Seth McFarlane's "The Flintstones"

edited May 2011 in General Chat
it's been announced that Seth McFarlane (creator of family guy) has gotten his grubby little hands on The Flintstones, what does everyone think of this?

Personally I think it's a complete travesty, I can just imagine Wilma pulling a sabretooth-mouse tampon out of her ho-hah, placing it down, and the mouse saying "It's a living" I'm also not sure I'm ready for Fred and Wilma to share the same bed... this clip is no doubt how it'll turn out =(

http://www.hulu.com/watch/242235/the-morning-after-seth-macfarlanes-flintstones#s-p1-sr-i1
«13

Comments

  • edited May 2011
    Personally, I don't care.
  • edited May 2011
    I've wanted this for a long time. I really really think The Flintstones can be made to work as a more adult sitcom, and frankly I even considered making a couple comics to try the idea out myself, because what the hell, Seth McFarlane, who's perfect for it, would never do it! Ha ha ha, yeah. I'm good with this.
  • edited May 2011
    I miss the days when we got real animation. Hell, I'm starting to miss the days when we got bad animation but, at least, the properties were new. This and the Napoleon Dynamite show on Fox are signs of even worse things to come in the field of televised animation. Here's hoping this bombs.
  • edited May 2011
    IMO, Seth MacFarlane does not make works suitable for only adults, it's more like he treats adults like children by overexposing them to what they like with no depth whatsoever.

    I pity the humanity who gave him time blocks for 3 cartoon shows, and my sorrow now only grows stronger.
  • edited May 2011
    I never liked The Flintstones at all, yet there's something a bit too sacred about it to let MacFarlane get his fingers in there
  • edited May 2011
    Actually, Seth MacFarlane started out as just an average animation guy. One of the animations he made before Family Guy was a short for What A Cartoon, which was the base of Family Guy (at least the talking dog part).

    I hate Family Guy's humor, so I have total confidence with the Flintstones. At least there he's confined to a different kind of humor.
  • edited May 2011
    Any video accessible to non-US people?
  • edited May 2011
    GaryCXJk wrote: »
    At least there he's confined to a different kind of humor.
    How so?
  • edited May 2011
    How so?

    Seconding that. He might as well change the overall tone of humor in Flintstones and get a fanbase. Which is actually what I'm scared of the most.
  • edited May 2011
    This and the Napoleon Dynamite show on Fox are signs of even worse things to come in the field of televised animation.

    Oh hey, there's something else I'm excited about too.
  • edited May 2011
    I think anyone excited about this should read Amid Amidi's write-up about the end of the creator-driven era of TV animation. While it mostly ties into the launch of The Hub, which was a significant and painful blow, the effect is only getting worse as we go forward into a world of safe-bet animation for both adults and children.
  • edited May 2011
    The oncoming upside presented in that article is far better than the oncoming downside to me. I say bring on the downfall of television if it means an era of independent work.
  • edited May 2011
    Avistew wrote: »
    Any video accessible to non-US people?

    oh sorry, it's a clip from "the morning after" a tv talk show on hulu, idk where else to find the clip...

    It just basically talks about the situation, and then they end it with a clip of the flintstones with vocals from family guy where they're talking about abortion dubbed over the animation

    on a side note, I love phineas and ferb, it's a great, creative, show which was created by ex-family guy writers... so this might not be a disaster, I still HATE the idea, but once I thought about that, it made me feel a WHOLE lot better...
  • edited May 2011
    The oncoming upside presented in that article is far better than the oncoming downside to me. I say bring on the downfall of television if it means an era of independent work.
    The upside is far more long-term and less dramatic than the downside. While the power of the internet as a platform does ALLOW for independent work, it's relatively unproven. How many amazing animated web shows can you name?

    The creator-driven era had it all. Animators in full control of network-backed projects that truly pushed the medium forward. Now, that medium is dying and the transitional phase leaves us with an uncertain, uncharted future. While the potential is there for something great, I can't help but wonder if it will end up structured and monetized like every other medium before it that came around with promises of bringing vast creativity to a wider audience with greater ease than ever before.
  • edited May 2011
    I have faith in the power of artistic ingenuity and human imagination. With shows like Grickle on the web, I don't have any fear at all that the independent movement wouldn't produce plenty of quality. Sure, not everything it would produce would be good, but that's to be expected. The curiosity of what it WOULD produce is more than enough for me to back it.

    The same can be said for The Flintstones reboot. I'm curious as to what a FOX aired Flintstones series would be like. We can speculate all day, and look at McFarlane's track record, but what it might produce is unknown. I'm hoping for something with the same care, gravitas, and good writing given to it as The Venture Bros or Futurama, and I think that moving the show to a more adult medium as a more well-written comedy would make it easier to relate to the characters as characters and not just sit and watch them as just cartoons that make us laugh because they stubbed their toe on a rock then hit their head on a tree. Am I saying I fully expect McFarlane to deliver something like that? Yes, and no. It could go either way, and studio interference will probably taint that quite a bit. Yet I can hope, and when McFarlane isn't stooping to the lowest common denominator, the man does know how to write good comedy. Simply put, I'm happy it's being made because I want to be able to see what it's like.
  • edited May 2011
    I miss the days when we got real animation. Hell, I'm starting to miss the days when we got bad animation but, at least, the properties were new. This and the Napoleon Dynamite show on Fox are signs of even worse things to come in the field of televised animation. Here's hoping this bombs.

    Hey, it's only been 6 years since Monkey Dust, the best cartoon of all time.
  • edited May 2011
    Yet I can hope, and when McFarlane isn't stooping to the lowest common denominator, the man does know how to write good comedy.

    Theoretically yes, he does use every written rule in his shows. Practically, it's a matter of choice and I choose not to be amused, so I have to decline that statement.
  • edited May 2011
    Hey, it's only been 6 years since Monkey Dust, the best cartoon of all time.

    God I loved Monkey Dust, it was such a twisted yet brutally honest show. personal favourites include Essex vs London and the very NSFW Cottaging guy
  • edited May 2011
    The upside is far more long-term and less dramatic than the downside. While the power of the internet as a platform does ALLOW for independent work, it's relatively unproven. How many amazing animated web shows can you name?

    Do you count machinima with animated sequences as animation, or would that be something completely different?
  • edited May 2011
    The ONLY thing I'm not really comfortable about is the fact that Fox is backing the project. You know, seeing as it is a Hanna-Barbera cartoon, and by extension property of WB. That and Fox has been making a habit of booting good series.
  • edited May 2011
    I wouldn't like for someone to grab Kauff after I'm dead and make a perverted version of him to amuse the masses.
    I like smart humor. I like stupid humor. I dislike vulgar humor. Seth combines all these in his shows and some of his jokes are actually very funny...
    But for the Flintstones...something tells me he'll just add vulgar stuff to shock people and gather audience. ...it's a bit sad, really.
  • edited May 2011
    The flintstones belong in the past (pun maybe intended. I haven't decided yet). They were a symbol of the 60s that refused to die. Do we really need it to by rebooted? How many people have honestly thought "Oh, I wish they would make more episodes of the flintstones"?
  • edited May 2011
    Hehe the other day I was having Nostagia over the Flintsones being a huge part of my childood.
  • edited May 2011
    I never watched the Flintstones. So I guess I really don't care. I did like their vitamins, though. They were quite tasty.
  • edited May 2011
    Friar wrote: »
    The flintstones belong in the past (pun maybe intended. I haven't decided yet). They were a symbol of the 60s that refused to die. Do we really need it to by rebooted? How many people have honestly thought "Oh, I wish they would make more episodes of the flintstones"?

    (raises hand) AND I wished it would be done specifically by Seth McFarlane so....yeah. GO ME. I got what I wanted. Eat me losers! (jumps out of the window)
  • edited May 2011
    Hey, it's only been 6 years since Monkey Dust, the best cartoon of all time.

    Some of Monkey Dust was brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Some of it I didn't enjoy quite as much.

    I don't know how I feel about this Flintstones announcement. I like Seth McFarlane and I loved The Flintstones as a kid, but I don't know if I like the idea of them together.
  • edited May 2011
    This could be a good thing, although it is still early to say anything. Today the show is mostly linked too kids, but from what I understand from different sources The Flintstones was actually considered to be the first animated series for adults during the 60's.

    This was not entirely a kid’s show at the time when it first aired. It had characters and a script that was accepted and relatable too adults, a story about a working-class Stone-Age man and his life with his family and his next-door neighbor and best friend. Of course there was a lot of jokes and cartoon goofiness for kids also, but that was deliberate.

    Perhaps Seth McFarland might be able to once again make The Flintstones a show that can be accepted and enjoyed by both adult and kids. As long as each joke don’t start with: Hey Barney! Remember the time we…
  • edited May 2011
    coolsome wrote: »

    LOLOL That second clip is exactly what I thought of when I heard the news
  • edited May 2011
    I have about as much interest in this as I did with the live action movie....nonexistent.
  • edited May 2011
    I have no problems with Seth McFarlane, and I have nothing against trying to reboot The Flintstones.

    What I do have a problem with is that he already has three shows, and they're already pretty much the same thing. Family Guy, Family Guy But Slightly Political, and Family Guy But Black. And now we're going to have Family Guy In The Stone Age. Can't TV get something new?
  • edited May 2011
    Scnew wrote: »
    Can't TV get something new?

    Survivor: Stone Age coming this fall!
  • edited May 2011
    This and the Napoleon Dynamite show on Fox are signs of even worse things to come in the field of televised animation.

    I don't care what anyone else says, but I'm excited for this. The Simpsons aren't funny anymore, Family Guy was never funny and Bob's Burgers makes me violently angry.
  • edited May 2011
    I didn't think that Napoleon Dynamite was funny even when it was cool to think it was funny. I guess I just can't understand that kind of humor, if indeed there was humor present in that movie.
  • edited May 2011
    ...if indeed there was humor present in that movie.

    There wasn't.
  • edited May 2011
    There wasn't.

    Oh good. I was afraid I was missing something important when I couldn't talk about a single humorous moment with my high school friends. I felt so left out.
  • edited May 2011
    I didn't think that Napoleon Dynamite was funny even when it was cool to think it was funny. I guess I just can't understand that kind of humor, if indeed there was humor present in that movie.
    There wasn't.

    Some people loved it, some hated it. I don't think there was any in-between.
  • edited May 2011
    I've disliked everything he's produced so this doesn't look good.
  • edited May 2011
    Oh good. I was afraid I was missing something important when I couldn't talk about a single humorous moment with my high school friends. I felt so left out.

    I personally have a very dry sense of humor, I can generally pick up the humorous undercurrants in something as well as the laugh-out-loud parts... I literally laugh before the humor starts because I can almost always see it coming... believe me, napolean dynamite was NOT funny, it was just plain stupid, and it saddens me that stupidity is what america finds funny now...

    I saw an interview clip from "community" where the cast was talking about sitting there and watching Senior' Chang doing his bit, and trying not to laugh... the senior chang bits are the same thing, pure stupidity, theres rarely anything funny that comes from that actor and I couldn't believe they were trying not to laugh at it...

    This is what is wrong with our country, theres no decent writing in comedys nowadays, whatever happened to the shows like "I love lucy" or "three's company" There were moments in both those shows where i almost caughed up a lung laughing... the duck soup episode of I love lucy where she did the mirror thing with the clown marx brother guy, the episode where she was sitting in the brown derby staring at celebrities and one decided to stare back, the episode of three's company where they hung the shower curtain, or what about some of the physical comedy that jack was so good at... that kind of humor just seems to be dissapearring nowadays... they cancel all the decent comedies like "better off ted" (great show, you gotta watch it if you havn't, it's on netflix) and they keep shows like "two and a half men" on the air for 9 seasons...
  • edited May 2011
    Personally I like Family Guy and American Dad. I've watched both many times and I don't think they are the same at all. FG has had more cutaways, the families have different personalities and Peter is more of an idiot than Stan. They're a heck of alot more interesting to me than what the Simpsons has been reduced to with their recycled plots. Never cared for the Cleveland show and I don't think it's a good idea to give Seth another show, especially one that's a remake of the Flintstones. How many can he handle before there's a lack of quality?
Sign in to comment in this discussion.