I was in the past just 3 minutes ago! I saw the past 2 years ago! I was in the year 2007 just 4 years ago. I am glad I was in 2011 just a minute ago. I like the technology in that year more. Some people might see this post in the future!
I am behind on my average posts per episode. (I never had really noticed till now. I should probably be at 450 by now!
i took the delorean to november 23rd 2011..... played the finale of bttf, wwe 12 and saw scenes for the next se..oh oops... potential paradox... haha.. found out it was only a dream!
Maybe not. Didn't you watch the last Behind the Scenes video? At the end, Bob Gale says that Ep. 5 Ends about the same way as BTTF1 did, and that people are going to say "Ohhhh Boy!"
Basically, Bob Gale is hinting that there could be a second season coming.
Maybe not. Didn't you watch the last Behind the Scenes video? At the end, Bob Gale says that Ep. 5 Ends about the same way as BTTF1 did, and that people are going to say "Ohhhh Boy!"
Basically, Bob Gale is hinting that there could be a second season coming.
Great, they're not giving us closure. That cliffhanger madness is starting to get on my nerves...
Great, they're not giving us closure. That cliffhanger madness is starting to get on my nerves...
Well how would you have felt if there were no sequels and therefore part I was the one and only movie? Would you consider that to be a cliffhanger?
There's plenty of films out there that essentially end with the assumption that there's further adventures to come. Some get sequels some don't, but that's different than a cliffhanger. Pretty much any superhero film does this. The ending of part II was a cliffhanger (which is fine because as we all know they were 100% certain at the time that another sequel was coming). Part III was an ending more similar to the first film. It was an ending such that it wasn't a cliffhanger but implied there are more adventures to come which left the door open for another sequel (which was in fairly hot talks through the 90's and which you could consider is this game).
This probably goes more in the predictions thread but my money is on the final shot being the delorean, time train, or another time vehicle coming towards the screen about to time travel.
Let's face it folks, doc brown built 2 time machines already, he even built one in a reality where he didn't become a scientist, he built one using 1800s technology. Doc will never retire from time traveling so unless they kill him off (which is guaranteed not to happen), there will ALWAYS be the possibility of another sequel.
Great, they're not giving us closure. That cliffhanger madness is starting to get on my nerves...
It's a business strategy. Make cliff hanger. Fans start foaming at the mouth, clamoring for more. Make them wait. Then release it. The clamoring creates internet hype and more and more people will buy it.
Bob Gale's comment at the end is likely meaning that we will be impressed by the ending, but that is left open to interpretation. The way I see it...so long as this series is INCREDIBLY successful, we could have serialized BTTF games for a long time.
What I got from their comments was that the ending would be similar to the end of BTTF1. The story will wrap up, but the last scene will leave it open to another season.
I got that it will end in much the same manner as BTTF 1 and 3 ended! BTTF 2 ended with a cliffhanger. I bet people back when it came out were going bananas over what will happen! Much like BTTF the Game!!!
I got that it will end in much the same manner as BTTF 1 and 3 ended! BTTF 2 ended with a cliffhanger. I bet people back when it came out were going bananas over what will happen! Much like BTTF the Game!!!
Hence why they were smart and put the trailer for BTTF 3 at the end of 2.
I still don't understand why fewer people like 3...
I still don't understand why fewer people like 3...
They do? Call me crazy but I thought it was better than Part II. Don't get me wrong, I love Part II very much and it holds very memorable scenes but I really liked the direction they took with Part III. Maybe it's because when I was a kid, I thought Doc was a real loner and I was sad that he didn't have a wife/girlfriend. As you might have guessed, I was very concerned with the well-being of my favorite characters during my younger years.
They do? Call me crazy but I thought it was better than Part II. Don't get me wrong, I love Part II very much and it holds very memorable scenes but I really liked the direction they took with Part III. Maybe it's because when I was a kid, I thought Doc was a real loner and I was sad that he didn't have a wife/girlfriend. As you might have guessed, I was very concerned with the well-being my favorite characters during my younger years.
My favourite is part II but possibly for the same reasons people dont like part II (it was the last one I saw, my dad told me it sucked). It is the only one that deals with the future and really compliments the first film well; biff is still hitting on Lorraine 60 years later, Griff bullies Marty Jr. the same way their grandparents did. We got to revisit the first film again (only sequel ever to do so), the alternate timeline; basically it dealt with the concept of time travel more than the other 2 which some people liked some didn't.
Part III is the weakest in the trilogy but is also different in its own sense; western fans like it the best. Probably fans of doc like it the best because his character comes fill circle (notice how in part I he starts out like a lunatic and gets more normal with each sequel). Marty on the other hand takes a back seat, something some people like and some dont. I like the film and am not in the camp wishing doc never got struck by lightning so part II would have ended it but here are reasons why i think it is the weakest of the trilogy;
-one of the neat things to the first 2 films was that we got to see how characters progressed; we see Marty and Doc at 2 stages of their lives and Biff, Lorraine, and George in 3 different stages. Aside from 1955 doc again at the beginning, there is none of this
-it follows too similar of a plot to the first film but the plot isnt as menacing; in the first film marty needs to get his parents to fall in love AND get back to the future by the delorean reaching the wire at the precise moment. In part III marty and doc merely need to avoid Buford and the end plan to get back is not as difficult
-it doesn't really deal with time travel and the effects of changing the timeline. Basically only doc's death and 'eastwood ravine' are the only noticable changes.
-there isn't a real family connection here as there were in the first 2 films seeing characters families (parents, grandparents, children). We see their distant ancestors whom they likely never met
-the first film broke a lot of ground in the sense of a character meeting his parents as teenagers. The second broke ground with the whole 'part I revisited'. Part III didn't really do things that had not be done to this point yet
But alas I'm glad it exists. For one thing it made the first 2 films more popular and we have a trilogy instead of a movie and sequel. We also got a happy ending (lets face it, doc going back to the future at the end of part II and destroying the time machine is not happy especially when we see Marty is destined to be a loser). Doc ends up happy, Martys character comes full circle and avoids being a loser and we are left with an open ending.
Yea sorry, but punny is a terrible pun on funny. No laughs!!
I actually wasn't using it as a pun there, but as a descriptive word for my behavior. I always make many puns, therefore I am always punny, so to speak.
Comments
Oh, you can ask anyone here. From what I gather, most of the forum members have a time-travelling DeLorean that they regularly abuse.
Well yea. What kind of BTTF fans would we be if we didn't?
Responsible ones. But then again, who's 'responsible' nowadays?
Hey what's so wrong about making a couple of bucks on the side?
I am behind on my average posts per episode. (I never had really noticed till now. I should probably be at 450 by now!
Hahahahahahaha!!
Someone's rather punny today.
Episode 5 is extremely good. Oh wait...space time continuum implosion...I haven't played it yet, and I don't have a time machine. So serious.
I learned from my father quite well indeed. (Fortunately I did NOT learn how to be a coward about confrontations from him.)
Its sad to see it go. But oh well.
You could always play Portal 2 again.
Maybe not. Didn't you watch the last Behind the Scenes video? At the end, Bob Gale says that Ep. 5 Ends about the same way as BTTF1 did, and that people are going to say "Ohhhh Boy!"
Basically, Bob Gale is hinting that there could be a second season coming.
Great, they're not giving us closure. That cliffhanger madness is starting to get on my nerves...
Well how would you have felt if there were no sequels and therefore part I was the one and only movie? Would you consider that to be a cliffhanger?
There's plenty of films out there that essentially end with the assumption that there's further adventures to come. Some get sequels some don't, but that's different than a cliffhanger. Pretty much any superhero film does this. The ending of part II was a cliffhanger (which is fine because as we all know they were 100% certain at the time that another sequel was coming). Part III was an ending more similar to the first film. It was an ending such that it wasn't a cliffhanger but implied there are more adventures to come which left the door open for another sequel (which was in fairly hot talks through the 90's and which you could consider is this game).
This probably goes more in the predictions thread but my money is on the final shot being the delorean, time train, or another time vehicle coming towards the screen about to time travel.
Let's face it folks, doc brown built 2 time machines already, he even built one in a reality where he didn't become a scientist, he built one using 1800s technology. Doc will never retire from time traveling so unless they kill him off (which is guaranteed not to happen), there will ALWAYS be the possibility of another sequel.
Yea sorry, but punny is a terrible pun on funny. No laughs!!
It's a business strategy. Make cliff hanger. Fans start foaming at the mouth, clamoring for more. Make them wait. Then release it. The clamoring creates internet hype and more and more people will buy it.
Bob Gale's comment at the end is likely meaning that we will be impressed by the ending, but that is left open to interpretation. The way I see it...so long as this series is INCREDIBLY successful, we could have serialized BTTF games for a long time.
AJ would be very appreciative I'm thinking. XD
Hence why they were smart and put the trailer for BTTF 3 at the end of 2.
I still don't understand why fewer people like 3...
I loved part III!!!!
They do? Call me crazy but I thought it was better than Part II. Don't get me wrong, I love Part II very much and it holds very memorable scenes but I really liked the direction they took with Part III. Maybe it's because when I was a kid, I thought Doc was a real loner and I was sad that he didn't have a wife/girlfriend. As you might have guessed, I was very concerned with the well-being of my favorite characters during my younger years.
My favourite is part II but possibly for the same reasons people dont like part II (it was the last one I saw, my dad told me it sucked). It is the only one that deals with the future and really compliments the first film well; biff is still hitting on Lorraine 60 years later, Griff bullies Marty Jr. the same way their grandparents did. We got to revisit the first film again (only sequel ever to do so), the alternate timeline; basically it dealt with the concept of time travel more than the other 2 which some people liked some didn't.
Part III is the weakest in the trilogy but is also different in its own sense; western fans like it the best. Probably fans of doc like it the best because his character comes fill circle (notice how in part I he starts out like a lunatic and gets more normal with each sequel). Marty on the other hand takes a back seat, something some people like and some dont. I like the film and am not in the camp wishing doc never got struck by lightning so part II would have ended it but here are reasons why i think it is the weakest of the trilogy;
-one of the neat things to the first 2 films was that we got to see how characters progressed; we see Marty and Doc at 2 stages of their lives and Biff, Lorraine, and George in 3 different stages. Aside from 1955 doc again at the beginning, there is none of this
-it follows too similar of a plot to the first film but the plot isnt as menacing; in the first film marty needs to get his parents to fall in love AND get back to the future by the delorean reaching the wire at the precise moment. In part III marty and doc merely need to avoid Buford and the end plan to get back is not as difficult
-it doesn't really deal with time travel and the effects of changing the timeline. Basically only doc's death and 'eastwood ravine' are the only noticable changes.
-there isn't a real family connection here as there were in the first 2 films seeing characters families (parents, grandparents, children). We see their distant ancestors whom they likely never met
-the first film broke a lot of ground in the sense of a character meeting his parents as teenagers. The second broke ground with the whole 'part I revisited'. Part III didn't really do things that had not be done to this point yet
But alas I'm glad it exists. For one thing it made the first 2 films more popular and we have a trilogy instead of a movie and sequel. We also got a happy ending (lets face it, doc going back to the future at the end of part II and destroying the time machine is not happy especially when we see Marty is destined to be a loser). Doc ends up happy, Martys character comes full circle and avoids being a loser and we are left with an open ending.
I made that pun first so I demand credit. Without it, this situation can be filed under a gross case of Plagiarism.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I clean my hands of this unlawful filth.
http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=5035731