Why There Should Not Be Ghostbusters III
The first movie was a terrific blend of horror and comedy. The second one, not as great. The video game, which sorta acted as a third in the saga, was pretty good, but not perfect. If they do a third movie in this day and age, the are just going to be giving movie goers and die-hard fans the middle finger salute. Sure, it is probably the most talked about sequel since Indiana Jones 4. But Kingdom of the Crystal Skull turned out to be a mess. If they do Ghostbusters III, and you go to see it, then you will probably need to use your popcorn bag as a puke bucket.
Sign in to comment in this discussion.
Comments
Nah.
Nah, it's all about the difference of opinion and in this particular instance we concur. Bring on Ghostbusters III, bring on the hate. Then we can say "told you so"!
Do you really wanna see frail old Bill Murray struggling to run with a proton pack on his back?
Yes. Bill Murray himself stated he'd only do GBIII if his character died, and being crushed by a proton pack sounds like a great way to go.
They need three guys and a girl. Don't tell me they're doing something similar to the Extreme Ghostbusters? I mean, if they can find a hot goth chick, I'm all up for a third Ghostbusters, but I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.
So you're for it then?
Gozer the Gozerian tells you to shut your mortal mouth, naysaying or otherwise. Gozer the Destructor thinks you to be a tit; barely worthy to lick the under carriage of an animated gargoyle dog creature.
Gozer the almighty laughs at your puny face.
You suck. Ghostbusters 3 will suck too. It will perish in the flaming pits of the Seventh Circle of Hell. The movie shall be a total abomination. I will cut off my own unit if it means that they won't do Ghostbusters 3. THEY MUST NOT DO IT.
...
Now I think its a bit late for a new ghostbusters film, so why not make the 3rd ghostbusters as a video game? Heck, they can even do a series of ghostbuster video games.
I think you mean that IJ ended in 1992, after Fate of Atlantis :cool:
And yeah, if it turns out to be a good movie, that's cool, and if it doesn't, well, we've still got the first two films.
I'm not threatening him! I'm just saying that it will suck, and I would remove the hurt you comment if I could.
At least enough Ecto-Cooler.
Not only that but the new generation of people who haven't seen Ghostbusters will see that part 3 is coming out and will want to watch the original first. So in a way, it would really only help the series if they made another one. You know, I have a friend who had never seen Ghostbusters. It took that scene in Zombieland for him to finally watch it. And yep, he enjoyed it.
In any case, A part 3 would be worlds better of an idea than a remake.
He said if they kill him off in the first reel he would do it.
I'm fully behind making another Ghostbusters 3. I'm not confident it would be good, though, I suspect any script that they actually manage to convince Bill Murray to do probably would HAVE to be pretty good. But yeah. I'd give it a shot. Everyone says Ghostbusters 2 isn't as good as the original, and I agree, but I still love it. It's still got some great lines.
One time I turned into a dog and they helped me.
I love Rick Moranis. Shame that he had to go out with another crappy Brother Bear movie.
Def, Ghostbuster 2's great fun, and that's what's important!
Hey! The original brother bear is an amazing film!
Playing the riddler in the next batman movie. lol
/edit: Just researched a little: Nope, Gordon-Levitt plays "a cop". That cop however could turn out to be anyone.
On Rick Moranis: I really want to see more of him in modern movies. He's 58 now, but what the heck?
He retired in 97 after his wife died of liver cancer.
His wife died in 1991, and he still acted after that. It's still connected as he explained, as being a single Dad and the demands to an actor are hard to combine. Still, is it official that he's coming out of retirement for GBIII? All I heard is rumors.