universe" pattern is like op art, the pattern is their and yet it isn't.
    And everything else that is local is within the constraints and observations, choices of our physical minds, bodies, brains which is of the physical and of the physical universe.

    So, why do good things happen to bad people, because it's possible to imagine, to exist, to observe, it's possible through choices that we make and that can be made. It's possible within the constraints of the physical and what the physical universe is capable of through "man and woman kind".

    Remember though, that if good things couldn't happen to bad people then good things could never happen for good people.

    Basically our minds, are sort of like mini Gods, out of source, and consciousness of the universe, a degree of awareness out of a fully aware god who comprehends everything , even that of which is nothing.

    We know and comprehend what is good and bad through experiences, the physical, we create the physical universe, influence it through choices, observations. It's our human experience.

    But, their is a multi-verse and different versions of reality.

    This is all just a theory I've developed through the desire to have a girlfriend. 23 years old, no friends, no girlfriend.

    I still don't understand women...
  • edited May 2011
    Reading all that in Adam Wests voice is a mind screw..well more of a mind screw then with out it anyway.
  • edited May 2011
    coolsome wrote: »
    Reading all that in Adam Wests voice is a mind screw..well more of a mind screw then with out it anyway.

    HA-HA! Yes, boy wonder, it's a MIND Screw! Take off your tights, you dirty dirty boy wonder you...mmmmhmmm...

    mmmhm

    mhm
    mhm....

    HA-HAA!
  • edited May 2011
    Im taking the tags advise right now and running as far as I can.
  • edited May 2011
    doodo! wrote: »
    But, their is a multi-verse and different versions of reality.

    Isn't physics great? I like believing in the parallel/multi universe theory myself. And since it's theoretically impossible to disprove anything, I go with that. So have you ever found contentment knowing that there is a version of you somewhere living a completely different existence? It's like reading a "Choose your Own Adventure" book and getting to pick all the choices. So you're not really missing out on anything.
  • edited May 2011
    Jenny wrote: »
    Isn't physics great? I like believing in the parallel/multi universe theory myself. And since it's theoretically impossible to disprove anything, I go with that. So have you ever found contentment knowing that there is a version of you somewhere living a completely different existence? It's like reading a "Choose your Own Adventure" book and getting to pick all the choices. So you're not really missing out on anything.

    It's not really 'your' self.
  • edited May 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    It's not really 'your' self.

    Well not "You" in the sense that we are our experiences, but it is a branching out of all possible existences of you, in a loose sense.
  • edited May 2011
    To me it's sort of like the issue of a clone. Even if it shared my DNA it isn't me. Though I do get what you're saying, I just have a conceptual disagreement with it.
  • edited May 2011
    Fair enough.

    I think of it as we exist simultaneously in all these parallels. So it is actually us, in the ethereal sense. But that's admittedly rather unscientific.
  • edited May 2011
    Davies wrote: »
    Davies' Musings...

    Doodo! changes his avatar more frequently than a curry addict frequents the toilet.

    Being a Tim Curry addict has nothing to do with frequent bathroom visits....unless it involves lots of tissues.
  • edited May 2011
    Tim Curry?... bathroom?
    Pennywise_shower.jpg

    Kind of makes "They all float down here" slightly more disturbing.


    ...and I agree with Irish, just adding "propagation of the species" in the latter part.
  • edited May 2011
    It's actually interesting, how many of "ours", and "mine" beliefs are in TV shows and music videos. This vaguely resembles the What-If-box out of Futurama. Which strengthens my idea and philosophy as it's part of the conscious and aware node of the physical universe and is along the same lines of the op art as it's sort of symbolic and metaphoric in meaning and stresses multiple different feelings, ideas, concepts, and is a sign of universal truth.

    :D

    Thanks for sharing guys/ girls!
  • edited June 2011
    Metaphor Symbolism, is unified within the conscious node of the physical universe's op art like pattern?

    "G
    It's like the old op-art. The pattern is there, yet changes in density in a local way. That local way is material, and those nodes can combine in many ways."
    (This inspired me and guided me into this direction, but I'm not so sure that this node is a different node , but rather the same node just in a different degree of awareness and so we have restraints, physical limitations, rather than say supposed aliens who travel across galaxies. )
    But, he was one of my top inspirations.

    That feeling in dance, in art, is in expression, is expression. When filtered it can manifest within the physical observation, choice, experience. That sensation that you're a live, moving, watching things move, that tapestry of colors, of senses. That feeling of time as it passes you by, as it's behind you, or the moment you live within that is "time", or the sensation or belief of looking into the future.


    Metaphor and symbolism is a birth product of the op art pattern and part of the conscious node of the physical universe, I think. I think it might even be the very creation process of the physical/ visual world that is felt and experienced in the human physical body.
    When we learn colors, learn ideas, beliefs we begin to read and interpret this metaphors and symbolism as universal truths, life experiences, individualistic experiences. Though no experience can go beyond what's human because what's human is what's human and that's inside of observation and idea as a human.

    I think that human life is just an extremely advance symbol or metaphor for something.
    Perhaps simply, itself...but everything appears to be independent of the simple idea of life, yet makes it up in body, is a reflection of life. And the unknown can become known through the acceptance of this body of knowledge.

    I think this feeling is a state in which all feelings are connected psychologically with a physically premeditated state to examine those feelings of poetry, art, music, to give them meaning, coherence in this "reality".

    I believe that their is only one true emotion.Yes, but not always, yet again always. It's the degree of emotions that set emotional states apart from one another socially, psychologically, And that's right for us, because physical sensations are pretty significant, normal physical sensations are sort of hard to read as we go back between several emotional states constantly, you're not even aware how often you go through all the emotions, it's when one is a untamed sensation, a flame that heats or torches your inside that you become aware of how strong these emotions have built up.

    I personally believe that there is only one true emotion which is actually the emotional state of all emotions. I think it's a direct behavior of the conscious node of the physical universe.

    Before actual thought, and like any other animal less socialized than us, we at first learn to move through this tapestry of colors and metaphors and symbol-isms, crawl, cry out when we feel a certain way or want to experience another feeling. Observations and choices still exist with ideas and beliefs.
    And I believe that metaphor and symbolism is from the op pattern within the node creates the physical as it is experienced, felt, and observed.But that suggest that "human consciousness" may have come to a height of awareness, sense, out of the physical body before ....
    But it some how suggests that our consciousness , rather than say "alien grays" (if not fictional) , some how we created our own reality, while taking on our own roles, controlling our worlds to some degree, we are like mini Gods, with great power, yet not enough power to change what's been constructed for us through consciousness.

    Wait, if we're all the same, and just in different versions of reality, then simply this must exist and simply the laws of which it exist must show constraint and remain constant, meaning we have natural laws created for our visual/ physical state that our consciousness has developed in opposition to other choices, observations of and for the reality we've made through our selves through source, God, through consciousness. Our reality must be constrained as it's a constant degree and node, if you would, which has been reflected off of the universe pattern! The local must remain local.

    But local nodes of information must be local, and their for within a local frame of reference things must show constraint, purpose, order. Things don't happen by mistake in my life, universe. Our system of reality has constraints, and constants. We can not fly out windows without the invention of wings.

    Poems can be wrote, metaphors made, symbolism, imagery, all as universal truths with multiple meanings and interpretations.

    The degree of which you're aware of multiple meanings and metaphors and symbol-isms is the degree at which you are "aware" and have meanings, universal truths of the universe. Such as knowledge, facts, your science and your math.

    See?It describes your layers of consciousness, what you can imagine, what's probable, possible, with the infinite op art, anything is possible. Its your mind, imagination, ideas beliefs, observations, feelings, choices.

    And observations and choices can exist before idea and belief.
  • edited June 2011
    I began trying to envision a woman's figure and began to wonder what sort of sound could express her figure. I been asking questions such as can you build things out of emotions, sculpt out of emotions, can you do abstract without a physical reference.

    Most likely when a baby first becomes aware of his environment, he's not conscious of what's"around him". I wonder if he sculpts, and sees from emotion. And what sound means to a crying baby, the soft sound of his mother's voice.

    Things of that nature, and if we ourselves are only conscious at a certain level of reality. I was wondering if it's even possible to show this "emotion" in some sort of tangible way. Or, perceive it in some sort of tangible way. I've seen abstract art, and it's all physical forms, references from other things, such as the female figure.

    I'm beginning to realize how abstract sound can be paired to the visual , and no, I realized it before, in the same way, same direction, yet some how the idea has had a different face. I think we've all had almost every idea, if not every idea in our lives," the idea is just wearing a different face".

    *sighs*, I don't know if I want to get back into this. I'm sort of emo right now.

    Everyone's a critic. I'm a 23 year old, who posts this sort of stuff, I never claimed it was right for everyone, but if any one enjoys it, or understands the words I'm saying feel free to share with me. Because, I don't feel like too many people truly understand me as a person or my ideas. Know what I mean. Don't be rude, please. It's not like that.


    My personal beliefs of God is different levels of awareness through a op art type pattern, where everything is the same, just locally through nodes it appears to be different through an intelligent, creative, level of consciousness on that node. I've been looking into metaphor, symbolism as it is closely related to op art, "the universe pattern", and recently surrealism has found me. I don't even remember how. Which is interesting. I believe that we are observations, choices, crazy you would call me, I believe that we are a level of consciousness, awareness manifested physically, and in this node, we are of this node and so we have limitations and barriers to be contained within our own node.

    I don't know if that makes sense, I haven't brushed up on this in a while. Thanks for reading. You sort of have to be "connected to see this, maybe you will be, by default"...the universe has been solved. 6 people and counting agree...I can now go on and try to enjoy other things, like women.
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110618200603AAcnq7L
  • edited June 2011
    Any sound used to express the figure of a woman is an abstraction and no sound used to do so is correct, because how a person interprets the sound and whether it invokes the feeling of a woman's figure will differ between individuals. At its core this is why some people like a piece of music or visual art and others don't. Either it resonates or it doesn't.
  • edited June 2011
    Doesn't matter if it's subjective because all things subjective are within the human expression and all things within the human expression are human.All perception, especially what's subjective is possible and especially correct for an individual as it's subjective and a property of that individuals mind.

    My theory has nothing to do about being correct or incorrect. It has everything to do with ignorance yet the totality of humanity and reality .

    Everything resonates, it's the same energy, doesn't matter how people abstract it. Abstract is a quality of mind and it's correct within its label ultimately as it's something we perceive abstraction,and it's a true and real reflection of emotions and of the individual. This philosophy argues nothing, explains everything through energies.

    It's hard for me to explain but it's not a argument because it's wrong but it's right.

    WITHOUT the subjective you can not have a objective balance. It's a matter of perspective. Take a mirror image for example which is flipped. It's flipped as a matter of perspective.
    Special Relativity...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
    Special Relativity...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wteiuxyqtoM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy

    A interesting nod in the direction


    http://www.amazon.com/Artful-Garden-Inspiration-Landscape-ebook/dp/B004C43FFC%3FSubscriptionId%3DAKIAJG44VJIVKC3F7GDQ%26tag%3Ddynamic09c-20%26linkCode%3Dsp1%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB004C43FFC

    The theory can provide for any science but it doesn't need to...
    Just another source.
    http://physics.about.com/od/quantumphysics/gr/QuantumEnigma.htm
    And another...
    http://ezinearticles.com/?Quantum-Physics-and-Affirmations&id=2338723

    And you're living a abstraction, delusion of reality. I don't know why just because we can interact with reality man kind thinks he has it all figured out, if that was the case , he'd be fully, 100 percent aware of EVERYTHING, no questions needed. Abstraction is to simplify by definition. This reality is abstract.
    AND SHE...:D
    There is no argument , only realization for every and any one, who could ever possibly exist.

    v2spiderman04.jpg

    dream_weaver_by_night_fate.jpg

    The theory provides for everything and yet for nothing. It can't be derailed, it can't be challenged, it can't be right but it's never wrong.

    Surrealism-Real-World11may05.jpg
    wrote:
    A scientific law or scientific principle is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science, like Newton's law of universal gravitation. A scientific law must always apply under the same conditions, and implies a causal relationship between its elements. The law must be confirmed and broadly agreed upon through the process of inductive reasoning. As well, factual and well-confirmed statements like "Mercury is liquid at standard temperature and pressure" are considered to be too specific to qualify as scientific laws. A central problem in the philosophy of science, going back to David Hume, is that of distinguishing scientific laws from principles that arise merely accidentally because of the constant conjunction of one thing and another.[1

    See how it doesn't matter? It provides for everything, everyone.


    random_drawing_by_Karizzle_Krist.jpg


    We are all only at a certain level of awareness, we don't have have the wisdom of God, we have our own physical limitations in what is possible within observation, within thought, within the choices we can make.

    egyptian-art.jpg

    Source

    http://www.art-is-fun.com/understanding-abstract-art.html

    Ballet

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiAWeb93GLM&feature=related

    3725877.jpg
    wrote:
    A jasmine tree called my silence.
    With a scent-full voice,
    it cried:
    “Write your love down!
    Set your letters up high!
    Free yourself!
    Off sins,
    off their seamless prison
    and give life,
    make my flowers bloom.

    mainpgimage.jpg

    Mirror.jpg

    magical-weave-mirror.jpg

    a9be3bd3a86d3616d567.jpg


    dreaming.jpg

    anger-management-hulk.jpg

    all_symbols-browse.jpg

    AHEM

    Be-angry.jpg

    iStock_000005569753XSmall.jpg

    iStock_000011492493XSmall.jpg

    TEAM.JPG

    Do you understand?

    Listen to this, watch this
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8OpsPok6iQ

    sacred-heart-of-jesus.jpg

    leda.jpg

    leonardo-da-vinci-heart.gif


    SalvadorDali-The-Persistence-of-Memory-1931.jpg
    020_entre_terre_et_ciel.jpg
    wrote:
    "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way--in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only."
    - Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities, Book 1, Chapter 1

    how-to-draw-cartoons-2.jpg

    baby_painting.jpg

    mi-child-baby-photography.jpg

    06ct2.gif

    alg_mccarren-crowd.jpg

    1.1247937041.city-line.jpg
    4_KB_Open_Minds_Pink_Vase.jpg

    Rani%20Pink%20Roses%20Vase%20650-400x400.jpg

    heic0601a_Beautiful_Space-s1600x1200-535.jpg

    clock.gif

    Elderly_people.jpg

    forests-nature%2B%2870%29.jpg
  • edited June 2011
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AndBOY.i3jggB6maoTeO7MPty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110622072641AAB9wOB

    This is a concept without any concept, it's the totality of subjectivity and objectivity.

    People already realize their full awareness but it wears many different faces.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SREZ-ggSDjM
    wrote:
    And I'll do anything you ever
    Dreamed to be complete
    Little pieces of the nothing that fall
    May put your arms around me
    What you feel is what you are
    And what you are is beautiful
    May do you wanna get married
    Or run away

    And I'll do anything you ever
    Dreamed to be complete
    Little pieces of the nothing that fall
    May put your arms around me
    What you feel is what you are
    And what you are is beautiful
    May do you wanna get married
    Or run away
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnn9JlqqTE4
    Another song
    wrote:
    When the rain

    Is blowing in your face

    And the whole world

    Is on your case

    I could offer you

    A warm embrace

    To make you feel my love



    When the evening shadows

    And the stars appear

    And there is no one there

    To dry your tears

    I could hold you

    For a million years

    To make you feel my love



    I know you

    Haven't made

    Your mind up yet

    But I would never

    Do you wrong

    I've known it

    From the moment

    That we met

    No doubt in my mind

    Where you belong

    Lyrics provided by http://www.kovideo.net/

    Source - http://www.kovideo.net/make-you-feel-my-love-lyrics-adele-128844.html



    I'd go hungry

    I'd go black and blue

    I'd go crawling

    Down the avenue

    No, there's nothing

    That I wouldn't do

    To make you feel my love



    The storms are raging

    On the rolling sea

    And on the highway of regret

    Though winds of change

    Are throwing wild and free

    You ain't seen nothing

    Like me yet



    I could make you happy

    Make your dreams come true

    Nothing that I wouldn't do

    Go to the ends

    Of the Earth for you

    To make you feel my love
    You can not deny this concept you are this concept even if you oppose it. "God" has left us plenty of hints behind. You're TV shows, movies, video recordings are abstractions as well. And when they design TV shows, they design characters, emotions, relationships, etc etc. It's art/ entertainment.

    Inspiration is the same.

    Hope is the same.

    Happiness.

    Sadness.

    These are not entirely logical things, ask Mr.Spock, but they are part of the op pattern of the universe. The universal pattern. This pattern is everything, yet nothing, creating opposition, contrast and at this level of awareness, awareness for the human race. Think your "reality" like a op art, or palette for all your fictional TV shows and for all of your surreal experiences.
  • edited June 2011
    You don't actually have a theory unless it's testable though.

    A television show hopes to reflect a part of human experience but as an abstraction can't perfectly reflect the each individual's sum experience since, despite the fact that experiences are similar, they're each different.

    An individual's experience is not an abstraction to the individual. It is the reality. The only way it can be an abstraction is if it is constructed on more real principles which demand an underlying reality, which people can claim to perceive but, since that alternative reality cannot be tested for, cannot be claimed to be true (which of course you've already said you can't be right), but further it can't be a theory. To claim lives are abstractions based on firmer or more real principles demands that everybody's life extracts principles from an underlying reality. And if you don't believe in that underlying reality then the entire hypothesis goes moot.
  • edited June 2011
    DAISHI wrote: »
    You don't actually have a theory unless it's testable though.

    Call it what you want, I call it my beliefs. All my beliefs take place in it. :)

    Word games. And I can almost pair my beliefs with anything that is testable. I personally feel like I have nothing more to prove. It's difficult but it's something I believe doesn't have to be academic to be understood.

    To me it's my "god" or religion if you would.

    And that's not besides the point with TV. I acknowledge that you're missing the point. Like a op art the pattern is there, yet it isn't. It can be anything, it can reflect anything. It's unbias, it's totality...


    You can't have a onion without it's layers, you can't have a temple without it's base, everyone may be subjective but it's all the same energy, manifestation of human beings. We are all human, this isn't a subject that can be argued.

    It's totality. Totalism lol. Totalism. Maybe some day I'll make you understand, but even if you fail to understand there is no true argument for this belief, because it provides all oppositions of the same energy.

    We are just a node to the universe, we aren't that impressive of beings, we're only 3rd dimensional. We aren't much too look at, I assure you...

    You're trying to use logic where it's not needed where it's not suggested to have to exist or to exist.

    ENERGY IS FEELING! Energy , it's all energy. Your body is only responding to that energy, and you are made out of this level of awareness in the universe.
  • edited June 2011
    doodo! wrote: »
    Surrealism-Real-World11may05.jpg

    This is going to haunt me for the rest of my days.
  • edited June 2011
    ENERGY.

    ENERGY has taken form at this level of awareness, consciousness, at this node of the universe. Our bodies are made of energy, and react to the body's strain or release of this energy. Ignorance is bliss. Thought, logic is not necessary for an all knowing God or a full and incomprehensive universe.


    This is why we react to patterns , or notice patterns, respond to patterns, function on patterns.

    We choose to observe things and make choices because we are aware and that is born out of emotions, experience, life at this level of consciousness.

    We are limited by our own dimensions and our own laws or nature because we can not comprehend and physically observe and react to a reality greater than this one. We are confined to our own symbols and metaphors and emotions, energy at this level, these frequencies and waves of the universe.

    Ever hear that the universe is sound? At this level we are at these frequencies, we are at a node, if you will. Now we are restricted to our node that is why we have laws and restrictions as this race of human beings and in this version of reality and within these physical and non physical dimensions. Because our mind and physical is restricted to that node.

    Only all things like the op art pattern, the universe pattern can reflect things without bias, because it's all the same energy.

    These are my beliefs.

    Well, you don't think people wear rose patterns on their dresses because they think a clump of cells is fascinating do you? For example...
  • edited June 2011
    Temporal.
    Science.

    These are possibly a-bridged version of my current beliefs.
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110624064452AAMS7x7

    This person realizes this concept, but isn't full aware that he/ she is a aware, but God is...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxmUYowiqwo&feature=related
  • edited June 2011
    Stephen H wrote:
    There is relative knowledge and wisdom and it would go round in circles, unless and until there was a very big upset to it. We've kind of got to let go and let something else come through and then we are into the next phase, something deeper, more meaningful, more intrinsic. So it kind of spirals towards the same centre rather than going round in circles.

    It can't really be properly defined, it is just recognised that something is gained, or there is something there when something is passed at the right time.

    One of my favourite examples is the story of King Solomon and "splitting the baby in half". There are so many ways that that can be applied and tested in relation to self and in relation to others and other things.

    LOL, glad to make friends...He helped me see things more clearly.

    I was here before...
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ageloxs1hdGinj0n1JGQle3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110625111301AASBNrC
  • edited June 2011
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApjbmkuYbmpx9XNbYBHL1Jvsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110627064804AAtNNyD

    I continue on the best I can...

    http://www.artchive.com/artchive/r/rockwell/rockwell_mirror.jpg
    I sort of like this example, I think this has been reflected to me as a example and I believe that this image shows a woman who is reflecting upon her youth and her youth reflecting upon her.
  • edited June 2011
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApjbmkuYbmpx9XNbYBHL1Jvsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110628072135AA9vRf2

    If any one cares, which I hope you do, it's all I got right now. I don't even know what's going to happen to me.

    Love, respect, Brian.
  • edited July 2011
    It's coming together! The code, the code!

    It's the code!
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110705074340AAKVFxU

    And now this
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Amov374_vrpGfhiF3mmrPKTsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110705072959AAz5VSu

    I get it, I know many of you won't and I know that I truly don't get anything, but i get my belief.

    Is it that hard to see how creativity and creation share a natural bond?

    This explains it a little further.
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110705085307AAQxaRe

    Some people can't gather wisdom within the obvious. And that's a shame. But, that's the way we are.

    Another reason why we are flawed.
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110705094643AAjmJW9

    I keep editing my posts, feel free to read the links.
  • edited July 2011
    I dont NEED proof. It's evident
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_nrQQV6dBQ

    Even of trained, or possibly untrained animals
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He7Ge7Sogrk&feature=channel_video_title
    HAHA, look how some people try to bridge the gap between intellect, it's small but it shows the purity of the code.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjBhLnwpekA&feature=channel_video_title

    These animals can do these things, and great apes can even speak with certain devices, such as whales
    can.

    Watch this...even dogs are connected without knowledge, without idea, words, they still have that wisdom. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXo3NFqkaRM&feature=related

    Haha, a world so blind by its own brilliance.

    Deny what you are but you can not deny what it is.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRw-lfXy_tQ&NR=1&feature=fvwp

    Some apes are even "smarter" than you (smarter is a dumb ass word, but meh)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJFo3trMuD8

    Here a chimp plays G-D pacman!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7ttRaXlnfs&feature=related

    Here is a karate chimp, do you get it yet? Do you see the code?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El4M5tk-N1A&feature=related

    Here's a dog who does all the choirs you're too lazy to get off your ass to do yourself
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ACBzJfUA9g&feature=fvst

    The connection is real, pure, truthful, your intellect is a delusion! It's not a code!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHiiG3-yU7k&feature=related

    Yes it's physical and in the physical universe it's an explanation that satisfies our expectations, knowledge, but it's not an ultimate program. This program is for more advanced beings to observe, abduct us out of curiosity , more prefect beings curious what life would be like , if not desired for. How it's wrote I have no idea, if they even wrote it, simply we are all about of the great one ness of the universe , multiverse.

    Plants respond to music to sun light as do you respond to nutrition as do plants respond to nutrition. No on understands the wisdom of the obvious!

    Creation and creativity share a natural bond, intellect only adds idea, concept to this bond. The code is the same code. The code locally changes.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110705151605AA5YyVh
  • edited July 2011
    This shit is as old as like the damn 70s. People just won't ever catch on.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNhFLhUZN0E
  • edited July 2011
    I agree with most this video, but I think he over looked a few things, but I'm only 23 and I'm ignorant.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ4a_Gu49SA&feature=channel_video_title
  • edited July 2011
    Thank you all for letting me share. Thank you, you're the only friends I have and the only few people who listen to me. Thank you so much, this is a great, loving forum. New members should feel free to join. Blessed be this place.Thank you so much for trying to be there for me and for thinking of me, thank you. This is a beautiful relationship I share with this forum, thank you so much. This is more helpful for me than you realize. I am still having issues with my physical injuries and my mind needs some place to go. I really appreciate this thread.

    Here is my recent philo. Thank you all.
    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=At.IQswDpjeB2tqZwmAuxo_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110707072818AAX4Jzf
  • edited July 2011
    I tried to be sincere and put some of my ideas, love into a video.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mXh14ddaHs&feature=channel_video_title
  • edited July 2011
    Updated my annotations to help make better sense of the video. Watch if you would please. Thank you, love, Brian.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mXh14ddaHs&feature=channel_video_title
  • edited July 2011
    I believe there is a god, and your universe is alive.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mXh14ddaHs&feature=channel_video_title

    Is our universe a dodecahedron? A cell, has often been asked, and this is what I've come up with. I love you all, peace be with you.
  • edited July 2011
    This is a demonstration of my philosophy made by some one else.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXXtQ-c9r_o&feature=related

    I was not related directly to the creator.
This discussion has been closed.